And you make them look very foolish and very clumsy before the court by bringing your objections timely or bringing your objections correctly with knowledge of the law. I've stood there and I've made my pleadings and I don't use adjectives, adverbs, and pronouns and it's real quiet in the courtroom. The distant attorney can't jump up and keep saying, objections, objections, objections because I'm using facts that are controlled by the condition of the mind. The will of intent. The only thing that you address your testimony to. When it's the opposition's turn to talk and he wants to get into adjectives, adverbs and pronouns, you can shut him down.

And the judge will say, well what does that mean? You're going to say, well I don't know. The minute you say I don't know, the case is dismissed under 12b1 federal civil procedure 12b1 that means you don't have subject matter jurisdiction over what it is you're talking about for the court. It creates a fraud. Once a fraud always a fraud the case is dismissed. Now another thing that they like to do is they like to use conclusionary law sites. A conclusionary law site has nothing to do with the facts before the case. A conclusionary law site has nothing to do with the condition of your mind.

It has to do with the condition of somebody else's mind. And it also is a disqualification under the terminology continuance of evidence. The continuance of evidence before the court must be highly defined. It must be timely. It must be exact. It must be exact if you are highly defined. And these attorneys that continually come back and use conclusionary law sites or they'll come back and say this terminology that Mr. Miller is using in court doesn't follow any known laws just because it's all procedure. They're looking for conclusionary law sites because that's all they were ever taught how to teach.

Everything that these attorneys were taught how to do violates the Fifth Amendment of due process of law. That's why they have to move these cases into a gold-ringed flag into a foreign country to get away from the rules and regulations of the Constitution because they can't make the case, yet they did. They have no shame to speak in court because of the way they were trained. Where an attorney used to be somebody that I used to highly respect, today I look at this person as somebody that's a criminal, that's a master at extortion, that is only there for one purpose and that's to hurt me.

It's pretty unique because we've got 40 kids next door here getting ready to take a body exam. I don't want to be a CD in here. What's that sound? What's that? We don't take no men's license. You don't take a coperate license? No, they have to have a key to stay with their key pack though. You can invite them over. Do they know anything?

They don't know. And if they do know, they're sworn to keep their key. Which is always, because anytime you want to ask an attorney anything, even your own attorney will never give you a straight answer. They just say well, pay me the money, $2500 or $5000, I'll take care of it. Depending on how much money you pay them, how big the bribe is going to be. How much? Yeah, because they don't want to attract the money off the same hand. If you have a statute for a corporate entity. Alright, that's section A. The first page of section A, that goes through a brief outline as to The procedures you have to follow to file a lawsuit.

You create your lawsuit and you have to put your name in upper and lower case. So the plaintiff and defendant's names must be in upper and lower case. If you put them in all upper case it creates a title 18 U.S.C. 1342 which is a particular use of a name for mail fraud. Here is a five year prison sentence and a $10,000 fine. Now the attorney should have sent me paperwork on this. I send them back a corrector lawsuit and I send them back their paperwork as an exhibit charging them with mail fraud. From that day forward I get all of my corresponding sent to an upper and lower case. Now that they know they can be tried criminally for what they did. And I still have the original documentation. Most attorneys immediately withdraw from the case and drop the whole subject. They give it back to their client and say no I'm not going to do this for you. Because if this guy wants to push it he can take me to federal court on mail fraud extortion. Now the attorneys when they do file a motion to dismiss against your complaint, they will put your names in uppercase non-vegare.

Creating a federal rule for civil procedure 10A violation. It also initiates the meal fraud violation under Title 18-1342. These two factors now disqualify their paperwork. And when they file a motion to dismiss, the word dismiss is a traverse because they are saying that this document has substance therefore it must go away. If you want it to go away, you discharge it. But it never happens. But a dismiss is, it exists and we have to argue about it. As a result it makes it go away. Because they file this motion to dismiss, they traverse and say what we have filed upon the court has validity.

It is a valid claim. And when we want to think of Smith for filing a frivolous action, we want an attorney to because they are asking for money now it qualifies under male prized sources because they put your name and application on the desk. It's a fatal mistake that they make because they ask for money. Male prized sources they just pin their prison sentence. So that also comes under criminal code 871 and 872. If the reduction of the finances that they do when they file this motion to dismiss is not an answer to a complaint. So when that 20 days runs out and they haven't answered the charges that you have brought against them, you now qualify for a default judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55. You file that as one separate document. It's only one page long and you bring out the fact that they didn't answer you within the 20 days provided under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for time. The next thing you do is you file a Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment which means you want to have the prayer that was placed in the original complaint activated. If you want to get paid the money that you had asked for because these people have not answered your complaint properly. And the third thing is you ask for a declaratory judgment for the money damages under Rule 57. Now, upon filing these here, the judge has 30 days to give you back an answer or to order both parties into arbitration to go ahead and settle it because one party wants to dismiss, the other party is moved for summary judgment to get paid. Because of this arbitration the very first thing that they will do is they want you to say your name to make contracts with their girlfriend's wife. But because we have a disclaimer on our contracts now it tells them that they cannot take us into a foreign government that they can't if they If they don't have a standing they use phone conferences to get around it.

They can still maintain their flag in the jurisdiction of wherever they are they will have their Admiralty flag or their military flag or their de facto. In other words the gold frame is a desecrated flag creating this non-entity. Now this is a room. It's got four corners. Four cornering means that you remove something from the surrounding. Whatever flag you place in a room like this here takes jurisdiction over this room. That's why they've got gold-framed flags in this room. I can go walk in there with my Title IV US-2-1 flag and capture that room and make it into common law. So we've got another thing called your bracket.

Now we're going to write the letter. And brackets, the square brackets like this here. The square brackets remove the statement from the paper. You've got to sign a trapezoid paper with a bracket around your name. There's no signature on that paper. Now, what happened here, some of you know Sondra Lynn, a friend of mine, she's been in so many seminars. For those who haven't heard this, I'm going to show you. Now, I told these kids, which is failing to state a claim upon which release can be granted is probably the number one defense that attorneys use to get cases disqualified.

What happened is the State Farm Insurance Company answered a complaint filed by her and they did it correctly. They up or low encased her name, addressed her properly, answered all the charges with expanded definitions so that it was a 100% proper answer except for one little detail. With a real fine pen they put a bracket around the F in sailing to state a claim upon which it can be granted upon the original subject matter. Now what this does is it removes the F from the paper. In other words it becomes alien. A-I-L-I-N-E-D. Alien means corruption on the original subject matter.

It comes from where the grandfather clause came from in our laws. So what the court was, what these attorneys very cleverly, there was 24-in-20 problems with the case. This is what they came up with. The brainstorm to see if they could defeat my procedure. They very carefully put a bracket around the test and now they made the statement that the defendant was corrupt in her original pleading on the original subject matter from the beginning. Is what that says. Just because they put a bracket around the test.

Because she was corrupt on her original pleading she committed a fraud against the court. Therefore, Kate dismissed because of the fraud, thank you for court costs and attorney fees. About $10,000. So what we did is we wrote them an explanation about their little bracket. Filed a notice of refusal for fraud on their paperwork and sent it back to them. On Monday we go to the final settlement on the case. Last week, Tuesday, that case was scheduled to go to court on a motion to dismiss. On Monday we filed the treason case against the attorney and the judge. The case was then removed from the docket. They would not allow it in the court and the judge ordered the insurance company and everybody concerned, the court or the litigation still steps for Monday to settle it. They don't want to bring the treason into the courtroom. Because that case has already gone to three trials before I was brought into it. Because they substandardly into a foreign entity under article one section nine paragraph eight of the constitution they already committed the treason. They either settle it or everybody that touches this case from the day it started goes down for 76 years in prison. Pretty strong partnership. She gets her settlement, she signs the FRCC 41 and the case is now gone. And they will seal this case, believe me, they will seal this thing. Yeah, you'll never see it because they're going to steal this one.

It's going to be their money, but they'll steal it. So it's not public record. I'm not sure if they're going to do the record. They said plaintiff cannot win. That's going to be the benefit. And then they have the record on the key of plaintiff. Linked it. Look up the word linked it. And they totally... That's what a plaintiff can't prosecute this case and they will put a bracket around the NC which says plaintiff can't prosecute the case. Totally reverse the entire intent of the whole document from one bracket. Anytime you see a bracket on a document you know you have a fraud in front of you.

You refuse it, don't even get tried, it perverts into it. Unless you want to do a lot of homework, look up all the words, look them up anyway it will be a good learning process for you to see what the tricks and traps are that they wish to perpetrate on you. Why would you want to do that? I think when somebody addresses me as a defendant I refuse that for fraud. I change it to a respondent. A defendant is someone who has been charged in a case by a jury and is now defending themselves. Now the judge came back and said no, defendant has been a proper terminology for 100 years and it is our policy and custom, which was a killer when he said that one, it's our policy and custom to call everybody a defendant. I'm going, well good, that's a 1983 personal injury under notes chapter 21, notes 319 and 337. That violates my due process of the 5th Amendment and 14th Amendment. I said, and you swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

You just committed perjury of oath, your honor. I said, while engaged in perjury and deprivation of rights under Title 18-242, you just lost your jurisdiction in this case. And he says, can we have it all now? What did he do? Just miss. Just miss the case. Spoke out of turn. It's knowing the phraseology and the right not to use is the right sacrifice. So you have to know when to speak and how to say it. What I've done here with my 22,000 hours of research is I've removed all the garbage and I've given you a bottom line so that you can study the right terminology. The little bit of procedure that's in here encompasses every subject matter in law and it can be used anytime, anywhere, on any subject. They must file the procedure or they will not have a standing in court and you can defeat any case. The first time you break procedure you defeat that case and you win. It doesn't matter if it's income tax evasion or tax issues.

With this procedure you can get the proper effect of what is supposed to happen when you have your day in court. And having your day in court is protected under the first amendment rights of grievance, freedom of speech, rights of press. Fifth amendment is due process. Sixth Amendment is right through a speedy trial. Seventh Amendment is right through a common law trial. Eighth Amendment says we can't treat you with cruel and unusual punishment. And the Ninth Amendment is very important because it says that elected officials are picked by the people to uphold the constitution of the United States. And when they do that as elected officials they have to create the laws for their states that are not represented, we are not putting the original constitution that's where we come to the 10th amendment.

But the 10th amendment is protected by the 14th amendment article 1. No state will trade a law that abridges the constitutional rights. What's a gold fringe flag doing in a state court? What's a gold fringe doing around a state flag? They are trying to abridge the constitution. They are trying to make their own oath and affirmation go away. So they commit perjury of oath. They violate the 10th amendment. They violate the 9th amendment. And if they take away your constitutional rights, that's cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment. Then they go ahead and they violate if you don't get your rights to a fair trial under the 7th because they can't have a common law trial in a foreign government because common law represented by the Constitution of the United States.

You don't get a fee trial because it makes you seem to be right on for years. Anytime you go past your 45 days for settlement you know the insurance company that is handling the case or the judge that is handling the case has violated the 5th amendment which then violates the due process of the law of the 5th amendment and if you get stuck in jail any place along the way here you have a 4th amendment violation because they never give you a proper 4th amendment warrant to go to jail. The judge just like when they sent me to jail for five days, the judge was supposed to sign an affidavit with a fourth amendment warrant with his signature on it and hand it to me in the courtroom and give it to the bailiff to give to me and then they could take me to jail. But he denied me my freedom of speech, freedom of press, right to grievance, right to produce evidence before And because he violated these things he created an obstruction of justice under title 1815 12.

10 year prison sentence for that one. Now that brings us back to the 11th amendment. The 11th amendment now states that no foreign state shall have jurisdiction over sovereign citizens. It says foreign states, it doesn't say foreign power because the 10th amendment gave the states their power. That's why we get into the 11th amendment now because it deals strictly with the states. What did they do? They put a gold fringe around the state flag creating a foreign state in the court. Federal flags have jurisdiction over state flags so they put gold fringe around the federal flag, Title IV U.S.B. 1. In any factor you either have a foreign power or a foreign state, neither of which has jurisdiction over the sovereign citizen state party or sovereign citizen constitutional party. They believe that they are not doing. See because if you were to put gold frames around a title four USG 1 flag and then have a state flag without gold frames on it on a pole, a state flag has jurisdiction over a foreign flag. It needs to be bound by state rules and regulations. But then they don't need that because the state rules and regulations are absolutely parallel to the United States Constitution which means these are guaranteed due process.

The same things are guaranteed in the federal rules and regulations are also guaranteed in the states because of the 14th amendment article 1. No state shall have jurisdiction. No state shall create a law to abridge the Constitution. So you're going to use the 9th amendment and go through the 11th amendment because the state official has to be elected, he has to uphold the constitution. So that automatically says you can't create a foreign government in the 11th, then you jump to the 14th amendment which gives you due process and equal protection of the law of the constitution initially. And if there is no state in creating the law to abridge the constitution, you go back to the 5th amendment which gives you your due process of law. Knowing how to use the constitution as a procedure, when these people drafted this thing in 1776, it was a work of genius because it totally blows away the foreign government that is captured every flag in the world. All 260 nations in the world have gold rings around their flags or they have gold spears on their flag poles making them military jurisdictions.

The gold eagles in the courtrooms have gold eagles on their flags. A gold spears can only a gold station holding the President of the United States, unless he personally authorizes the judge by handwritten signature, by declaration from the President, that that judge can personally use an eagle on his flagpole. I have not seen a federal judge yet in any court with that in Executive Order, Executive Order 10834 dated April 29, 1957. August 25, 1959. This is when 57 is when Alaska, Hawaii came in and 59 is when Alaska came in. Right? There's a dead way around. Alaska came in in 49, right? And then Hawaii came in. But you'll find that in the Federal Register, you can pull that up on the internet and download it on your computer. It gives you the dimensions of the flag.

It explains the desecration of the flag, you can't put anything on it. So if you put gold fringe on it, it says you can't put anything on it, Title IV U.S.C. III. So nobody can make an excuse, well it's just declarations. You can't put declarations on the flag. It's guaranteed that they can't be decorated. And if you do that, it causes a desecration of the flag. Because nobody knows it. They have taken every army regulation that has explained that and the books are all made up.

If you go to the library once, you get a book on flags. It will all be admiralty flags. Every flag in that book will have gold fringe on it. I've been to the library. Our big public library in Milwaukee has got over 2.5 million books in it. There isn't a single book in that library that describes anything, anywhere about any Title IV USO 1 flag. Every flag and every book is described with gold fringe on it. In every country of the world. Not just the flag, but the USO 1 flag.

Right. Now another thing is when you go into your churches, you have gold fringes on your flags in your churches. To qualify for a 501c3 exemption, you must put a gold fringe on your flag and the church flag. They want to capture all the flags so that you are psychologically teed up and you go up looking at the gold fringe on the flag thinking this is the proper flag. They put it in our schools and have our children pledge allegiance to a gold-fringed flag thinking that they are pledging allegiance to the constitution of the United States. Where in the fact is they are pledging allegiance to a de facto government that suspends the constitution. Now if you watch some of the TV programs, Discovery Channel, Overseas News Broadcast, the Scholar Channel.

Every now and then they'll show close-ups of flags in courtrooms or government officials of these different countries. You'll always see a gold frame on their flag in a foreign country. They've captured every flag in every country. But my broadcast on these procedures gets sent out on short waives every single night, seven days a week. It goes out worldwide. In all 250 nations of the world people are studying the David Miller Law procedures about trying to get the gold ring off of their flag. And now with the freezing technology this procedure works in all 250 nations because all 250 nations have protections in their constitution for deprecations of their national flag but it's been a secret among this inner circle of people trying to take over the government under a new world order that has, they want to incorporate the entire planet under contract and do away with all the different countries and constitutions and enslave the planet that is the intent.

Well, there's a couple of prophecies out there, but one says good, the other one says bad. And there's two ways we can do it. There's nothing wrong with a one world order, provided we are innocent until proven guilty and have a constitutional right. But if you're going to have a one world order where you're guilty until proven innocent with no rights whatsoever, that's enslavement. And our constitution guarantees us that we're not allowed to enter into contract for slavery. The world government also has the same constitution that you cannot enslave another nation. Just like when Iraq wanted to move into Kuwait, the world, everybody picked up arms and went to their to stop it. Or when South Africa wanted to practice atheist. It was shunned from the whole planet until they came into the fold of freedom. Freedom has always been here, it's always been alive and well, there's nothing wrong with our constitution, it functions perfectly. Because every single person in government, it doesn't matter what you are in government, legislature, congressman, a senator, a lawyer, attorney, a judge, police officer, a clerk of courts, they all have to swear to support the Constitution of the United States which makes them federal employees.

Which means that the first contract of authority is with the Constitution of the United States is to guarantee that the people dealing with this will be treated equally and that they will have their freedom. And then they go ahead and they put up a gold-fringed flag at the doorway of the courthouse, doorway of the legislature, and they fly these every place so they can suspend the Constitution of the United States. And the treason papers that are in the document can be filed on anybody employed underneath that flag because they have committed perjury of oath and have surrendered their oath and affirmation to a foreign power. Can you have the authority under Title 42 U.S.C. 1986 for knowledge of the law to enforce the negligence under Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 8 of the constitution and under title 18, 1621 perjury of oath and title 18, 242 for deprivation of rights. You can remove these rights or you can file and you can do this in the penal gallery. You don't have to have a case before the court. Go after every senator, judge, congressman, anywhere.

What about the president? Well, it's pretty hard. It's pretty hard to, now as you know 1933 she made statehood bankrupt. So they went ahead and they created the War Powers Act. I brought down with me A book here is called The War and Emergency Powers. This is written by Gene Schroeder. Very good. Good lesson plan on flags. Goes all the way back to when Julius Caesar and how to flag. I did a lot of research.

It's a very good book. I highly recommend anybody read it. It gives you all your declarations by government creating all these different entities on the flag. But Mr. Schroeder made one little mistake in the entire book. Even back in Julius Caesar's time, 3000 years ago, they put gold fringe on the flag. He talks about the gold fringe on the flag throughout the entire book. But what he has failed to bring out is the sanctuary of the bar is neutral territory. A flag is sovereign. When you have a sovereign person with a flag represented by the constitution that is set up, the person, the sovereign person with the constitutional flag or the national flag, not the national flag, the flag represented by their constitution, declares will capture and has jurisdiction over all flags, all foreign flags.

Now you find that in Army Regulations A40-1 Chapter 2-1. Now what that means is that when you go into the sanctuary of the bar with your Title IV U.S.C. 1 flag, you capture the court back into common law. And even though, like even during World War II, when the Constitution of the United States was suspended during times of war, under the War Powers Act, the sanctuary of the bar is neutral. It is not affected by this law. During this time period, you could have walked into any bar in the United States with a Title IV U.S.C. 1 flag and have full constitutional protected rights within the sanctuary. You could have taken a Japanese flag into the sanctuary on sovereign soil. If that was the only flag inside the bar you would have to be under the Japanese constitution and you would be bound by their, it would actually create an embassy within the sanctuary and you would be under their constitution. You could do the same thing with a Canadian flag or a German flag or a Russian flag or a Chinese flag. You can take the American flag to any of the 250 nations of the world. Walk into that court. If there was no flag with your flag, capture that court and have a United States territory in the sanctuary of that bar as a sovereign citizen, have constitutional rights in the sanctuary of the bar, the sovereign flag always has jurisdiction in whatever country you are in.

So if it became necessary for an individual to, let's say someone came here from Japan and broke the law here, the Japanese embassy could go into one of our courts. A whole trial with one of their ambassadors under a Japanese flag using their constitution, using their attorney can have a Japanese court held on sovereign territory. But if that party wanted to change the venue to a United States venue all she would have to do is bring in a Title IV U.S.B.1 flag and then it would be under a United States jurisdiction immediately. It would capture the Japanese flag and neutralize it. It's a very unique power that under this flag is what controls the jurisdiction of all of our courts. So the very number one thing that you always have to be aware of when you go into court is to look at the flags and make sure the jurisdiction is proper before you even get into subject matter. It happens before you do anything else.

If you don't do it, a right not used is a right sacrificed. If you walk into a foreign entity you are always going to be found guilty or at the will of their pleading. Now another unique thing is when you are in this foreign entity it doesn't matter there is no constitution so if you want to lie on the stand that's permitted. Because the judge flat out in one trial said the police officer got up to uncommitted perjury I said well I have a video tape of your honor I certified as an uncommitted perjury because the police officer is allowed to commit perjury in my court. Because you have no constitutional right in my court. And I was found guilty.

But that was before I knew better. That was back in 84 or 85 if it was. Back in the court. So it's... The technology has evolved. All I have to do is hurt somebody once. I'm the one guy that hurt her. I heard of this information on a community that might be a man working in the city to kill this girl. How can I resist this? Okay, the person or incident you are referring to, that ambassador was recalled to his nation and stood trial in his nation for killing a person, killing a sovereign citizen here in the United States.

Right and that carries 20 years in prison if not death penalty. Yeah he was an embarrassment. Part of the oath that they take when they come over to foreign countries incorporates those penalties. If you break the laws within the country you stand trial for it in our country under our rules and regulations. In the United States it's probably got the most lack of all the rules in the world because if you've got to go back to your own country and stand trial for these crimes and that you stand a better chance of surrendering to authorities here than standing trial. Do you have a program that all the investigators and people in our different areas are focused on here?

Well, if you are involved in a covert over the activity they do protect them here because it's in the best interest of somebody else's pocketbook. I've learned one thing, you file the money and you're going to find out where the crimes are actually taking place. It's the will of intent. You must go back to thinking, you must go back to who engineered the program. If you go ahead and you say you engineer a criminal activity and then you say to another person you will execute this activity or die. You take the responsibility because the intent is that person wishes to live and he will carry out that violation. He will be tried for one part of the violation but the person who engineered the plan will stand trial for the will of intent. He will be charged with the same crime only his crime will be also incorporate a conspiracy charge because you have two people acting together. The unique thing about a conspiracy is that a judge, anytime you charge a judge with a conspiracy under title 42 U.S.C. 1985 subsection 1, 2 or 3 he immediately loses his immunity from what he did.

This is the one time where you don't sue him for what he doesn't do, but for what he does. Because he cannot take an active role in a conspiracy. But to get to the conspiracy, you first have to establish what he didn't do qualified a conspiracy. You have to fight the case in a backwards position. until 87. And here's a Bill of Rights. September 17, 1779. Bill of Rights? Yeah. Yeah, it's not my birthday. Right, okay. This one says Bill of Rights is uh, 91. You're not taking advantage of anything? Anything? Yeah, Bill of Rights. May 20, 91. Oh, I thought it was.