That's right. That's the first place to go. That's right there on the face of it. You don't have to go back into the rest of it. Well, you know, in application on the Gary and mail fraud, there's 900 pages specifically on that issue. So you've got them probably on probably 10 or 15 accounts, and under California law, you got them for $250,000 for every account. Well, I think that you should attach all 900 pages as an exhibit. What you do, you go in and make it specific. And, you know, Casefiler has produced a pure document. Anything we do to vary that document by bringing in case law or anything else other than procedure, we're contaminating the document. So you've got them under specific law that you can act on right now because of procedures.

The whole attack now should be strictly procedure. All right. Keep going because this is going to be fun. It will be. Bobby, oh yes. Bobby doesn't stay to help Bob, Bob's got to do it all alone. I'm available by telephone 24 hours a day. I like your warm body. You better watch out he's... So does the judge in Massachusetts. All right.

Nothing to do with me. Yeah, why involve him? And others for violation of federal copyright and unfair competition laws and upon state law claims for relief. Well, I mean, we're really in competition with them, aren't we? Heckers have denied liability to USP for any alleged damages or other relief. This is important. So be sure you get that. Well that that sort of thing will become more and more clear clear because you see before this agreement was written there was a lot of stuff taking place between attorneys. One other thing I want to point out, look how all this is all uppercase, non-negare, but look what they did to Judge Coyle. Look at the wording, read it. It's proper. It's what? That's why look at how they did honorable Robert E. Coyle.

They did not do that in all uppercase. Nominity here. So he's the only living being. Yeah. I've been through three conversations going on at one time here. I think I'm going to make Bob go back through his nominee gear and everybody being dead. Yeah, that's very important. Nobody got that. That's very important. That's the important thing. Well, the bottom line is that this is a clear violation of how they have addressed everybody in this document.

Dr. Eckers is dead and Quarles is living. Well, that's basically right. And I'd like to point out that this is exactly how they stole all the property from the people in Hawaii. They made an agreement with them on a lease for 20 years and they put all their names in uppercase non-nagare. 20 years and one day they had been dead and not living on that land because they were killed on paper. And then 20 years and one day according to the treaty agreement they had not lived on the land for twenty years. They were dead. And this is a very critical point and one that is open to attack and you have a clear violation by Judge Coyle for allowing this and you now can go back with a Title 42 against Coyle. If you just analyze it and look at it from that perspective and forget all of this conclusionary law.

That isn't in your case anymore. If you attack it from a constitutional common law standpoint, all this stuff is trash. You've got them if you just do it. Well we're going to do it. Well don't talk about statute law and all the other laws that can contaminate your common law. Keep it pure and simple and keep it on common law. And that means you're going to have to file your paperwork properly with the court that it cannot be heard under any other jurisdiction than common law, just like Dave Miller suggests. And you've got them. Yeah, but you don't have any response to them until you learn a little bit more. So we have to tread a little bit cautiously.

90% of everything that's going to happen has to happen in paper. You establish jurisdiction in the court via paperwork. You don't march into the courtroom and say I can clear this common law. You do it by paper. Once they accept the contract, then they're under contract when you pay that filing fee. So, Nung-Tagere means if anybody's name is printed in all uppercase letters, they are dead after 20 years. That's in the law. That's in the law. No, it depends on the situation. In Hawaii, that was a 20-year contract. And by the king, who had made the contract by treaty with the United States. My suggestion, too, is when you start filing your paperwork, you're poor ignorant people.

And, you know, you have a right to flag different areas with your index and so forth. I would flag with these non-fringe flags just your two originals. And if they object to defacing of this paper or they try to refuse to accept it, you just tell them, well, that marks our original copies. What do you mean? We're just too dumb to know the difference. But this will establish your common law right on the front page of your document. Common law law centers have their stationery printed with color flag printed on it. I think that's an excellent idea. Excellent idea. That's right. Should we try the next word? I think Keith and Margie better move out here too. They're going to get extremely tired of making comments and having to drive all the way out here to implement them. Well, they won't drive. They'll learn. They will figure a way to fly, I'm sure. Knowing Keith. Yes, I know. He will insist on a long commute.

One other point I want to make on this before I forget it is that in Dave Miller's study and the cases he's represented, in over a thousand cases where a judge has responded with a four-page document, there has been 50 procedural errors in four pages or up from 50 to 200 procedural errors in four pages of the court response. So that is a good place to look for relief. I'll try again. Feel free. During the course of the litigation, USP obtained a sanction order against the Eckers now wish to resolve the pending litigation described in paragraph two above, and to resolve other potential claims between them, known and unknown, by the following agreements, covenants, conditions, and releases.

No admission of liability. Number four. It is understood and agreed by all parties to this agreement that the agreement is not to be construed or interpreted as an admission of any liability or wrongdoing of any nature whatsoever on the part of the Eckers or any other person, firm entity, or corporation, agreement expressly denies any and all liability associated with the above referenced litigation and claims. Stipulated permanent injunction. Number five. At the time this agreement is signed, the Eckers and USP will sign a stipulated permanent injunction in the form described in Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. USP will immediately present the stipulated permanent injunction to the court for signature and filing as a final binding court order. The Eckers expressly waive their right to challenge the permanent injunction by appeal or collateral attack. How about that one?

every term of the permanent injunction described in Exhibit A. Stipulated money judgment and agreement not to file or execute. Number six. As part of this settlement agreement and simultaneously with the execution of this agreement, the Eckers shall sign and deliver to USP's attorneys stipulated judgments in the form set forth in Exhibits B and C hereto, which are incorporated by reference, and USP shall sign and deliver to the Ecker's attorneys. A stipulation in the form set forth in Exhibit D hereto, which is incorporated by reference. Exhibit B is a stipulated judgment in the total principal sum of $31,230 and no cents.

So what happens is that the former sanction of $62.30 gets added onto the $25 at the end of the second year. after this consolidation occurs. Exhibit D is a stipulation which stipulates to the vacation of the sanction order effective December 196. That's the 6230 that is abandoned. A. The stipulated judgment set forth in Exhibit B, shall be void and of no effect, and USP shall return it to the Ecker's attorneys. During the two years from December 194 to 96, there were two financial obligations in effect. One was a sanction for 6230 and the other was the $25,000.

On December 1st, they were to void out the sanction for 6230 and file what was post-dated, a post-dated one for 31230. And so the 31-230 then takes care of the two. It's all the same money. in Exhibit C, only upon a finding by the court of contempt of the stipulated permanent injunction. Now you got her! Alright, remember this lawsuit was filed on December 9th, 1996. This last one, the contempt thing. So what it says here is, after December 1, 1996, USP may file with the court and execute upon the stipulated judgment described in Exhibit C, that's the one for 31-230, only upon a finding by the court of contempt of the stipulated permanent injunction described in paragraph 5 above.

Provided however that USP shall not be permitted to execute upon any portion of the sum of $6,230 in no sense, as U.S.P. may have collected from the Eckers between December 194 and December 96, pursuant to sanction order, which simply means they can't collect it twice, nor upon any sum collected Exhibit B under Exhibit B between December 1 and December 196, and any writ of execution sought to be issued pursuant to the stipulated judgment on or after December 196, shall give due credit for any sums collected toward the principal sum of $6,230 or toward Exhibit B before December 196. This is item C. Exhibit D shall be filed immediately upon execution of this agreement, and USP will take any action and sign any further documents as may be necessary in order to vacate the sanction order.

Paragraph D. Except as expressly provided herein, and only upon exhaustion of all appeals from a judicial finding of contempt of the stipulated permanent injunction described in paragraph 5 above, USP may not file, execute upon, nor claim, or file any lien or abstract based upon the stipulated judgments described in subparagraphs A or B, and the finding of contempt is reversed on appeal, U.S.P. shall make the Eckers whole for any amounts executed upon, plus interest. Published Statement No. 7 The Eckers agree to use their best and diligent efforts to petition the editors of the publication Contact to publish the following statement in a prominent place in the publication. Well there's Cort and Ron. They're running right on time. The University of Science and this is what was to be published, the University of Science and Philosophy is a heading.

Many of you may be aware of the very important legacy left by Walter Russell in his published works relating to the nature of humanity and the universe in which we exist. The University of Science and Philosophy is a world home study university for self-transcendency founded to teach Walter Russell's new knowledge of the nature of man and his universe through universal law, natural science, and living philosophy. The university is dedicated to these concepts and their dissemination through programs and home study courses that the university conducts and publishes for information about their programs and to obtain further information about the Russell Works, readers may contact the university at the following address and telephone number. Swannanoa Palace, Waynesboro, Virginia, 22980, telephone 703-942-5161. So brought up another point that we may want to make issue of US and P.

I think you said that the they lost their university status or they tried to say that they were a university and the state came and said that they weren't. There's so much they were operating under a state tax exemption as a university. Someone Richmond looked into the matter and found that there was no university. There was no faculty. There were no students and no library. None of the necessary qualifications to have a university and get tax deduction in the state of Virginia. So I was told that they lost my tax exemption for that reason. They couldn't qualify. So to pass themselves off as a university. I think there's two different things in it. Stipulated dismissal, number eight.

Let's look at that before we move on just a little bit. Also, and I don't know that you even want to bother with this, you know, all of the things in rebuttal. But a home study course is like a course of anything that you pay for. Now people can come and public information flows like from here, it's yours. Even though there isn't any charge for it, even if we pay you to come, it's yours because we are are very open and we allow anybody to use anything that we have, including our books, our journals, anything that we do. Although that does not mean that you have a right to use anyone else's material that we may use as far as publicly distributed. If we would use very much, for instance, of Mr. Mullins' works, we need to itemize that, give full credit, tell everybody and this is what we do, where you can get the books, preferably not even from a distributor but from the source.

And I would hope that many people did contact Eustace personally over the period of years Because we always try, as in Coleman or whoever, we don't say, go to Mr. Green, the distributor, to get your books. Go to the author if the author has the capability of shipping or whatever. Or he can refer it to a distributor. I don't like the fact that distributors get theirs for at least 40% off and then son of a gun they bring it back up and maybe even sell it for more and they make and I resented the fact that George Green worked out a deal then with Timothy Binder to distribute US and P's books, Walter Russell's books because let's take it where it's at, he got a 40% rip off, we were continually advertising those books. You can't get that information any longer from any known source around, so go directly to US&P, not a distributor, and get that work. Get Mr. Russell's books.

So they made a lot of money of our advertising. Go ahead, please. Stipulated dismissal. Number 8. USP and the Eckers, through counsel, shall sign a stipulation for dismissal of the action described in paragraph 2 above with prejudice. USP shall file a stipulation with the court immediately after this agreement is signed by the Eckers and USP and the stipulated permanent injunction and the stipulation attached here to as Exhibit D described above is signed and filed with the court. You'll have to go back and remember some things in this agreement. There was a stipulation that the Eckers were not guilty to this point, but they also made a direct statement that we could not come back against US&P or their assigns. That was just an agreement. Up to the signing of that agreement, everything be put down. Nobody's guilty of anything. And that's where it ended. Now we start again.

And let's remind each other that USMP, unknown entity, see, without authorization, somebody thing that came before it now. Go on. Released by the Eckers. Number nine. The Eckers hereby release USP and its employees, agents, officers, directors, attorneys, and representatives of any nature, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action. How careful they were to get everybody covered. Defenses, liabilities, liens, dues, damages, debts, contracts, and judgments of any nature whatsoever, to the date of this agreement.

This release extends to all claims that were made or could have been raised in the action described in paragraph 2 above, and further extends to both known and unknown claims to the date of this release. They knew. They knew Eckers had won the case. And this was to protect their financial assets. They knew that if it was pushed into trial, Eckers were going to end up in behalf of the Phoenix Institute if no one else because all of Dorma's writings are assigned or were or signed or whatever up until this case and everything gets so confused. But she doesn't take anything for those books.

They are published. Whatever happens to them happens to them after she turns over whatever she writes. So she doesn't even know what happens to them. But they are the property of someone else and this would leave them wide open and I still tell you that the Phoenix Institute could have gone back in there and really dealt them misery because the property belonged to the Phoenix Institute. Question? Yes. It says here several times to the date on which this was signed are actionable. And the actors have not signed away their... Right.

..all the links to history. Right. Like, for example, what happened in Fresno last week. Well, but you see, they have now opened... Right. Now we can play with that. We had agreed up to the signing of it not to go back into all of that, but once they have reopened it, and they have reopened it how? On contempt of court regarding that injunction that should never have been allowed to stand, period. So they've opened it on the basis of something that the rest of you could not have reopened this case By releasing unknown claims, the Eckers agree and acknowledge their intent to release claims that may exist to the date of this agreement, even if the Eckers have no present knowledge of any such claims on the factual basis of any such claims.

The Eckers, therefore, assume the risk that their present knowledge may be inadequate to determine whether any such claims exist, and further waive the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides, quote, a general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which is known by him, which if known by him, must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. By releasing this provision, the Eckers voluntarily relinquish any and all of their protections, and agree they will not raise or assert this statutory provision in any context to limit the scope and extent of this release. For purposes of this paragraph and paragraph 21, the phrase, quote, representatives of any nature, or representatives, does not include George W. Green, Desiree Green, You say we weren't all stupid.

America West publishers or America West distributors. Release and indemnification by USP. Excuse me, what does that exclusion mean? It means we would not allow them to be excluded as far as damages or any other thing. Release and indemnification by USP, Number 10. USP hereby releases the ECERS and their agents, employees, attorneys, representatives, heirs, and assigns of any nature, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, defenses, liabilities, liens, dues, damages, debts, contracts, and judgments, of any nature whatsoever, to the date of this agreement and the stipulated permanent injunction described above. This release extends to all claims that were made or could have been raised in the action described in paragraph 2 above and further extends to both known and unknown claims to the date of this release. By releasing unknown claims, USP agrees and acknowledges its intent to release claims that may exist to the date of this agreement, even if USP has no present knowledge of any such claims or the factual basis of any such claims.

USP, therefore, assumes the risk that its present knowledge may be inadequate to determine whether any such claims exist, and further waives the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides, quote, a general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which, if known by him, must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. By releasing this provision, He voluntarily relinquishes any and all of its protections and agrees it will not raise or assert this statutory provision in any context to limit the scope and extent of this release. Warranty of Authority 11.

Each of the parties to this agreement represents and warrants that it, he, she has the authority to enter into this agreement, and none of them has made or suffered any assignment, transfer, conveyance, encumbrance, hypothecation, or other disposition, voluntary or involuntary, of any claim or demand relating to any matter covered by this agreement. Now, hold up right there. There's another very little deep hidden thing in there. Once again, they had maybe the authority as far as the legal department was concerned to represent Timothy Binder. But once again, you've used a generic corporation as being able to function as a person. And there were obviously ecker-ecker or entities, persons. But USNP is not a person, it is a corporation operated by people. And there has never been an authorization furnished to anyone giving Binder the authority to act on behalf of USNP. But Binder did execute all of the agreements, all of everything, and has literally brought this second suit.

without, I mean now without even being the CEO president. So this is important to keep in your mind because we're going to look at Tahatchipe Distributing also still named and actually how can you sue Tahatchipe Distributing at the time it was in operation. So this opens up the ability of Rick Martin in behalf of Tatchpee Distributing, whether it was, is valid or invalid at this particular point, unless it was dissolved entirely, He can now go back to enter into his case. The damage is brought to him by just being named again in this case, because they never removed it from the document. Now Ed Young has the right to go in full bore, because when you get the last letter that they sent, well, that wasn't the last one, the next to the last one.

They named him and said he should suffer the same consequences of prison and sanctions. Well, what soup does he have to do with anything? He was not a party to any of these agreements and contact is not the Phoenix Institute or Ecker, Ecker, as a matter of fact, you will not find that Doris Ecker has even been in that office where contact is housed more than four times, period. And all of the times she was in there is to pick up Rick Martin or drop off something for him. So you've got so many, many things and you're going to miss them. And if you want to do something in common law, you're going to have to get out there and you're going to have to utilize every last tiny opportunity you have. So that you keep coming up and coming up and coming up and pretty soon every time the court reporters look and see any reference to any of you, they're going to be down there. They're going to be down there.

And that's the way publicity begins to bring a focus. And in this manner, the same way that famous people, when they have exhausted everything that the court has done to them, let's take O.J. Simpson, and once again, I'm going to tell you, I don't care whether he was guilty or whether he is innocent. And when he exhausts everything else, you will have an avenue for him to go in and open up these cases without putting himself in jeopardy. And then you really begin to get some attention focused on your operation as people have a last resort place to appeal for help. So let's hold these things in mind. And don't let just because you're going to find Ed, well I don't want to go through all this bother. Well basically if the staff puts together a splendid case it shouldn't even come to the point of him having to appear. But he's a bright mind, he can certainly, you know, if he holds three PhDs, he should be able to remember long enough to go say, my name is Ed Young and you've abused me.

And as they say, money talks. How much damage would Ed Young have possibly received by this kind of publicity and by trying to name him and get him thrown into prison when he's not an agent, he's not anything. He's an editor-in-chief. So let's not let anything slip through. Everybody's going to have to make their contribution. And what is more important is everybody who gets anything or does anything or even gets markers that are used from the Phoenix Institute or Ecker Ecker or wherever you get them, you are damaged by this. And I'm sorry, Gene, I'm not going to let you not let them file. Yes, the admiral will come back and say, well, this is a conspiracy.

No, sir, it is not a conspiracy. I'm an individual. I am an individual. And they have damaged me because my markers are no good if they can't get money to pay me. And what are you trying to do? You're trying to make a reputation and do a job right. And so they call you conspirators. What are they going to do? Pull all of you into court. They don't want to do that because you will each one demand a trial by juries.

So they're going to start dismissing stuff right away. We can't not do it. Or if we don't do it, then we're not going to advertise ourselves as a constitutional anything, law center or otherwise. We're going to either do it and do it right and brave whatever is required of us, put our feet out there first. You know, just right behind Mr. Miller. We let him get shot first because he dared, you know. Commander, I think you don't want to use the word individual. That applies to corporations under the law. You always want to use the word private citizen. Each party to this agreement agrees to indemnify and hold each other harmless from any breach of the representations and warranties contained in this paragraph.

This indemnity obligation shall include payment of any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, liabilities and expenses, including cost of suit and reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements, resulting from any breach of the representations or warranties contained in this paragraph. Negotiated agreement, number 12, I should say. Each of the parties agrees and acknowledges this settlement agreement was negotiated between them and that each of them has been represented by counsel throughout the process of negotiating and executing this agreement. So you need to know the counsel. USP representation. USP represents that it is the lawful owner of the copyrights to the following works of Walter Russell, The Secret of Light, Atomic Suicide, and the revised edition of A New Concept of the Universe, and has been the lawful owner of the copyrights to the Home Study Course and the original...

When Nora did her research, she found that the home study course that Eckers had purchased now I want Eustace to get this clear. Any information, I'm not careless. Any information that we use verbatim and I can dictate until hell freezes. And she's going to sit there and type. And we didn't want to screw up Walter's work by her trying to draw pictures. We tried it, but it just did not work. And we were into days trying to get through one illustration. They had already, because of Randall Lane, they didn't know Walter Russell, they didn't know University of Science and Philosophy. Randall Lane had decided to go back and visit them.

Walter was dead, Lau was still living and he wanted to go and visit with Lau. I guess he had had some telephone conversations. and he sent to E.J. the advertisements. He picked up the little catalog of stuff. And he really was captivated by Lau and the idea. And you know, Randall was quite new age oriented at the time. And he really wanted to know if possibly we would enjoy that home study course because it looked so good and he wanted to financially help them. So E.J. said, well, okay, Randall, I don't mind purchasing the home study course. This was years ago.

But it was after here. I mean, it's within the last ten years. So I would be happy to do that. And this home study course was purchased and it's not given away, man. It's expensive and I don't remember how many books might be in it or workbook type things, but it came in nice shrink wrap and it sat in shrink wrap until we started writing. Now that's how much copy we've done so far. Nobody has done anything except once. When there was a discussion about Walter Russell and his work, John Sroffer brought a book from 1927.

It was signed to him and a date, 1927. No information in the front as to copyright, publication, nothing. Now maybe it just had been removed, maybe it came that way, maybe there was something there, but there was no way to have intentionally used anybody's copyrighted material. Now, you're going to tell me that a university, a public university, Public university who has sold a home study course now prevents the students and the purchaser of that from using the information? What the hell is a class for? And that's what we're talking about. And it turns out that that particular edition was not copyrighted.

And Mr. Binder lied about it because he answered everybody saying, and that home study course was copyrighted, protected, no. And so they write about this new concept of the universe. What in the soup is that? These people never had heard of it and still don't know what it is. Is this possibly their home study course now? Well, they can keep it. I'll tell you something else. If Timothy Binder's been playing in it, they better keep it. Because that's the biggest botch and problem they ever had.

And this man has gone out, and I want you to know this, because yes, I do have information, others don't. And I care about my people. Timothy Binder has gone out with some of his buddies, and this can be documented. You can go to the Tesla Institute or you can go out here to Borderline Sciences and their little seminars and stuff, and they not only are utilizing Walter Russell's material in conjunction with Tesla's patents, but they are patenting this stuff themselves as they produce it. It won't work. I will see to it that it will never work. And yet I could make it work for them very easily if their intentions were different.

It would be a great gift to mankind. They have enough of it put together, you know, that they, oh well. I mean, and they are going to sell this idea. And this is why they put, they just stepped down and they couldn't just follow Kelo because he was going to be their biggest, biggest sword.