Alright, you train people to do what you do and you do so now in a very intensive 7 day course. 9 days. 9 days. 9 days. 9 days. Exactly 10. The students are required to take a mid-course break. Required to. In other words, it's so damn intensive they've got to take the break. Yeah, they do. Not only is it intensive work-wise, it changes their lives forever. can no longer look at things the way they did after they were through with the course. Major, do you accept anybody or is there some sort of litmus test or test that you apply to those who would wish to take training with you?

There is, the training is expensive, it's $4,500 so that limits a lot of people. But our general litmus test is that a student must be diligent, confident, and patient. That's all we need. Are there a lot of people who don't make it through? Only a few, only a few. And those are the ones that lack one of the aforementioned. Are there... We need stable people. They have to be emotionally stable. They're going to be undergoing some, it will start off as oh my god on day two or three this really works to the point where they perceive things that they may wish they'd never seen. May wish they'd never seen. Is it, what do we know about the nature of the threat of the future major, knowing some of the things that you know, can we change them and if we can change things because I know that we have a certain range of response.

We can change things within a certain range as individuals. So I assume that extends to us corporately. Whether or not we should is an ethical, logical problem. It is, yes. I just can't answer that. I'm just an average guy. Knowing some events that are coming, and I don't know whether you can, you know, you probably cannot perceive the smaller events, but have you appropriately experimented with the ability to modify what appears to be the unmodifiable? That's rather topological when you think about it, because how would we know, really? We don't have a way of double-checking. We run into a double paradox if we do that.

If we remote-view something to get feedback on something that we would plan upon doing, did we in fact affect it? What came first, you know, the chicken or the egg? Did we in fact affect the event or did we effect the event? And that's difficult. It gives me headaches to think about. I don't know how much leeway we have in changing the future. It may be that the things that we as remote viewers perceive are only those things that have reached 100% likelihood in some other dimension and fallen out as data with us. We may not indeed be able to perceive things that are less than 100% probable. I don't have the answers to those questions yet, nor will I probably ever.

We do not do research. We will allow our students to do that in the future. We strictly apply it. OK, Gordon Michael Skalyan is a good friend of mine. He's been on the show many times. He does prophecy based on what he describes as seeing three TV screens or three visions. He likens it to three TV screens, with two of them being very pale pictures and one of them being bright and very colorful. Can you imagine that with what you do as sort of the more likely future, the more likely scenario?

No, it's linear in our terms. time and trajectories, state space trajectories of entities, in this case Earth and humans we see as linear. We don't, we are, what we perceive as remote viewers vis-a-vis the future of the Earth in terms of the next hundred years is grim as hell, there's nothing right about it. What do you think? Except to say that our children's children will have to rebuild the planet and that's a character building opportunity for them. Do you have children? Yes, I have two, a 12 and a 14 year old and I have two stepdaughters. Given the opportunity to have more children, would you? Yes, yes I would.

So you have hope? I have, oh, I never said I did not have hope. I just said that we're going to be running a gauntlet here and it's a really, it's an adventurous time to be alive. It really is. It's like I say, there's some real character building opportunities ahead for us. I mean the big things are the ones that really build character. That's a personal opinion. Earth changes, major earthquakes, that sort of thing. What do you see?

Beyond all that, humans are more durable. We are a little bit tougher, thick-skinned allegorically. In terms of earth changes, only what my company stands by, and that is again the high winds and the atmospheric geological changes that I've already talked about. And the babies. That's just a piece of the action there. It's one thing. And by telling mothers about this problem, a potential problem, and alerting them to the fact that and then when the flag will go up when babies start to die, if this knowledge gets out, if this kind of predictors gets out, that's why it's so important for us, for SciTech to be correct in the public eye.

My corporation really got to double check and triple check it worked before we go public. If we attain that degree of credibility in the public eye, we really will be able to save lives. Not all of them. People will still poo poo the very existence of this type of thing, but others will listen and will scare people enough. They'll scare mothers and fathers enough in some instances where they will take their babies off of hormone-injected milk. Mother's milk, then. Mother's milk is the way to go, yeah. And otherwise, consider a move to a northern latitude?

I would... a northern latitude or a community, start thinking about how communities could build structures to weather these storms and to grow food. All right. Major, it has been a seriously interesting night. And a lot of people are going to reflect very carefully on all you've said. And it's going to have scared a lot of people. But I guess you mean to do that, don't you? Again, I was called Dr. Doom at the White House, and I guess I earned that. But the truth packs a responsibility and it isn't always pleasant and fun and entertaining. We as Americans love to be entertained. Well, this is not very entertaining but it's very true. And the tools that we teach that again tax dollars paid for so many years of research and operations, it's a tool that can discern direct knowledge and truth and we'll try to get that in the hand of as many young people as possible in the future. The people who directed those tax dollars, if they heard this this morning, and I presume many of them did, are they really upset with you for this?

I think a couple may be and are already, but others like Stanislaw Bill Turner, former head of the CIA, would not be at all. We tend in our eleventh hour of life to change. Oftentimes I have a little practical exercise. I move along to the moment just before I die and I look back along to the left and I ask myself at that point, problematically, is there anything I regret? And if I can find something I regret, then I make sure I take note of that so I don't let it happen.

I don't have any roads not taken that I regret not taking. That's a good exercise to do. So, in other words, the old saying is operative, live every day as though it was your last. That's a good question. And if I do have to go soon, then I want to go out and buy. I do want one of those Art Bell watches. Watches. All right. Well, I will see to it, Major. And I want to thank you for being here this morning. The pleasure is all mine. All right. Take care. And I'm sure if you continue to listen, you will hear quite a bit of reaction. Mine, too. Man. Want a copy of this program?

1-800-917-4278 1-800-917-4278 1-800-917-4278 I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC. I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC. I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC. I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC. I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC. I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC. I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC.

I'd say this is the moment for this particular CBC. Okay. Yeah. I can wind it back again. Yeah. How many of them is that? I think it's about the same. Yeah. Okay. Okay.

Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay.

Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay.