This Phoenix Journal was generated by scanning a printed edition using optical character recognition (OCR). Although efforts have been made to correct errors readers should refer to the image-based or printed version if discrepancies need to be resolved.

/Ground Crew


The Phoenix Journals are intended as a “real time” commentary on current events, how current events relate to past events and the relationships of both to the physical and spiritual destinies of mankind.

All of history, as we now know it, has been revised, rewritten, twisted and tweaked by selfishly motivated men to achieve and maintain control over other men. When one can understand that everything is comprised of “energy” and that even physical matter is “coalesced” energy, and that all energy emanates from God’s thought, one can accept the idea that the successful focusing of millions of minds on one expected happening will cause it to happen.

If the many prophecies made over thousands of years are accepted, these are the “end times” (specifically the year 2000, the second millennium, etc.). That would put us in the ”sorting period and only a few short years from the finish line. God has said that in the end-times would come the WORD--to the four corners of the world--so that each could decide his/her own course toward, or away from, divinity—based upon TRUTH.

So, God sends His Hosts--Messengers--to present that TRUTH. This is the way in which He chooses to present it, through the Phoenix Journals. Thus, these journals are Truth, which cannot be copyrighted; they are compilations of information already available on Earth, researched and compiled by others (some, no doubt, for this purpose) which should not be copyrighted. Therefore, these journals are not copyrighted (except SIPAPU ODYSSEY which is “fiction”).

The first sixty or so journals were published by America West Publishing which elected to indicate that a copyright had been applied for on the theory that the ISBN number (so necessary for booksellers) was dependent upon the copyright. Commander Hatonn, the primary author and compiler, insisted that no copyrights be applied for and, to our knowledge, none were.

If the Truth is to reach the four corners of the world, it must be freely passed on. It is hoped that each reader will feel free to do that, keeping it in context, of course.




ISBN 0-922356-56-4

First Edition Printed by America West Publishers, 1991

Published by


Printed in the United States of America



























































































































































TUE., NOV. 19, 1991 8:01 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 095




In “watching” today, please note closely that which is being shown you and more specifically that which is being “told” to you.

Your President has come forth and said that you need no special thrust to shore up the economy because “...it shows strength that it is in good condition!” Be reminded that when the “news” is all “good and positive”, the bottom is ready to drop out and a NEW SOCIAL ORDER is on its way posthaste. YOU-THE-PEOPLE must be lulled back into stupor while the “big boys” have a frantic breakdown in order to show you later “how hard they tried”. You ones should go back and read the book GAMES PEOPLE PLAY. I will leave you to your own calculations today for the nations are ready for massive war and it pulls my attention.


The arresting and blaming of Libya for the air disaster in Scotland is a pathetic and non-hidden world-wide announcement that the Elite are in control of EVERYTHING. The release of the two hostages yesterday were in direct response to the naming of the Scapegoat so you ones would stop your prodding into matters which will show your own country’s involvement in that death trap of your prime college children. You are dealing with an Elite group of conscienceless killers who will stop at nothing to gain Rulership of the World. Who will be next?


In this book we are going to outlay beyond dispute the blackmail and intrigue of lies and swindles surrounding the myth of the Six Million Holocaust. If you are not concerned after reading Vol. 1, then I know not how to get your attention and since we force nothing upon any man--you will be left to your own decisions. I can only ask that you read carefully, re-read more carefully and then if there is doubt, check out documentation. If you lose your Constitutional Rights in America, the world will follow immediately, and forever you will be entrapped in the snare so carefully laid for your imprisonment.

The Talmudists have from the beginning used the six holocaust million swindle to blackmail the World and specifically West Germany (for East Germany and the Communists have made NO reparations) into “atoning” with excess of 58 BILLION DOLLARS of indemnities to Israel. Note I said to “Israel” which was not even a nation at the time of the War. Israel, as a State, was part of the reparations handed out by the Elite, in appreciation, by the United Nations (United States, England, Soviet Union, China and France). (Actually It was demanded by the Soviet Talmudists and given by the United States and England). Enough pressure was put on Washington not to sign the American-German treaty for German autonomy until Adenauer agreed to such indemnities to a bastard state that had not been in existence during the era of the Third Reich.

But not only has Israel blackmailed West Germany into subsidizing it, Israel and World Jewry have also blackmailed it with the figure of six million into paying pensions and indemnities to every Jew who supposedly survived Nazi-occupied Europe and millions who after the war sneaked into West Germany from behind the Iron Curtain and then claimed to have “suffered” under the Nazis. This is not such bad “work” if you can get it. Enough have been able to sign up and “get it” to exceed the number of Jews in Germany at any time before, during or after the WW II. This in itself should prove to the world that there was NO EXTERMINATION of anything—if you are left with more than that which you began, it hardly represents extermination.

Claiming such indemnities has probably produced the greatest heyday in history for those choosing to assume the label ”JEWS” to commit perjury for one another, and for fraud and lying and cheating on a horrendous scale. I remind you goodly “’Y’ews” that perhaps the Holocaust has damaged you also! After all, a “Jew” by definition is “...anyone who calls himself a Jew”--remember? You want examples of my above statement? Here are two: Dr. Phillip Auerbach, concentration camp survivor, got himself appointed Bavarian Commissioner of Reparations. In 1952 he was finally caught and sentenced to two and a half years in prison for huge frauds and swindles in his behalf and that of his co-racialists. He thereupon shot hirnself. Prof. Hans Deutsch got eighty-five million Marks for the Hungarian Havantny Art Collection which he claimed the Nazis had stolen. This luckily could be proven a lie, and he got eighteen months in prison. In reality, of course, by Earth standards he should have been hanged. The frauds in connection with pressuring indemnities out of Bonn cry to heaven for exposure and rectification!

I can aid in the exposure--YOU WILL HAVE TO ATTEND THE RECTIFICATION. I do remind you, however, that America alone is paying massive BILLIONS to Israel in reparations for so-called State damage during the Gulf War. How is it that a “United Nations” war is America’s responsibility? Didn’t the U.S., after all, present Israel with all those protection devices called Patriots? So--the scam shows its dirty head! There were no scuds attacking from Iraq to Israel and still YOU PAY BILLIONS. When are you going to stop this “SUCKER CON GAME”? FURTHER, THE FACTS ARE: ISRAELI PLANES PROVIDED, OF COURSE, BY THE U.S. WERE THE VERY FIRST TO BOMB IRAQ!!--WITH COVER FROM THE UNITED STATES AND BRITAIN!

You see, these two examples I give are PROVEN INCIDENTS and the other outlays of truth shall also become proven just as soon as you “wake-up”.


Just as with the facts now coming forth (which are no different from the facts presented at the happening) that there are actual films of John Kennedy’s assassination and the restructured pictures, drawings, etc., of the autopsy--showing that the CIA and Mafia murdered the man--so too, will the truth be revealed. You who continue to pretend shock and denial are now getting to be in the gross minority. You don’t have access to the media airwaves--but the truth is making its way around and you can see the concern from the Elite--in such things as a Governor’s election in quite an insignificant political state as Louisiana. The Elite are getting concerned and they are now stepping up the counter-cover lies in an effort to subdue you-the-people.





In the Holocaust lie, aside from the fact that most of the most vindictive Communists are ALSO ”JEWS” (like one called Ilya Ehrenburg, the Soviet Propaganda Minister who exhorted the Soviet troops to rape all German women and kill any men who tried to protect them), the general run of Communists, Sovjet-Russians and others, eagerly help Israel and World Jewry to propagate the lies.

They certainly have an excellent motive. It is to cover several things as well as press forward with World Domination. The grim fact is that more Jews came to grief in territory controlled by Stalin than in Nazi-occupied lands by magnificent proportion. This horrid truth Talmudic leaders WELL KNOW. But they also know that from the Bolsheviks, whether in Moscow or in Warsaw, East Berlin, America or anywhere, they cannot blackmail reparations for either real or fabricated Jewish corpses--after all, any corpses presented were from the “Soviet sectors”. Therefore, they maintain a conspiracy of silence about Jews persecuted and killed in Red-dominated lands so as to blackmail the West Germans and, in fact, all so-called Christian-acting people, more effectively.


I will next ask Dharma to reprint just a couple of pages from another document which rather neatly sums up the point. The title of the book itself is not important but it deals solely with the Holocaust, which copy of same came into Dharma’s hands only last night--sender unknown to her. I shall not give the author for he is prominent and already has enough trouble without us presenting him with more.


The devastation of civilization to date by the rapacious hordes of Godless Communism, as well as their planned annihilation of all non-Jewish societies and political organizations, began to ravage the world in the nineteenth century. It has resulted in incredible suffering and death for many millions of Godly (Christian) victims in many parts of the world. Yet these Christian victims lie in their graves, unmourned and unknown, while a new class of international citizens, the creators of Marxist terrorism, profess to be the only “victims” who have endured suffering in the past one hundred and fifty (plus) years. They command the world to weep for them, because they control the news media of the world.

These harbingers of terror claim to be “refugees”, since they had no nation of their own, but infested the civilized societies in every part of the world for two thousand years, bringing with them, in every instance, disease and death. They have emerged from one shattered nation after another, not as refugees, but as the final victors, bearing away their loot, and scurrying through parts which they have created and which they alone know how to follow, until they come to another host nation. With them they bring, like the medieval Bubonic Plagues, (an infection which they were accused of spreading), a terrible contamination, an infestation which quickly spreads through the new host country, and fells all who become its victims. This plague is world Communism, and its known carriers, the furry scavengers who have found their way through the sewers into every civilized place, are the international so-called, self-styled “Jews”.

We are asked to weep ONLY for the Jews, and to ignore the many millions of actual victims of world terrorism in the past one hundred and fifty years, a chronicle of such horror that one scarcely can bear to put down this bloodstained record, not merely in fear that the world might put away its business in order to mourn these countless victims of international Communist terrorism, but that the tragic fate of these innocents, most of them women and children, is one of such pathos that one’s heart could break from the full impact of its terrifying implications for everyone alive today.

One of the first victims of the international financiers, shortly after publication of the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx in 1848, was the Southern civilization of the United States. White immigrants had wrested from a hostile territory the means to create a gracious culture, one which the ruder and more unlettered sections of the new Republic could only gape at in admiration, an admiration, however, which soon turned to envy and then hatred. This hatred brought armies into the American South, bearing the terrorists who unknown at that time, were the first Communist totalitarians determined to wreak their hatred and policies of annihilation on all civilized………”










SAT., MARCH 30, 1991 7:23 A.M. YEAR 4, DAY 226


Who were these remarkable people--remarkable as much by their power and achievements as by their conversion to a religion of outcasts? The descriptions that have been spread around to you originate in hostile sources, and must not be taken as truth for the deliberate deceit began long before you can count.

An Arab chronicler makes an interesting statement:

As to the Khazars, they are to the north of the inhabited earth towards the 7th clime, having over their heads the constellation of the Plough. Their land is cold and wet. Accordingly their complexions are white, their eyes blue, their hair flowing and predominantly reddish, their bodies large and their natures cold. Their general aspect is wild.”

It is obvious that after a century of warfare, this Arab writer had no great sympathy for the Khazars. Nor had the Georgian or Armenian scribes, whose countries, of a much older culture, had been repeatedly devastated by Khazar horsemen. A Georgian chronicle, echoing an ancient tradition, (PAY ATTENTION!) WITH THE HOSTS OF GOG AND MAGOG—“WILD MEN WITH HIDEOUS FACES AND THE MANNERS OF WILD BEASTS, EATERS OF BLOOD”. An Armenian writer refers to “..the horrible multitude of Khazars with insolent, broad, lashless faces and long falling hair, like women”. Lastly, the Arab geographer Istakhri, one of the main Arab sources, has this to say: “The Khazars do not resemble the Turks. They are black-haired, and are of two kinds, one called the Kara-Khazars, (Black Khazars) who are swarthy verging on deep black as if they were a kind of Indian, and a white kind (Ak-Khazars) (Ashkanazi), who are strikingly handsome.” (Movie stars and politicians, perhaps?)

The latter is more flattering, but ONLY adds to the confusion. For it was customary among Turkish peoples to refer to the ruling classes or clans as “white”, to the lower strata as “black”, and thus you can see how “terminology” is of tremendous importance in deciphering truth. Thus there is no reason to believe that the “White Bulgars: where “whiter” in color than the “Black Bulgars”, or the “White Huns” (the Ephtalites) who invaded India and Persia in the fifth and sixth centuries were of fairer skin than the other Hun tribes which invaded Europe. Istakhri’s black-skinned Khazars--as much else in his and his colleagues writings--were based on hearsay and legend, and you are none the wiser regarding the Khazars physical appearance, or their ethnic origins.

The last question can only be answered in a most vague fashion from historical documentations. But it is equally frustrating to those who inquire into the origins of the Huns, Alans, Avars, Bulgars, Magyars, Bashkirs, Burtas, Sabirs, Uigurs, Saragurs, Onogurs, Utigurs, Kutrigurs, Tarniaks, Kotragars, Khabars, Zabenders, Pechenegs, Ghuzz, Kumans, Kipchaks, and dozens of other tribes of people who at one time or another in the lifetime of the Khazar Kingdom passed through the turnstiles of those migratory playgrounds. Even the Huns, of whom you know much more, are of uncertain origin; their name is derived from the Chinese Hiung-nu, which designates warlike nomads in general, while other nations applied the name Hun in a similarly indiscriminate way to nomadic hordes of all kinds, including the “White Huns” mentioned above, the Sabirs, Magyars and KHAZARS.

Note that while the British at the time of World War I used the term “Hun” in the same pejorative sense, in Hungary schoolchildren were taught to look up to “our glorious Hun forefathers” with patriotic pride. Attila is still a popular first name in that area and a very exclusive “rowing club” in Budapest was called “Hunnia”. In the first century AD, the Chinese drove these disagreeable Hun neighbors westward, and thus started one of those periodic avalanches which swept for many centuries from Asia towards the West. From the fifth century onward, many of these westward-bound tribes were called by the generic name of “Turks”. The term is also supposed to be of Chinese origin (apparently derived from the name of a hill) and was subsequently used to refer to all tribes who spoke languages with certain common characteristics--the “Turkic” language group. Thus the term Turk, in the sense in which it was used by medieval writers--and often also by modern ethnologists--refers primarily to language and not to race. In this sense the Huns and Khazars were “Turkic” people (but not the Magyars, whose language belongs to the Finno-Ugrian language group).

The Khazar language was supposedly a Chuvash dialect of Turkish, which still survives in the Autonomous Chuvash Soviet Republic, between the Volga and the Sura. The Chuvash people are actually believed to be descendants of the Bulgars, who spoke a dialect similar to the Khazars. From this original language integrated into the more recently accepted Arab/Hebrew dialect--came “YIDDISH”. Do you feel the trail getting hotter and hotter?

The origin of the original name “Khazar”, and the modern derivations to which it gave rise, came from the Turkish root gaz, “to wander”, and simply means “nomad”. And now, hold your breath: the really interesting derivations from it are the Russian Cossack and the Hungarian Hussar--both signifying martial horsemen; and also the German KETZER--“ HERETIC, I.E.: JEW!”

I would herein say that this information has GREAT IMPACT on what is going on in your world this day!




FRI., NOVEMBER 8, 1991 8:38 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 084




I have very little to “add” to the discussion regarding AIDS, as you will note--but you misdiagnose the “cause” of “Magics” dis-ease. This man is not homosexual nor is he promiscuous. This does not mean that he has not erred in the practice of moral monogamy--it simply means he “had no reason to acquire HIV virus by those methods”. This fine young man was deliberately infected several years ago and has been carefully evaluated since, in order to study time periods of symptom onset and to further set the stage for that which WILL come. What was the response of the populace? There was no indication of changing moral behavior--only “more caution” in the practice of loose sex. I have no particular comment other than to point Out that the master planners are now getting ready to set you up for inoculations and total accounting for ALL persons. This is just a higher form of killing and organizing in order to finalize the “plan”.

This seems to be the public interest-holder this day and from whence comes the greatest number of inquiries. It is only one more step in measuring your time to enslavement.


Indeed, this is of great note and almost NONE of the people of Earth have any notion of that which is in point. There is surfaced information that indicates nuclear devices were used well over 8,000 years ago. In India there are, indeed, temples with deep underground security shelters. I don’t want to get entangled in that subject at this time. For you who are curious, the city destroyed by such a device is in the state of Rajasthan. As the ruins are uncovered, the area is still too radioactive to allow habitation.

As this uncovers you will find that the “aliens” and “ancient astronauts” are to blame. No, the fact that the shelters were available and the temples built with thick stone walls for protection indicates that the facts were that the information was well expected ON EARTH and FROM EARTHMAN. If the intent or expectation was to be destroyed by distant aliens--you would have had a much more surprise, with no hope of survival, situation. The very presence of the “shelters” indicates a lengthy pre-knowledge of what was going to occur. I told you that WE, ourselves, have been around for millennia WARNING YOU BLIND CHILDREN! WHO WILL SEE THIS TIME?


These scrolls will never be released to you in full format. They remain under the control of the Elite and the Zionists at any rate. I have already told you that the reason for the holding from the public is that they give historic information which will prove many things: Truth of the Biblical lies and tampering, history of the times in an accurate manner, revelation regarding transference and immortality with integrated reincarnated personages. In other words, information which would destroy the entire Zionist movement and cause immediate movement into a nuclear devastation to gain the final power--IT HAS HAPPENED ON YOUR PLANET OVER AND OVER AGAIN IN THE PAST AGES--YOU JUST DONT SEEM TO LEARN OR CARE! This is WHY your enemy has been able to do such a thorough job of deceiving you-the-masses, THEY have the information and THEY are again trying to mass an army to use against GOD!

As a matter of fact, and now I will blow some of you totally “out”--it has happened so many times that each sequence is CORRECTED earlier in the scenario to allow for the adversary to WIN. The games only get more and more sophisticated and that is WHY, in this major cyclic change--the plans on OUR part must be more sophisticated also, and total evacuation prepared for--in case the adversary starts a chain reaction which will this time blow the whole planet to bits.

How did the ancient ones, the “Humans” (Indians by your labels) KNOW WHEN? By their records do they know--they have but to add two and two. They have the oral input and the markings of civilizations past--and they only have to add time probabilities for a sequence to cycle around to an expected “frame”. In this “time” there are a lot of Godly people caught in a “planetship” (biosphere) where the adversary has come into great rulership. You, therefore, are experiencing in the midst of great confrontation of God Creator who WILL reclaim His children and creation (planet). Those beings who are in the service of the adversary will choose their own journey but the encounter will be indeed great. God does not have any need to “punish” nor to annihilate either places or persons. This being of Creator is beyond all limitation and He needs no form of destruction of the “physical” to make His point. He does not counter nor correct the changes of Nature (Mother) for they are the Universal Law in motion and manifestation. He will, further, allow the man species to do or undo themselves.

Where comes the thought that there would be a “lift-off” of God’s people? Why would a thing like a rapture be thought of in the first place? Think about It and then look very carefully at that which the “teachers” are telling you. The evangelists tell you that there will be a “rapture” to the clouds, etc. It is wholly without “reason” or “logic”. Further, it is totally without “reason” or “logic” that a murdered man 2,000 years ago would take away your responsibility to abide within the Godly laws! The most wondrous gift given Man by God was his “reason with logic” and “choices in freewill”. If you fail to use these gifts-it is of your doing so stop blaming God for your plight and also STOP accepting the LIE of your absolution.

It becomes obvious that the FACT of some kind of a “liftoff” has been done before and the Truth is known. This causes oral truths to confirm happenings of ancient experience--and WE DO NOT LEAVE OUR BRETHREN TO PERISH IN A HELL CREATED BY PHYSICAL THIEVES. He who moves within the teachings of Truth and Godly Laws are welcomed into the higher dimensional experiences and those who continue to desire the physical manifestation will be left to experience whatever comes. That appears to be near destruction in holocaust (consummation by fire). This is a description given by the elders to fit that which man brings upon himself as wars and experiences get more and more sophisticated. The ancient Zionists knew and know how the story unfolds. They simply wrote your instruction book to suit the needs of enslaving you--if you have the knowledge of that which came before--in Truth--you have but to change the scenario to suit the desired outcome. This that is expected is what is called in some circles--HELL. “Good” or “bad” have no meaning except as perceived by individuals and societies. Godliness and Evil DO EXIST. One is the direction by guidelines of behavior which God lays forth to maintain balance and harmony. Evil is a thing produced by physical man and can only exist in the physical compression. Ponder it for I have taken hundreds of pages to explain it and I trust you will search out such a message of importance.

At any rate, I do not wish to further discuss the Dead Sea Scrolls at this time, either. You have plenty of things to note which are right under your noses and you have missed them.

Name some? Please, chelas, you do try my patience.


Ok, you continue to barrage me with inquiries about your “money”. When will “they” change the currency? What do I mean by a “cashless” society? How long do we have to set aside assets and how can we “keep” them in value? IF YOU WOULD KEEP UP WITH THAT WHICH IS DONE BY YOUR GOVERNMENT--YOU WOULD KNOW AND WOULD HAVE NO NEED TO ASK ME! I have, however, given you ways in which I see some possibility of sustaining a bit longer--perhaps not in “perfection” but with the knowledge that all “other” things will fail. I have no interest in your “money” nor your “assets”--I do have interest in building enough industries to get you through a time of devastation--in physical form and with some degree of safety and life-sustaining format.

But how do I note change and “timing” sequence? By your recordings and workings. Let us look a minute at a MAJOR step forward in New World Order economic control. I, further, pick at random a writing by someone in the U.S who recognized this move a full year ago. Many recognized it and efforted to tell you about it--I TOLD YOU ABOUT IT AT THE TIME, ALSO, BUT IT WAS MORE IMPORTANT TO DENOUNCE OUR WORK.

Dharma, I will quote from this short writing but as I have so many of such similarity, I shall leave it unnamed. The information is already obsolete at any rate for a year has passed. However, had you taken this to heart at the moment instead of tying yellow ribbons on the old oak trees--you would be ahead of the game at this point. This short article has just been sent to this location as confirmation and I will share it for the same purpose.



In Late November (1990), while everyone’s attention was riveted on the crisis in the Persian Gulf, Congress passed (and President Bush signed) Public Law 101-647. It was another step along the road toward the “New World Order” of economic control.

Title I of P.L. 101-647 is entitled “International Money Laundering”. But would you be surprised to learn that THIS LAW HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MONEY LAUNDERING?! Section 101 orders a study to be made regarding the uses made of Currency Transaction Reports (itself worth a lengthy discussion, but I'll have to resist the temptation for now).

Section 102 is much more interesting. It is entitled “Electronic Scanning of Certain United States Currency Notes”. This law establishes a special task force to:

(A) study methods of printing on United States currency notes. . .in denominations of $10 or more a serial number on each such United States currency note that may be read by electronic scanning.

(B) make an assessment of the cost of implementing such electronic scanning of such United States currency notes; and

(C) make recommendations about the amount of time needed to implement such electronic scanning.” In case you missed the significance of all this, let me clarify. What this law does is to ring the death knell of cash, of financial privacy, of financial freedom, and the sanctity of personal property. Let me explain:

In any economic system cash is the ultimate expression of personal property. It provides a store of your excess labor (cash in your pocket represents your hard labor!); it can be traded for other goods and services; it gives the holder financial privacy and freedom. When ANY government tampers with or changes the money (as Roosevelt did in 1933 when he outlawed gold money), It is attacking the sanctity of personal property, invading your privacy and restricting your most critical freedom. After all, political freedom is irrelevant if you have no economic freedom.

The immediate practical result of P.L. 101-647 (if the recommendations of the Task Force are adopted by Congress--and they will be) would be the tracking of all cash transactions. This means at the local K-Mart or Sears or Albertsons any clerk could use a laser scanner to scan your cash, thereby recording how much you spent, where you spent it, when you spent it, and what you spent it for! Complete loss of privacy in your financial dealings! Welcome to THE NEW WORLD ORDER!


Moreover--the scanners are already in place in hundreds of thousands of outlets and already programmed awaiting the order to “begin”. Some places already are scanning the bills as they are placed in the cash receptacles. The fibers within the higher denominations are immediate identification and do their “own scanning”.

So what do you do to survive the New World Order? If the New World Order comes upon you and your Constitution is set aside as the plans are laid--YOU WONT SURVIVE THE NEW WORLD ORDER--YOU WILL BE CAUGHT AND BURIED IN IT.


The New World Order is upon you as a train at full throttle, and, as this P.L. 101-647 illustrates, it is not a friend of those who cherish economic freedom, financial privacy, and the sanctity of personal property, It, further, gets harder and harder to begin a program such as we outlay in PRIVACY IN THE FISHBOWL, etc. It is, however, that our accommodations are still somewhat available and the methods of finding privacy still workable. Every passing day, however, the opportunities are shut down in many areas to prevent your slipping away. There is still PLENTY that you can do if you are willing to act boldly and only if you are willing to “change” the way you handle your financial affairs, and ignore the official voices of complacency that sing to you that “All is well, go back to sleep; ignore the wolves, be good little sheep!”

For that which you will HOLD as cash, I suggest no more than $1,000 per adult in large bills--i.e., $50’s and $100s. You will have to give REASONS for holding more and the overage will be probably confiscated. If you have a corporation you will be able to account for MORE QUANTITY for the assumption will be that you “do business” but it will need accounting also--but on a different standard of acceptability. Probably around $3,000 per corporation will be unquestioned greatly.

Note that the forms are already printed and available for currency exchange as is the currency itself. The forms bear mandatory reporting of amounts of exchange over $3,000. The point at onset will be to catch you with the cash and cause you to pay additional heavy taxes on the cash in hand or total forfeiture of the amounts unaccounted for as being priorly taxed.

I suggest that you convert cash which you might be holding in smaller bills into “government” tender--i.e., coins minted by the Government. This means mostly quarters, etc. And/or convert to silver and gold. (Note, however, that gold “money” was made illegal in 1933 and safe-deposit boxes were ordered opened for inspection and confiscation). Therefore, it gets harder and harder to control. I suggest a couple of months living expenses in silver “bullion” and or gold “bullion” and up to three months income in precious metal.

If you have large sums of money--the evidence is that it will be confiscated. If you have very many assets you will be required to report all, taxed over certain amounts to massive extent and all available assets above a certain limit will simply be confiscated.

Many counselors recommend placing money outside the U.S.--I do not. It will become impossible to shift money back and forth and the transactions will be the first hit for the individual investor. There will be opportunities for the Elite to transfer their property at the proper times but NOT YOU-THE-PEOPLE.

The best and most secure way for some level of protection is to actually put your assets TO WORK. Invest “against” gold which is held in an “Establishment” bank and allow borrowing against the hard asset. To protect it you have to utilize a reasonable investment vehicle, or you will have a hard time making this kind of transaction and, furthermore--you will simply end up with cash to again make accounting. I have asked ones here to make available participation arrangements but that is for you and them to discuss. There must be good and viable industry to have “basis” for the exchange. Much can be supportive to the Constitutional Law Center and industries such as the housing projects which will also qualify for R&D funds, underground growing facilities which will also be supported by R&D funding--YOU WILL HAVE TO EAT TO SURVIVE AND YOU WILL HAVE TO HAVE SHELTER. There will never again be the PERFECT solution because the enemy’s intent is to have EVERYTHING you own--hook, line, sinker and fish. They even have it arranged that you will either be given the “mark” chip, or you will die of AIDS. The fact is--they plan both in most instances.

I still recommend--at the same time as practicing the preceding tactic--incorporating in Nevada. After YOU make the “loan” (investment transfer), all subsequent business is funnelled into and through your corporation which precludes YOU ending up with cash, etc., back in YOUR NAME. I suggest corporate names of nondescript nature--NOT PERSONAL LABELS. I, further, suggest that if you “share” very large amounts, that you have several corporations according to specific circumstances. Small corporations, well tended, will survive the reign of terror to great extent if ego can be separated to the sideboard. If YOU must have ATTENTION--please do not involve yourselves with these workers--they have neither the time nor inclination to further your “ego trip”.

There are some types of “trusts” which are also advantageous. I do not, however, note that any surpass the value of well-run corporations. We do, in fact, have available services whereby Doris and E.J. will list themselves as your “officers” which are required by the State of Nevada--voluntarily. They will list themselves on ALL the corporations and the records are run through Nevada as such. Then public documentation is absent your individual name as owner if that is your wish. It insures privacy and they are willing to do this to assist in returning to Constitutional Law. You ones are going to have to get off your selfish kicks and begin to “serve” one another where you can legally do so. USE the laws of the land wherein you can--with the loopholes set up for the Elite, to the best of your ability. It requires, however, that you go to ones WHO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND KNOW THE LAWS AND RULES. IF YOU GO TO YOUR LOCAL LAWYER OR ACCOUNTANT YOU WILL BE TOLD IT IS VALUELESS AND UNDOABLE--IT IS THE WAY THEY MAKE THEIR MONEY!



I have spoken much on this subject in these immediate days, i.e., Matthew 10:16--You must be “wise as serpents, yet innocent as doves”.

You must understand that your enemies ARE the SERPENT- PEOPLE. They called themselves by this title as they established themselves for WORLD CONQUEST. Their symbol remains “the serpent” and is used in public places as a “sign” just as you would use the Christian sign of the fish. “Wise” is not the appropriate definition, however, as CLEVER and SHREWD are more suitable for your would-be rulers.

You must understand that in EVERY instance--you are not allowed to see facts--even as with the $10 billion guarantees to Israel. The facts are that the $10 billion is more nearly $50 billion and 60% of the funding is to go directly into the coffers for shoring up the Israeli economy with only some 20% going for the housing. We have, or will, give you input on that subject from outside sources, shortly. I ask that you pay very close attention to the numbers and the clever manipulations involved. It is the reason that Bush got himself totally crossways with the Israelis--he found out the intent of the use of the funds requested and he couldn’t find a way to allow for the accounting of same to Congress. You see, the Camel is already taking up all the space in the tent--even after having shoved the “master” outside to freeze.


Now who might this be? Someone you never heard of? Well, this is just a “citizen” of your wonderful state of Nebraska--the heartland of your nation. I have been asked to comment on this matter and yes, I confirm the Truth of it--Alisha is very definitely and deliberately being murdered.

A group of citizens in Nebraska is making noises, for all the good it seems to be doing, for citizens have “no rights” when incarcerated by the politicians and evil participants in heinously criminal activities. This is something that should be covered in an “update” of SATAN’S DRUMMERS but time limits us to more urgent material for the mass unveiling of the “big picture” from which stems these smaller incidents. These citizens in Nebraska are calling on the Governor, Benjamin Nelson, and Attorney General Donald Stenburgh to intervene in the case of Alisha Owen. This person was convicted and jailed on charges of “perjury”. The group of protestors claim she is being deliberately poisoned.

Owen had been told to recant her testimony, but refused, identifying prominent individuals of the Nebraska establishment as participants in an organized child abuse and satanic network. The network involved Larry King (yep, same old Larry) who “allegedly” provided child prostitutes for attendees of a Republican Party National Convention, and the failed Franklin Credit Union, and was the subject of an investigation by a special state Senate committee. How many of you heard about this on “Larry King Live”? Have you wondered why there is such a “party line” and screened phone calls into that CNN program? Well, where there is “smoke”, dear ones, there is almost always some amount of “fire”. I make no comment on the case except to show you how little recourse a citizen has in such instances.

Owen, while jailed, is showing all the signs of poisoning; hair loss, “blue-moon” fingernails, spontaneous bleeding--increasing and now unpreventable hemorrhaging blood clots from her nose.

Ah, but there is more--indeed! It all is swirling around Sen. Robert Kerrey. You know, that nice Senator who went to Asia to check into the POW/MIA situation? Well, lo and behold, the citizens who are witnessing this Nebraska disgrace happening, without recourse, in front of their faces, fear that with Sen. Robert Kerrey’s announcement of his candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination, there are increased efforts afoot to bury the scandal. Kerrey, formerly Nebraska’s governor, is backed by Warren Buffett of SALOMON BROTHERS, a very wealthy and powerful figure allegedly tied to the network. Yes, this is THE SAME Salomon Brothers involved in the “flipping” activities with the Savings & Loans, specifically in the case of Dharma, Santa Barbara Savings and Loan Association. There are no longer any “little fish”--YOU ARE THE LITTLE FISH BEING SERVED UP FOR THE DINING PRIVILEGES OF THE “BIG FISH”.

How much help do you-the-people think will come from the Governor and Attorney General of Nebraska???

Now I ask YOU--do you or do you not need a Constitutional Law Center big enough to help? Well, it is up to you-the-people. As is, even the Court of Last Resort, which is also now established and becoming a functioning entity, cannot act quickly enough to stop this type of incredible murder and abuse of citizens who speak out against the evil system. YOU ones are going to have to raise up in mass, support these ones in their pursuit of regaining Constitutional Law and attending the innocent victims of the vipers. We can establish all manner of avenues for assistance--BUT YOU MUST TAKE THE ACTION AND SUPPORT THOSE WILLING TO “SERVE” FOR THEY “RISK IT ALL” FOR YOU AND THIS NATION IN ITS DEATH THROES. IT IS UP TO YOU, AMERICA!

If you ones fail to open your ears and eyes and see that which is upon you, I have nothing to offer. I repeat--it is up to you, America! What will you do?

As I close this segment, just let me share one other chilling note with you readers. It comes from the Thursday, November 7 (yesterday), 1991 Wall Street Journal.


CHILLING TAPES SHOW HOW SOLDIERS DIED IN “FRIENDLY FIRE”; Ordered to ‘Take ‘em Out, Colonel Finally Shoots--And Kills Two of His Own.

At 12:56 a.m. on Feb. 17, Cpl. Jeffery Middleton, 23, and Pvt. Robert D. Talley, 18, are parked in their armored vehicle in the Iraqi desert. They have four minutes to live. [H: I want you to check on the name “Talley”, please.]

At that moment, a ground commander radios to a helicopter above the desert. “Can you engage those two vehicles?”

Helicopter: “Roger, I can shoot those easy.”

Ground commander: “Go ahead, Take them out.”

The resulting explosion reduces the Bradley fighting vehicle to molten rubble three feet high, shoots flames 100 feet into the sky--and is still reverberating, because all the soldiers involved were American. Cpl. Middleton and Pvt. Talley were two of 35 American soldiers killed by “friendly fire” during the Iraq War, and the helicopter gunner and mission leader who pulled the trigger, Lt. Col Ralph Hayles, was the only American disciplined in the deaths. [H: Now do some of you doubting Thomases begin to see a bit more clearly that there was no intent of allowing anyone to return to the states as alive and free, who would tell the truth? Ones who saw and understood the awful lies were simply killed and there are so many of them that you cannot count the dead and you will NEVER be told how many!]

Col. Hayles, a 20-year veteran who was the subject of a front- page article in this newspaper on Sept. 10, was stripped of command and retired. The Army says that’s not because of the deaths, but because an officer of his rank should have been managing, not shooting.

Now videotapes from the internal recorders of the attacking helicopters--from infrared night vision cameras--shed more light on the incident. They also show another side to the precise, high-tech battle characteristic of the Iraq War--a tale of flawed technology and human error. “Things weren’t as glorious as they led people to believe, says Cpl.Middleton’s mother, Joyce. This high-tech system outdid itself, adds her husband, Bill. They sure can shoot good, but they can’t see if it’s a cow or a coyote.

The tapes show that Col.Hayles hesitated to fire--he says he feared the vehicles might be friendly--but was ordered to shoot. But he says the tapes don’t change anything for him. I never want to fly again. I killed two good men on my last flight, says the 42-year-old officer, who had won rave reviews from superiors for molding the First Infantry Division’s Apache helicopter battalion into one of the Army’s most highly disciplined units. Pentagon officials decline comment on the tapes.

The alert came in at 12:15 a.m. on Feb. 17. Amid a blinding sandstorm, First Division’s headquarters gets word that enemy armor might be threatening an American armored column. In fact, pilots on the mission say later that they doubt there were any Iraqi vehicles to begin with; they say the U.S. armored troops, confused in the sandstorm, simply mistook others in their own column for the enemy and called in the air support. The armored commanders won’t comment.

Three AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, wasp-like war machines fit for science fiction, launch at 12:22 a.m. The six-foot- two Col. Hayles is in the lead. Tne recorders are stuffed inside the helicopters eight-ton mass near the silver-suited pilot and co-pilot. Mounted outside are 16 Hellfire missiles, each capable of burning through any armor. The 30 mm cannon can fire 600 rounds per minute.

The helicopters hover over a line of more than a dozen U.S. armored vehicles stretching east and west, facing north. The more distant vehicles appear as shimmering, ghostly white Silhouettes on a black background.

12:55 a.m.: The synthesized, highpitched voice of the Apaches computers break in to warn: Radar searching. It means nearby radar is scanning the helicopters. They could be moments away from being blown from the sky. Apache pilots are trained to consider retreating from such danger.

Get Rid of Those”

12:56 A.M.: Col. Hayles, code-named Gunfighter Six, reports that one of this helicopter crews has spotted two vehicles about a half-mile north of the Allied line. Despite all of its high-tech gadgetry, the Apache can't distinguish between friendly and enemy forces. Col. David Weisman, code-named Iron Deuce Six, commander of the armored vehicles positioned underneath the Apaches, gives the order from headquarters to “take them out”. [H: Any of my crew sick yet? Confirmation is painful but it can only be worthy of the ones who pay the ultimate price, to have honor for those who are the targets--can you not see it clearly?]

12:57 a.m.: Col. Weisman, urgency building in his voice: “Let's go ahead and shoot those, get rid of those.” 12:58 a.m.: Col. Hayles tries to fire a burst from this 30 mm cannons. “The gun jammed. Son of a bitch.” Col. Weisman: “Go ahead and take 'em out.” 12:59 a.m.: “Boy, I'm going to tell you, it's hard to pull this trigger,” Col. Hayles says. Chief Warrant Officer Larry LeBlanc, Col. Hayle's co-pilot, steadies the Apache and helps zero in on the targets. “There you go”, he says, “Now, do the mother ---“. I'll be firing in about 10 seconds,” says Col Hayles. Chief LeBlanc: “Okay, do 'em.” But Col. Hayles hesitates for another half-minute. Chief LeBlanc urges him on again. “We're ready, Do 'em.”


1 A.M.: Col. Hayles pulls a red trigger. The infrared screen shows the Hellfire's six-second flight. It rises in a 400-yard- high arc before diving through the top of a Bradley fighting vehicle. The Apache viewer glows with the explosion. The vehicle now appears in pieces spread out over about 50 yards.

Col. Hayles: “Gunfighter Six. Completely destroyed the first target.” Soldiers later reported the Bradley gushed molten chunks of armor for hours. Cpl. Middleton and Pvt. Talley died; the three other crewmen escaped. Chief LeBlanc: “Let's go.” Col. Hayles: “I'm going to shoot the second one. It's fixing to go away.” Chief LeBlanc “Let's do 'em. This Bud's for you.”

1:01 a.m.: A Hellfire strikes the second target, an M-113 armored personnel carrier parked just a few yards from the destroyed Bradley, with three crewmen. They escape with relatively minor injuries. But another Apache crew warns that enemy soldiers are fleeing the two burning vehicles.

Col. Hayles: “Trust me when I say any personnel around those targets are dead. Oh, we got two personnel walking away.” Col. Weisman, wondering if the Apaches can shoot the survivors, asks: “Have you got guns?” Col. Hayles reiterates that his 30 mm cannon is jammed. But one of the other Apaches fires its cannons several times. The shots miss.


1:02 a.m.: Col. Weisman receives reports from his ground forces: “Friendly vehicles may have been hit,” he says.

Col. Hayles: “Roger. I was afraid of that. I was really afraid.”

Col. Weisman: “Cease fire.”

Col. Hayles: “Cease fire. I hope it’s not friendly vehicles I blew up, because they're all dead.

1:03 a.m.: The Apache crews hover, watching in horror as the vehicles burn in the distance, Col. Hayles: They're just blowing up like mad out there. Ground officers radio for medics. We're moving Band-Aids in”, says a ground officer.

1:04 a.m.: Col. Hayles: “I bet I killed friendly people.”

1:05 a.m.: Col. Hayles: “Request to break station and go home.” Col. James Mowery, answering from an armored vehicle to the rear: “Continue to work for Iron Deuce Six. Those things are going to happen.”

1:06 a.m.: Col. Hayles to Cpt. Daniel Garvey in one of the other Apaches: “What do you think, Dan? Do you think I screwed up?” Capt. Garvey: “No. I don't think you screwed up.” Col. Hayles: “I just killed a bunch of people.”

1:07 a.m.: The three Apaches fly along the U.S. armored column and Col. Hayles notes that the burning vehicles are some distance from the rest--giving the appearance they aren't part of the friendly forces. “There's the screen line and there's the two vehicles way out in front.”

1:07 a.m.: Chief Lefllanc: “That's correct. That's affirmative. Let's let them work through it. Seems like they don't know what the (expletive) is going on. We'll sort it out later.” Col. Hayles: “He said shoot 'em up. Well, there they are, and they're shot up.” Moments later, he adds, “I killed some people.”

The General Accounting Office is investigating flaws in the Apache's targeting devices, Meanwhile, the Army and Marines have begun tagging their vehicles with electronic beacons to help ward off friendly fire in the future. “I won't let this slide,” says Cpl. Middleton's mother. “I want something done about it.”


I'm sorry, Dharma--but you had to know. Allow us not to allow these ones to have died in vain.

Let us have a break that you might regain your balance. You must realize that these two vehicles were ordered to be separate from the group. I know of no easy way to make you ones see the dreadful horror of the “master plan” against you. Oh, Father, what will wake up these sleeping babies? How can we bear this evil? Hold close to me, dear chelas, for I do know the way but it shall not be easy. The “son” had utilized a slightly different identification for protection as he called on me--but yes, precious, it is the same. This is why you ceased to “hear”.

The evil is so rampant--how will you find it all? You won’t. It is as with the same Journal and another article which headlines FATAL FLAWS: SOME ARTIFICIAL HEART VALVES THAT FAIL ARE LINKED TO FALSIFIED RECORDS AT A PFIZER UNIT.” Is it surprising to note that Pfizer is one of the most Elite of the Elite industries? I thought not.

I shall move to stand-by. Thank you. Hatonn to clear.



SAT., NOVEMBER 9, 1991 11:36A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 085



As we sit to write I am ever newly feasting on the upgraded quality of the inquiries which pour back to us. It is wondrous to see that multitudes see and hear and desire more input on subjects which actually mean the difference in remaining in ignorance and finding Truth. We know that you will find as you move onward that you do not “have to” suddenly turn out everything you have known until such time as the Truth can be made valid to your senses. He who acts and changes as the wind-chimes is less enlightened than all for he discerns not for self. I only ask that you ones consider refraining from great negative blasts at us and other Truth-bringers--until you have all facts. We get some letters which already are resulting in ones having to eat a lot of ”crow”. I honor magnificently, however, ones who formed opinions and then are able to say, “By golly, friend, I guess I was wrong.” It is greater to have an open mind to Truth--than a closed mind to that which might have been your inspiration.

I think we won’t deal with today’s news” for it is time-consuming when the barrage of questions now center around things such as the possibility of Truth being different from that which has been hanging around for 5-6 thousand years. You want more, more and more on the Dead Sea Scrolls. It is important that you know what those scrolls were and are but there are a few items to mention first.


Yes, Gates will “head” the CIA. It is a farce at best, a show at least. Note how much easier it is to get an evil man into power than it is to get a good man past the evil spoilers! In that is lesson enough.


Another “inside” version is coming forth of the Bush trip to Paris in 1980. This one from a person who worked with Carter. I have written at length about this and yet I find that most of you are fragmented by all the “versions” coming forth. It suffices to know that it “happened”. It is more important to know that Bush flew in one of those dandy little “Blackbirds” to Moscow at the start of the Gulf War. You will note that all sorts of “stuff” will now be coming out against Bush, etc., as the Israelis are out to pull him down and destroy him. You will find a lot of these farcical authors on the “Larry King Live” show, so keep your eyes open. He “had” to have Ross Perot on the show in confrontation of North’s statements, and further, Ross is a very wealthy and powerful figure. Because of that--they dare not squash him for he will fight back--I CAN HARDLY WAIT TILL THEY REALLY MAKE HIM MAD!

I want to give you a “hidden” release which the gangsters did not want published but we like to do things that annoy the adversary. This is as important a bit of confirmation as to what was October Surprise and whether or not it was “real”. The other nice thing about confirmation is that the mark of the Mossad/CIA is all over the murder I shall speak of--I think I need no further comment at this time for I am really eager to get on with the REAL story of that subject for such elaborate plans have been laid and enacted to obliterate facts regarding the incident.


Police in Martinsburg, West Virginia are now probing the death of Danny Casolaro as a possible murder. Casolaro, an investigative reporter, had told associates that he was on the verge of nailing down key details of the “October Surprise” scandal-- that the Reagan-Bush campaign allegedly conspired to delay the release of American hostages from Iran until after the 1980 election.

Several factors have prompted local police to revise their initial pronouncement that this death was a suicide--not the least was our writing that it was a “hit” job and told them who did it. A New York City reporter received an anonymous call on Aug. 11, the day after Casolaro’s body was found at the Martinsburg Sheraton. The caller said that an investigator probing October Surprise had been found dead just outside Washington, and that the death would be ruled a suicide, although he had actually been murdered. The call was received one day before Casolaro’s family had been informed of his death and a day before the Martinsburg police had any idea of Casolaro’s ties to the scandal probes. The reporter had not recognized the significance of the timing of the call until several days later, but had nevertheless reported the call to the FBI in New York immediately.

Also, the police have been unable to determine where the razor blades that slashed Casolaro’s arms and wrists were purchased or even where they are. It has been confirmed that they were not purchased in either Martinsburg nor in the northern Virginia area where Casolaro lived.

Police have also been unable to determine who Casolaro was meeting with in West Virginia or what happened to the case of files that Casolaro was known to have been carrying with him at the time of his death.

And so the story goes--and goes, and goes. Is it not remarkable that they convict an innocent person of “perjury” or indiscretion on piles of evidence located through incredibly fantastic means-- and yet, they can’t find evidence which sticks to their very fingers and is unavoidable?

You will also be relieved to have further confirmation so that you don’t have to throw out old Hatonn:


Surely from the historians and “watchers” whom you have grown to trust and recognize from their constant TV performances, you can accept some input.

U.S. faces ‘dark upheaval, expert says: The United States now faces a dark upheaval if it continues to follow the Roman rood to decline”, Alistair Cooke wrote in the Oct. 5 Financial Times of London. Cooke, who has been writing about the U.S. for over 60 years, is Britain’s most senior “U.S. watcher”.

According to Cooke, the danger of “decay from within” far overrides all other threats to the U. S, including perceived threats from the outside.

He wrote: “I do not remember a time, not even during the ghastly ‘60s, when Americans have complained more, in a tone close to despair, about the visible and seemingly unhealable wounds in American society. The city crime rates are regularly beyond those of all but the worst previous years, and random street crime at night matches the jottings of 18th-century diaries. Drugs are a pestilence afflicting all classes and every age. We have just wakened to the discovery that, for a long time, maybe for several decades, public education in America has been setting such easy and dithering standards that, at the least, a large minority, perhaps a majority, of high school graduates are in comparison with their European and Asian fellows, semi-literate.

An even more recent discovery is that “flourishing real estate in the big cities has meant mainly office skyscrapers and luxury high-rise apartment buildings. Within mocking and walking distance of these are the open lots or scrubby bits of park where the homeless huddle and the drug pushers bargain. Meanwhile, two generations of middle class families who might have spent their lives in low-cost housing estates find that to afford “affordable” housing requires two hefty salaries.”

Cooke pointed to three possibilities as “likely outcomes” of the situation: “1. The second American Civil War, triggered by separate ethnic and regional uprisings: 2. The arrival of a populist dictator....; 3. An emergency return to the benevolent form of national socialism created by Franklin Roosevelt in the first New Deal. . . . These three seem to me to be the real possibilities if the social dangers, deprivations and frustrations I have mentioned cannot be placated by the present political system and become too much for most Americans to bear.”


It is interesting to note that Mr. Cooke misses the most important clue of all--that of the One World Government under Elite-Bankster-Talmudic-Israel. He would be one of the few who would certainly recognize the impact of British Israel in this scenario of world evolution and underground control. Funny thing--these things are never mentioned by the “touter” scholars and perhaps that is why they are allowed to be so “well-known”. I find it interesting to note that in all the “Establishment Book Stores” as well as the “Far-Out Book Stores” that ones such as Mr. Cooke are honored and their works and misinformation are everywhere. I note that it is “hush-hush” that the PHOENIX JOURNALS are not even ALLOWED IN PLACES LIKE THE BODHI TREE, where everything from occult to black magic, satanic how-to and tarot cards dominate the scene. I believe that is the best reference and confirmation of the TRUTH in our writings and the obvious Truth of our presence that can be given. There MUST BE SOME REASON for the banning, burning or burying of any documents for, if nothing else, it is a decision to not allow the word to go forth. It most certainly tells all who pay attention that there is SOMETHING that is NOT WISHED TO BE WITNESSED! These JOURNALS are not even allowed to be spoken of with customers other than to tell them that the store doesn’t carry them. However, it is more help to us than carrying them--because we have yet to have even one person be told this fact, and that the owner of the store trashed and burned the books to give quite a lot of insight to the inquiring mind seeking the documents. This particular store, as well as the group with Ramtha, will not even tell inquiring people where they can obtain the books! Do you not find this fascinating? What do you suppose they don’t want you intelligent people to see? GOD TELLS YOU TO READ IT ALL AND THEN NOTE THAT TRUTH WILL STAND ALONE--INTO INFINITY. WHAT ARE THE CONTROLLERS OF YOUR MINDS HIDING FROM YOU?


I guess it is appropriate to speak of that while we are on the subject. As I write I ask that you keep in mind that almost all the labels used are not accurate. Christ is a state of being, “israel” simply means “chosen”, Jew actually will be referring to Zionists, etc. But if you keep our true definitions as given in “No. 1” dictionary meanings in mind then this will make a lot more sense to you as you read. I weary of having to take the space to explain each term each time I use it.

When we speak of “British Israel” you will find that most people believe it. Very few have ever heard the term. Almost every church in America teaches some aspect or some part of British Israelism. All of the TV evangelism preaches British Israelism but never utter the word. Fundamentalist Christianity is a grassroots groundswell “ministry” for British Israelism, but fundamentalist preachers never say “British Israel”.

What is British Israel? What is this mystery religion that has infiltrated religious America? British Israel is not an organization. British Israel is not visible in whole or in part. British Israel has no expressed or stated purpose as to its true existence. British Israel is not limited by national and international law.

British Israelism is an organism: invisible, international and informal. It may function legally or illegally within the law or above THE LAW. IT HAS NO ETHNIC, SOCIAL, LEGAL OR NATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OR RESTRICTIONS. It has no membership list.

British Israelism is a subversive Pharisaic doctrine which has infiltrated Christianity with the religion of racial and national salvation. It is also the “kingdom message”. The kingdom message is the Pharisaic doctrine that there is coming yet a future 1000 year reign of Christ (specifically the one called “Jesus”) on an earthly throne in earthly Jerusalem to rule the world.

Well, the few people who are barely aware of the racial aspects of British Israelism recognize the Herbert W. Armstrong Worldwide Church of God as the main British Israel cult in America. Others see variation of British Israelism in the Identity Cults. (Remember: I use the term “cult” as I would “group” or “church”, which is, after all, the first definition of the word itself. You of the world have been deluded and deceived by those who change the meanings of words to suit their own particular needs for disinformation or even partial truths. In this instance the people call themselves “Anglo Israel”. No, I jest not--go look it up!)

I do realize you have a problem in looking up things that you are not supposed to see. How many of you noticed on yesterday’s news that Texas is in an uproar over history textbooks for the schools. The errors, deliberate or subtle, number into the hundreds in the new texts to be utilized by the school systems. These are not little typographical errors--they are blatant lies and misinformation. This happens constantly in every updating and retranslation of everything from the Bible--to, quite frankly, the reprinting or opinionated projection of the JOURNALS. You have created a citizenship which is almost illiterate and anything told to them will be believed.


The term “Israel” in British Israel and Anglo Israel is an attempt to make a Biblical claim that the white race and the nations of Britain and the United States are chosen, modern Israel. They claim that the nation of Israel is just one of the twelve tribes. Now our friends in the local Baptist Church, the Methodist Church and all the protestant churches and most of professing Christian define the British Israel group in this form. To them it is obviously not Christian and does not in any way apply to them nor affect their Christian beliefs. To them it is just another “doctrine”.

You will note a big splash as ones like Bush denounce David Duke for his “racist” views when those ones doing the yelling are the very ones who hold the same, only more intense, bigoted views. Anyone from Yale’s Skull and Bones is worse, by far, than any member of the KKK. You can go look this one up also! As a matter of fact--Bush quietly is in full support of David Duke. It is almost like there is a massive church with a doctrine based on the Kol Nidre throughout the world, isn’t it? You would be better off to turn everything stated by the media, press and politicians in complete reverse and you would have it just about right.

True to human nature and true to nominal Christians they are only looking at the form of British Israelism and not the “spirit”. They perceive an organization but discern not the organism of British Israel which has silently infiltrated their own religious beliefs and, through a long process of patient gradualism, turned their once Christian faith into Pharisaism. Any good preacher can tell you that the Pharisees were the evil people of their own pronouncement.

The fact is that the British Israelism is an organism, a pseudo Christian Doctrine (meaning “false”), which is the basic propaganda of world revolution. The International Elite raise up nations and destroy them with British Israel propaganda. Nazi Germany was no less a victim of British Israel propaganda, though no more than a handful of Germans ever heard the term “British Israel”.

Simply stated, British Israelism is a master race theory. For example, Israel today is based on a master race (chosen race) theory exactly as was Nazi Germany. Why can’t people see this? It is because they look at names, forms, organizations and they do not understand the power of an organism. They cannot discern its spirit mainly because they believe it themselves. They are doubleminded. Can anybody tell you what is the difference in a religion of racial and national salvation that applies to Nazi Germany and one that applies to Israel today? There is none. Israeli Nazism and German Nazism are interchangeable if you understand the organism and discern the spirit of British Israelism. If the whole Israel cult could be justified Biblically today, so could Nazi Germany, for they are identical. Things that are equal to the same thing are equal to each other. Israel’s existence today is based on race and nation. Nazi Germany was based on race and nation.

What, then, must you conclude? The whole of professing Christianity today has been deceived with British Israelism into a religion of racial and national salvation. They condemn German Nazism but embrace Israeli Nazism or Jewish Nazism. A very pivotal example of doublemindedness. British Israel Pharisaism was created by “Satan” based on a racial (physical) and national RELIGION which is totally intended to deceive Christians into another gospel of some kind.

The fundamentalists and multiplied millions of nominal Christians would respond that they believe in salvation by grace for themselves, but salvation by “race” for the so-called “Jews”. They might as well believe it for themselves. There is but one salvation for ALL people of all ages and that is by grace--OF GOD CREATOR. This relegates “National” Israel to the dump heap--or--world pharisaism.

And what else is British Israelism besides racial and national salvation? It is the kingdom message. The kingdom message is the Jewish Doctrine of millenialism, or the belief there is yet a future 1000 year earthly reign of a Christ. Professing Christians today believe this earthly reign will come soon. The kingdom message is political propaganda clothed in the Christian religion to bring about so called “divine” world government. It is the kingdom message propaganda which has infiltrated professing Christians and made of them one voice for world pharisaism. This is British Israelism because this conspiracy originated with the British Empire.

You may have never heard of British Israelism, but you have heard the kingdom message from every radio and television in America and almost every church in America. The kingdom message comes from the British Israel world propaganda ministry to prepare all professing Christians for a world political messianic kingdom. GO BACK AND READ THAT AGAIN!!

By understanding British Israelism as an organism, as a doctrine or philosophy that is not limited to an organization or cult, one can see how British Israelism influences every man, woman and child in America. One can believe in racial and national salvation and the kingdom message without ever having heard of British Israelism. Organization is outward form only. Organism is the substance and power of a doctrine to get into any church of whatever name or persuasion.

Have you not heard much propaganda about star wars defense and the Russian threat? Have you ever been warned by government authorities about the British Israel conspiracy to subvert the United States into a New World Order by using the Christian church and Christian evangelism and the Elite Banks? On the contrary, government supports this British Israel “religious propaganda, tax-free This is nothing more than a state nation being a religion and setting up itself wherever it wishes--as a tax-free entity as that religion. Remember those billions of dollars? Dear ones, a rose by any other name is but a rose! Will you awaken?

Finally, British Israelism is the means by which “authority” causes the people to be doubleminded. Doublemindedness is the belief of two opposing thoughts at the same time, i.e., that Judaeo-Christian is actually a meaningful term instead of directly in opposition one to the other. This is an altered state of consciousness created by authority to control and use the people without their knowledge, a modern system of slavery. One cannot believe in racial and national salvation and the “kingdom message” of British Israel AND ALSO believe the gospel of Christ at the same time, even the tampered-with version of same. Millions are efforting to do so.

Perhaps this can give meaning and understanding to the command to “Seek ye first the kingdom of God”? Only by a true understanding of God’s kingdom can you escape your authoritarian induced doublemindness.



Unfortunately “Judaism” is another misrepresented term. It does not mean what it once did nor are “Judaists” even recognized, as in “Judean”. So, we had better look at the many faces of “Judaism”. Do not be confusing Judaism and Talmudism--although both are linked inseparably by intent to mislead you good masses of world citizenry.

Let us just say if that which the Israelis, Talmudists, Zionists, British Israelis, Christians, etc., etc., etc., call Judaism IS, then World Government is a CERTAINTY. Judaism “means” a political Messiah ruling over the earth from Jerusalem.

What might take a thousand more years to establish a worldwide Jewish Zionist Kingdom under the name of Judaism, can be established as the “false kingdom of God on Earth”, as defined by the Talmudists, much sooner in the name of “Christianity”. All of you so-called, self-styled “Christians” will do it for the “master plan”. This is exactly what is being done by placing a so-called “Jewish” interpretation upon Old Testament prophecies. The very word “israel” vs “Israel” gives you all the clue you need to prove this statement to self.

Why Judaism? Judaism is being used by the One Worlders because it is the perfect vehicle for spiritual and political control. If men can be brought into Judaism through whatever means, they become perfect slaves. Once this concept of conspiracy is understood then you can understand “Spiritual Communism”. Spiritual Communism simply states that if a man believes in his heart that Christ will return to establish a World Government, then he can in no wise be patriotic. He is then a One Worlder regardless of anything he might say or do to save his country, his freedom and/or his property.

The art of Judaizing has many twists and most important many reverse twists. Many come into Judaism through Masonry, Mormonism, Jehovah Witnesses, the vast majority of Protestantism, Catholicism and so on ad-infinitum. Note all the above identify themselves as generic “Christians”. What is the common denominator of all these so-called “Christians” (they certainly do not like nor respect each other as groups, or as they sometimes actually call themselves by that impossible label: Judeo-Christians)? IT IS THEIR BELIEF IN THE JEWISH EARTHLY KINGDOM.

The reverse twist of Judaizing is getting an “anti-Jew” movement started with “Jew-bait” (I use the term because it is valid even though it repulses my very being). It seems that honest people who escape every other trap fall for the so-labeled “Jew- bait”. The Jew-baiters are actually promoting the scheme of One Worldism by fostering the propaganda that there are ”JEWS” physically in the world today. There are NO ”JEWS” PHYSICALLY IN THE WORLD TODAY--BUT THE JEW-BAITERS CONTRIBUTE TO THE HOAX THAT THERE ARE, therefore aiding the Judaizers and One Worlders who must have ”JEWS” to stage their Jewish kingdom of God on earth. All so-called Jews today are PHARISEES who practice the Jew’s Talmud religion, the millennium.

The pattern of the “Jew-baiter” is to attack the “Jew” on one hand and promote Judaism on the other through premillennialism, Masonry, and so forth. The One Worlders do not want the Jew's religion to be rightly identified as Pharisaism. They must at all cost make the Jew's religion synonymous with Christianity. The faster this can be done the faster we will officially have One World Government from Jerusalem.

So to unravel the tangled mystery of “Jew-bait” you must simply expose the “Jews” religion (their millennium) as that which it is and which can be recognized by any Christian Biblical scholar, as PHARISAISM.


I seem to be taking a lot of flack and shrapnel from the attacks and counter-attacks raging among the members of the Populist Party and SPOTLIGHT and thus and so. I have no intent whatsoever to sanction any “political party” and especially not the “Populist Party” and I do not either sanction SPOTLIGHT, so please do not interpret what Hatonn says according to your selective input. If a “Party” is based on anything other than “one nation under God” and squarely upon the Constitution--then I am against it--PERIOD. If they clean up their act, then reconsideration may well be in order. At this time, massive damage is being laid forth in the tainting of Col. Gritz--WHOM I DO BLESS AND SANCTION AS GIFTED FOR THE JOB OF LEADING YOUR NATION--UNDER GOD AND BACK WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS TIME YOU AS A NATION OF SOVEREIGN CITIZENS (INDIVIDUAL) LOOK UNTO THE MAN IN POINT AND THRUST FROM YOU ALL THE POLITICAL GARBAGE. THE GARBAGE IS SOMEHOW REQUIRED TO ALLOW A “CANDIDATE” TO REACH THE ABILITY TO COME BEFORE THE “FIXED” ELECTIONS BALLOTS. I FURTHER COULD OFFER YOU NO BETTER INPUT AT THIS TIME THAN TO CAUSE A COALITION OF ONES SUCH AS PEROT AND GRITZ TO FORM TEAMWORK IN THIS ENDEAVOR TO TURN YOUR NATION ABOUT. BOTH (EACH) HAVE SOME ERRORS IN PERCEPTIONS BUT THEY ARE DEVOUTLY COMMITTED TO THE NATION AND RECOVERY OF THE CONSTITUTION--UNDER GOD--AND THEREFORE THE REST WILL FOLLOW.

I ask that you readers contact these persons individually and express your wishes and remember--YOU MUST MAKE A PLATFORM FROM WHICH THESE ONES CAN BE PLACED ON THE PUBLIC BALLOTS, IT IS NOT UP TO THEM--IT IS UP TO YOU-THE-PEOPLE. I shall better explain this on the morrow but I am swamped with inquiries. Did you think it would be EASY, America? Oh, indeed not and therefore, it is up to YOU what direction your blessed nation shall take!

Hatonn to clear, please. God rests His hand gently upon His blessed children. Salu.



SUN., NOVEMBER 10, 1991 8:02 A.M. YEARS, DAY 086




Hatonn present to commune and hopefully bring clarity and information acceptable to you precious friends. I find much love and giving among you and tremendous desire building to reclaim your sovereign kingdom. I only wish to bring motivation--not pull you down from the bombardment of dastardly deeds by ones of evil intent. Our ability to get information to you-the- people is so limited relative to the massive backlog of information that we are recognizing that the amounts seem to bury ones. We must keep moving, brothers, and gear the outlay to the “fastest” of the receivers so that ALL may have the input as they attain a level of desire for same.


In passing through this veil into understanding you will find much which will stun your senses. We give you some for “shock” value to awaken you--other things simply bring pain and overwhelm newly opening eyes and ears. For instance, how many of you read the “radio” commentaries? You have talk shows constantly--but how many of you look at the critiques and/or even know your stations? I thought not. The point of the adversary is to so confuse the issues and overload the senses into more confusion so that you don’t pay any attention whatsoever to the babbling.

I note that if Johnny Carson resigns, however, there is attention and some lesser thought given to what will happen to McMahon, etc. How many radio stations are there in the USA? How many TV networks and/or “channels”? DO YOU REALIZE THAT LICENSES ARE NOT GIVEN TO ANY WHO ARE NOT IN COMPLETE AGREEMENT AND GUIDELINES OF THE ELITE MEDIA CONTROLLERS?



I have such a man to honor this day. His name is Christian and he has been “dismissed” from his well-accepted, well-reviewed program--in fact, has been fired from the station as a whole. Why? Because he said that he would re-interview George Green regarding the PHOENIX material (right or wrong in content) because the people have a right to hear and respond to ALL information--the more controversial--the better.

The Jewish Anti-Defamation League of Bnai Brith has contacted every radio station and every TV station and has threatened to “close down” the stations if the PHOENIX material is allowed to air---ALL!

IF George or other spokesmen are put on the air then it is allowed ONLY if the callers and questions are screened. I printed a copy of the letter of demand and other literature in the paper so that you could see for yourself. THIS IS THE WAY A NATION IS DESTROYED AND WHY YOU PRECIOUS CITIZENS HAVE NO TRUTH IN INFORMATION! If no information can reach the masses, how are the masses to learn that which is REALLY happening?

For us this is good news because a “banned” thing is of great curiosity and causes people to inquire somewhat--most will never know of the banning nor will they care. But it is your nation and what happens--happens to YOU and to YOURS. Do you not see that this violates every one of YOUR First Amendment rights? This does not just effect one, C. Christian, formerly of KTAR. THIS VIOLATES YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW, SPEAK, PRACTICE YOUR CHOICE OF RELIGION AND DENIES TOTALLY, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND MEDIA.

There are some daring speakers who go ahead and violate the orders and remain on the air but the lineup gets less and less for valid interview programs. When the information is aired--you have no idea how many calls are made for more information. You are not alone in this Truth seeking and desire to reclaim your nation--but the effort is blatantly to prevent you from HAVING INFORMATION UPON WHICH TO FUNCTION.

The obvious is to have our own radio, TV, Motion Picture network, which is fully planned; however, it must be realized that you have to have “permits”, etc.--FROM THE SAME ELITE GROUP WHO CONTROL ALL AIRWAVES! Can we override? Oh indeed--but how many of you would be able to receive? Ponder it and check your shackles!! The massive effort at present is to prevent George from even purchasing an already permitted “independent” station--the leverage, of course, is that the transmitting “permit” will be withdrawn.

I honor Mr. Christian who efforted to bring facts and possibilities unto you and has paid dearly for the effort. I would welcome him within my crew any day and together we will find the pathway back to freedom.

You who are outraged by this miscarriage of powerand treatin free America--write to RADIO NEWS, The Arizona Republic, P.O. Box 1950, Phoenix, AZ 85001. If you are sick to death of the ADL screaming “anti-Semitic” (when the Jews are not even Semites), then SPEAK UP! This group of “ban” everything effort to project that ALL who disagree with, say, $50 billion in non-repaid money to Israel, are anti-humanitarian and anti-Semites. Are you not incensed? They cause all ones who have disagreements with what they are out to achieve, which is total control of the entire planet, to be seen as extremist and somehow “dangerous”. LOOK AT YOURSELVES, AMERICA/WORLD! WHERE ARE YOU? IF YOU SPEAK UP AS A PATRIOT FOR YOUR OWN NATION, YOU ARE THWARTED AND CALLED BY BILIOUS NAMES AND FALSE ACCUSATIONS BROUGHT AGAINST YOU—IF YOU ARE A PATRIOT--THEN YOU MUST BE A PATRIOT TO ISRAEL--IF YOU LIVE IN THE U.S.A.! YOU HAD BETTER THINK ON THESE THINGS FOR IT IS YOU THEY ARE OUT TO GET. Those of your brothers who speak out against these heinous practices and denial of Constitutional Rights are destroyed, most often by murder.

Will Julie Newberg of the Radio News (above) print your letters? No--not on your bet! But, they will be obliged to read your objections--and/or CALL that station and every other one you can think of AND OBJECT! If you write to Christian, ask that the mail be forwarded or it will not be. And, I would ask that you give the man support. I realize that many of you have written these stations for I have received copies of the correspondence--thank you--for it will be through you who act, that your nation can be brought about.

How many of you realized your nation had come to this?? I thought not. Without exception, the Mossad (the Israeli secret service) enforces these cute little “suggestions” for doing business--and they are the most evil, vile, soul-less terrorists on the face of your earth. They are infiltrated into every fiber of your nation and are the most extreme faction on your globe. THE INTENT IS FOR THE KHAZARIAN COMMUNISTS TO RULE YOUR WORLD!


This is why the information is stopped from reaching through to you--BECAUSE YOUR ADVERSARY KNOWS YOU CAN FIND PROOF RIGHT IN THE PAGES OF PRINT WHICH SLIPPED BY THEM!! IT IS UP TO YOU! It is the mark of the evil adversary to deny you access to the Truth for they know when you have Truth you will also find freedom--THEY WILL BE FINISHED!


Ah yes, those scrolls! It has been almost 45 years past that those scrolls were found by a Bedouin shepherd. And yet it is only NOW that great attention and myriads of writings are coming forth with every kind of “tale” imaginable. Why? Because the scrolls were in strict and confidential holding by the so-called “Jews”. They allowed no information except that which “they” produced to become public. Then recently, under demand, some of those scrolls went to the Huntington Library in the U.S. (under the agreement of secrecy--that the public would not have access, etc.). The material was so incredible, historically, that the documents were shown to scholars who could see the value and the truth of the historical documentation. The “disinformation” spreaders are now trying to head off the TRUTH from reaching YOU-THE-PEOPLE. Along with that deception, is coming the onslaught of hateful UFO beings and extra-terrestrials--EXACTLY AS I HAVE BEEN WARNING YOU!

Just as some day in the far recesses of the future experiences of another human civilization--these JOURNALS will be found and TRUTH will again be given unto the world manifest so that another lost civilization can regain and find its way. God always gives His creations that which they need when the sequence is proper. It is what man DOES WITH THESE THINGS which marks the civilization. WHAT WILL YOUR LEGACY BE?????

One of my most precious scholars has given me a couple of views as they are being presented to you-the-public. I am indebted, N.B., for your assistance. I cannot speak of that which you have no notion and make sense of the circumstance. I am going to ask that we reprint public documents as they are being written--which point up my above statements regarding disinformation and half-truths.

I tell you prior to beginning this task, that it is a hard one because the simple facts are that the Dead Sea Scrolls, as you recognize their identification, gives you the entire history which has been totally changed and distorted for your eyes and ears. Since this information WILL AT SOME TIME COME FORTH IF YOU DEMAND IT--I focus on current activities which might turn your world about in time to save your ecosystems and your sovereignty as nations and peoples. You cannot wait to be filled in on the lies of the generations lest you wait until too late to take control of your circumstance presently within the lies. YOU ARE A PEOPLE OF MASSIVE DECEPTION AND WHAT YOU WILL DO WITH THIS INFORMATION IN ACTION DETERMINES YOUR PURPOSE AND GROWTH IN THIS WONDROUS MANIFESTED EXPERIENCE--WILL YOU PERISH PHYSICALLY OF THE EVIL INTENT--OR WILL YOU MOVE INTO AND WITHIN THE PLACES OF HOLY CREATOR? THE CHOICE IS YOURS.

There is such a pile of information gathered here that I shall pick some articles which I feel to be descriptive. There will be repetition but please bear with us for it is urgent to realize that you will have much repeated and repeated until you come to believe the lies--again.

This topic will need be broken into sections and if you find it boring, please reconsider setting it aside for it is so very critical that you understand the importance of these documents and how the thrust has been from onset, to hide and distort the translations, etc. The Jewish scholars have been working around the clock to “rewrite” the contents and as you can see it has taken half a century and they didn’t finish in time. Now, you do stand the possibility of having them destroyed prior to proper translation. The documents were moved in part to the West Coast of the U.S. in order to have sure destruction in the earth-upheavals (with proper excuse). There are no limits beyond which these Elite will not go to deceive you--NONE.

At this point I will simply ask that the documents be kept on file for I wish to not reveal source at this time. The documents will be copied from current press information which is going through the Associated Press, etc., to all parts of the globe according to the reaction desired. I do not wish to prejudice nor bias you in any way for it is the “subject” in point which is of importance.

Thursday, September 5, 1991: QUOTE:

The Associated Press, NEW YORK—Using a desktop Macintosh--”Rabbi Computer”--two scholars have compiled a bootleg version of previously unpublished text from the Dead Sea Scrolls. [H: Note from the start that you will receive information from a computer translation version--which they conveniently call “Rabbi”.]

The first of five volumes in A Preliminary Edition of the Unpublished Dead Sea Scrolls was released Wednesday, but the publisher and the Hebrew transcription contained few historical or theological surprises.

As far as the content, it’s not a bombshell, said Hershel Shanks of the Biblical Archaeology Society. “The significance is that for the first time an unpublished text (of the scrolls) is available to scholars. It’s a start. Weve broken the monopoly.

As far as we know, no ancient text has ever been reconstructed by computer,” [H: remember the principle of a computer: data in--data out. Garbage in--garbage out!] said Dr. Ben-Zion Wacholder, professor of Talmudic Studies at Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati... “Rabbi Computer, of Dr. Computer, did the work.”

The Dead Sea Scrolls, one of the century’s great archaeological finds, were discovered in the late 1940’s and early 1950’s in caves near the Dead Sea. They were handwritten on parchment in Hebrew and Aramaic, possibly by a small sect of Jewish monks, and range from Biblical texts to details of everyday life about the time of Jesus.

Published sections of the scrolls already have provided insights into the development of Judaism and Christianity. But the international committee of scholars that controls the scrolls has never published all the material, and in recent years some scholars have complained that the committee was unfairly restricting access. Israeli authorities, meanwhile, have insisted all the scrolls be in print by 1996. [H: Yes indeed, to coincide with their take-over of the globe backed up by the “religious” garbage they will thrust upon you-the-people of the world. Through the power of “religion” can they bring man to his prison.]

But Wacholder, who is 67 and almost blind, said he couldn’t afford to wait. So he discussed the problem with Martin Abegg, a biblical graduate student and computer hacker.

Wacholder had never seen the scrolls themselves or photocopies. But a member of the scrolls scholars committee had given him a document entitled A Preliminary Concordance to the Hebrew and Aramaic Fragments, a five-volume guide to the scrolls. [H: Is this not about as handy as you can get?]

A concordance is a scholar’s tool that is organized like a dictionary. But instead of defining words, it gives the contexts in which they appear in a given document or body of writing. The concordance for the scrolls, compiled about 25 years ago, lists every usage of every word that appears in the previously unpublished texts, including words adjacent to it and the name of the scroll where it appeared.

Abegg programmed his computer to recognize overlaps between the concordance’s word strings, and to assemble those groups of words into larger and larger word groupings. The material contained in volume one includes calendars, almanacs and the rules and customs of the priestly class that produced the scrolls.

The scholar who gave Wacholder the concordance said Wednesday that the release of the computer-generated transcript, which sells for $25 a volume, was “a sad thing”.

Wacholder’s taking someone else’s work and publishing it himself, [H: A very good Kol Nidre practice--totally acceptable in the Khazarian Empire.] said John Strugnell of Harvard University, who was dismissed from the scholars committee last year after criticizing Judaism, “what else would you call it but stealing?”


Please note that as we move along--the “Associated Press” is owned. onerated and totally controlled by the Elite.

NEXT QUOTATION: Monday, October 28, 1991

SCHOLARS MAY VIEW DEAD SEA SCROLLS: Associated Press, JERUSALEM--The Israel Antiquities Authority gave up its attempt to restrict access to the Dead Sea Scrolls on Sunday, agreeing to allow biblical scholars from around the world, (after screening), to view unpublished fragments. [H: These “fragments” contain no information of value whatsoever-- they are already censored documents]

But the authority announced that scholars would have to promise not to publish full texts of scroll fragments on their own. a restriction that drew criticism from a leading critic of the authority’s handling of the scrolls.

Scholars have complained for years that the scrolls were being hoarded by a small group of scholars, and that the pace of publication was too slow.

The 2,000-year-old scrolls, discovered in caves near the Dead Sea between 1947 and 1956, contain the earliest known version of the Old Testament, biblical writings and information about early Christianity and modern Judaism.

About 80 percent of the scrolls have been published, according to the authority.

The authority’s decision was made reluctantly after the Huntington Library in San Marino, Calif., began allowing scholars to view its microfilm copies of the scroll fragments.

The Huntington’s action came shortly after two scholars announced that they were publishing a bootleg version of the previously unpublished text of 24 scrolls, which they said they pieced together using a computer.

Emanuel Toy, the editor in chief of the scrolls project, said Sunday that the authority would give all scholars access to the thousands of fragments of writing in ancient Hebrew.

We have now realized that, for the benefit of scholarship, this is the right thing to do,” he said.

But he said scholars would have to agree not to publish full texts if they wanted to review the unpublished scrolls.

Hershel Shanks, the editor of the Washington-based Biblical Archaeology Review, called the new policy too little, too late. Shanks, who has long fought for broader access to the scrolls, wants the material available for publication by all scholars. END OF QUOTING.

NEXT QUOTATION: Thursday, Oct. 17, 1991


Biblical treasures back in news: They contain the oldest copies of the Bible ever seen. Their very name conjures images of antiquity, a musty yet mystical thrill of ancient times rediscovered.


That treasure of crumbling parchments that shook the archaeological and religious world when it first came to light more than 40 years ago faded from attention during the long process of scholarly research. But suddenly this fall the scrolls were back in the news. One of the research institutes studying the carefully controlled scrolls ripped aside the curtain of secrecy that has surrounded them for years and released its copies to anyone interested.

Marcus Borg, for one, was glad.

Borg is a professor of religious studies who teaches at both Oregon State University and the University of Oregon. An internationally known scholar on Jesus, he is national chairman of the Historical Jesus Section of the Society of Biblical Literature, the oldest and largest association of biblical scholars in the United States. [H: The only obviously “wrong” thing with this historical research is that it, too, is based on tampered information--to deceive the world--the information MUST BE SQUELCHED OR TAMPERED.]

As a scholar, he said, he is pleased that the scrolls finally are being made available to the world, rather than the small, academic audience to which they have been confined.


They contain copies of the Old Testament 1 ,000 years older than any we have had before their discovery,” Borg said. For thousands of years, the Old Testament was passed down, first orally, then painstakingly copied and recopied in the centuries before printing. Prior to the discovery of the scrolls, “the oldest known copy of the Old Testament was handwritten in about 900 A.D. The Dead Sea Scrolls date back to about 100 B.C., making them twice as old, and are believed to have been collected by a Jewish religious community known as the Essenes, living around the time of Christ.

[H: Oops! I hope all of you will go back and read AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL. To have come from the group calling themselves the Essenes (at the time) was NOT a good recommendation for TRUTH! Be that as it may--the original scrolls had nothing to do with the Essenes of that day or this.]

They provide us with first-hand knowledge of a Jewish religious group around the time of Jesus,” he explained.

This isn’t just important as an antique curiosity. It tells us some important things about the Old Testament and about the time of Christ, Borg said.

When the scrolls were first discovered, “There was this thought that they would illumine the origin of Christianity in a fresh way,” Borg said. However, those hopes have not borne fruit. “Instead, they have given us a very detailed view of life in a first century Jewish community.” [H: This would give you more input than anything else you get your hands on--first hand information of how it REALLY was and a new perspective on this “Christ” who became the “blood sacrifice” to absolve you of your responsibility of good behavior under the laws of God and The Creation. IT “AINT LIKE THEY TELL YOU IT WAS! And they surely do NOT want you to find out that fact.]

The scrolls and the later texts of the Old Testament are very similar, showing the remarkable fidelity with which they were copied and recopied. But “remarkable fidelity” does not necessarily mean 100 percent exactness, Borg pointed out, “Not the kind of 100 percent accuracy that people looking to print the inerrancy of Scripture would like.”


The Dead Sea Scrolls contain copies of every Old Testament book except Esther. Esther, Borg noted, is the only book in the Bible which does not mention God. [H: How quaint!] That may be just an interesting coincidence. But, Borg noted, the Essenes were a conservative sect of Judaism focusing on God’s holiness. To them the Book of Esther may simply not have been a holy book worth preserving, Borg suggested. [H: HOGWASH.]

The scrolls also contained commentaries on some Old Testament books, and documents of the community itself. [H: Any good lawyer worth his weight in rock would know this is BAD testimony to facts. If you do not know who stashed the documents and you can’t interpret them and there are no originals from which to work--how can you SAY what they say”? These ones are only in speculation about something which is hypothetical and has no basis in fact. NONE. My own senses hardly allow me to continue with such speculation but this is exactly what is fed to you-the-people as if the authority knows of that which he speaks when, in fact, there is no foundation for the predictions at all. But--to continue---]

The latter included “The Manual of Discipline”, “The Temple Scroll”, describing what worship in the restored temple would be like and “The War of the Children of Light Against the Children of Darkness”, [H: Hot dog, now we are going to get to some really DANDY “STUFF”. Watch out world-- here comes the blast of blasts as laid forth by MAN for MAN so that one faction can take rule over that of another and WHY you won’t ever be given, except through pure accident and demand of God, to see and have the original documents in point,] an apocalyptic text on the coming war between evil, in the form of the ruling Roman Empire and good, personified by the Jews in general, the Essenes in particular. [H: This would be overwhelming Barf material except that the “Roman Empire” IS a major portion of the Khazarian so-called “Jew” empire--this day, 1991. Even the Pope is a placement by the Jewish infiltrators as from the beginning-- set up to pull down the civilization--TODAY! You had best be wary and attend these things for these are the parts of the blueprints set forth to gain Global Control of the physical aspect of manifestation!]

These scrolls give us a window into the beliefs and practices of a First Century Jewish community,” Borg said.


The Essenes were a sectarian movement with Judaism. The followers of Jesus, as a group of historians today call the Jesus Movement [H: Again, refer back, please, to AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL regarding His encounter with the group of Essenes.], also were a sectarian movement within Judaism [H: very true],” Borg said. Comparing and contrasting the two is an interesting exercise, he said.

The primary quality of God, extolled by the Essenes was holiness, almost to the exclusion of any other quality, Borg said. The movement was very inward oriented, carrying a sense of “Were good and everyone else is bad. It was marked by hatred of the outside, hatred of enemies. The Essenes were content to keep themselves apart from the rest of the world, holding in contempt anything that was not them, and waiting for God to liberate them from Rome.

The Jesus Movement extolled compassion as the primary quality of God. It was an inclusive movement, including the untouchables, the diseased and impious, Some scholars have suggested that Jesusadmonition to love thy neighbor was a deliberate contrast to the Essenes.

Borg mentioned in passing that the Aramaic word for compassion is rooted in the word for womb. “To be compassionate is to be womb-like, sustaining, nurturing. That’s a very different connotation for God, he said.

[H: Now I petition YOU: If in the face of this factual speculation and/or downright deceitful presentation of that which was and was translated—how can you as today’s Christians and/or anything else, pronounce without hesitation and in denouncement of any who disagree with the concept-HOLD FORTH THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND ERRORS IN THE BIBLE OR THE OTHER HOLY BOOKS???? I WEARY OF YOUR SMUG RIGHTEOUSNESS IN TOTAL IGNORANCE. YOU ARE PEOPLE OF THE LIE AND THE LIE IS CREATED BY THE VERY ONES YOU PROTECT AND WHO WILL DESTROY, ACCORDING TO A MASTER PLAN, ALL THAT IS OF THIS CREATION--INCLUDING YOU! I especially confront you who tout “man’s opinions” as proof unto the children who ARE finding Truth and their path unto Light--shame is upon you for your blatant ignorance and refusal to LOOK! Instead you insist and demand that Ihide Truth beneath the bushel so that you don’t have to face your own folly--NO, NEVER SHALL “I” HIDE GOD’S TRUTH TO SUIT ANY MAN! I AM OF GOD AND THE BETTER PART OF WISDOM IS TO ACCEPT THAT FACT UNTIL YOU CAN BE IN THE FINDING OF THE PROOF YOU SEEM TO NEED AND DEMAND!]


Some scholars, mostly on the fringe, have speculated that the reason the scrolls have taken so long to come into the public domain is that they contain some shocking revelation or damaging evidence. Borg said he doubts that will turn out to be the case. [H: Upon what does he base this assumption? Well, I apologize for my interruptions but this is the manner in which YOU must begin to analyze and discern.]

There have been certain controversial claims associated with the Dead Sea Scrolls, but very few serious scholars believe them,” Borg said.

I myself don’t expect any surprises, and Im a guy who likes surprises, he said. Itd be great if there was something wonderfully controversial in them. There is some suspicion on the part of a few scholars that the reason publication has been delayed is because there is something sensational there. I don’t know any serious scholar whose work I respect who believes that.” [H: With this attitude of self-ego importance, I have to admit that I just lost all respect (his words) for his own scholarly judgment. In other words, he will never find any writings which do not totally agree with his predisposed idea of how it is and, further, they will be rejected and certainly never made available to you-the-people because the next assumption is that you are “...too stupid to discern for selves and need his ”expert authority of what is and is not correct or right in order to function. Do I take exception and would I stand toe to toe with this self-indulgent man of great importance? Indeed, and love every wondrous moment of it. A human “authority” can only effort to “prove” his importance and knowledge from that which is already in physical expression--in other words, what is already known, be it lies or Truth. This attitude indicates self-importance far exceeding a “mere mortal” who is obviously not as great as he. God created man in His image and that means that each individual is perfection and power beyond that which is physical or conscious. Indeed, I tremendously enjoy these encounters with these self-styled “authorities”. Somehow, however, they NEVER wish to encounter me in any manner whatsoever and effort to keep the rest of you from doing so, likewise.]

For instance, some of the scrolls mention an unnamed “teacher of righteousness” who was executed by the political authorities. “A very few scholars claim the figure of Jesus was invented by the early Christian church, modeled after the teacher of righteousness”, Borg said. Another theory suggests that either John the Baptist or even Jesus spent time at Qumran, and the thoughts of John the Baptist and Jesus were affected by this community. “Very few serious scholars put much credence at all in these theories,” Borg said.

Borg believes the 40-year lapse between discovery and publication has a much more mundane cause.

Delay in publication has had much more to do with scholarly procrastination and scholarly egotism,” he said, [H: Well, he said it himself. By the way, for you little chelas whose parents and preachers have sent you so much information by which to “prove” our mission wrong and evil--this man is most often quoted from the great annals of information. Is it just POSSIBLE that there is some remote POSSIBILITY that we are exactly who and what we say we are? We are the Hosts sent by God, with God, to attend this planet in trouble. I suggest you who claim to know it all and yet do not even read the information would be wise to cease and desist making the children who DO SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THIS PRECIOUS OLD WORLD feel isolated and rejected because they DO SEE TRUTH. “Age in years” does not equate with “WISDOM”--ponder it! NO, the delays of publication are due to rewriting, the original writing and total deceit. Many of the so-called “scrolls” will never see the light of day for they are original writings to suit the needs of the “master planners”.]

The scrolls were farmed out to individual scholars for translation and interpretation. Those scholars have had sole access to the scrolls until late last month, when the Huntington Library in California decided it had had enough of the secrecy and let them loose to the world.

They (the selected scholars) developed a proprietary attitude, as if the scrolls were theirs,” Borg said. “There's a tendency to want to gain some measure of immortality by being associated with something. It isn’t so much that people were trying to keep secrets as they were trying to protect their own immortality with being associated with the scrolls.”

This has been frustrating to other scholars.


As a student in the late 1960s, and early 1970s, Borg was working on his doctoral thesis based on the temple of Jerusalem.

I was frustrated at that point because I knew there was such a thing as the Temple Scroll. It hadn't been published yet, but it would be soon. I had no way of knowing what it said, but I was afraid it might undermine my thesis.” [H: how interesting--undermine his thesis; Truth be damned. Well, he need not worry for the first “Temple Scroll” to make publication will be one in which the party line of the Khazarian Zionists present their exact plan for the way it will be according to Talmudism and will have no taint of Truth about it. YOU are being set up to enter into a massive genocide to produce “THEIR” temple on another’s property and you will insist on a return to the evil of that Temple practice--Satanic ritualistic killing and blood sacrifice. God does not create and then slay, torture and bleed His precious creatures. This movement upon you is total evil in intent and YOU make it possible to come into fruiting.]

Borg has not done any work with the actual manuscripts, but he uses earlier translations in his study of the Jewish world.

One issue that is up in the air again is whether were correct to think the scrolls were produced by the Essenes, he noted. Some of the untranslated material may suggest the Qumran scrolls were more like an ancient Jewish library rather than the documents of a specific Jewish sect. If so, scholars would have to revise some of their views.

The question the scholarly world is asking is, will they confirm or disconfirm whether the scrolls were, as is almost universally believed, written by the Essenes.” [H: I ask YOU--YOU THE READER. RIGHT NOW: Have YOU seen these scrolls? Have you touched them? Do you speak Hebrew? Do you even know Mr. Borg? Are the scrolls, themselves, valid and/or actually EXIST? HOW DO YOU KNOW ????****!!!! Right this moment, with this question--from whom and wherefrom do you acquire your information to form opinion? HOW DO YOU KNOW? OTHER HEINOUS THINGS HAVE BEEN PRESENTED AND SOLD TO YOU HOOK, LINE, AND SINKER--ALONG WITH STINKING ROTTED FISH. HOW DO YOU KNOW? CONTINUE TO CLOSE AND LOCK YOUR MIND TO POSSIBILITIES-ANY AND ALL POSSIBILITIES—AND YOU WILL BRING ABOUT THE PERISHMENT OF YOUR PLANET AND SPECIES. THE WAR IS BETWEEN THE GOD AND EVIL OF PHYSICAL EXPRESSION AND YOU ARE PAWNS IN THE GAME. WILL YOU TAKE UP YOUR SPIRITUAL POWER IN GODNESS AND STOP THIS MADNESS--OR WILL YOU PERISH AS THE PHYSICAL EXPRESSION OF EVIL? THE CHOICE IS YOURS.]

Borg studied at Concordia College in Minnesota, Union Theological Seminary in New York, Oxford University and the University of Tubingen. He has held fellowships from the Rockefeller Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities [H: All totally controlled Elite institutions!] He also has taught adult religious education classes in his church for 20 years [H: Ah, could he possibly have taught a few “errors” in that 20 years, like where his own opinion might have clouded an issue according to some prior teaching--or does this mortal man claim total perfection?], and conducts classes for both Protestant and Catholic clergy. [H: This alone goes along with what I wrote yesterday about “British Israel” which is total intent to present Pharisaism and not teachings of GOD!]

His wife, Marianne Well Borg, is a recent graduate of Church Divinity School of the Pacific and is a member of the Episcopalian clergy.

[H: May God, in his wondrous Grace, give you eyes to see and ears to hear--for the lie bears down upon you as the tidal wave in the cleansing as the cycles fall into chaos and destruction and the blind are never given to see or hear of that which is their destruction and, worse, the messengers are destroyed and civilizations are left to the demise of the nations and the oral traditions of the elders who are all that “remember” how it was!

Do we simply herein write of “HOW IT WAS”?]



Discovery made 44 years ago: [H: This is the party-line, at any rate, and suffices to give you a hint as to subject matter. I cringe at the inaccurate projections but this is what you are given upon which to place your lessons and I cannot help it. Just know that I disagree with the outlay as given herein. So much of the “truth” is in fabrication of numbers, places and what is actually being projected that I am embarrassed to ask you to read most of it.]

STORY: A Bedouin shepherd tossed a rock into a cave and heard, not the dry clank he expected, but a shattering sound.

Inside, he found a broken clay vessel with the remains of an ancient scroll. It was 1947, and the jar he broke was the first of the Dead Sea Scrolls to be discovered.

Subsequent explorations discovered hundreds of scrolls hidden in caves among the desolate terrain of the Dead Sea, generally southeast of Jericho, and almost due east of Jerusalem.

The scrolls have been dated by their script to have come from the 2nd Century B.C. to the 1st Century AD.

After having been buried in caves for some 2,000 years, it has taken another 40 for them to finally come out into the light.

The scrolls are believed to have been written or collected by a group called the Essenes, who formed a quasi-monastic community at Qumran in protest against the Maccabees taking control of the high priesthood at the Temple of Jerusalem. An early leader is identified only as the teacher of righteousness, and his opponent as the wicked priest, probably Simon Maccabaeus. [H: Alice in Wonderland?]

The Essenes attempted to preserve the true worship of God while awaiting his return to smite their enemies, whether Maccabee or Roman. They were strict adherents to the law. [H: Whose law?]

Because the scrolls were found in what was then Jordan, the Jordanian government exercised initial control, assigning the Rev. Roland de Vaux of the French Ecole Biblique in East Jerusalem to lead the translation effort. The seven men de Vaux picked were to have exclusive rights to publish the documents. Other scholars were outraged, and their anger grew as the work proceeded slowly.

In 1967, Israel took over the West Bank area including Jerusalem, and the scrolls came under the control of the Israeli Antiquities Authority. Since then the number of researchers has grown to about 80, and the work has quickened, but still only about half of the scrolls have been rewrit---er, ah, translated.

Late last month (Sept. 1991), a California research institution changed all that. The Huntington Library, in San Marino, Calif., had one of only four complete photographic sets of the scrolls. On Sept. 22, they opened their vaults. Deliberately violating the secrecy agreement [H: Total balderdash-hogwash. You don’t just open vaults and break agreements” with Israel, little blind mice. The Huntington Library is a total entity created and operated by the Elite One World Government/New World Order Establishment!!! You are going to be shown (given) EXACTLY that which they want you to see (under the illusion of broken promises and in spite of secrecy agreements so that you lovely people can access this material) moreover, building the anticipation to outrageous proportions so that NONE OF YOU MISS THE INFORMATION--WHICH WILL BE EXACTLY THAT WHICH THEY WANT YOU TO HAVE TO CONVINCE YOU THAT A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT WITH YOU AS SLAVES IS WHAT YOU WANT.]

When we free the scrolls, we free the scholars,” said director William A. Moffat. “If we had sat quietly, we would have violated our own policy, of unrestricted access.”


[H: Come, come--sleeple!--AND by the way--”...the check from the Government is in the mail.” COME ON OUT OF LA-LA-LAND AND PETER COTTONTAIL! Yes, Virginia, “there is a Santa Clause”--and he is bringing you poison candy!]

*** Dharma, break this at this point and begin another writing for the efforts are to wipe this out of the computer. I would, however, like to finish this today even though it is Sunday and you have guests. I am sorry, chela, but it is so important for the readers can now begin to SEE the deceivers in full action in their deadly games. Rest can come when messages are OUT! Thank you.***



SUN., NOV. 10, 1991 11:24A.M. YEAR5,DAY 086


QUOTE from periodical dated Nov. 19, 1991:


Passages from the Dead Sea Scrolls that are so secret only a handful of scholars have seen them reveal that UFO’s landed on Earth 2,500 years ago, Jesus will be reborn in 1991 and the world will end 10,000 years from now--in 11,991! [H: Id say that there is definitely “good” news and “bad” news regarding this projection but it is actually more valid than the other garbage being thrust upon you. Most, as usual, depends upon “what you do about the mess youre in and whether or not you choose to wake up and change the tale.”]

That's the word from biblical scholar and translator Felix Bonjean [H: I expect this is one of “those” scholars for whom Dr. Borg has “no respect”.], who claims to be one of only six men who have examined the passages that have been kept under lock and key at the Vatican since 1949. [H: VATICAN!?!? AH, THE PLOT THICKENS, DOES IT NOT???]


* That a fleet of massive, circular starships landed on Earth 2,500 years ago in 500 B.C. A description of the extraterrestrials that got off the ships was badly decayed and unreadable, although a reference to the fact that they had enormous, bulb- shaped heads survived.

* What God looks like. Though the description is sketchy, the scrolls say He has fiery green eyes, flowing brown hair and stands 9 feet tall.

* The rise and fall of a genocidal “antichrist” in the mid- 20th century, a likely reference to Adolf Hitler. The development of atomic weaponry is also mentioned. And in another prediction the scrolls warn of a horrifying plague in the late 20th century, which seems to be a reference to AIDS.

* The exact location of Noah’s Ark. Long thought to be buried under tons of rock and on Turkey’s Mount Ararat, it actually came, to rest in Egypt--just miles from the Great Pyramid.

* That the Messiah will be reborn in 1994. It is said that He will rise to a position of power and prominence and spearhead a worldwide conversion to true Christianity before 2025.

* The creation of a worldwide economy-of-plentyAND ELIMINATION OF POVERTY IN 1992.

* That Moses wasnt Jewish, Egyptian or even human. He came from another planet. [H: No-o-o?]

* That mankind will enjoy 10,000 consecutive years of peace before the world ends in the year 11,991. [H: Not at the rate you are going! But let’s see what happens when TRUTH pervades the lands!]

At that time life as we know it will cease to exist while the souls of the “chosen few” will be reborn as life-forms on the Red Planet Mars. [H: Don’t be so sure that Mars is THE red planet as considered by Earth men.]

[H: Here the assumptions cloud the reasoning process of the given word. You can only “assume” based on what you have been led to “believe” and much of that “assumption” is totally in error. But this is a neat story and more nearly on target than anything else touted about those scrolls.]

* The discovery of America by an adventurer from the east--Christopher Columbus--in 1492.

* Details of America’s 1969 moon shot, including the initials of the astronauts, N.A. for Neil Armstrong and B.A. for Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin.

* The election of America’s first female president after President George Bush serves out his second term in 1996. Described as the daughter of a slain former president, the woman in question would appear to be Caroline Kennedy. [H: And, just when we were beginning to get some “real stuff“.]

* The truth about Atlantis. The Lost continent was home to a race of superhuman beings that God destroyed because they rejected Him and began to worship the Devil.

* That Satan will literally walk the Earth for six years beginning in 2010. The Evil One will claim and destroy the lives of millions before God banishes him forever. [H: This hardly seems feasible if item No’s 1 and 3 are correct--but so be it.]

* The devastation of one of the greatest countries on Earth in 1997. It is not clear where this Godless society is located, but the passage seems to be referring to either China or America.

The truth was bound to come out sooner or later and after much agonizing and even more prayer Ive taken it upon myself to tell mankind what it has a right to know, said Dr. Bonjean.

The passages were hidden from the public because the men who have controlled the scrolls since their discovery by a Palestinian shepherd boy in 1947, spoke for many when he criticized Dr. Bonjean for leaking privileged information that was never meant to be seen or heard by ordinary men.”

Other experts, like German archaeologist Ulrike Hoffman, actually praised Dr. Bonjean “for having the integrity and courage to reveal the truth about the scrolls once and for all.”

Both the VATICAN AND ISRAELI ANTIQUITIES DEPARTMENT which oversees the study and publication of the 2,000-year-old scrolls, have been strangely silent, on the issue. But Dr. Bonjean says that’s not surprising since they can’t say anything about the secret scroll passages without admitting that theyve been deceiving the public for almost 50 years.”

The expert claims to have seen the Vatican’s scroll passages in 1952. [H: By the way, this checks out, little chelas.]

He refused to name the other five men who have [for their privacy and protection--they may do what they wish regarding the matter. To speak out is an almost sure death sentence].

But a highly placed Vatican source confirmed that Dr. Bonjean “can, in fact, talk about the passages with unquestioned authority.

These particular scrolls and passages were brought to the Vatican for safekeeping because it was feared that the content would cause panic and chaos, throughout the world.” continued the source. [H: Reminds me of the meeting we had with Baruch, Eisenhower, etc., and they, too, kept it from you people to prevent religious riots and panic by you-the-people.]

Whether that fear was founded or unfounded will soon become evident, of course, now that Dr. Bonjean has spoken out.” Dr. Bonjean concluded: “I did what I had to do and I have no regrets. God will decide if I was right or wrong and nobody can argue with that.” [H: Want to bet?]



Why do I think it important to look again at the incident called “October Surprise”? Because a strange thing has happened on the way to Congress. This is a real hot potato! This notation is also an October Surprise because of political implications. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee narrowly approved a resolution calling for an investigation into the October Surprise scandal--they almost got it past you-the-people and yet, all the reasons are wrong. Watch the rest of this little notation. This is the little scandal in which members of the Reagan-Bush campaign team arranged for Iranian radicals to delay the release of American hostages until AFTER THE 1980 ELECTION. But Sen. Richard Lugar called the probe a “monstrosity” and promised a filibuster to prevent passage on the floor of the Senate. On the other side of the aisle, Sen. Christopher Dodd voted against the resolution because it included an amendment TO INVESTIGATE CARTER ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS. Does anyone other than me see “dirty pool” in action??? Again, watch for the flame when you see so much smoke.


Do you remember a bit of argument over arms and sanctions, invasions and “storms” over Iraq and Kuwait? Well, isn’t it nice to know that the good old U.S.A. is “always right on target for fairness, honor and justice?” Secretary of State James Baker admits the Bush administration decided NOT TO PLACE ANY ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AGAINST ISRAEL FOR ILLEGALLY EXPORTING BANNED MISSILE TECHNOLOGY TO SOUTH AFRICA, DESPITE ISRAEL’S FOUR-YEAR- OLD PROMISE NOT TO DO SO. [H: By the way, goodly citizens, SANCTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW.] However, in the name of “justice” the South African company which got the data, Armscor, will be banned from U.S. trade for two years. [I thought the business was done in Israel? Is there no longer any separation at all from Israel? Nope!] BAKER REFUSED TO SAY WHY ISRAEL GOT THE SPECIAL TREATMENT!


I am going to quote this next segment but I want you to know that the first two statements are not factual.

You can debate the existence of God; you can debate any aspect of sexual performance or non-performance. You can talk about almost anything under the protection of the First Amendment. But you can’t even SUGGEST THE SUBJECT OF THE HOLOCAUST IS DEBATABLE. Historian Bradley Smith paid for a full page ad in the University of Michigan newspaper titled: The Holocaust Controversy: The Case for Open Debate. Zionists became apoplectic. The next day the newspaper was forced to apologize for running a paid ad which only “suggested that the ”holocaust was a subject open for debate. Forget the First Amendment if the subject is not politically correct.

Well, hang in there because I am going to “Prove” that the “holocaust” did not happen as you have been told. It was a Zionist/Nazi plot to take out the Jews and enemies of the Zionist planners--that same group which is destroying your rights under your Constitutional Bill of Rights.

You think this cannot be and that there is “more to it”? No--you had better pay attention because such denial is already illegal in France, Germany, England and some other European nations as well as in the Soviet Union and “publicly” in Canada.

Scholars in the United States, for instance, who simply suggest that the subject be more carefully investigated because statistics and records simply do not balance, are threatened with death and beatings--and have received both. And, on July 4, 1984, a major Historical Institute which was looking into the matters, the Institute for Historical Review (California) was burnt to the ground for their pioneering work in honest scholarship. Their purpose, worse yet, was to prove that there was a “holocaust” to coincide with the Jewish claims. Do you not find this interesting?



I will, however, reprint herein what the SPOTLIGHT has just published about the matter and leave it to you. This is WHY all the sudden controversy and somehow you seem to think that “Hatonn” and “Space-Command” seem to have the reins in hand—I personally wouldnt get within 10 feet of the horses, much less pull the reins. This is exactly, however, what happens with good candidates who are willing to “serve”. They only have choices which are bad at best. What have YOU done to get a platform and support under this willing servant? I thought not--YOU would rather complain and nag--and point fingers.

I am “dared”, yet, to print the write-up. Oh, I have been “dared” on much more interesting substance but perhaps it will help you to at least know what is being said--truth has nothing to do with it at this point--as usual.


QUOTE, SPOTLIGHT, Nov. 11, 1991.

According to the October 16 issue of Ballot Access News (BAN), Populist Party National Director Don Wassall, a Ford City, Pennsylvania promoter, has yet to qualify his party’s presidential candidate, Lt. Col. James (Bo) Gritz, for even a single state ballot.

This despite the fact that more than an entire year ago--the period of April through October, 1990--there were fully 17 states where ballot access efforts could have been undertaken well in advance for the 1992 election.

Those states were: Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Hawaii, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah and Vermont.

In fact, according to BAN there are only two states where there are visible ongoing efforts to qualify the Populist Party for the ballot: Georgia and Maryland.

Ironically, one of the leaders of the Georgia ballot access effort, Jim Yarbrough of Gainesville, has been officially “expelled” from the Populist Party by Wassall.

And in Maryland, State Chairman Boyd Godlove has emerged as one of Wassall’s leading critics.

In 36 other states where petitioning could be under way to put Gritz on the ballot, there is no activity of any consequence noted.

This includes Arizona, Florida and Missouri, home states of top-level Wassall associates, party parliamentarian Bill Chandler, party money handler, Phil Chesler and executive committee member Jeff Wilderson who is Wassall’s handpicked ballot qualification expert.

According to BAN, not a single petition signature has been obtained in those key states.

In stark contrast, the Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate, former Alaska state legislator Andre Marrou, is already on the ballot in 20 states for the 1992 presidential election.

In seven other states, the Libertarians have either finished collecting the required number of petition signatures or are in the process of so doing.

According to BAN, there are only 10 states where the Libertarian Party has failed--as of this time--to seek ballot status.

(There are 12 states where state restrictions prohibit collection of petition signatures prior to a specified date.)

These figures are shocking, to say the least, when one considers the amount of money that has poured into Wassall’s coffers since the beginning of 1990 alone.

In 1990 Wassall controlled $219,215.94 in the party bank account. He spent $192,683.46 of that amount. Only a tiny percentage of those funds was expended for the purpose of obtaining ballot access.

What’s more, Wassall gave only a piddling $10,023--less than 4.6 percent of the total--to Populist Party candidates, forcing 23 people running in seven states to divide the sum among themselves.

In 1991, according to Wassall’s July 15 filing with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Wassall’s Ford City office bank account had expended a whopping sum of $97,169.94.

Of that amount, $11,179.50 was paid to Wassall in salary. (Wassall’s salary, hiked repeatedly, skyrocketed to a total of $34,000 per year. [H: Mr. Iococca, eat your heart out!]) Wassall also picked up an additional $1,713.95 in “petty cash reimbursement” * [H: Now chelas, bashing is one thing but malicious bashing is so evident herein that I am embarrassed to continue printing this. Do you realize that Congress voted themselves a raise in the middle of the night which averaged more than this amount any way you scrape it out of the garbage pail?]

Party Treasurer Phil Chesler received $3,821.77; and a woman in his employ, Betty Losh, received $3,549.49--for a combined total of $7,371.26. [H: This would seem to average out to about a skyrocket amount of some 56 cents per hour.] (Other, previous party treasurers were committed Populists, volunteers who served without compensation.)

Wassall also spent $622.58 for magazine subscriptions, even including a $234 subscription to the New York Times.

A total of $1,468.95 in payments was made toward a vehicle purchased in the party’s name.

Since these filings with the FEC, Wassall has mailed out a barrage of fund-raising letters using the name of Gritz. However, there has never been a nominating convention for Gritz, and even Wassall’s so-called national committee itself is without standing, not having followed the bylaws of the party formulated before he took control.

However, Wassall has raised a great deal of money through the use of Gritz’s name and Gritz’s mailing list.


The sum of $937.15 in salary and expenses was paid to Wassall’s aide, young Harry Bertram, who engaged in what to date was the first, last and only known ballot access effort undertaken by Wassall. This was in the state of Utah.

There, according to a headline story published in the April 5 edition of the Salt Lake City Tribune, Bertram was nabbed forging signatures on ballot access petitions.

According to the Tribune, Wassall’s protégé was caught in what election officials say is a poorly executed scam involving the alleged forgeries of hundreds of signatures of registered voters’ in the state of Utah.

At the time the Tribune reported the Salt Lake County attorney was conducting a criminal investigation and that an indictment was expected. A county attorney was quoted as saying that, “There is clear evidence of a crime committed.”

Although Wassall was quoted in the Tribune as having said Bertram had “bamboozled” the party, Wassall has since welcomed Bertram back into the party, despite his alleged criminal activity, and has lavished praise on the accused forger in the pages of his monthly organ, The Populist Observer.

Wassall has never reported Bertram’s malfeasance in the Observer.

Ironically, Van Loman, then a member of the party's executive committee, had warned Wassall against hiring Bertram as the party's national coordinator.

Wassall has since begun sending out letters viciously attacking Loman, whom many considered Wassall's brainiest adviser on the party’s national executive committee.

Despite Loman's words of caution, Wassall apparently wanted to prove to his many critics that he was actually engaged in ballot access efforts (rather than running a fund-raising operation) and brought Bertram aboard, only to become enmeshed in the scandal.

Rather than focusing on getting the party on the ballot, Wassall has been busy arranging a $20 million libel suit against The SPOTLIGHT [H: The truth begins to hit the fan, does it not?] for exposing his activity--and inactivity.

Two of Wassall’s complaints are that he was labeled a political Nerd and a “yo-yo.” He claims he's neither....

This article is by Michael Collins Piper.



Why? Is not your own discernment worthy of thought conclusion?

But I WILL COMMENT (You trusting souls knew I would!). This is the kind of slime-suckers that will try at every turn to keep the Establishment and Elite in POWER! You have just witnessed the FACT that even though the SPOTLIGHT gives some valid input--it is basically an Establishment run paper which only gives a bit of truth and then, after sucking you in-- deceives you by intent. It is clear that: No.1: the SPOTLIGHT doesn’t want Bo Gritz to run for anything and will do ANYTHING to prevent it. Mr. Wassall has no real part in the issue at all. No. 2: Mr. Piper is a poison pen tool and the accusations so shallow as to kill a fish.

Neither of these points are of any lasting value to the issue. The point is that unless there is revamping from top to bottom, the Populist Party is the sure way to lose an election and keep Gritz useless to your nation. Whether the accusations be true or false is of no point herein--the “planks” of the political “platform” of the “party in point” are actually little more Constitutional in orientation than are the already “in power” parties.


When you ones start serving God within His laws and the rules laid down for a chosen nation under that God--then, and only then, will reclamation be possible. God will provide the way and the leader--but YOU will take the journey. Is James Gritz perfect? Gracious, you jest! Of course he is not perfection--but didn’t anyone ever tell you that NOTHING SHORT OF GOD IS PERFECTION? His intent is perfection and THAT, sirs and madams, is what is important. You have boggled your election systems to the point that you can hardly get anyone ON the ballot to be in the elections--it is THE way to control you and who will be your King--Didn’t you know?

What about the Populist Party and thus and so? I see that it is probably without any salvation--there are too many skeletons over which bones can be picked--even though they be wasted bones. If you tout ANYTHING other than a return to Constitutional truth and law, you will be debased, denounced, picked and kicked--AND FEW MEN CAN TAKE IT! IF YOU CANNOT BE DESTROYED BY THE PRESS THEN THEY WILL COME WITH GUNS. Well, I wouldnt count to readily on the guns” working with this particular Colonel. God favors this particular “little soldier” and it is a bit hard to “bump off” that which is favored by God. Ponder it. The Col. already has some rather interesting uniforms in his collection wherein you will find a bullet hole which enters and exits the cloth--but what of the man who was wearing the uniform?? I think I would think upon that little “magic” also. You of Earth don’t seem to understand God and who or what is God.


I repeat again and again--read with discernment. I did NOT say, stop reading--most especially the SPOTLIGHT for their thrust is to give you lots of “trust me” information. Always measure that which is given against the Laws of God and The Creation and see how Truth stacks up, They do give you much very valid and unprinted “elsewhere” information. It is up to you to discern with care.

Well, why do they tell such awful things about the administration and the Government, etc.? Because they want their own people to eventually be in the slots of Government and it must APPEAR that they are ON YOUR SIDE! This is the VERY REASON we have no interest in “overthrowing” any Government as you understand revolutions to be. It will do no good to simply “overthrow” the power in power because the REAL POWER is NOT in those places.

We have gone on much too long today but it seems so impossible to get all the information out and into your hands. Please be patient as we effort to get through these myriads of inquiries and comments--we take none as invalid questions and none are ever mundane or inappropriate if asked in intent for knowledge. There are no silly questions--only silly people--you must discern which is being utilized when you write and never assume you must ask a question “for” another for it may well be only your perception and that becomes most ungracious. I look forward each day to the responses and inquiries as you send them along-- most are “direct” to me, hundreds are through Dharma regarding our writings. We treasure each and every one--even those which would appear negative and bitter. Those are the very ones which allow us perception more clearly than almost any other. I am most saddened, however, by the ones who “hit and run”. If you “hit” that is fine--but to run that you might avoid confronting the response--is quite foolish on your own part. Wisdom can only be gained by coming into KNOWLEDGE regarding those things which are at present misperceived or are correct. You cannot know either until you know both sides of the issue in point.

Thank you for your service and your attention.

Hatonn to clear, please.



MON., NOV. 11, 1991 9:14A.M. YEAR5,DAYO87



Please allow me a word with my scribe. On the yesterday evening I kept her busy and away from the watching of the TV until after 60 MINUTES was well under way and she is pained by missing it for, as she tuned in, it was dealing with the “murder” of Pvt. Tally (we wrote on this deliberate “friendly killing” on the day before yesterday). All here have been “boggled” by the smallness of the world these days and how more and more things will be coming to surface as it becomes harder and harder to cover the evil.

I request that ALL WHO WILL DO SO, write to this beloved Lt. Col. Ralph Hayles for he feels his life has been destroyed by this horror. This is another sign for you ones as to the Truth which I have given you for when asked, “Why have you come forth, Col. Hayles, in all this pain and remorse? Can you not put this aside and go on with your life? Must you continue this public display?” With tears flowing he said, “No, I cannot allow the story to go forth as it is being told and I cannot go on with my life ”as usual for I have killed.

Now what do you suppose the government is investigating? Not the killing of “friends” or the “setting-up” of these ones to be killed intentionally--but the Government is investigating “WHY THE MACHINE GUN JAMMED”. You see, the “big brother” wanted all the ones who escaped--shot--for the ones who got away will come forth to speak out when they realize what happened to them. A couple of them were later taken out in the barrack’s bombing but the ones who were silenced under threat will come forward as Hayles and others speak out.

America--you can no longer keep your silence for your very beings are being murdered as the Elite Antichrist makes a final assault to take your world.

I suggest you barrage CBS-”60 MINUTES” with letters (not post-cards which can be read--but sealed envelopes with letters) marked TO: LT. COL. RALPH HAYLES [FOR WARD]. This young man needs support of you-the-people and to know that he is not alone. Then, I ask that someone from my crew get a transcript of that portion of “60 MINUTES” for my use. Thank you.

On this day as staunch men stand at the memorials of fallen comrades (while at the same time Baker plies Cambodia for TRADE AND BUSINESS RENEWAL FACILITIES), and weep as if their souls are in torment--think about that which has fallen upon your world. How many fine men have fought and died, murdered and destroyed their lives to fight in the sick and useless wars for the Elite Bankers? If your own soul does not weep and cry out for justice, then we are hopeless and helpless to change this world about. There are still prisoners of war and missing-in-action soldiers still in prison--without hope of return--in Laos, Cambodia and Viet Nam. It is hard for me to understand HOW you sleep at night while these bastard thieves run loose. So be it


I have a return of inquiries: “I missed something, who are the Pharisees as used by you in recent writings? Most all, except the unindoctrined children; know who the Pharisees were in the Biblical times. They were the evil brood then and they are the evil brood now. The Pharisees are members of an ancient Jewish cult (sect) that accept the Mosaic and then the Zionist Talmudic law as well as the oral traditions and rituals associated with it, and emphasizing strict attention to the rituals of atonement, i.e., Kol Nidre (Vow of All Vows). These are considered “formal”, sanctimonious, hypocritical persons who were denounced in the time of Emmanuel by Emmanuel.

You must bring into consideration that the Pharisees have started most of your wars to help kill off “Christians” and other “believing” groups and gain other things for themselves. You see, there MUST be confusion and wars in the illusion--the general people do not realize that Christianity is but a branch of the Pharisean guidelines as well. But let us consider more recent times when memories can still be recalled by “living” minds. For instance World War I and World War II, and your sequential smaller wars and non-declared wars must be looked at. The “Pharisees” set up the League of Nations at the time of WW I but it failed. They had to bring about WW II, so they could set up their United Nations, which is their world police state which will help give them complete control and make slaves out of the entire world. There had to be a “headquarters” from which to deceive the populace in a massive way under the guise of world peace. (How much peace have you witnessed since their structuring?)

It was in 1945 that the U.S.A. signed the United Nations Charter--overriding the Constitution and making you a servant, as a nation, to the United Nations and no longer the united states of America. At that time you lost your sovereignty, and became just a part of this United Nations over which you have no control at all, as it is controlled by a small group of ”Pharisees”, and is the law of force. in 1913 the Pharisees established, in your country, the Federal Reserve CORPORATION (privately owned--not Federal) which is not a branch of your government but as stated above, is privately owned by them, and in which they make money. Since 1913 they have profited on this up into the BILLIONS of dollars. They completely control big businesses, which includes the labor organizations, and also all radio and television, and their programs are thrust solely toward the influencing of the thinking and belief systems of all men and women--and especially the children.

As I was speaking prior to this of British Israel I should have pointed out more clearly that Political Zionism was hidden in the secret base in Britain in the form of Freemasonry--which, of course you all know, was established in Britain. It claims there is to be a “NEW AGE” and this is perhaps their way of saying “KINGDOM OF GOD ON EARTH” since Pharisaism promotes this by way of premillennial preachers and teachers. This, of course, makes Masonry also “Pharisaic”. This was undisputed through the ages--until now that we bring attention to these hypocrisies and cause the evil gnats to squirm in their hidden dens. The secret chambers and rituals, not to mention the “priests” thereof, shrink in the light of attention. The lineup of facts speak for themselves regarding the historical truth of this writing for British Israel World Federation is Pharisaism and Pharisaism is Masonry and Masonry then becomes controller of the world, then you already have a world Pharisee order. “A rose by any other name is yet a rose!”

I suggest you who do not understand these connections get a book, if you can locate it, called INTERPRETATION OF FREEMASONRY, by Martin L. Wagner. Moreover, do not take exception to this commentary if you are a Mason of a “club” which does “good” in your community! How could you know that the establishers of the “order” were evil in intent and eventually planned to rule the world? This is a part of THE DECEPTION and how could you possibly know these things for you will NEVER be told truth in any of the media and the books regarding the matter are destroyed along with their authors. It is clearly that while masonry pretends religious neutralism, it is promoting its own “devil religion” which is to become the universal religion. Masonry being set up by Pharisaism has gained world power and controls all political parties and ideologies, but keeps everyone unaware that they do this and how they do it. Masonry is NOT an innocent brotherhood as its many dupes suppose for it works every angle or phase of World Revolution for the Pharisees. You who are members of that group and have worked your way through the “degrees” recall your “vows” and recall your rituals. Did they not have to do with death and secrecy? If they did NOT, then your group will be disciplined and discarded as not following the proper instructions--now, I suggest you members be HONEST in your appraisal of some of those rituals! I know, you “...thought it was sort of ”in fun and didn't REALLY mean anything. So be it.

Remember that the Pharisees and the so-called “Jews” are two words applying to one people, and they promote an earthly kingdom (premillennialism) and set up organizations which help spread their religion of a kingdom of God on Earth. The Bible teaches that Christ has already established His kingdom of God which is “spiritual”, never to be on Earth, and that He now reigns in heaven from His Throne. When He returns it will be to “judge” the people, and frankly, sort out the present world which may well be in destruction, taking His people unto safety into the places He has prepared to receive them.

The Pharisees idea, of course, is to get you to believe that there are really JEWS there in your midst, so you may give your thoughts to them and not realize that the Pharisees (also called Khazar Zionists) are there doing their conspiring against goodness and God’s doctrines. They appeal to the conservative so they bring in a few Truths, but they will NEVER mention kingdom of God or premillennialism and this is the way you can check their stories for Truth. The Jew Baiters promote the Jews as real, and you hear that Russia may take you over someday and all that, but if you look closely it will be the Communist thrust of the Khazar Zionists behind the facade--EVERY TIME.

It was the British Pharisees that took over Russia many years past, and many people were killed at that time. The Pharisees intend to blame everybody, anybody or the Russians for many things, but especially for setting up Communism--which they themselves established. (Of course this “communism” is not-- and it is pure Zionist Socialism in its most heinous form of conspiracy and debauchery.) Under this “idealistic” facade it assists them in their plot to gain world rule—for if people can be taught that all would be fine under one ruler then the lambs move easily to the slaughter. You, of course, are the lambs in point! For if you are one of the Pharisee ”JEWS” reading this document, you will shred and burn it--again proving the Truth of the message!!!


Dharma, we can no longer “put off” that which must be confronted. I understand your terror at walking off the edge of the cliff and into the fire of hatred and assault because we present Truth--but it shall be given and God Will protect you for the soul is of God and cannot be slain and God has promised TRUTH unto His creations in this day of chaos. It is our mission to pull that which has been given into central volumes and then our mission is worthy. Fear has no place in the LOVE OF GOD.

In the following writings we will bring together irrefutable evidence that the allegation that some 6 million Jews died during the Second World War, as a direct result of an official German policy of extermination, is utterly unfounded. This conclusion, admittedly an unpopular one to say the least, results from investigations by ones who originally thought themselves to be proving the fact that THERE WAS truth in the original claim. This information is all already on your place and suppressed just as it is being outlawed to even hold a variance of opinion regarding the matter.

I believe that as we present the next writings, you will be convinced that beyond any doubt the allegation is not merely an exaggeration but an invention of post-war propaganda to gain specific ends.

Of course, atrocity propaganda is nothing new. It has accompanied every conflict throughout the ages and especially within the so-called 20th century. Doubtlessly it will continue.

During the First World War, the Germans were actually accused of “eating” Belgian babies, as well as delighting to throw them in the air and transfix them on bayonets. The British also alleged that the German forces were operating a “Corpse Factory”, in which they boiled down the bodies of their own dead in order to obtain glycerine and other commodities, a calculated in- suit to the honor of an Imperial army. After the war, however, came the retractions; indeed, a public statement was made by the Foreign Secretary in the House of Commons apologizing for the insults to German honor, which were admitted to be wartime propaganda.

No such statements have been made after the Second World War. Even with the Katan Forest massacres the truth was not admitted about the Soviets UNTIL the original story was uncovered as a lie. In fact, rather than diminish with the passage of years, the atrocity propaganda concerning the German occupation, and in particular their treatment of the Jews, has done nothing but increase in virulence and elaborate its catalogue of horrors. Each year more and new violent films are produced and the shout of “never forget”, etc., rings from the airwaves and through the controlled media and press. Gruesome paperback books with lurid covers continue to roll from the presses, adding continuously to a growing mythology of the concentration camps and especially to the story that no less than Six Million Jews were exterminated in them. The ensuing pages will reveal this claim to be the most colossal piece of fiction and the most successful of deceptions; but here an attempt may be made to answer an important question: What has rendered the atrocity stories of the Second World War so uniquely different from those of the First? Why were the latter retracted while the former are reiterated louder than ever? Is it possible that the story of the Six Million Jews is serving a political purpose, even that it is a form of political BLACKMAIL?


So far as the Khazarian Zionists “Jewish” people themselves are concerned, the deception has been an incalculable benefit--and therefore, it must be considered as quite possibly “calculated” as you would investigate in any objective investigative procedure. Every conceivable race and nationality had its share of suffering in the Second World War, but none has so successfully elaborated it and turned it to such great advantage. The alleged extent of their persecution quickly aroused sympathy for the Jewish national homeland they had sought for so long; after the War the British Government did little to prevent Jewish emigration to Palestine which they had declared illegal, and it was not long afterwards that the Zionists wrested from the Government the land of Palestine and created their haven from persecution, the State of Israel. Indeed, it is a remarkable fact that the Jewish people emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max Nussbaum, the former chief rabbi of the Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953, “The position the Jewish people occupy today in the world--despite the enormous losses--is ten runes stronger than what it was twenty years ago.” It should be added, if one is to be honest, that this strength has been much consolidated financially by the supposed massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity allegation of all time. To date, the staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid out in compensation by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel (which did NOT even EXIST during the Second World War), as well as to individual Jewish claimants.


In terms of political blackmail, however, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second World War has much more far-reaching implications for the people of Britain and Europe than simply the advantages it has gained for the Jewish nation. And here one comes to the crux of the question: Why the Big Lie? What is its purpose? In the first place, it has been used quite unscrupulously to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people of Britain or any other European country attempt to assert their patriotism and preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded as “neo-Nazis”. Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and you all know what happened then--Six Million Jews were exterminated! So long as the myth is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to it; the need for international tolerance and understanding will be hammered home by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of freedom, is abolished.

A classic example of the Use of the “Six Million” as an anti-national weapon appears in Manvell and Frankl’s book, THE INCOMPARABLE CRIME (London, 1967), which deals with “Genocide in the Twentieth Century”. Anyone with a pride in being British will be somewhat surprised by the vicious attack made on the British Empire in this book. The authors quote Pandit Nehru, who wrote the following while in a British prison in India: “Since Hitler emerged from obscurity and became the Fuhrer of Germany, we have heard a great deal about racialism and the Nazi theory of the ‘Herrenvolk’. . .But we in India have known racialism in all its forms ever since the commencement of British rule. The whole ideology of this rule was that of the ‘Herrenvolkand the master race...India as a nation and Indians as individuals were subjected to insult, humiliation and contemptuous treatment. The English were an imperial race, we were told, with the God-given right to govern us and keep us in subjection; if we protested we were reminded of the ‘tiger qualities of an imperial race. The authors Manvell and Frankl then go on to make the point perfectly clear for us: “The white races of Europe and America,” they write, “have become used during centuries in regarding themselves as a “herrenvolk.” The twentieth century, the century of Auschwitz, has also achieved the first state in the recognition of multi-racial partnership” (ibid. .p. 14).


One could scarcely miss the object of this diatribe, with its insidious hint about “multi-racial partnership”. Thus the accusation of the Six Million is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood and national pride, but it threatens the survival of the Race itself. It is wielded over the heads of the populace, rather as the threat of hellfire and damnation was in the Middle Ages. Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably Britain and America, are today facing the gravest danger in their history, the danger posed by the alien races in their midst. Unless something is done in Britain to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans and Asians into their country, they are faced in the near future, quite apart from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration and destruction of the British people as they have existed since the coming of the Saxons. In short, they are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of their European culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications? He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a “racialist” and an “anti-Semite”. And what is racialism, of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi! They [so everyone is told, anyway] murdered Six Million Jews because of racialism, so it must be a very evil thing indeed. When Enoch Powell drew attention to the dangers posed by colored immigration into Britain in one of his early speeches, a certain prominent Socialist raised the specter of Dachau and Auschwitz to silence his presumption.

Thus any rational discussion of the problems of Race and the effort to preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged. No one could have anything but stunned disbelief for the way in which the Jews have sought to preserve their so-called race through so many centuries, and continue to do so today. This is because the very ones in point have no idea that they are set-up for “the game” and any “Jew” who disagrees will be the first sacrificed (murdered). The average “so-called” Jew of today has not the vaguest idea that he is a product of political Zionism and not a “race” of man. Those who DO come to realize this are now labelled with other area names and hidden traditions to avoid discovery and “marking”. The marking comes not from the neighbors and populace but from the Zionists themselves.

In an effort to “survive” they have frankly been assisted by this story of Six Million, which, almost like a religious myth, has stressed the need for greater Jewish racial solidarity. Unfortunately, it has worked in quite the opposite way for all other peoples, rendering them impotent in the struggle for self-preservation.

The aim in the following pages is quite simply to tell the Truth. The distinguished American historian, Harry Elmer Barnes, once wrote that “An attempt to make a competent, objective and truthful investigation of the extermination question.. .is surely the most precarious venture that an historian or demographer could undertake today.” In attempting this precarious task, it is hoped to make some contribution, not only to historical truth, but towards lifting the burden of a Lie from your own shoulders, so that you may freely confront the dangers which threaten you all.


Rightly or wrongly, the Germany of Adolf Hitler considered the Jews to be a disloyal and avaricious element within the national community, as well as a force of decadence in Germany’s cultural life. This was held to be particularly unhealthy since, during the Weimar period, the Jews had risen to a position of remarkable strength and influence in the nation, particularly in law, finance and the mass media, even though they constituted only 5 per cent of the population. The fact that Karl Marx was a Jew and that Jews such as Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebeknecht were disproportionately prominent in the leadership of revolutionary movements in Germany, also tended to convince the Nazis of the powerful internationalist and Communist tendencies of the Jewish people themselves.

It is no part of the discussion here to argue whether the German attitude to the Jews was right or not, or to judge whether its legislative measures against them were just or unjust. Our concern is simply with the fact that, believing of the Jews as they did, the Nazis solution to the problem was to deprive them of their influence within the nation by various legislative acts, and most important of all, to encourage their emigration from the country altogether. By 1939, the great majority of German Jews had emigrated, all of them with a sizeable proportion of their assets. Never at any time had the Nazi leadership even contemplated a policy of genocide towards them.


It is very significant, however, that certain Jews were quick to interpret these policies of internal discrimination as equivalent to extermination itself. A 1936 anti-German propaganda book by Leon Feuchtwanger and others entitled Der Gelbe Fleck: Die Ausrotung von 500,000 deutschen Juden [The Yellow Spot:The Extermination of 500,000 German Jews. Paris, 1936], presents a typical example. Despite its baselessness in fact, the annihilation of the Jews is discussed from the first pages-- straightforward emigration being regarded as the physical “extermination” for German Jewry. The Nazi concentration camps for political prisoners are also seen as potential instruments of genocide, and special reference is made to the 100 Jews still detained in Dachau in 1936, of whom 60 had been there since 1933. A further example was the sensational book by the German-Jewish Communist, Hans Beimler, called Four Weeks in the hands of Hitler’s hell-Hounds: The Nazi Murder Camp of Dachau, which was published in New York as early as 1933. Detained for his Marxist affiliations, he claimed that Dachau was a death camp, though by his own admission he was released after only a month there. The present regime in East Germany issues a Hans Beimler Award for services to Communism.

The fact that anti-Nazi genocide propaganda was being disseminated at this impossibly early date, therefore, by people biased on racial or political grounds, should suggest extreme caution to the independent-minded observer when approaching similar stories of the war period.

The encouragement of Jewish emigration should not be confused with the purpose of the concentration camps in pre-war Germany. These were used for the detention of political opponents and subversives--principally liberals, Social Democrats and Communists of all kinds, of whom a proportion were Jews such as Hans Beimler. Of course this was heinous, I make no note of any comment as to “rightness” of these actions but I am setting the record straight as to the “difference” of reasons for the various incidents and circumstances. Unlike the millions enslaved in the Soviet Union, the German concentration camp population was always quite small; Reitlinger admits that between 1934 and 1938 it seldom exceeded 20,000 throughout the whole of Germany, and the number of Jews was never more than 3,000. [The S.S.: Alibi of a Nation, London, 1956, p. 253.]



MON., NOV. 11, 1991 12:28P.M. YEAR5,DAY 087


The Nazi view of Jewish emigration was not limited to a negative policy of simple expulsion, but was formulated along the lines of modern Zionism. The founder of political Zionism in the 19th century, Theodore Herzl, in his work THE JEWISH STATE (please read that sentence again--Jewish (18th century) Zionism (19th century), had originally conceived of Madagascar as a national homeland for the Jews, and this possibility was seriously studied by the Nazis. It had been a main plank of the National Socialist party platform before 1933 and was published by the party in pamphlet form. This stated that the revival of Israel as a Jewish state was much less acceptable since it would result in perpetual war and disruption in the Arab world, which has indeed been the case. The Germans were not original in proposing Jewish emigration to Madagascar; the Polish Government had already considered the scheme in respect of their Jewish population, and in 1937 they sent the Michael Lepecki expedition to Madagascar, accompanied by Jewish representatives, to investigate the problems involved.

The first Nazi proposals for the Madagascar solution were made in association with the Schacht Plan of 1938. On the advice of Goering, Hitler agreed to send the President of the Reichsbank, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, to London for discussions with Jewish representatives Lord Bearsted and Mr. Rublee of New York (cf. Reitlinger, The Final Solution, London, 1953, p. 20). The plan was that German Jewish assets would be frozen as security for an international loan to finance Jewish emigration to Palestine, and Schacht reported on these negotiations to Hitler at Berchtesgaden on January 2, 1939. The plan, which failed due to British refusal to accept the financial terms, was first put forward on November 12, 1938 at a conference convened by Goering, who revealed that Hitler was already considering the emigration of Jews to a settlement in Madagascar (ibid. p. 21). Later, in December, Ribbentrop was told by M. Gorges Bonnet, the French Foreign Secretary, that the French Government itself was planning the evacuation of 10,000 Jews to Madagascar.

Prior to the Schacht Palestine proposals of 1938. which were essentially a protraction of discussions that had begun as early as 1935, numerous attempts had been made to secure Jewish emigration to other European nations, and these efforts culminated in the Evian Conference of July 1938. However, by 1939 the scheme of Jewish emigration to Madagascar had gained the most favor in German circles. It is true that in London Helmuth Wohltat of the German Foreign Office discussed limited Jewish emigration to Rhodesia and British Guiana as late as April 1939; but by January 24th, when Goering wrote to Interior Minister Frick ordering the creation of a Central Emigration Office for Jews, and commissioned Heydrich of the Reich Security Head Office to solve the Jewish problem “by means of emigration and evacuation”, the Madagascar Plan was being studied in earnest.

By 1939, the consistent efforts of the German Government to secure the departure of Jews from the Reich had resulted in the emigration of 400,000 German Jews from a total population of about 600,000, and an additional 480,000 emigrants from Austria and Czechoslovakia, which constituted almost their entire Jewish populations. This was accomplished through Offices of Jewish Emigration in Berlin, Vienna and Prague established by Adolf Eichmann, the head of the Jewish Investigation Office of the Gestapo. So eager were the Germans to secure this emigration that Eichmann even established a training center in Austria, where young Jews could learn farming in anticipation of being smuggled illegally to Palestine (Manvell & Frankl, S.S. AND GESTAPO, p. 60). Had Hitler cherished any intention of exterminating the Jews, it is inconceivable that he would have allowed more than 800,000 to leave Reich territory with the bulk of their wealth, much less considered plans for their mass emigration to Palestine or Madagascar. What is more, we shall see that the policy of emigration from Europe was still under consideration well into the war period, notably the Madagascar Plan, which Eichmann discussed in 1940 with French Colonial Office experts after the defeat of France had made the surrender of the colony a practical proposition.


With the coming of the war, the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force. On September 5, 1939, Chaim Weizmann, the principal Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world’s Jews, stating that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies... The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources etc....” (Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 8, 1939).


All Jews had thus been declared agents willing to prosecute a war against the German Reich, and as a consequence, Himmler and Heydrich were eventually to begin the policy of internment. It is worth noting that the United States and Canada had already interned all Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese descent in detention camps before the Germans applied the same security measures against the Jews of Europe. Moreover, there had been no such evidence or declaration of disloyalty by these Japanese Americans as had been given by Weizmann. The British, too, during the Boer War, interned all the women and children of the population, and thousands had died as a result, yet in no sense could the British be charged with wanting to exterminate the Boers.

The detention of Jews in the occupied territories of Europe served two essential purposes from the German viewpoint. The first was to prevent unrest and subversion; Himmler had informed Mussolini on October 11th, 1942, that German policy towards the Jews had altered during wartime entirely for reasons of military security. He complained that thousands of Jews in the occupied regions were conducting partisan warfare, sabotage and espionage, a view confirmed by official Soviet information given to Raymond Arthur Davis that no less than 35,000 European Jews were waging partisan war under Tito in Yugoslavia. As a result, Jews were to be transported to restricted areas and detention camps, both in Germany, and especially after March 1942 in the Government-General of Poland.

As the war proceeded, the policy developed of using Jewish detainees for labor in the war-effort. The question of labor is fundamental when considering the alleged plan of genocide against the Jews, for on grounds of logic alone the latter would entail the most senseless waste of manpower, time and energy while prosecuting a war of survival on two fronts. Certainly after the attack on Russia, the idea of compulsory labor had taken precedence over German plans for Jewish emigration. The protocol of a conversation between Hitler and the Hungarian regent Horthy on April 17th, 1943, reveals that the German leader personally requested Horthy to release 100,000 Hungarian Jews for work in the “pursuit-plane program” of the Luftwaffe at a time when the aerial bombardment of Germany was increasing (Reitlinger, DIE ENDLOSUNG, Berlin, 1945, p. 478). This took place at a time when, supposedly, the Germans were already seeking to exterminate the Jews, but Hitler’s request clearly demonstrates the priority aim of expanding his labor force.

In harmony with this program, concentration camps became, in fact, industrial complexes. At every camp where Jews and other nationalities were detained, there were large industrial plants and factories supplying material for the German war-effort--the Buna rubber factory at Bergen-Bergen, for example, Buna and I.G. Farben Industrie (Uh-oh--”Farben” again!) at Auschwitz, and the electrical firm of Siemens (oops!) at Ravensbruck (dear ones, these are Jewish!). In many cases, special concentration camp money notes were issued as payment for labor, enabling prisoners to buy extra rations from camp shops. The Germans were determined to obtain the maximum economic return from the concentration camp system, an object wholly at variance with any plan to exterminate millions of people in them. It was the function of the S.S. Economy and Administration Office, headed by Oswald Pohl, to see that the concentration camps became major industrial producers.


It is a remarkable fact, however, that well into the war period, the Germans continued to implement the policy of Jewish emigration. The fall of France in 1940 enabled the German Government to open serious negotiations with the French for the transfer of European Jews to Madagascar. A memorandum of August 1942 from Luther, Secretary-of-state in the German Foreign Office, reveals that he had conducted these negotiations between July and December 1940 when they were terminated by the French. A circular from Luther’s department dated August 15th, 1940 shows that the details of the German plan had been worked out by Eichmann, for it is signed by his assistant, Dannecker. Eichmann had, in fact, been commissioned in August to draw up a detailed Madagascar Plan and Dannecker was employed in research on Madagascar at the French Colonial Office (Reitlinger, THE FINAL SOLUTION, p. 77). The proposals of August 15th were that an inter-European bank was to finance the emigration of four million Jews throughout a phased program. Luther’s 1942 memorandum shows that Heydrich had obtained Himmler’s approval of this plan before the end of August and had also submitted it to Goering. It certainly met with Hitler's approval, for as early as June 17th his interpreter, Schmidt, recalls Hitler observing to Mussolini that “One could found a State of Israel in Madagascar” (Schmidt, HITLER'S INTERPRETER. London, 1951, p. 178).

Although the French terminated the Madagascar negotiations in December, 1940, Poliakov, the director of the Center of Jewish Documentation in Paris, admits that the Germans nevertheless pursued the scheme, and that Eichmann was still busy with it throughout 1941. Eventually, however, it was rendered impractical by the progress of the war, in particular by the situation after the invasion of Russia, and on February 10th, 1942, the Foreign Office was informed that the plan had been temporarily shelved. This ruling, sent to the Foreign Office by Luther's assistant, Rademacher, is of great importance, because it demonstrates conclusively that the term “Final Solution” meant only the emigration of Jews, and also that transportation to the eastern ghettos and concentration camps such as Auschwitz constituted nothing but an alternative plan of evacuation. The directive reads: “The war with the Soviet Union has in the meantime created the possibility of disposing of other territories for the Final Solution. In consequence the Fuhrer has decided that the Jews should be evacuated not to Madagascar but to the East. Madagascar need no longer therefore be considered in connection with the Final Solution” (Reitlinger, ibid. p. 79). The details of this evacuation had been discussed a month earlier at the Wannsee Conference in Berlin, which we shall examine below.

Reitlinger and Poliakov both make the entirely unfounded supposition that because the Madagascar Plan had been shelved, the Germans must necessarily have been thinking “extermination”. Only a month later, however, on March 7th, 1942, Goebbels wrote a memorandum in favor of the Madagascar Plan as a “final solution” of the Jewish question (Manvell & Frankl, DR. GOEBBELS, London, 1960, p. 165). In the meantime he approved of the Jews being “concentrated in the East”. Later Goebbels memoranda also stress deportation to the East (i.e., the Government-General of Poland) and lay emphasis on the need for compulsory labor there; once the policy of evacuation to the East had been inaugurated, the use of Jewish labor became a fundamental part of the operation. It is perfectly clear from the foregoing that the term “Final Solution” was applied both to Madagascar and to the Eastern territories, and that therefore it meant only the deportation of the Jews.

Even as late as May 1944, the Germans were prepared to allow the emigration of one million European Jews from Europe. An account of this proposal is given by Alexander Weissberg, a prominent Soviet Jewish scientist deported during the Stalin purges, in his book DIE GESCHICHTE VON JOEL BRAND (Cologne, 1956). Weissberg, who spent the war in Cracow though he expected the Germans to intern him in a concentration camp, explains that on the personal authorization of Himmler, Eichmann had sent the Budapest Jewish leader Joel Brand to Istanbul with an offer to the Allies to permit the transfer of one million European Jews in the midst of the war. (If the “extermination” writers are to be believed, there were scarcely one million Jews left by May, 1944). The Gestapo admitted that the transportation involved would greatly inconvenience the German war-effort, but were prepared to allow it in exchange for 10,000 trucks to be used exclusively on the Russian front. Unfortunately, the plan came to nothing; the British concluded that Brand must be a dangerous Nazi agent and immediately imprisoned him in Cairo, while the Press denounced the offer as a Nazi trick. Winston Churchill, though orating to the effect that the treatment of the Hungarian Jews was probably “the biggest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world,” nevertheless told Chaim Weizmann that acceptance of the Brand offer was impossible since it would be a betrayal of his Russian Allies. Although the plan was fruitless, it well illustrates that no one allegedly carrying out “thorough” extermination would permit the emigration of a million Jews, and it demonstrates, too, the prime importance placed by the Germans on the war-effort.


Statistics relating to Jewish populations are not everywhere known in precise detail, approximations for various countries differing widely, and it is also unknown exactly how many Jews were deported and interned at any one time between the years 1939-1945. In general, however, what reliable statistics there are, especially those relating to emigration, are sufficient to show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been exterminated.

In the first place, this claim cannot remotely be upheld on examination of the European Jewish population figures. According to CHAMBERS ENCYCLOPEDIA the total number of Jews living in pre-war Europe was some 6,500,000. Quite clearly, this would mean that almost the entire number were exterminated. But the Baseler Nachrichten, a neutral Swiss publication employing available Jewish statistical data, establishes that between 1933 and 1945, 1,500,000 Jews emigrated to Britain, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Australia, China, India, Palestine and the United States. This is confirmed by the Jewish journalist Bruno Blau, who cites the same figure in the New York Jewish paper Aufbau, August 13th, 1948. Of these emigrants, approximately 400,000 came from Germany before September 1939. This is acknowledged by the World Jewish Congress in its publication UNITY IN DISPERSION (p. 377), which states that: “The majority of the German Jews succeeded in leaving Germany before the war broke out.” In addition to the German Jews, 220,000 of the total 280,000 Austrian Jews had emigrated by September, 1939, while from March 1939 onwards the Institute for Jewish Emigration in Prague had secured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former Czechoslovakia. In all, only 360,000 Jews remained in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia after September 1939. From Poland, an estimated 500,000 had emigrated prior to the outbreak of war. These figures mean that the number of Jewish emigrants from other European countries (France, the Netherlands, Italy, the countries of eastern Europe, etc.) was approximately 120,000.

This exodus of Jews before and during hostilities, therefore, reduces the number of Jews in Europe to about 5,000,000. In addition to these emigrants, you must also include the number of Jews who fled to the Soviet Union after 1939, and who were later evacuated beyond reach of the German invaders. It will be shown below that the majority of these, about 1,250,000 were migrants from Poland. But apart from Poland, Reitlinger admits that 300,000 other European Jews slipped into Soviet territory between 1939 and 1941. This brings the total of Jewish emigrants to the Soviet Union to about 1,550,000. In Colliers magazine, June 9th, 1945, Freiling Foster, writing of the Jews in Russia, explained: “2,200,000 have migrated to the Soviet Union since 1939 to escape from the Nazis.” But the lower estimate is probably more accurate.

Jewish migration to the Soviet Union, therefore, reduces the number of Jews within the sphere of German occupation to around 3 1/2 million, about 3,450,000. From these should be deducted those Jews living in neutral European countries who escaped the consequences of the war. According to the 1942 WORLD ALMANAC p. 594), the number of Jews living in Gibraltar, Britain, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland and Turkey was 413,128.


A figure, consequently, of about 3 million Jews in German- occupied Europe is as accurate as the available emigration statistics will allow. Approximately the same number, however, can be deduced in another way if you examine statistics for the Jewish population remaining in countries occupied by the Reich. More than half of those Jews who migrated to the Soviet Union after 1939 came from Poland. It is frequently claimed that the war with Poland added some 3 million Jews to the German sphere of influence and that almost the whole of this Polish Jewish population was “exterminated”. This is a major factual error. The 1931 Jewish population census for Poland put the number of Jews at 2,732,600 (Reitlinger, DIE ENDLOSUNG. p. 36). Reitlinger states that at least 1, 170,000 of these were in the Russian zone occupied in the autumn of 1939, about a million of whom were evacuated to the Urals and south Siberia after the German invasion of June 1941 (ibid. p. 50). As described above, an estimated 500,000 Jews had emigrated from Poland prior to the war. Moreover, the journalist Raymond Arthur Davis, who spent the war in the Soviet Union, observed that approximately 250,000 had already fled from German-occupied Poland to Russia between 1939 and 1941 and were to be encountered in every Soviet province (ODYSSEY THROUGH HELL, N.Y., 1946). Subtracting these figures from the population of 2,732,600, therefore, and allowing for the normal population increase, no more than 1,100,000 Polish Jews could have been under German rule at the end of 1939. (GUTACHEN DES INSTITUTS FUR ZEITGESCHICHTE, Munich, 1956, p. 80).

To this number we may add the 360,000 Jews remaining in Germany, Austria and former Czechoslovakia (Bohemia Moravia and Slovakia) after the extensive emigration from those countries prior to the war described above. Of the 320,000 French Jews, the Public Prosecutor representing that part of the indictment relating to France at the Nuremberg Trials, stated that 120,000 Jews were deported, though Reitlinger estimates only about 50,000. Thus the total number of Jews under Nazi rule remains below two million. Deportations from the Scandinavian countries were few, and from Bulgaria none at all. When the Jewish populations of Holland (140,000), Belgium (40,000), Italy (50,000), Yugoslavia (55,000), Hungary (380,000) and Rumania (720,000) are included, the figure does not much exceed 3 million. This excess is due to the fact that the latter figures are pre-war estimates unaffected by emigration, which from these countries accounted for about 120,000 (see above). This cross-checking, therefore, confirms the estimate of approximately 3 million European Jews under German occupation.


The precise figures concerning Russian Jews are unknown, and have therefore been the subject of extreme exaggeration. The Jewish statistician Jacob Leszczynski states that in 1939 there were 2,100,000 Jews living in future German-occupied Russia, i.e., western Russia. In addition, some 260,000 lived in the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. According to Louis Levine, President of the American Jewish Council for Russian Relief, who made a post-war tour of the Soviet Union and submitted a report on the status of Jews there, the majority of these numbers were evacuated east after the German armies launched their invasion. In Chicago, on October 30, 1946, he declared that: “At the outset of the war, Jews were amongst the first evacuated from the western regions threatened by the Hitlerite invaders, and shipped to safety east of the Urals. Two million Jews were thus saved.” This high number is confirmed by the Jewish journalist David Bergelson, who wrote in the Moscow Yiddish paper Ainikeit, Dec. 5th, 1942, that “thanks to the evacuation, the majority (80%) of the Jews in the Ukraine, White Russia, Lithuania and Latvia before the arrival of the Germans were rescued, Reitlinger agrees with the Jewish authority Joseph Schechtmann, who admits that huge numbers were evacuated, though he estimates a slightly higher number of Russian and Baltic Jews left under_German occupation, between 650,000 and 850,000 (Reitlinger, THE FINAL SOLUTION, p. 499). In respect of these Soviet Jews remaining in German territory, it will be proved later that in the war in Russia no more than one hundred thousand persons were killed by the German Action Groups as partisans and Bolshevik commissars, not all of whom were Jews. By contrast, the partisans themselves claimed to have murdered five times that number of German troops.


It is clear, therefore, that the Germans could not possibly have gained control over or exterminated anything like six million Jews. Excluding the Soviet Union, the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after emigration was scarcely more than 3 million, by no means all of whom were interned. To approach the extermination of even half of six million would have meant the liquidation of every Jew living in Europe. And yet it is known that large numbers of Jews were alive in Europe after 1945. Philip Friedmann in THEIR BROTHER’S KEEPERS (N.Y., 1957, p. 13), states that “at least a million Jews survived in the very crucible of the Nazi hell”, while the official figure of the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee is 1,559,600. Thus, even if one accepts the latter estimate, the number of possible wartime Jewish deaths could not have exceeded a limit of one and a half million. Precisely this conclusion was reached by the reputable journal BASELER NACHRICHTEN of neutral Switzerland. In an article entitled “Wie hoch ist die Zahl der judischen Opfer? (How high is the number of Jewish victims?, June 13th, 1946), it explained that purely on the basis of the population and emigration figures described above, a maximum of only one and a half million Jews could be numbered as casualties. Later on, however, it will be demonstrated conclusively that the number was actually far less, for the Baseler Nachrichten accepted the Joint Distribution Committee’s figure of 1,559,600 survivors after the war, but you shall see that the number of claims for compensation by Jewish survivors is more than double that figure. This information was not available to the Swiss in 1946.

Let us break at this point so that the segment doesn’t get too lengthy. I also suggest that you take a break. Thank you for your service.

I only ask that you readers hear us out before your draw conclusions. This is a most important factor in discerning who brings truth and who is controlling your very information resources. Please read with reason, logic and an open mind for you may be surprised to find that history is frequently warped to meet the needs of “master planners”. May insight be your gift in this reading and may each be guided by that reason within. Survival of a planet in freedom rests on your discernment and wisdom.

Hatonn to clear, please. Good-day.



TUE., NOV. 12, 1991 11:58 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 088



Dharma, since we are so pressed for time this day I ask that we move right into the subject in point. The “watch” would be mundane at any rate. I note the leading news is that you have sent representatives to the Soviets to “set up a central bank for the Soviet people”. The poor Soviets have to use “cash” for everything and “...the Soviet Union cannot move into a new world society unless there can be freeing of funds through loans to fund business, etc., etc., etc.” Good luck, world.

Let’s get back to the lie of 6 million Jews killed in a so-called Holocaust.


Indisputable evidence is also provided by the post-war world Jewish population statistics. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war, the New York Times, Feb. 22, 1948 placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000 and a maximum of 18,700,000. Quite obviously, these figures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but “thousands”. Sixteen and a half million in 1938 minus the alleged six million leaves ten million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world’s Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years. This is patently ridiculous.

It would appear, therefore, that the great majority of the missing “six million” were in fact emigrants--emigrants to European countries, to the Soviet Union and the United States before, during and after the war. And emigrants also, in vast numbers to Palestine during and especially at the end of the war. After 1945, boat-loads of these Jewish survivors entered Palestine illegally from Europe, causing considerable embarrassment to the British Government of the time; indeed so great were the numbers that the H.M. Stationery Office publication No. 190 (Nov. 5, 1946) described them as “almost amounting to a second Exodus”. It was these emigrants to all parts of the world who had swollen the world Jewish population to between 15 and 18 million by 1948, and probably the greatest part of them were emigrants to the United States who entered in violation of the quota laws. On Aug. 16th, 1963 David Ben Gurion, President of Israel, stated that although the official Jewish population of America was said to be 5,600,000, “the total number would not be estimated too high at 9,000,000” (Deutsche Wechenzeftung, Nov. 23rd, 1963). Now, chelas, I don’t care WHO you are-- you cannot have it both ways but, obviously you-the-world have bitten on all fronts and on all figures depending upon the convenient arithmetic. Now why would Ben Gurion use such nice high numbers if it were not true? Well, let’s see--the reason for this high figure is underlined by Albert Maisal in his article “Our Newest Americans” (Readers Digest, Jan. 1957), for he reveals that “Soon after World War II, by Presidential decree, 90 per cent of all quota visas for central and eastern Europe were issued to the uprooted.”

Now how about other methods of counting, etc. It seems that thousands upon thousands of names began to appear in the obituary columns and most specifically in the columns of Aufbau, the Jewish American weekly published in New York. Jewish emigrants to the United States subsequently changed their names. In the records, however, it had to show “formerly” XXX, as example: Arthur Kingsley [formerly Dr. Konigsberger of Frankfurt]. Could it be that some or all of these people whose names are “deceased” were included in the missing six million in Europe?


From the foregoing it would seem certain that the figure of six million murdered Jews amounts to nothing more than a vague compromise between several quite baseless estimates; there is not a shred of documentary evidence for it that is trustworthy. Occasionally, writers narrow it down to give a disarming appearance of authenticity. Lord Russell of Liverpool, for example, in his The Scourge of the Swastika (London, 1954) claimed that “Not less than five million Jews died in German concentration camps,” having satisfied himself that he was somewhere between those who estimated 6 million and those who preferred 4 million. But, he admitted, “The real number will never be known.” If so, it is difficult to know how he could have asserted “not less than five million”. The Joint Distribution Committee favors 5,012,000 but the Jewish “expert” Reitlinger suggests a novel figure of 4,192,200 “missing Jews” of whom an estimated one third died of natural causes. Perhaps this “missing” and “natural causes” could be lumped in with the “Eisenhower’s Death Camps” among other losses. I shall have to later refresh your minds regarding your own death camps” where documentation is more fully available.

At any rate the above numbers would indicate a reduction of the number deliberately “exterminated” to a “possible” 2,796,000. However, Dr. M. Perlzweig, the New York delegate to a World Jewish Congress press conference held at Geneva in 1948 stated: “The price of the downfall of National Socialism and Fascism is the fact that seven million Jews lost their lives thanks to cruel Anti-Semitism.” Here again, you have this newly originated gross error in semantics. These so-called Jews are NOT Semites! In the Press and elsewhere, the figure is often casually lifted to eight million or sometimes even nine million. Do any of you have any concept of 9 million people? I agree that ONE is too many to be slain and moreover, how dare ones defile that ONE by lying about 6 million?? The facts are, and we have proved it, none of these figures are in the remotest degree plausible or possible, indeed, they are totally ridiculous!


So far as is known, the first accusation against the Germans of the mass murder of Jews in war-time Europe was made by the Polish Jew Rafael Lemkin in his book AXIS RULE IN OCCUPIED EUROPE, published in New York in 1943. Somewhat coincidentally, Lemkin was later to draw up the U.N. Genocide Convention, which seeks to outlaw “racialism”. His book claimed that the Nazis had destroyed millions of Jews, perhaps as many as six millions. This, by 1943, would have been remarkable indeed, since the action was allegedly started only in the summer of 1942. At such a rate, the entire world Jewish population would have been exterminated by 1945.

After the war, propaganda estimates spiralled to heights even more fantastic. Kurt Gerstein, an anti-Nazi who claimed to have infiltrated the S.S., told the French interrogator Raymond Cartier that he knew that no less than forty million concentration camp internees had been gassed. (How many of you can relate to 40 million?) In his first signed memorandum of April 26th, 1945, he reduced the figure to 25 million, but even this was too bizarre for French Intelligence and in his second memorandum, signed at Rottweil on May 4th, 1945, he brought the figure closer to the six million preferred at the Nuremberg Trials. Gerstein’s sister was congenitally insane and died by euthanasia, which may well suggest a streak of mental instability in Gerstein himself but, of course, that is only pure speculation--perhaps he just couldn’t count. He had, in fact, been convicted in 1936 of sending eccentric mail through the post. After his two confessions” he hanged himself at Cherche Midi Prison in Paris--or so the story goes.

Gerstein alleged that during the war he passed on information concerning the murder of Jews to the Swedish Government through a German baron, but for some inexplicable reason his report was “filed away and forgotten”. He also claimed that in August 1942 he informed the Papal nuncio in Berlin about the whole “extermination Program”, but the reverend person merely told him to “Get out”. The Gerstein statements abound with claims to have witnessed the most gigantic mass executions (twelve thousand in a single day at Belzec), while the second memorandum describes a visit by Hitler to a concentration camp in Poland on June 6th, 1942 which is known never to have taken place. Shades of “October Surprise”!?

Gerstein’s fantastic exaggerations have done little but discredit the whole notion of mass extermination. Indeed, the Evangelical Bishop Wilhelm Dibelius of Berlin denounced his memoranda as Untrustworthy (H. Rothfels, Augenzeugenbericht zu den Massenvergasungen” in Vierteljahrshefte fur Zeitgeschichte , April 1955). This is only important because Gerstein was “one of them”. It is an incredible fact, however, that in spite of this denunciation, the German Government in 1955 issued an edition of the second Gerstein memorandum for distribution in German schools (Dokementation zur Masenvergasung, Bonn, 1955). In it they stated that Dibelius placed his special confidence in Gerstein and that the memoranda were “valid beyond any doubt”. This is a striking example of the way in which the baseless charge of genocide by the Nazis is perpetuated in Germany, and directed especially to the youth.

The story of six million Jews exterminated during the war was given final authority at the Nuremberg Trials by the statement of Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl. He had been an assistant of Eichmanns, but was in fact a rather strange person in the service of American Intelligence who had written several books under the pseudonym of Walter Hagen. Hoettl also worked for Soviet espionage, collaborating with two Jewish emigrants from Vienna, Perger and Verber, who acted as U.S. officers during the preliminary inquiries of the Nurenberg Trials. It is remarkable that the testimony of this highly dubious person Hoettl is said to constitute the only “proof” regarding the murder of six million Jews. In his affidavit of November 26th, 1945 he stated, not that he knew but that Eichmann had “told him” in August 1944 in Budapest that a total of 6 million Jews had been exterminated. Needless to say, Eichmann never corroborated this claim at his trial. Hoettl was working as an American spy during the whole of the latter period of the war, and it is therefore very odd indeed that he never gave the slightest hint to the Americans of a policy to murder Jews, even though he worked directly under Heydrich and Eichmann.


It should be emphasized straight away that there is not a single document in existence which proves that the Germans intended to, or carried out, the deliberate murder of Jews. In Poliakov and Wulf’s Das Dritte Reich und die Juden: Dokumente and Aufsatze (Berlin, 1955), the most that they can assemble are statements extracted after the war from people like Hoettl, Ohlendorf and Wisliceny, the latter under torture in a Soviet prison. In the absence of any evidence, therefore, Poliakov was forced to write: “The three or four people chiefly involved in drawing up the plan for total extermination are dead, and no documents survive.” This seems very convenient. Quite obviously, both the plan and the “three or four” people are nothing but nebulous assumptions on the part of the writer, and are entirely unprovable. Doesn’t this sound a bit like read my lips? and/or Ollie North did it ALL!?

The documents which do survive, of course, make no mention at all of extermination, so that writers like Poliakov and Reitlinger again make the convenient assumption that such orders were generally “verbal”. Though lacking any documentary proof, they assume that a plan to murder Jews must have originated in 1941, coinciding with the attack on Russia. Phase one of the plan is alleged to have involved the massacre of Soviet Jews, a claim we shall later disprove. The rest of the program is supposed to have begun in March 1942, with the deportation and concentration of European Jews in the eastern camps of the Polish Government-General, such as the giant industrial complex at Auschwitz near Cracow. The fantastic and quite groundless assumption throughout is that transportation to the East supervised by Eichmann’s department, actually meant immediate extermination in ovens on arrival.

According to Manvell and Frankl (HEINRICH HIMMLER, London, 1965), the policy of genocide “seems to have been arrived at” after “secret discussions” between Hitler and Himmler (p. 118), though they fail to prove it, Reitlinger and Poliakov guess along similar “verbal” lines, adding that no one else was allowed to be present at these discussions, and no records were ever kept of them. This is the purest invention, for there is not a shred of evidence that even suggests such outlandish meetings took place. William Shirer, in his generally wild and irresponsible book THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH, is similarly muted on the subject of documentary proof. He states weakly that Hitler’s supposed order for the murder of Jews apparently was never committed to paper--at least no copy of it has yet been unearthed. It was probably given verbally to Goering, Himmler and Heydrich, who passed it on down....” (p. 1148).

A typical example of the kind of “proof” quoted in support of the extermination legend is given by Manvell and Frankl. They cite a memorandum of 31st July 1941 sent by Goering to Heydrich, who headed the Reich Security Head Office and was Himmler’s deputy. Significantly, the memorandum begins: Supplementing the task that was assigned to you on 24th Jan. 1939 to solve the Jewish problem by means of emigration and evacuation in the best possible way according to present conditions...” The supplementary task assigned in the memorandum is a “total solution (Gesamtlosung) of the Jewish question within the area of German influence in Europe”, which the authors admit means concentration in the East, and it requests preparations for the “organizational, financial, and material matters” involved. The memorandum then requests a future plan for the “desired final solution” (Endlosung), which clearly refers to the ideal and ultimate scheme of emigration and evacuation mentioned at the beginning of the directive. No mention whatever is made of murdering people, but Manvell and Frankl assure you that this is what the memorandum is really about. Again, of course, the “true nature” of the final as distinct from the total solution “was made known to Heydrich by Goering verbally” (Ibid. p. 118). The convenience of these “verbal” directives issuing back and forth is obvious.


The final details of the plan to exterminate Jews were supposed to have been made at a conference at Gross Wannsee in Berlin on 20th January 1942 presided over by Heydrich (Poliakov, Das Dritte Reich und die Juden, p. 120 ff; Reitlinger, THE FINAL SOLUTION, p. 95 ff). Officials of all German Ministries were present, and Muller and Eichmann represented Gestapo Head Office. Reitlinger and Manvell and Frankl consider the minutes of this conference to be their trump card in proving the existence of a genocide plan, but the truth is that no such plan was even remotely mentioned, and what is more, they freely admit this. Manvell and Frankl explain it away rather lamely by saying that “The minutes are shrouded in the form of officialdom that cloaks the real significance of the words and terminology that are used” (THE INCOMPARABLE CRIME, London, 1967, p. 46), which really means that they intend to interpret them in their own way. What Heydrich actually said was that, as in the memorandum quoted above, he had been commissioned by Goering to arrange a solution to the Jewish problem. He reviewed the history of Jewish emigration, stated that the war had rendered the Madagascar project impractical, and continued: “The emigration program has been replaced now by the evacuation of Jews to the east as a further possible solution, in accordance with the previous authorization of the Fuhrer.” Here, he explained, their labor was to be utilized. All this is supposed to be deeply sinister, and pregnant with the hidden meaning that the Jews were to be exterminated, though Prof. Paul Rassinier, a Frenchman interned at Buchenwald who has done sterling work in refuting the myth of the Six Million, explains that it means precisely what it says, i.e., the concentration of the Jews for labor in the immense eastern ghetto of the Polish Government-General. “There they were to wait until the end of the war, for the re-opening of international discussions which would decide their future. This decision was finally reached at the interministerial Berlin-Wannsee conference...” (Rassinier, Le Meritable Proces Eichmann, p. 20). Manvell and Frankl, however, remain undaunted by the complete lack of reference to extermination. At the Wannsee conference, they write, “Direct references to killing were avoided, Heydrich favoring the term “Arbeitseinsatz im Ossten” (Labor assignment in the East) (HEINRICH HIMMLER, P. 209). Why you should not accept labor assignment in the East to mean labor assignment in the East is not explained.

According to Reitlinger and others, innumerable directives actually specifying extermination then passed between Himmler, Heydrich, Eichmann and commandant Hoess in the subsequent months of 1942, but of course, “none have survived”.


The complete lack of documentary evidence to support the existence of an extermination plan has led to the habit of reinterpreting the documents that do survive. For example, it is held that a document concerning deportation is not about deportation at all, but a cunning way of talking about extermination. Man- veil and Frankl state that “various terms were used to camouflage genocide. These included “Aussiedlung” (desettlement) and “Abberforderung” (removal)” (ibid. p. 265). Thus, as you will have already seen, words are no longer assumed to mean what they say if they prove too inconvenient. This is a very good knack that the Khazarian Zionists have to mislead, disinform and mock you--they simply change the meanings of terms and you end up too confused to realize you have been “had”.

This kind of thing is taken to the most incredible extremes, such as their interpretation of Heydrich’s directive for labor assignment in the East. Another example is a reference to Himmler’s order for sending deportees to the East, that is having them killed” (ibid. p. 251). Reitlinger, equally at a loss for evidence, does exactly the same, declaring that from the “circumlocutionary” words of the Wannsee conference it is obvious that “the slow murder of an entire race was intended” (ibid. p. 98).

A review of the documentary situation is important, because it reveals the edifice of guesswork and baseless assumptions upon which the extermination legend is built. The Germans had an extra-ordinary propensity for recording everything on paper in the most careful detail, yet among the thousands of captured documents of the S.S. and Gestapo, the records of the Reich Security Head Office, the files of Himmler’s headquarters and Hitler's own war directives there is not a single order for the extermination of Jews or anyone else. It will be seen later that this has, in fact, been admitted by the World Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv. Attempts to find “veiled allusions” to genocide in speeches like that of Himmler's to his S.S. Obergruppenfuhrers at Posen in 1943 are likewise quite hopeless. Nuremberg statements extracted after the war, invariably under duress, are examined in the following chapter.

Let us leave this for now as we have a meeting to attend. Thank you.

Hatonn to clear, please.



WED., NOV. 13, 1991 10:12 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 089


I wish to move right straight into the subject of the errors of the so-called “Holocaust”. We are dealing, now, with numbers-- which cannot possibly be correct and we shall set that to right in this JOURNAL so that we can then move on to the happenings as they occurred and how these distortions came to be accepted. I do not, however, desire that any JOURNAL be allowed to go over the approximate 200 pages in length for readers become restless and inattentive with long dissertations. It also allows us to more rapidly get information into hands while we are continuing the dialogue. I ask that the “Readers” give us approximation of content so that we come within the proper guidelines. I do wish to finish the “numbers game” in this volume so we may end up a bit over the average. We do need to have continuity of thought segments.

Let us take up the information produced at that most heinous misgiving of justice which has ever hit the world courts. What was done at Nuremberg is the blackest mark against a judicial system and against innocent men that has ever been known since the dark ages. WAR is evil and yet, the incredible persecution was basically the work of the Jews own brotherhood and yet, Germans paid with their lives for basically following orders and were accused, and are still accused, convicted and executed without evidence. Were these evil doings right? No, but two wrongs do not make one right, it only compounds the “wrong”. If you work on the same judicial basis--Eisenhower and Churchill both should have been executed!!! Their crimes were far more heinous and deliberate. War and power over people is AGAINST GOD IN ANY SETTING AND ALL ARE LOSERS. THERE ARE NO WINNERS IN WAR!


The story of the Six Million was given judicial authority at the Nuremberg Trials of German leaders between 1945 and 1949, proceedings which proved to be the most disgraceful legal farce in history. For a far more detailed study of the iniquities of these trials which, as Field Marshal Montgomery said, made it a crime to lose a war, the reader is referred to the works cited below, and particularly to the outstanding book ADVANCE TO BARBARISM (Nelson, 1953), by the distinguished English jurist, F.J.P. Veale.

From the very outset, the Nuremberg Trials proceeded on the basis of gross statistical errors. In his speech of indictment on November 20th, 1945, Mr. Sidney Alderman declared that there had been 9,600,000 Jews living in German occupied Europe. Our earlier study has shown this figure to be wildly inaccurate. It is arrived at (a) by completely ignoring all Jewish emigration between 1933 and 1945, and (b) by adding all the Jews of Russia, including the two million or more who were never in German occupied territory. The same inflated figure, slightly enlarged to 9,800,000 was produced again at the Eichmann Trial in Israel by Prof. Shalom Baron.

The alleged Six Million victims first appeared as the foundation for the prosecution at Nuremberg, and after some dalliance with ten million or more by the Press at the time, it eventually gained international popularity and acceptance. It is very significant, however, that although this outlandish figure was able to win credence in the reckless atmosphere of recrimination in 1945, it had become no longer tenable by 1961, at the Eichmann Trial. The Jerusalem court studiously avoided mentioning the figure of Six Million, and the charge drawn up by Mr. Gideon Haussner simply said “some” millions.


Should anyone be misled into believing that the extermination of the Jews was “proved” at Nuremberg by “evidence”, he should consider the nature of the Trials themselves, based as they were on a total disregard of sound legal principles of any kind. The accusers acted as prosecutors, judges and executioners; “guilt” was assumed from the outset. (Among the judges, of course, were the Russians, whose numberless crimes included the massacre of 15,000 Polish officers, a proportion of whose bodies were discovered by the Germans at Katyn Forest, near Smoleask. The Soviet Prosecutor attempted to blame this slaughter on the German defendants.) At Nuremberg, ex post facto legislation was CREATED, whereby men were tried for “crimes” which were only declared crimes after they had been allegedly committed. Hitherto it had been the most basic legal principle that a person could only be convicted for infringing a law that was in force at the time of the infringement. “NULLA POENA SINE LEGE.”

The Rules of Evidence, developed by British jurisprudence over the centuries in order to arrive at the truth of a charge with as much certainty as possible, were entirely disregarded at Nuremberg. It was decreed that “the Tribunal should not be bound by technical rules of evidence” but could admit “any evidence which it deemed to have probative value”, that is, would support a conviction. In practice, this meant the admittance of hearsay evidence and documents, which in a normal judicial trial are always rejected as untrustworthy. That such evidence was allowed is of profound significance, because it was one of the principal methods by which the extermination legend was fabricated through fraudulent “written affidavits”. Although only 240 witnesses were called in the course of the Trials, no less than 300,000 of these “written affidavits” were accepted by the Court as supporting the charges, without this evidence being heard under oath. Under these circumstances, any Jewish deportee or camp inmate could make any revengeful allegation that he pleased. Most incredible of all, perhaps, was the fact that defense lawyers at Nuremberg were not permitted to cross-examine prosecution witnesses. A somewhat similar situation prevailed at the trial of Adolf Eichmann, when it was announced that Eichmann’s defence lawyer could be cancelled at any time if an intolerable situation should arise, which presumably meant if his lawyer started to prove his innocence.

The real background of the Nuremberg Trials was exposed by the American Judge, Justice Wenersturm, President of one of the Tribunals. He was so disgusted by the proceedings that he resigned his appointment and flew home to America, leaving behind a statement to the Chicago Tribune which enumerated point by point his objections to the Trials (cf. Mark Lautern, Das Letzie Worth uber Nurnberg, p. 56). Points 3-8 are as follows:

3. The members of the department of the Public Prosecutor, instead of trying to formulate and reach a new guiding legal principle, were moved only by personal ambition and revenge.

4. The prosecution did its utmost in every way possible to prevent the defense preparing its case and to make it impossible for it to furnish evidence.

5. The prosecution, led by General Taylor, did everything in its power to prevent the unanimous decision of Military Court being carried out, i.e., to ask Washington to furnish and make available to the court further documentary evidence in the possession of the American Government.

6. Ninety percent of the Nuremberg Court consisted of biased persons who, either on political or racial grounds, furthered the prosecution’s case.

7. The prosecution obviously knew how to fill all the administrative posts of the Military Court with Americans” whose naturalization certificates were very new indeed, and who, whether in the administrative service or by their translations, etc., created an atmosphere hostile to the accused persons.

8. The real aim of the Nuremberg Trials was to show the Germans the crimes of their Fuhrer, and this aim was at the same time the pretext on which the trials were ordered...Had I known seven months earlier what was happening at Nuremberg, I would never have gone there.

Concerning Point 6, that ninety per cent of the Nuremberg Court consisted of people biased on racial or political grounds, this was a fact confirmed by others present. According to Earl Carrol, an American lawyer, sixty per cent of the staff of the Public Prosecutor’s Office were German Jews who had left Germany after the promulgation of Hitler’s Race Laws. He observed that not even ten per cent of the Americans employed at the Nuremberg courts were actually Americans by birth. The chief of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, who worked behind General Taylor, was Robert M. Kempner, a German-Jewish emigrant. He was assisted by Morris Amchan. Mark Lautern, who observed the Trials, writes in his book: “They have all arrived: the Solomons, the Schlossbergers and the Rabinovitches, members of the Public Prosecutor’s staff.. .(ibid. p. 68). It is obvious from these facts that the fundamental legal principle: that no man can sit in judgment on his own case, was abandoned altogether. Moreover, the majority of witnesses were also Jews. According to Prof. Maurice Bardeche, who was also an observer at the Trials, the only concern of these witnesses was not to show their hatred too openly, and to try and give an impression of objectivity (Nuremberg ou la Terre Promise, Paris, 1948, p. 149).


Altogether more disturbing, however, were the methods employed to extract statements and confessions” at Nuremberg, particularly those from S.S. officers which were used to support the extermination charge. The American Senator, Joseph McCarthy, in a statement given to the American Press on May 20th, 1949, (and this, as much as any ‘communist investigations was his personal downfall), drew attention to the following cases of torture to secure such confessions. In the prison of the Swabisch Hall, he stated, officers of the S.S. Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler were flogged until they were soaked in blood, after which their sexual organs were trampled on as they lay prostate on the ground. As in the notorious Malmedy Trials of private soldiers, the prisoners were hoisted in the air and beaten until they signed the confessions demanded of them. On the basis of such “confessions” extorted from S.S. Generals Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Paiper, the Leibstandarte was convicted as a “guilty organization”. S.S. General Oswald Pohl, the economic administrator of the concentration camp system, had his face smeared with feces and was subsequently beaten until he supplied his confession. In dealing with these cases, Senator McCarthy told the Press:

I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived in sick brains. They were subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticize us severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our moral integrity.”

The methods of intimidation described were repeated during trials at Frankfurt-am-Mein and at Dachau, and large numbers of Germans were convicted for atrocities on the basis of their admissions.. The American Judge Edward L. van Roden, one of the three members of the Simpson Army Commission which was subsequently appointed to investigate the methods of justice at the Dachau trials, revealed the methods by which these admissions were secured in the Washington Daily News, January 9th, 1949. His account also appeared in the British newspaper, the Sunday Pictorial, January 23rd, 1949. The methods he described were: “Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoner’s fingernails; knocking out the teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations.” Van Roden explained: “The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months...The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses...All but two Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators.” Are you readers STILL UNDER THE DELUSION THAT THE JEWISH ISRAELI MOSSAD ARE NICE PEOPLE?

The “American” investigators responsible (and who later functioned as the prosecution in the trials) were: Lt. Col. Burton F. Ellis (chief of the War Crimes Committee) and his assistants, Capt. Raphael Shumacker, Lt Robert E. Byrne, Lt. William R. Perl, Mr. Morris Ellowitz, Mr. Harry Thon, and Mr. Kirschbaum. The legal adviser of the court was Col. A.H. Rosenfeld. The reader will immediately appreciate from their names that the majority of these people were “biased on racial grounds” in the words of Justice Wenersturm--that is, were Jewish, and therefore should never have been involved in any such investigation.

Despite the fact that “confessions” pertaining to the extermination of the Jews were extracted under these conditions, Nuremberg statements are still regarded as conclusive evidence for the Six Million by writers like Reitlinger and others, and the illusion is maintained that the Trials were both impartial and impeccably fair. When General Taylor, the Chief Public Prosecutor, was asked where he had obtained the figure of the Six Million, he replied that it was based on the confession of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf. He, too, was tortured and his case is examined below. But as far as such “confessions” in general are concerned, we can do no better than quote the British Sunday Pictorial when reviewing the report of Judge van Roden: “Strong men were reduced to broken wrecks ready to mumble any admission demanded by their prosecutors.”


At this point, let us turn to some of the Nuremberg documents themselves. The document quoted most frequently in support of the legend of the Six Million, and which figures largely in Poliakov and Wulf’s Das Dritte Reich and die Juden Dokumente and Aufsatze, is the statement of S.S. Captain Dieter Wisliceny, an assistant in Adolf Eichmann’s office and later the Gestapo chief in Slovakia. It was obtained under conditions even more extreme than those described above, for Wisliceny fell into the hands of Czech Communists (Khazarian Zionists) and was “interrogated” at the Soviet-controlled Bratislava Prison in November, 1946. Subjected to torture, Wisliceny was reduced to a nervous wreck and became addicted to uncontrollable fits of sobbing for hours on end prior to his execution. Although the conditions under which his statement was obtained empty it entirely of all plausibility, Poliakov prefers to ignore this and merely writes: “In prison he wrote several memoirs that contain information of great interest” (HARVEST OF HATE, p. 3). These memoirs include some genuine statements of fact to provide authenticity, such as that Himmler was an enthusiastic advocate of Jewish emigration and that the emigration of Jews from Europe continued throughout the war, but in general they are typical of the Communist-type “confession” produced at Soviet show-trials. Frequent reference is made to exterminating Jews and a flagrant attempt is made to implicate as many S.S. leaders as possible. Factual errors are also common, notably the statement that the war with Poland added more than 3 million Jews to the German-occupied territory, which we have disproved above.


The Wisliceny statement deals at some length with the activities of the Einsatzgruppen or Action Groups used in the Russian campaign. These must merit a detailed consideration in the survey of Nuremberg because the picture presented of them at the Trials represents a kind of “Six Million” in miniature, i.e., has been proved since to be the most enormous exaggeration and falsification. The Einsatzgruppen were four special units drawn from the Gestapo and the S.D. (S.S. Security Service) whose task was to wipe out partisans and Communist commissars in the wake of the advancing German armies in Russia. As Early as 1939, there had been 34,000 of these political commissars attached to the Red Army. The activities of the Einsatzgruppen were the particular concern of the Soviet Prosecutor Rudenko at the Nuremberg Trials. The 1947 indictment of the four groups alleged that in the course of their operations they had killed not less than one million Jews in Russia merely because they were Jews.

These allegations have since been elaborated; it is now claimed that the murder of Soviet Jews by the Einsatzgruppen constituted Phase One in the plan to exterminate the Jews. Phase Two being the transportation of European Jews to Poland. Reitlinger admits that the original term “final solution” referred to emigration and had nothing to do with the liquidation of Jews, but he then claims that an extermination policy began at the time of the invasion of Russia in 1941. He considers Hitler’s order of July 1941 for the liquidation of the Communist commissars, and he concludes that this was accompanied by a verbal order from Hitler for the Einsatzgruppen to liquidate all Soviet Jews (Die Endlosung, p. 91). If this assumption is based on anything at all, it is probably the worthless Wisliceny statement, which alleges that the Einsatzgruppen were soon receiving orders to extend their task of crushing communists and partisans to a “general massacre” of Russian Jews.

It is very significant that, once again, it is a “verbal order” for exterminating Jews that is supposed to have accompanied Hitler’s genuine, written order--yet another nebulous and unprovable assumption on the part of Reitlinger. An earlier order from Hitler, dated March 1941 and signed by Field Marshal Keitel, makes it quite clear what the real tasks of the future Einsatzgruppen would be. It states that in the Russian campaign, the Reichsfuhrer S.S. (Himmler) is to be entrusted with “tasks for the preparation of the political administration, tasks which result from the struggle which has to be carried out between two opposing political systems” (Manvell & Frankl, ibid. p. 115). This plainly refers to eliminating Communism, especially the political commissars whose specific task was Communist indoctrination.


The most revealing trial in the “Einsatzgruppen Case” at Nuremberg was that of S.S. General Otto Ohlendorf, the chief of the S.D. who commanded Einsatzgruppe D in the Ukraine, attached to Field Marshal von Manstein’s Eleventh Army. During the last phase of the war he was employed as a foreign trade expert in the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf was one of those subjected to torture described earlier, and in his affidavit of November 5th, 1945, he was “persuaded” to confess that 90,000 Jews had been killed under his command alone. Ohlendorf did not come to trial until 1948, long after the main Nuremberg Trial, and by that time he was insisting that his earlier statement had been extracted from him under torture. In his main speech before the Tribunal, Ohlendorf took the opportunity to denounce Phillip Auerbach, the Jewish attorney-general of the Bavarian State Office for Restitution, who at that time was claiming compensation for “eleven million Jews” who had suffered in German concentration camps. Ohlendorf dismissed this ridiculous claim, stating that “not the minutest part” of the people for whom Auerbach was demanding compensation had even seen a concentration camp. Ohlendorf lived long enough to see Auerbach convicted for embezzlement and fraud (forging documents purporting to show huge payments of compensation to non-existent people) before his own execution finally took place in 1951. I believe this speaks better than I can for the wondrous “legal” tactics utilized.

Olendorf explained to the Tribunal that his units often had to prevent massacres of Jews organized by anti-Semitic Ukranians behind the German front, and he denied that the Einsatzgruppen as a whole had inflicted even one quarter of the casualties claimed by the prosecution. He insisted that the illegal partisan warfare in Russia, which he had to combat, had taken a far higher toll of lives from the regular German army--an assertion confirmed by the Soviet Government, which boasted of 500,000 German troops killed by partisans. In fact, Franz Stahlecker, commander of Einsatzgruppe A in the Baltic region and White Russia, was himself killed by partisans in 1942, The English jurist F.J.P. Veale, in dealing with the Action Groups said: “There is no question that their orders were to combat terror by terror,” and he finds it strange that atrocities committed by the partisans in the struggle were regarded as blameless simply because they turned out to be on the winning side (ibid. p. 223). Ohlendorf took the same view, and in a bitter appeal written before his execution, he accused the Allies of hypocrisy in holding the Germans to account by conventional laws of warfare while fighting a savage Soviet enemy who did not respect those laws.


The Soviet charge that the Action Groups had wantonly exterminated a million Jews during their operations has been shown subsequently to be a massive falsification. In fact, there had never been the the slightest statistical basis for the figure. In this connection, Poliakov and Wulf cite the statement of Wilhelm Hoettl, the dubious American spy, double agent and former assistant of Eichmann. Hoettl, it will be remembered, claimed that Eichmann had “told him that six million Jews had been exterminated--and he added that two million of these had been killed by the Einsatzgruppen. This absurd figure went beyond even the wildest estimates of Soviet Prosecutor Rudenko, and it was not given any credence by the American Tribunal which tried and condemned Ohlendorf.

The real number of casualties for which the Action Groups were responsible has since been revealed in the scholarly work MANSTEIN, HIS CAMPAIGNS AND HIS TRIAL (London, 1951), by the able English lawyer R.T. Paget. Ohlendorf had been under Manstein’s nominal command. Paget’s conclusion is that the Nuremberg Court, in accepting the figures of the Soviet prosecution, exaggerated the number of casualties by more than 1000 per cent and that they distorted even more the situations in which these casualties were Inflicted. [These horrific distortions are the subject of six pages of William Shirer’s THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH, pp. 1140-46]. Here, then, is the legendary 6 million in miniature; not one million deaths, but one hundred thousand. Of course, only a small proportion of these could have been Jewish partisans and Communist functionaries. It is worth repeating that these casualties were inflicted during savage partisan warfare on the Eastern front, and that Soviet terrorists claim to have killed five times that number of German troops. It has nevertheless remained a popular myth that the extermination of the Jews began with the actions of the Einsatzgruppen in Russia.

In conclusion, you may briefly survey the Manstein trial itself, typical in so many ways of Nuremberg proceedings. Principally because Action Group D was attached to Manstein’s command (though it was responsible solely to Himmler), the sixty-two year old, invalid Field Marshal, considered by most authorities to be the most brilliant German general of the war, was subjected to the shameful indignity of a “war-crimes” trial. Of the 17 charges, 15 were brought by the Communist Russian Government and two by the Communist Polish Government. Only one witness was called to give evidence at this trial, and he proved so unsatisfactory that the prosecution withdrew his evidence. Reliance was placed instead on 800 hearsay documents which were accepted by the court without any proof of their authenticity or authorship. The prosecution introduced written affidavits by Ohlendorf and other S.S. Leaders, but since these men were still alive, Manstein’s defense lawyer Reginald Paget K.D. demanded their appearance in the witness-box. This was refused by the American authorities, and Paget declared that this refusal was due to fear lest the condemned men revealed what methods had been used to induce them to sign their affidavits. Manstein was eventually acquitted on eight of the charges including the two Polish ones which, as Paget said, “were so flagrantly bogus that one was left wondering why they had been presented at all.”

Let us take a break from the writing. We will continue with a discussion of another trial before we move into the subject of Auschwitz and Polish Jewry. I must not miss reminding you, as we move along, that conclusions and discernment are left into the hands of the readers. We are efforting to bring factual documentation to this matter. I suggest that you also remember that the term “Jew” has been distorted and you who are from the beloved lineage of the Judeans MUST PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THIS INFORMATION FOR IT IS YOU WHO ARE FIRST IN LINE FOR DESTRUCTION AT THE HANDS OF THESE KHAZARIAN ZIONISTS WHO, THROUGH THE TALMUDIC PROTOCOLS, ARE IN ALLIANCE WITH THE SO-CALLED COMMUNIST SOVIETS. ALL ARE PURE AND SIMPLE DICTATORIAL SOCIALISTS WHO INTEND TO ENSLAVE THE WORLD. THEY ARE THE “ANTICHRIST” DESTROYERS IT IS TIME YOU ONES FACE, SQUARELY, THE FACTS LEST YOU FIND YOURSELVES TOO SUPPRESSED TO HAVE DIFFERENCE OF OPINION. Note that the tactics described herein have not changed one iota and your own American courtrooms are getting to the point of offering no justice better than the atrocities at Nuremberg. Remember that one of the Protocols gives instruction to “take over the courts and judicial system” and “to furnish evidence and witnesses as necessary to WIN the case” whether or not they are actually witnesses. I promise you this, that even in this “small” case revolving around “Dharmas” property, that is EXACTLY WHAT THE ZIONISTS ADVERSARY HAS DONE--but this time, it has backfired!

You are in serious jeopardy, beloved citizens. You must face the Truth if you would regain your freedom.

Remember also, the full-blown effort in America by the Jewish groups is to cause it to be ILLEGAL TO EVEN QUESTION THE POSSIBILITIES OF INACCURACIES REGARDING THE HOLOCAUST.

Such questioning (such as these documents project, fully protected by the present First Constitutional Amendment) is already ILLEGAL in France, Germany, England and probably other European nations, and in Canada and the Soviet Union. But none of those countries have your Bill of Rights and its unique First Amendment placed there by shrewd Founding Fathers who understood tyranny and oppression. Even if you disagree, you must stand for the RIGHTS OF PROTECTION under that Beloved Constitution THAT ALL THINGS MIGHT BE OPENLY QUESTIONED. Is it not evident in itself that there is much to be hidden within the curtain of enforced secrecy? Do not the very ACTIONS SPEAK FAR LOUDER THAN ANY WORDS?

Hatonn to stand-by. Thank you.



WED., NOV. 13, 1991 1:34 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 089


The case of the Action Groups is a revealing insight into the methods of the Nuremberg Trials and the fabrication of the Myth of the Six Million. Another is the trial of Oswald Pohl in 1948, which is of great importance as it bears directly on the administration of the concentration camp system. Pohl had been the chief disbursing officer of the German Navy until 1934, when Himmler requested his transfer to the S.S. For eleven years he was the principal administrative chief of the entire S.S. in his position as head of the S.S. Economy and Administration Office, which after 1941 was concerned with the industrial productivity of the concentration camp system. A peak point of hypocrisy was reached at the trial when the prosecution said to Pohl that “had Germany rested content with the exclusion of Jews from her own territory, with denying them German citizenship, with excluding them from public office, or any like domestic regulation, no other nation could have been heard to complain.” The truth is that Germany was bombarded with insults and economic sanctions for doing precisely these things, and her internal measures against the Jews were certainly a major cause of the declaration of war against Germany by the democracies.

Oswald Pohl was an extremely sensitive and intellectual individual who was reduced to a broken man in the course of his trial. As Senator McCarthy pointed out, Pohl had signed some incriminating statements after being subjected to severe torture, including a bogus admission that he had seen a gas chamber at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944. The prosecution strenuously pressed this charge, but Pohl successfully repudiated it. The aim of the prosecution was to depict this dejected man as a veritable fiend in human shape, an impression hopelessly at variance with the testimony of those who knew him.

Such testimony was given by Heinrich Hoepker, an anti-Nazi friend of Pohl’s wife who came into frequent contact with him during the period 1942-45. Hoepker noted that Pohl was essentially a serene and mild-mannered person. During a visit to Pohl in the spring of 1944, Hoepker was brought into contact with concentration camp inmates who were working on a local project outside the camp area. He noted that the prisoners worked in a leisurely manner and relaxed atmosphere without any pressure from their guards. Hoepker declared that Pohl did not hold an emotional attitude toward the Jews, and did not object to his wife entertaining her Jewish friend Annemarie Jacques at their home. By the beginning of 1945, Hoepker was fully convinced that the administrator of the concentration camps was a humane, conscientious and dedicated servant of this task, and he was astonished when he heard later in 1945 of the accusations being made against Pohl and his colleagues. Frau Pohl noted that her husband retained his serenity in the face of adversity until March 1945, when he visited the camp at Bergen-Belsen at the time of the typhus epidemic there. Hitherto the camp had been a model of cleanliness and order, but the chaotic conditions at the close of the war had reduced it to a state of extreme hardship. Pohl, who was unable to alleviate conditions there because of the desperate pass which the war had reached by that time, was deeply affected by the experience and, according to his wife, never regained his former state of composure.

Dr. Alfred Seidl, the highly respected lawyer who acted as principal defense counsel at the Nuremberg Trials, went to work passionately to secure the acquittal of Pohl. Seidl had been a personal friend of the accused for many years, and was thoroughly convinced of his innocence with respect to the fraudulent charge of planned genocide against the Jews. The Allied judgment which condemned Pohl did not prompt Seidl to change his opinion in the slightest. He declared that the prosecution had failed to produce a single piece of valid evidence against him.

One of the most eloquent defenses of Oswald Pohl was made by S.S. Lieutenant Colonel Kurt Schmidt-Klevenow, a legal officer in the S.S. Economy and Administration Office, in his affidavit of August 8th, 1947. This affidavit has been deliberately omitted from the published documents known as Trials of the War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals 1946-1949. Schmidt-Klevenow pointed out that Pohl had given his fullest support to Judge Konrad Morgen of the Reich Criminal Police Office, whose job was to investigate irregularities at the concentration camps. Later on we shall refer to a case in which Pohl was in favor of the death penalty for camp commandant Koch, who was accused by an S.S. court of misconduct. Schmidt-Klevenow explained that Pohl was instrumental in arranging for local police chiefs to share in the jurisdiction of con- centration camps, and took personal initiative in securing strict discipline on the part of camp personnel. In short, the evidence given at the Pohl trial shows that the proceedings involved nothing less than the deliberate defamation of a man’s character in order to support the propaganda legend of genocide against the Jews in the concentration camps he administered.


Spurious testimony at Nuremberg which included extravagant statements in support of the myth of the Six Million was invariably given by former German officers because of pressure, either severe torture as in the cases cited previously, or the assurance of leniency for themselves if they supplied the required statements. An example of the latter was the testimony of S.S. General Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski. He was threatened with execution himself because of his suppression of the revolt by Polish partisans at Warsaw in August 1944, which he carried out with his S.S. Brigade of White Russians. He was therefore prepared to be “co-operative”. The evidence of Bach-Zelewski constituted the basis of the testimony against the Reichsfuhrer of the S.S. Heinrich Himmler at the main Nuremberg Trial (TRIAL OF THE MAJOR WAR CRIMINALS, Vol. IV, pp. 29, 36). In March 1941, on the eve of the invasion of Russia, Himmler invited the Higher S.S. Leaders to his Castle at Wewelsburg for a conference, including Bach-Zelewski who was an expert on partisan warfare. In his Nuremberg evidence, he depicted Himmler speaking in grandiose term at this conference about the liquidation of peoples in Eastern Europe, but Goering, in the courtroom, denounced Bach-Zelewski to his face for the falsity of this testimony. An especially outrageous allegation concerned a supposed declaration by Himmler that one of the aims of the Russian campaign was to “decimate the Slav population by thirty millions”. What Himmler really said is given by his Chief of Staff, Wolff--that war in Russia was certain to result in millions of dead (Manvell & Frankl, ibid. p. 117). Another brazen falsehood was Bach-Zelewski’s accusation that on August 31st, 1942 Himmler personally witnessed the execution of one hundred Jews by an Einsatz detachment at Minsk, causing him to nearly faint. It is known, however, that on this date Himmler was in conference at his field headquarters at Zhitomir in the Ukraine (cf. K. Vowinckel, Die Wehrmacht Im Kampf, vol 4, p. 275).

Much is made of Bach-Zelewski’s evidence in all the books on Himmler, especially Wiolli Frischauer’s HIMMLER: EVIL GENIUS OF THE THIRD REICH (London, 1953, p. 148 ff.). However, in April 1959, Bach-Zelewski publicly repudiated his Nuremberg testimony before a West German court. He admitted that his earlier statements had not the slightest foundation in fact, and that he had made them for the sake of expediency and his own survival. The German court, after careful deliberation, accepted his retraction. Needless to say, what Veale calls the “Iron Curtain of Discreet Silence” descended immediately over these events. They have had no influence whatever on the books which propagate the myth of the Six Million, and Bach-Zelewski’s testimony on Himmler is still taken at face value.

The truth concerning Himmler is provided ironically by an anti- Nazi, Felix Kersten, his physician and masseur. Because Kersten was opposed to the regime, he tends to support the legend that the internment of Jews meant their extermination. But from his close personal knowledge of Himmler he cannot help but tell the truth concerning him, and in his MEMOIRS 1940-1945 (London, 1956, p. 119 ff.) he is emphatic in stating that Heinrich Himmler did not advocate liquidating the Jews but favored their emigration overseas. Neither does Kersten implicate Hitler. However, the credibility of his anti-Nazi narrative is completely shattered when, in search of an alternative villain, he declares that Dr. Goebbels was the real advocate of “extermination”. This nonsensical allegation is amply disproved by the fact that Goebbels was still concerned with the Madagascar project even after it had been temporarily shelved by the German Foreign Office, as we showed earlier.

So much for the false evidence at Nuremberg. Reference has also been made to the thousands of fraudulent “written affidavits” which were accepted by the Nuremberg Court without any attempt to ascertain the authenticity of their contents or even their authorship. These hearsay documents, often of the most bizarre kind, were introduced as “evidence” so long as they bore the required signature. A typical prosecution affidavit contested by the defense in the Concentration Camp Trial of 1947 was that of Alois Hoellriegel, a member of the camp personnel at Mauthausen in Austria. This affidavit, which the defense proved was fabricated during Hoellriegel’s torture, had already been used to secure the conviction of S.S. General Ernst Kaltenbrunner in 1946. It claimed that a mass gassing operation had taken place at Mauthausen and that Hoellriegel had witnessed Kaltenbrunner (the highest S.S. leader in the Reich excepting Himmler) actually taking part in it.

By the time of the Concentration Camp Trial (Pohl’s trial) a year later, it had become impossible to sustain this piece of nonsense when it was produced in court again. The defense not only demonstrated that the affidavit was falsified, but showed that all deaths at Mauthausen were systematically checked by the local police authorities. They were also entered on a camp register, and particular embarrassment was caused to the prosecution when the Mauthausen register, one of the few that survived, was produced in evidence. The defense also obtained numerous affidavits from former inmates of Mauthausen (a prison camp chiefly for criminals) testifying to humane and orderly conditions there.


There is no more eloquent testimony to the tragedy and tyranny of Nuremberg than the pathetic astonishment or outraged disbelief of the accused persons themselves at the grotesque charges made against them. Such is reflected in the affidavit of S.S. Major-General Hans Fanslau, who visited most of the German concentration camps during the last years of the war. Although a front line soldier of the Waffen S.S., Fanslau had taken a great interest in concentration camp conditions, and he was selected as a prime target by the Allies for the charge of conspiracy to annihilate the Jews. It was argued, on the basis of his many contacts, that he must have been fully involved. When it was first rumored that he would be tried and convicted, hundreds of affidavits were produced on his behalf by camp inmates he had visited. When he read the full scope of the indictment against the concentration camp personnel in supplementary Nuremberg Trial No. 4 on May 6th, 1947, Fanslau declared in disbelief: “This cannot be possible, because I, too, would have had to know something about it.” (Of course this is assuming he didn’t have an Ollie North to keep all this information from the top such as Reagan, Bush, Gates and on and on and on.)

It must be emphasized that throughout the Nuremberg proceedings, the German leaders on trial never believed for a moment the allegations of the Allied prosecution. Hermann Goering, who was exposed to the full brunt of the Nuremberg atrocity propaganda, failed to be convinced by it. Hans Fritzsche, on trial as the highest functionary of Goebbels Ministry, relates that Goering, even after hearing the Ohlendorf affidavit on the Einsatzgruppen and the Hoess testimony on Auschwitz, remained convinced that the extermination of Jews was entirely propaganda fiction [THE SWORD IN THE SCALES, London, 1953, p. 145]. At one point during the trial, Goering declared rather cogently that the first time he had heard of it “was right here in Nuremberg” [Shirer, ibid. p. 1147]. The Jewish writers Poliakov, Reitlinger and Manvell and Frankl all attempt to implicate Goering in this supposed extermination, but Charles Bewley in his work HERMANN GOERING (GOETTINGEN, 1956) SHOWS THAT NOT THE SLIGHTEST EVIDENCE WAS FOUND AT NUREMBERG TO SUBSTANTIATE THIS CHARGE.

Hans Fritzsche pondered on the whole question during the trials, and he concluded that there had certainly been no thorough investigation of these monstrous charges. Fritzsche, who was acquitted, was an associate of Goebbels and a skilled propagandist. He recognized that the alleged massacre of the Jews was the main point of the indictment against all defendants. Kaltenbrunner, who succeeded Heydrich as chief of the Reich Security Head Office and was the main defendant for the S.S. due to the death of Himmler, was no more convinced of the genocide charges than was Goering. He confided to Fritzsche that the prosecution was scoring apparent successes because of their technique of coercing witnesses and suppressing evidence, which was precisely the accusation of Judges Wenersturm and van Roden.


The concentration camp at Auschwitz near Cracow in Poland has remained at the center of the alleged extermination of millions of Jews. Later we shall see how, when it was discovered by honest observers in the British and American zones after the war that no “gas chambers” existed in the German camps such as Dachau and Bergen-Belsen, attention was shifted to the eastern camps, particularly Auschwitz. Ovens definitely existed here, it was claimed. Unfortunately, the eastern camps were in the Russian zone of occupation, so that no one could verify whether or not these allegations were true. The Russians refused to allow anyone to see Auschwitz until about ten years after the war, by which time they were able to alter its appearance and give some plausibility to the claim that millions of people had been exterminated there. If anyone doubts that the Russians are capable of such deception, they should remember the monuments erected at sites where thousands of people were murdered in Russia by Stalin’s secret police--but where the monuments proclaim them to be victims of German troops in World War Two. Try giving thought, as example, to Katyn Forest.

The truth about Auschwitz is that it was the largest and most important industrial concentration camp, producing all kinds of material for the war industry. The camp consisted of synthetic coal and rubber plants built by I. G. Farben Industries, for whom the prisoners supplied labor. Auschwitz also comprised an agricultural research station, with laboratories, plant nurseries and facilities for stock breeding, as well as Krupp’s armament works. We have already remarked that this kind of activity was the prime function of the camps; all major firms had subsidiaries in them and the S.S. even opened their own factories. The remarkable evidence that says more than anything--IS THAT THE INDUSTRIES WERE ALMOST ALL JEWISH!

Accounts of visits by Himmler to the camps show that his main purpose was to inspect and assess their industrial efficiency. When he visited Auschwitz in March 1941 accompanied by high executives of I. G. Farben, he showed no interest in the problems of the camp as a facility for prisoners, but merely ordered that the camp be enlarged to take 100,000 detainees to supply labor for I. G. Farben. This hardly accords with a policy of exterminating prisoners by the millions.


It was nevertheless at this single camp that about half of the six million Jews were supposed to have been exterminated. Indeed some writers claim 4 or even 5 million. Four million was the sensational figure announced by the Soviet Government after the Communists had “investigated” the camp, at the same time as they were attempting to blame the Katyn massacre on the Germans, Reitlinger admits that information regarding Auschwitz and other eastern camps comes from the post-war Communist regimes of Eastern Europe: “The evidence concerning the Polish death camps was mainly taken after the war by Polish State commissions or by the Central Jewish Historical Commission of Poland” (THE FINAL SOLUTION, p. 631).

However, no living, authentic eye-witness of these “gassings” has EVER been produced and validated. Benedikt Kautsky, who spent seven years in concentration camps, including three in Auschwitz, alleged in his book Teufel and Verdammte (Devil and Damned, Zurich, 1946) that “not less than 3,500,000 Jews” had been killed there. This was certainly a remarkable statement, because by his own admission he had never seen a gas chamber. He confesses: “I was in the big German concentration camps. However, I must establish the truth that in no camp at any time did I come across such an installation as a gas chamber” (p. 272-3). The only execution he actually witnessed was when two Polish inmates were executed for killing two Jewish inmates. Kautsky, who was sent from Buchenwald in October, 1942 to work at Auschwitz-Buna, stresses in his book that the use of prisoners in war industry was a major feature of concentration camp policy until the end of the war. He fails to reconcile this with an alleged policy of massacring Jews.

The exterminations at Auschwitz are alleged to have occurred between March 1942 and October 1944; the figure of half of six million, therefore, would mean the extermination and disposal of about 94,000 people per month for thirty-two months--approximately 3,350 people every day, day and night, for over two and a-half years. This kind of thing is so ludicrous that it scarcely needs refuting. And yet Reitlinger claims quite seriously that Auschwitz could dispose of no less than 6,000 people a day.

Although Reitlinger’s 6,000 a day would mean a total by October of 1944 of over 5 million, all such estimates pale before the wild fantasies of Olga Lengyel in her book FIVE CHIMNEYS (London, 1959). Claiming to be a former inmate of Auschwitz, she asserts that the camp cremated no less than “750 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift”. She also alleges that, in addition, 8,000 people were burned every day in the “death-pits”, and that therefore “In round number, about 24,000 corpses were handled every day” (p. 80-1). This would, of course, mean a yearly rate of over 8 1/2 million. Thus between March 1942 and October 1944 Auschwitz would finally have disposed of over 21 million people, six million more than the entire world Jewish population. Comment is superfluous, I believe, for she certainly Didn’t offer any circumstances such as days off for good behavior, etc.

Although several million were supposed to have died at Auschwitz alone, Reitlinger has to admit that only 363,000 inmates were registered at the camp for the whole of the period between January 1940 and February 1945 (THE S.S., ALIBI OF A NATION, p. 268 ff.), and by no means all of them were Jews. It is frequently claimed that many prisoners were never registered, but no one has offered any proof of this. Even if there were as many unregistered as there were registered, it would mean only a total of 750,000 prisoners--hardly enough for the elimination of 3 or 4 million. Moreover, large numbers of the camp population were released or transported elsewhere during the war, and at the end 80,000 were evacuated westward in January 1945 before the Russian advance.

One example will suffice of the statistical frauds relating to casualties at Auschwitz. Shirer claims that in the summer of 1944, no less than 300,000 Hungarian Jews were done to death in a mere forty-six days (ibid. p. 1156). This would have been almost the entire Hungarian Jewish population, which numbered some 380,000. But according to the Central Statistical Office of Budapest, there were 260,000 Jews in Hungary in 1945 (which roughly conforms with the Joint Distribution Committee figure of 220,000), so that only 120,000 were classed as no longer resident. Of these, 35,000 were emigrants from the new Communist regime, and a further 25,000 were still being held in Russia after having worked in German labor battalions there. This leaves only 60,000 Hungarian Jews unaccounted for, but M.E. Namenyi estimates that 60,000 Jews returned to Hungary from deportation in Germany, though Reitlinger says this figure is too high (THE FINAL SOLUTION, p. 497). Possibly it is, but bearing in mind the substantial emigration of Hungarian Jews during the war (cf. REPORT OF THE ICRC, Vol. I, p. 649), the number of Hungarian Jewish casualties must have been very low indeed.


Some new facts about Auschwitz are at last beginning to make a tentative appearance. They are contained in a recent work called Die Auschwitz-Luge: Em Eriebnisbericht von Thies Christopherson [THE AUSCHWITZ LEGENDS: AN ACCOUNT OF HIS EXPERIENCE BY THIES CHRISTOPHERSON, Kritik Verlag/Mohrkirch, 1973]. Published by the German lawyer Dr. Manfred Roeder in the periodical Deutsche Burger-Iniative, it is an eye-witness account of Auschwitz by Thies Christopherson, who was sent to the Bunawerk plant laboratories at Auschwitz to research into the production of synthetic rubber for the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute. In May 1973, not long after the appearance of this account, the veteran Jewish “Nazi- hunter” Simon Wiesenthal wrote to the Frankfurt Chamber of Lawyers, demanding that the publisher and author of the Foreward, Dr. Roeder, a member of the Chamber, should be brought before its disciplinary commission. Sure enough, proceedings began in July, but not without harsh criticism even from the Press, who asked “Is Simon Wiesenthal the new Gauleiter of Germany?” (Deutsche Wochenzeitung, July 27th, 1973).

Christopherson’s account is certainly one of the most important documents for a re-appraisal of Auschwitz. He spent the whole of 1944 there, during which time he visited all of the separate camps comprising the large Auschwitz complex, including Auschwitz-Birkenau where it is alleged that wholesale massacres of Jews took place. Christopherson, however, is in no doubt that this is totally untrue. He writes, “I was in Auschwitz from January 1944 until December 1944. After the war I heard about the mass murders which were supposedly perpetrated by the S.S. against the Jewish prisoners, and I was perfectly astonished. Despite all the evidence of witnesses, all the newspaper reports and radio broadcasts, I still do not believe today in these horrible deeds. I have said this many times and in many places but to no purpose. One is never believed” (p. 16).

Space forbids a detailed summary here of more details about personally known facts, which include facts about camp routine and the daily life of prisoners totally at variance with the allegations of propaganda (pp. 22-27). More important are his revelations about the supposed existence of an extermination camp. “During the whole of my time at Auschwitz, I never observed the slightest evidence of mass gassings. Moreover, the odour of burning flesh that is often said to have hung over the camp is a downright falsehood. In the vicinity of the main camp (Auschwitz I) was a larger farrier’s works, from which the smell of molten iron was naturally not pleasant (p. 33-4). Reitlinger confirms that there were five blast furnaces and five collieries at Auschwitz, which together with the Bunawerk factories comprised Auschwitz III (ibid. p. 452). The author agrees that a crematorium would certainly have existed at Auschwitz, “since 200,000 people lived there, and in every city with 200,000 inhabitants there would be a crematorium. Naturally people died there--but not only prisoners. In fact the wife of Obersturmbannfuhrer (Christopherson’s superior) also died there, (p. 33). The author explains: There were no secrets at Auschwitz. In September 1944 a commission of the International Red Cross came to the camp for an inspection. They were particularly interested in the camp at Birkenau, though we also had many inspections at Raisko” (Bunawerk section, p. 35).

Christopherson points out that the constant visits to Auschwitz by outsiders cannot be reconciled with allegations of mass extermination. When describing the visit of his wife to the camp in May, he observes: “The fact that it was possible to receive visits from our relatives at any time demonstrates the openness of the camp administration. Had Auschwitz been a great extermination camp, we would certainly not have been able to receive such visits” (p. 27).

After the war, Christopherson came to hear of the alleged existence of a building with gigantic chimneys in the vicinity of the main camp. “This was supposed to be the crematorium. However, I must record the fact that when I left the camp at Auschwitz in December 1944, I had not seen this building there” (p. 37). Does this mysterious building exist today? Apparently not; Reitlinger claims it was demolished and “completely burnt out in full view of the camp” in October, though Christopherson never saw this public demolition. Although it is said to have taken place “in full view of the camp, it was allegedly seen by only one Jewish witness, a certain Dr. Bendel, and his is the only testimony to the occurrence (Reitlinger, ibid. p. 457), This situation is generally typical.

When it comes down to hard evidence, it is strangely elusive; the building was “demolished”, the document is “lost”, the order was “verbal”. At Auschwitz today, visitors are shown a small furnace and here they are told that millions of people were exterminated. The Soviet State Commission which “investigated” the camp announced on May 12th, 1945 that “using rectified coefficients and the figure of four millions has become ridiculous” (ibid. p. 460).

Finally, the account of Mr. Christopherson draws attention to a very curious circumstance. The only defendant who did not appear at the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial in 1963 was Richard Baer, the successor of Rudolf Hoess as commandant of Auschwitz. Though in perfect health, he died suddenly in prison before the trial had begun, “in a highly mysterious way” according to the newspaper Duetshe Wochenzeitung (July 27, 1973). Baer’s sudden demise before giving evidence is especially strange since the Paris newspaper Rivarol recorded his insistence that “during the whole time in which he governed Auschwitz, he never saw any gas chambers nor believed that such things existed,” and from this statement nothing would dissuade him. In short, the Christopherson account adds to a mounting collection of evidence demonstrating that the giant industrial complex of Auschwitz (comprising thirty separate installations and divided by the main Vienna-Cracow railway line) was nothing but a vast war-production center, which, while admittedly employing the compulsory labor of detainees, was certainly not a place of “mass extermination”.

Let us take respite for I see that we cannot finish this JOURNAL today. Let us consider easing up a bit with intent of wrapping it up by Friday. There are several more subjects I want to cover in this approach to the “Holocaust”. Then we will follow with another couple of historical outlays. We will simply have to approach the massive amount of material in segments. Each is far too important to omit so we must ask readers to bear with us through these presentations. This is one of the most urgent and critical segments of your “time”, it IS worth every minute of your reading time. Peace, Light and understanding are given unto you if you will but accept them. Salu, Hatonn



THU., NOV. 14, 1991 7:46 A.M. YEAR 5, DAY 090



No “Today’s Watch because we have a press deadline. I am getting a backwash of the most heinous threats regarding the so-called “Holocaust” of which I am laying forth facts. I trust the “readers” here will place the following documentation in proper sequence so that in the JOURNAL the writings regarding “false counting” will not be interrupted. Thank you.

To hurry through this document I am going to give appreciation to Lt. Col. Gordon “Jack” Mohr, AUS Ret. My subject in point is a review of a publication OTHER LOSSES, by James Bacque. Most of the information in this writing, however, comes from The Canadian Intelligence Service, Bag 78, High River, Alberta, Canada TOL lB who carries the book in point for about $28.00. You can, I believe, also obtain the book from America West and I assume the price will be about the same.

Although it is one of the most controversial books of this decade, it had to be published out of the United States. We wrote of this material a couple of years ago but I find new readers are not going back to pick up old JOURNALS because of the heavy reading load of the paper.

The following is only a review with some dates which have been verified as accurate and totally confirmed as truth. If you desire more input, then I can only ask you to get the backup in the JOURNALS and/or the book OTHER LOSSES and then follow- up on the references given where you will find some three pages of Bibliography for sources.

This deals with the Death camps of “Eisenhower” and crew. You might believe there is no connection between Eisenhower and the Jewish Khazarian Zionists; however, I hasten to remind you--Eisenhower himself stated, when he chose to run for President and moved within the Republican Party--that “...although I am a confirmed Zionist...!” I fail to see how you can give your allegiance any more clearly. So be it.


Within the documentation of facts you are going to find some most heinous and painful truths unfolding about your blessed nation founded under God with a Constitution which guarantees you protection of your Constitutional freedom and rights. While you slept and were misled, things were taking place in the secret councils and at international levels of intrigue which have now brought your nation to the brink of total fall. In view of that which has gone on before your eyes in the recent Gulf non-war, undeclared, you will find it perhaps easier to realize that crimes have gone on through all the wars of this century, in fact--all wars throughout all time. We are going to deal here, however, with some final truths about World War II.

In bringing this material to the open light of day you are going to have to also realize that the Soviet Union has been tied to the U.S. in all of the massive “cover-ups”. You will have to note that the Soviet relations of recent months, which has caused its leaders to admit to the murder of millions of their own people, allowed a few rays of truth to filter down and penetrate the Iron Curtain which has been erected over World War II, and which has kept vital facts from your people.

Do not be fooled by the so-called “...moving of Lenin’s body and other show-acts of changing the leopard’s spots. The Soviet Zionists in conjunction with the other Zionists now spread within the fiber of your nations have changed not one iota their intent to have a Global Government under their total and unrelenting control.

Let us look at only a few incidents released to you-the-people. I havent the time this day to investigate every detail of why this information was allowed to come forth--but that alone is worth a full JOURNAL. Mostly it is to cause you to know that the power is massive and “you will be next if you do not follow OUR new rules!” The detention camps are already operable right in the U.S.A. to detain you who do not like the things which are coming down upon you. I havent said this is easy to believe--I simply give you facts.

This information, and if possible Bacque’s book, should be seen by EVERY veteran who fought in World War II. In fact--all veterans--for the lies told to the public about every encounter-- ARE LIES. You who fought in these horror stories KNOW THE TRUTH and it is giving you nightmares and terrors and destroying your very present existence by the hiding it within. If you would save your nation and freedom under your wondrous Constitution you must stand against the “ENEMY WITHIN” WHICH YOU RAISED YOUR HAND TO THE SQUARE AND SWORE TO DEFEND. The enemy has moved within and has gained control of your nation starting at the very Government Administration and Congress. Unless you KNOW truth you cannot know that which is WRONG.

This writing revolves around the Supreme Commander of the Allies in Europe, Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower, who was known during his days at West Point as that “terrible Swedish Jew”. Surprised???

During the days before World War II, “Ike”, as he was most affectionately called, was noted as quite a “ladies man, and the best damned bridge player on the Post”. When anyone would mention Ike as a troop commander, it was met with hilarious, profane skepticism. Then too, you must understand that these opinions are projected by the attitudes of ones such as Gen. George Patton, who looked on Eisenhower as a “whimp”, not worthy of his rank and certainly not qualified to LEAD in such high capacity. Of course, he DID NOT LEAD--he was only the “front” for those who directed the war to suit the gains of the Elite.

As many of you can still remember, Ike was promoted to Supreme Commander in Europe. From Lieutenant Colonel, in early 1941, Eisenhower was promoted to full Colonel in March 1941, to Brigadier General (temporary) in Sept. In Feb. 1942, after he became a favorite of Gen. George Marshall during the Louisiana Maneuvers, he was appointed Assistant Chief of the War Plans Division. About this time, Ike became acquainted with the daughter of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and she introduced her boy friend to “pappa”. Evidently F.D.R. recognized in this young officer, a man who would agree with any of his plans and who would do anything to gain promotion. This began a rapid spiral of promotions which by-passed many officers who outranked him and who were much more qualified for the posts he occupied. He became Chief of Operations Division, War Department General Staff (March, 1942), Sicily, (May 1943), Italy (September, 1943) and finally to his ultimate designation by President F.D.R. as Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force for the invasion of Europe. Now, if you don’t like my information--GO LOOK IT UP. TRUTH ONLY MEANS WHETHER YOU LIVE OR DIE--IT IS QUITE SIMPLE, BROTHERS.


Where do you think you got the fine idea of bombing homes, women and children in Iraq? You realize you missed all of the military installations, don’t you? Come now, precision surgical bombing--and everything was left standing and useable? What did your planes do on those raids they showed you on CNN? You were bombing and shooting some of your own soldiers who were going to “spill the beans” when they got home, and civilian targets in Iraq!

This came from some FINE military calculations regarding Germany, Churchill asked his staff to calculate “how many homes and civilian targets destroyed would be required to take Germany? He was told “65%”. From that moment ALL attacks were leveled against ONLY civilian targets--Dresden was totally wiped away EXCEPT for military installations. (Dresden is only ONE example.) When it was announced that 65% of the civilian targets had been demolished--the war ended. But not for the Germans who would fall into these terrorist’s hands.


It was Eisenhower’s advice to F.D.R. and Churchill (the FIRST worst war criminal of all time), which caused the war to drag on for two extra years, resulting in millions of deaths on both sides, and hundreds of billions of dollars of profit for Eisenhower’s racial Zionist brethren, the International bankers, who financed BOTH SIDES--AS USUAL.

If you are shocked, then I suggest you go back and read the story of Pearl Harbor wherein Roosevelt was in on the planning of the destruction at Pearl Harbor!

In early 1943, General Patton and the British Commander, Gen. Montgomery, presented a plan to Churchill and F.D.R. which called for the invasion of Europe through the “soft underbelly of Europe”. This would have liberated all the eastern European countries from “Communist” control and would have ended the war in 1943.

But Eisenhower’s hatred of the Germans, which was openly shown many times during those terrible days of the war, demanded that as many Germans as possible be made to suffer for their part in the war.

It might be well to state here, that as early as 1902, International “Zionism” had a plan for the destruction of what was recognized as “Christianity” in Europe.

This called for the destruction, first of Czarist Russia (note I did NOT say “Khazarian Zionist Russia”) which took place in 1917 with the same people financing the war, and then for the destruction of Germany. A war chest of some $2-billion (and in those days THAT WAS A LOT OF MONEY!) WAS SET ASIDE FOR THIS PURPOSE, LONG BEFORE A MAN NAMED ADOLF HITLER EVEN CAME ON THE SCENE.

When Churchill and F.D.R. listened to the advice of Stalin, instead of their two best military leaders, it gave Stalin two years to establish control over all of Eastern Europe, which is now known as the Warsaw Pact Nations.

You can see the further treason in Eisenhower’s actions, when in 1945, as Patton’s armored forces swept into Germany, they were held back from entering Berlin, and were even ordered to withdraw to the Western borders of Germany, until Soviet troops could enter Germany.

Any military commander “worth their salt”, knows that Patton could have ended the war on the Eastern border of Germany and that country would have never been divided. Patton by this time was beginning to realize that a conspiracy existed among the top war leaders, which were keeping him from the victory his troops so deserved. It was a traumatic lesson which was to be later repeated with General Douglas MacArthur in Korea, when he was not allowed to attack enemy positions north of the Yalu River. Again, I urge you to research this for yourselves, the documentation is available and easily acquired. I suggest you do not go to the memoirs of Eisenhower, however, for your truth.


The One Worlder groups in Washington, D.C., and London had much different plans and aided Stalin in his rape of Eastern Europe and Germany. As a matter of FACT, when we finish the other document regarding the Death Camps (so-called) of Hitler--you are going to find another blow to your senses; as you have to realize that the camps which have ever been in question as possible extermination camps were in territories which came under control of the Communists.

It was at that time the “terrible Swedish Jew” Eisenhower, whose open hatred of everything German, caused him to promote “Operation Keelhaul” at the end of the war, where thousands of anti-Communist fighters, who had surrendered to American forces, were forced, at bayonet point, back to the tender mercies of the Communists. Thousands of them were murdered outright, or disappeared into the Gulags of Russia.

Surely you remember that I have also told you that you have many missing men from Korea--IN SOVIET PRISONS--TODAY (ALIVE)!

Eisenhower returned to the States, made a hero by the controlled prostitute press of America, and his popularity from the populace he had betrayed was such that he became the 34th President of the United States in 1953.

I wish to also note that I have proof in information regarding your current “controlled media and press” which I will again share with you at another writing.

Eisenhower was quoted at the war’s end as saying: I hate war as only a soldier who has lived through it can, only as one who has seen it’s brutality, it’s futility, it’s stupidity. But he did not hate it as much as he hated Germans, and he took a terrible Talmudic Zionist’s revenge on over a million SURRENDERED German soldiers and civilians when the war ended. Praised by the media and the “kept” historians, this man was directly responsible for one of the most reprehensible acts in the history of so-called civilized man and warfare. One which should put him in the same class with Atilla the Hun and other total barbarians.

The peace which was inflicted on a completely defeated Germany in 1945, was called the Morgenthau Plan. It was promoted by Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, a Zionist, who later stated that most of the ideas for this plan had come directly from Eisenhower.


Now, after tremendous research spanning over two decades, the truth about this Zionist Commander of America’s forces, who became the 34th President of the United States, is known and documented and you don’t have to just believe some non-visible space cadet with a big mouth.

In 1945, during the post-World War II period, American foreign policy was largely in the hands of a small group of very powerful Zionists based in Washington, D.C. This secret, invisible government, which has controlled America for over fifty years, was headed then by Sen. Herbert Lehman, Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau. They drew up the “blueprint” for a plan, which the enthusiastic Eisenhower carried out in Europe, which was the most monstrous policy of hate and vengeance known in the annals of civilized history.

This policy is still in operation today, fifty years later, where media pundits, twisting, exaggerating, and even manufacturing historical claims, have hounded, harassed, and had arrested 70 and 80-year old European war veterans for alleged “war crimes”, which were supposed to have taken place over fifty years ago.

The following facts should be known by every American veteran and serviceman who served in World War II, especially. You are entitled to KNOW how you were lied to and inveigled into a war for the benefits of the Internationalists. Every American Legion and Veterans of Foreign War Post in this country, should have this article read to its members and groups caused to RESEARCH the facts, for you see, the same treason was carried out in Korea and then later in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Central and South America, the Gulf “Storm” and on and on. But it is you, the veterans of America, who have the first RIGHT TO KNOW the truth about the traitors who were responsible for the murder of your buddies, and the crippling of hundreds of thousands more, and who are even now laying the groundwork to get your sons and daughters involved in WORLD WAR III (NUCLEAR WAR 1)

The National Archives in Washington, D.C. contains an official document called the “Weekly Prisoner of War and Disarmed Enemy Forces Report” for the week ending Sept. 8, 1945. It shows that 1,056,482 German prisoners were then being held by the U.S. Army in the European theater, of whom 692,895 were still classified as POW’s (Prisoners of War) and the other 363,587 as DEF’s (Disarmed Enemy Forces).

This latter designation was illegal under international law and completely contrary to the Geneva Convention, to which both the United States and Germany were signatories. A German soldier designated DEF had no right to any food, shelter, or water--in fact, to anything. Quite often he did not receive even the basic necessities of life and died within days.

In the first week of September 1945, 13,051 of the 363,587 Germans died and were listed cryptically as “other losses”. This was the equivalent of a death rate of 3.6% per week. At such a rate, all the remaining 350,536 DEF’s would have been dead within 28 weeks--before the end of the approaching winter.

The civilian death rate immediately outside the American camps in Germany was about 2% per year, or nearly 100 times lower, despite the greater proportion of older people. Since adequate supplies were readily available to the American troops at all times, this killing was totally deliberate.

As for the 692,895 German soldiers still falsely listed as POW’s, the last of them had actually been transferred from POW to DEF status a month earlier on August 4, by order of General Eisenhower. Their death rate quickly quadrupled within weeks, from .2% to .8% per week. Assuming the latter rate for the week ending September 8, about 5,543 of the so- called POW’s listed in the report as being alive and in American hands had died that week--all would have died within just over two years. (”The reason this death rate was lower than 3.6% weekly for the longer-term DEF’s was simply that the barbaric treatment of the DEF’s was cumulative, and that some of the American troops refused to go along with this barbaric treatment.)

Many of you veterans will recall the winter of 1945, when you were on occupation duty in Japan. A similar order came from your local U.S. military commander who was known for his hatred of all Japanese. It did not come from MacArthur’s headquarters in Tokyo. You were not allowed to give food of any kind to Japanese civilians, although many of them were on the verge of starvation. One officer remembers that he was commanding a detachment of 28 men, which were guarding a Japanese Quartermaster dump at the little town of Niskiyahama, about eighty miles south of Osaka. Food in this storehouse was literally spoiling, yet you were not allowed to share it with the Japanese people. For Christmas rations that year, the detachment received eight sheep carcasses and 28 turkeys, with no refrigeration for storage. Rather than see this food go to waste, the commander shared it with the starving population, and when word leaked out, he came very close to being court-martialed. It was only the intervention of a high ranking officer from MacArthur’s Headquarters which saved him. I hold this man’s name secure because he is STILL under constant attack.

The same thing happened over and over again in Germany, and American officers and servicemen were court-martialed, on Eisenhower’s orders, for sharing their rations with the starving Germans. If you were a young man, with several small children at home, you know how these enemy children played on the minds of decent Americans who knew what their government was doing was wrong. Enemy children have never been enemies, to big-hearted Americans--BROTHERS, CRY OUT FOR GOD’S SAKE AND YOUR OWN--THIS IS HEINOUS AND YOU HAVE ALL BEEN MADE TO BEAR THIS HORROR ON YOUR CONSCIENCE AND MIND TO THE POINT OF MADNESS.

But Eisenhower, with his unbounded hatred for the Germans, through his order of August 4th, made it impossible for there to be such a thing as a bona fide German POW in American hands on European soil.

Instead, there were vast concentrations of men (including some women and children) starving to death in open, muddy, disease- ridden fields.

In November 1945, Eisenhower returned to Washington. A month later, a slight relaxation went into effect. Men of conscience, such as General George Patton, had no qualms about killing German soldiers in combat, but he drew a line at the deliberate policy of murder which was advocated by Eisenhower. This, of course, was the reason he met such an untimely and strange death. The truth is now coming out of old records and that “war crimes” were by no means a German monopoly, and that the “good war”, as the Zionist media and historians called it in the United States, was as evil as any conflict in world history.


Careful calculations force the following conclusions:

Eisenhower had deplored the German’s useless defense of the Reich in the last months of the war because of the waste of life. At least ten times as many Germans (undoubtedly 800,000, almost certainly 900,000, and quite possibly a million) died in the French and American camps as were killed in all the combat on the Western front in northwest Europe from America’s entry into the war in December 1941, through April 1945.

Bacque was ably assisted in his research by Col. Ernest F. Fisher, a senior historian for the U.S. Army, as well as by other highly placed members of the American military. One of them, Cot. Philip S. Lauben, Chief of the German Affairs branch of SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force), stated that in late 1945, “the Vosges (northeast France) was just ONE BIG DEATH CAMP FOR GERMANS.”

Now, these men started out their research searching for information on a different matter entirely only to come across entries listed simply as “OTHER LOSSES” and the conclusions are what results from following massive investigation and research into buried documents.

In spite of everything which has been written about Eisenhower which makes him out to be a hero, there seems little question that Dwight Eisenhower meets all the qualifications of a certified war criminal, even if Bacque’s figures are off by a bit. (If Germany had been the winner, there is little doubt he would have been tried and found guilty of the most heinous crimes against mankind.)

Many of you veterans will get very upset with this appraisal of a man you looked on as a “bona fide” American hero. So be it. But the proof for these accusations can be found in what happened to those Germans who were fortunate enough to surrender to the British and the Canadians--some two million of them. The evidence shows that “almost all continued in fair health and many were quickly released and sent home or transferred to the French, to help in the post-war work of reconstruction. “Bacque found verification and specifically commends General Patton for behavior towards his POWs in a civilized manner. His Third Army freed vast numbers of German captives during May 1945, to the dismay, no doubt, of the Zionists who controlled Washington.

Both General Omar Bradley and J.C.H. Lee, Communications Zone (ComZ) Europe, ordered the release of prisoners within a week of the war’s end. This SHAEF order was countermanded by Eisenhower on May 15, 1945.

While German soldiers from the British and Canadian zones were quickly regaining their strength and were helping rebuild Europe, Germans taken by the Americans were dying by the hundreds of thousands--emaciated figures in diarrhea-smeared clothing, huddling pitifully in water holes with perhaps a scrap of cardboard over their heads and rotten potato for supper. At times many of them were reduced to drinking urine and eating grass--if there was any.

Did all this happen because of one supremely unprincipled and influential man named Eisenhower? Or was Ike, in turn, influenced by a small circle around him or by his superiors in Washington? Historians will be probing this question for decades to come--HOWEVER, I THINK YOU WILL NOTE AS WITH OLIVER NORTH--THE MEN “ABOVE” HAD TO KNOW!


1944: Eisenhower told the British ambassador to Washington that the 3,500 officers of the German General staff should be “exterminated”. He also favored the liquidation of perhaps 100,000 prominent Germans. Soon after, he wrote to his wife, Mamie: “God, I hate Germans! Why? Because the German is a beast!” Eisenhower said he was ashamed to bear a German name.

August 1944: The North American wheat surplus was greater than at any time in history, nearly one billion bushels. The U.S. corn surplus and potato crop also reached a new high.

March 10, 1945: A message sent from Eisenhower to the Combined Chiefs of Staff (CCS) of Britain and the U.S. recommended the creation of an entirely new class of prisoners, Disarmed Enemy Forces or DEFs. At a press conference in Paris, this same day, Ike said: “If the Germans were reasoning like normal human beings, they would realize the whole history of the United States and Great Britain is to be generous towards a defeated enemy. We observe all the laws of the Geneva Convention. ”

March 19, 1945: Eisenhower’s special assistant, General Everett Hughes, visited the American supply depots at Naples and Marseille. In both places, he writes, there are more stocks than we can ever use. They stretch as far as the eye can see.

Spring 1945: The International Red Cross had over 100,000 tons of food stockpiled in Switzerland. At one point, it sent two trainloads into the American Zone of Germany, but the food was sent back. The Morgenthau Plan for a “Carthaginian Peace” in Germany, to use the words of Military Governor Lucius Clay, is implemented through the directive JCS (Joint Chiefs of Staff) 1067, which specifies to Eisenhower the policy he must adopt towards every institution in Germany. The directive is largely the work of three of Henry Morgenthau’s underlings in the Treasury Department--Harry Dexter White, Frank Coe, and Harry Glasser. White and Glasser were both Zionists and all three were Communist fellow travelers.

April 11, 1945: On the eve of his death, FDR told Morgenthau in Warm Springs, GA: “Henry, I am with you 100%.” When Truman took over, he continued Morgenthau’s Carthaginian Policy towards conquered Germany.

April 17, 1945: The Americans opened their enormous Rheinberg Camp, six miles in circumference, with no food or shelter whatsoever. As in the other big “Rhine meadow” camps, opened in mid-April, there were initially no latrines and no water. In some camps, the men were so crowded they could not lie down. Meanwhile, at Camp Kripp, near Remagen, the half-American Charles von Luttichau determined “that his German comrades are receiving about 5% as much food as their captors.” Complaining to the camp commander, he was told: “Forget the Geneva Convention. You don’t have any rights.

Late April 1945: Heinz Janssen, a survivor of the Rheinberg camp, described conditions as they were at the time. “Amputees slithered like amphibians through the mud, soaking and freezing. Naked to the skies day after day and night after night, they lay desperate in the sand of Rheinberg or sleep exhaustedly into eternity in their collapsing holes.”

April 26, 1945: The Combined Chiefs of Staff sent a message to Eisenhower, urging him not to take any more prisoners after VE Day. He ignored it. The CCS approved of Ike’s proposed DEF status, but only for certain types of German prisoners. The British refused to go against the Geneva Convention. The CCS orders the illegal DEF status to be kept strictly secret. By this date, Eisenhower’s Quartermaster General of ASHAEF, Gen. Robert Littlejohn, has already twice reduced the rations to German prisoners, on orders. A message to Gen. George C. Marshall, signed by Ike, mandated: “No shelter” for German prisoners, despite an unusually cold and wet March and April.

May 4, 1945: The first German POW’s were transferred to DEF status. Mail to and from all German prisoners was banned for more than a year.

May 8, 1945: Germany surrendered unconditionally. The U.S. State Department wasted no time dismissing Switzerland as the official Protecting Power for German prisoners, contravening the Geneva Convention. State also informed the International Red Cross that, with no Protecting Power to report to, there is no point in sending delegates to the camps. From this day forward, prisoners held by the U.S. Army had no access to any impartial observer. The British and Canadians also removed the Swiss protectors, but continued treating their POW’s decently.

May, 1945: The American Red Cross reported that more than 98% of Americans captured by the Germans will be coming home safely, thanks in part to the food parcels sent to them during the war, which were promptly delivered by the Germans.

May 15, 1945: Eisenhower and Churchill talked about further reducing the rations for the German POWs. Churchill was informed that the POW’s have been getting 2,000 calories per day (compared to 4,000 for American troops) and that 2,150 was regarded as an absolute minimum required for sedentary adults living under shelter. Eisenhower failed to tell Churchill that the U.S. Army was not even feeding many DEFs, and that they were feeding others, much less than 2,000 calories per day.

Mid-May 1945: The Bingen camp, near Bad Dreuznach in the Rhineland, was now holding between 200,000 and 400,000 German POW’s, with no shelter, food, water, or medicine. The death rate for prisoners in these U.S. camps was now about 30% per year, according to a U.S. medical survey.

June 2, 1945: The European Theater Provost Marshal issued two reports. One, the last in a series of daily reports, logged 2,870,400 POW’s on hand. The other, the first report in a weekly series, dated the same day, logged only 1,836,000. At one point in mid-June, the prisoner strength on the ration list is given as 1,421,559, despite the evidence of Gen. J.C.H, Lee and others that there were about 4 million, This bizarre bookkeeping persisted throughout 1945 in all branches of the occupying army. The apparent purpose was to obscure the death toll by means of an indecipherable mass of conflicting statistics. (One of Bacque’s greatest “coups” has been to decipher them.)

Mid-June, 1945: British “Tommies” took over the huge Rheinberg Camp from the Americans, saving many thousands of German lives. The final act of the “Yanks” before the British took charge, was to bulldoze one section flat while the men were still living in their holes in the ground. Now, I ask you, who do you now think might have thought up burying 12,000 Iraqis in their trenches while ordered “to take no prisoners”? Meanwhile, a team of doctors from the U.S. Army Medical Corps completed a survey of some of the smaller Rhineland camps, holding some 80,000 POW’s (not DEFs). They found a death rate 80 times higher than anything they have known in their professional careers.

July, 1945: Eisenhower becomes military governor of the U.S. Zone in Germany. He continued to turn back all relief teams from Switzerland, the U.S. and elsewhere.

July 10, 1945: A French Army unit under Gen. Rousseau, took over the Dietersheim camp (near Mainz) from the Americans. He found 32,000 men and women of all ages in a moribund (dying) state. Another French officer. Capt. Julien, was taking command 17 days later, and found a vast mire “peopled with living skeletons, male and female, huddling under scraps of wet cardboard”. Horrified, Julien wrote: “This is just like the photographs of Buchenwald and Dachau.” [Now you will find that the pictures are the ones most often shown during your “Holocaust Weeks” as representing pictures of the German camps--nope, they were dying at the hands of you lovely, caring Zionist Americans!!!]

July 20, 1945: Gen. Littlejohn received a memo stating, “These men, German POW’s, are authorized a maximum of 1, 150 calories for the non-workers and 1,850 for workers.

(Remember, it takes 2,000 calories to keep a sedentary adult alive.)

July 26, 1945: The International Red Cross proposed restoring mail service to German POW’s. Fearing that the reality of the death camps might come to light, the U.S. War Department rejected the idea.

August 4, 1945: Eisenhower ordered that all remaining German POW’s be stripped of their rights, thus reducing them to DEF status.

August 27, 1945: In a long memorandum, Gen. Littlejohn informed Eisenhower that 1,550,000 Germans who supposedly were getting U.S. ARMY RATIONS, WERE RECEIVING NOTHING. Ike turned a deaf ear to his report and the death rate continued to climb.

August 30, 1945: Max Huber, head of the International Red Cross, wrote a stinging letter to the U.S. State Department about American interference in efforts to save starving Germans. Some months later, an evasive response, signed “Eisenhower”, arrive in Washington, falsely claiming that giving Red Cross food to enemy personnel was forbidden. Thousands of train cars loaded with decaying food were sent back to Geneva and to sources in Paris and Brussels. Huber apologized for tying up the French rail system because of the food which was being returned by the Americans.

By this time, more than 2-million German men had been discharged into American custody, including thousands of priests, ministers, doctors, and professors. Not one single camp commander or guard was questioned by the Allied press corps and the controlled media of the U.S. concerning conditions in these hell holes.

It might be well to stop right here and ask this question: “Is anyone who reads this horrifying account so naive as to believe that the American people would have put up with these barbaric actions by its chief military man if they had known about it--much less, turn around and make him hero President? Do you think that the politicians who were in the forefront of those who kept these facts from Americans would have lasted very long in office, if the truth had been known? Do you think that millions of Americans would show such concern for the so-called Holocaust of the Jews if they knew that it was Jewish hatred for their fellow kinsmen and were killing over a million Germans--who were helplessly incarcerated? I sincerely doubt it! That’s why these facts have been kept from the American people for half a century. Now these Elite believe themselves to be so POWERFUL and in CONTROL that they can override anything YOU-THE-PEOPLE can offer in resistance. We shall see!

Late Summer, 1945: Jean-Pierre Pradervand, head of the International Red Cross delegations in France, told Henry W. Dunning, an American Red Cross official, that conditions in the French camps are worse, in many instances, than anything seen in the former Nazi camps. Pradervand showed Dunning pictures of the living skeletons. Dunning explained all this to the American Red Cross in Washington, which informed key government officials. Nevertheless, the cover-up continued. Pradervand also informed Charles De Gaulle that one-third of the prisoners handed over to France by the Americans will die soon without a radical change in treatment. De Gaulle showed no interest and the prisoners continued to die.

September 27, 1945: Pradervand’s pictures of German living skeletons were shown to Eisenhower in his office--with witnesses present.

September 30, 1945-October 1: The French newspaper, Le Monde, ran a story which began: “As one speaks today of Dachau, in ten years people throughout the world will speak about camps such as Saint Paul dEgiaux. Well, not so wrong after all--since so many of the pictures you are shown are actually OF THOSE CAMPS AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH GERMAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS--SO YOU HAVE PROVIDED YOUR ENEMY WITH THE VERY PICTURES TO CONTINUE THE FARCE OF THE HOLOCAUST. YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN THE HUMAN IS REDUCED TO SKELETONS--THEY ALL LOOK ALIKE!

OCTOBER 11, 13, 14, 15, 20: The New York Times ran a coverup report of the death camps by star newsman Drew Middleton. Interviewed by Bacque in 1988, Middleton admitted that he never actually visited any of the 50 U.S. camps located within 40 miles of his Frankfurt desk, but was only ”driven by, as he was being debriefed by the military. (Will this not remind Col. Gritz of the so-called news coverage he had in confrontation with the very ones in Southeast Asia who COULD STOP THE DRUG TRADE?) We all end up in the same company-- even old Hatonn got usurped by that very newsman from a radio network. America, you are getting to the point of no return. I suggest you give careful thought to this matter.

December 1945: Eisenhower returned to the States and the U.S. Army allowed the first relief shipment to enter the American sector.

1947-1950s: Nearly all the surviving records of the Rhineland death camps were destroyed. The West German government concluded that 1.7-million German soldiers were alive at the war’s end, and who were known to have been in fair health, and disappeared. The Western Allies pinned virtually all the blame on the Soviets.

1950: The first German edition of ALLHERERTE KRIEGSVERBRECHEN is published. Never translated into English, the book gives eye-witness descriptions of the conditions which prevailed in the American camps.

1960s-1972 : The West German Foreign Office, under Will Brandt subsidized books denying the atrocities in American POW camps and the high death rate. How nice to have bought- off friends on your side, in high places.

1980: The International Committee of the Red Cross refuses to open its archives to James Bacque and other investigators into Allied atrocities. To this day, the ICRC has remained silent on the subject, despite the visits of Pradervand and other Red Cross delegates to many of the camps.

September 1989: James Bacque’s book on the American death camps, “Other Losses”, published by Stoddard, a Canadian Publishing House (but they are not allowed to even have a dissenting opinion about questions regarding the Holocaust), was released, after being refused by more than 30 American publishers. Saturday Night, one of Canada’s most respected magazines, simultaneously published a summary of this book as its lead story and within days Canada was buzzing about Gen. Eisenhower’s war crimes. Why is it that you have heard almost nothing of this in the United States in spite of initial (2 days) of press mention?

As American citizens, many of you who served in the American Armed Forces during World War II, and a great many of you who are of German heritage, should demand of your leaders in Washington, D.C. that the truth about this War be made known.

I know that it tumbles in on top of myriads of other subjects being pressed by you people--so, barrage them with these topics also and DEMAND ACCOUNTING. I further know that it is terrifying to think of the consequences of your coming public. I had a pile of witness reports flow when we first wrote of these matters--all asking for confidentiality--but urging us to continue with the blessed work. Well, my scribe and speakers are about weary of bearing this big target on their chests for ALL the rest of the masses. How long can they continue to carry that burden while you precious citizens are allowed secrecy? Oh, I shall never divulge a name or location without absolute permission-- but if you who have SEEN and KNOW do not come forward, how will you change anything? THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF YOU WHO KNOW AND SAW AND EXPERIENCED THESE ATROCITIES IN EACH AND EVERY SO-CALLED WAR. YOU MUST NOT STOP WEEPING AT THE SHRINES OF YOUR FALLEN BUDDIES--BUT YOU MUST MAKE THEIR PASSAGE WORTH SOMETHING! THE WAR IS AT HOME THIS TIME, YOU MARINES, AIR FORCE, ARMY AND NAVY! THE FRONT IS RIGHT IN YOUR DOOR-YARD AND YOU ARE ABOUT TO LOSE THE WAR, FOR YOU HAVE ALREADY LOST ALMOST ALL OF THE “BATTLES”.

With accurate information of what really happened, instead of Zionist propaganda, just possibly you might be able to avert that World War III, which is now being planned by these same One Worlders.

I remind you again--the next time you are shown pictures of so- called atrocities during World War II purporting to be Jewish victims of “racial extermination”, those are actually pictures of German civilians who had died under American war criminals.

This segment needs to be closed because it grows too long--but don’t go away, Readers, for we are going to finish our subject of the deceit and in that we will also consider Korea and Viet Nam and who and what those wars were all about.

May you rest in peace--then get up off your assets and go to work!

Hatonn to stand-by.



THU., NOV. 14, 1991 11:06A.M. YEAR5, DAY 090



In terms of numbers, Polish Jewry is supposed to have suffered most of all from extermination, not only at Auschwitz, but at an endless list of newly-discovered “death camps” such as Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec, Chelmno, Maidanek and at many more obscure places which seem suddenly to have gained prominence. At the center of the alleged extermination of the Polish Jews is the dramatic uprising in April 1943 of the Warsaw Ghetto. This is often represented as a revolt against being deported to gas ovens; presumably the alleged subject of Hitler and Himmler’s secret discussions” had leaked out and gained wide publicity in Warsaw. The case of the Warsaw Ghetto is an instructive insight into the creation of the extermination legend itself. Indeed, its evacuation by the Germans in 1943 is often referred to as the “extermination of the Polish Jews” although it was nothing of the kind, and layers of mythology have tended to surround it after the publication of sensational novels like John Hersey’s The Wall and Leon Uris Exodus.

When the Germans first occupied Poland, they confined the Jews, not in detention camps but in ghettos for reasons of security. The interior administration of the ghettos was in the hands of Jewish Councils elected by themselves--remember the Jews had openly stated that they were hostile and would join the armed forces against the Germans. These ghettos were policed by independent Jewish police forces. Special currency notes were introduced into the ghettos to prevent speculation. Whether this system was right or wrong, it was somewhat understandable in time of war, and although the ghetto is perhaps an unpleasant social establishment, it is by no means barbaric unless ones within the group choose to be barbaric against their own people. And it is certainly not an organization for the destruction of a race. But, of course, it is frequently said that this is what the ghettos were really for. It has been published, regarding the Warsaw Ghetto, a brazen assertion that concentration camps “were a substitute for the practice of cramming the Jews into overcrowded ghettos and starving them to death.” It seems that whatever security system the Germans used, and to whatever lengths they went to preserve a semblance of community for the Jews, they can never escape the charge of “extermination”. Even to the point of requiring national LAWS that prohibit even the “discussion” of possible flaws in the Holocaust reporting.

It has been already established that the 1931 Jewish population census for Poland placed the number of Jews at 2,732,600, and that after emigration and flight to the Soviet Union, no more than 1,100,000 were under German control. These incontrovertible facts, however, do not prevent Manvell and Frankl asserting that “there had been over three million Jews in Poland when Germany began the invasion” and that in 1942 “some two million still awaited death” (ibid. p. 140). In reality, of the million or so Jews in Poland, almost half, about 400,000 were eventually concentrated in the ghetto of Warsaw, an area of about two and a-half square miles around the old medieval ghetto. The remainder had already been moved to the Polish Government-General by September 1940. In the summer of 1942, Himmler ordered the resettlement of all Polish Jews in detention camps in order to obtain their labor, part of the system of general concentration for labor assignment in the Government-General. Thus between July and October 1942, over three-quarters of the Warsaw Ghetto inhabitants were peacefully evacuated and transported, supervised by the Jewish police themselves. As you have seen, transportation to camps is alleged to have ended in “extermination”, but there is absolutely no doubt from the evidence available that it involved only the effective procurement of labor and the prevention of unrest. In the first place, Himmler discovered on a surprise visit to Warsaw in January 1943 that 24,000 Jews registered as armaments workers were in fact working illegally as tailors and furriers (Manvell & Frankl, ibid. p. 140); the Ghetto was also being used as a base for subversive forays into the main area of Warsaw.

After six months of peaceful evacuation, when only about 60,000 Jews remained in the residential ghetto, the Germans met with an armed rebellion on 18th January 1943. Manvell and Frankl admit that “The Jews involved in planned resistance had for a long time been engaged in smuggling arms from the outside world, and combat groups fired on and killed S.S. men and militia in charge of a column of deportees.” The terrorists in the Ghetto uprising were also assisted by the Polish Home Army and the PPR-Polska Partia Robotnicza, the Communist Polish Workers Party. It was under these circumstances of a revolt aided by partisans and communists that the occupying forces, as any army would in a similar situation, moved in to suppress the terrorists, if necessary by destroying the residential area itself. It should be remembered that the whole process of evacuation would have continued peacefully had not extremists among the inhabitants planned an armed rebellion which in the end was bound to fail. When S.S. Lieutenant-General Stroop entered the Ghetto with armored cars on April 19th, he immediately came under fire and lost twelve men; German and Polish casualties in the battle, which lasted four weeks, totalled 101 men killed and wounded. Stubborn resistance by the Jewish Combat Organization in the face of impossible odds led to an estimated 12,000 Jewish casualties, the majority by remaining in burning buildings and dug-outs. A total, however, of 56,065 inhabitants were captured and peacefully resettled in the area of the Government- General. Many Jews within the Ghetto had resented the terror imposed on them by the Combat Organization, and had attempted to inform on their headquarters to the German authorities.


The circumstances surrounding the Warsaw Ghetto revolt, as well as the deportations to eastern labor camps such as Auschwitz, has led to the most colorful tales concerning the fate of Polish Jews, the largest bloc of Jewry in Europe. The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, in figures prepared by them for the Nuremberg Trials, stated that in 1945 there were only 80,000 Jews remaining in Poland. They also alleged that there were no Polish-Jewish displaced persons left in Germany or Austria, a claim that was at some variance with the number of Polish Jews arrested by the British and Americans for black market activities. However, the new Communist regime in Poland was unable to prevent a major anti-Jewish pogrom at Kielce on July 4th, 1946, and more than 150,000 Polish Jews suddenly fled into Western Germany. Their appearance was somewhat embarrassing, and their emigration to Palestine and the United States was carried out in record time. Subsequently, the number of Polish Jewish survivors underwent considerable revision; in the American-Jewish Year Book 1948-1949 it was placed at 390,000, quite an advance on the original 80,000. You may expect further revisions upwards in the future as things unfold.


The most influential agency in the propagation of the extermination legend has been the paper-back book and magazine industry, and it is through their sensational publications, produced for commercial gain, that the average person is made acquainted with a myth of an entirely political character and purpose. The hey-day of these hate-Germany books was in the 1950s, when virulent Germano-phobia found a ready market, but the industry continues to flourish and is experiencing another boom today and increases by leaps and bounds annually. The industry’s products consist generally of so-called “memoirs”, and these fall into two basic categories: those which are supposedly by former S.S. men, camp commandants and the like, and those bloodcurdling reminiscences allegedly by former concentration camp inmates.


Here is where you had best begin to pay careful attention so that you get the “hook-up” because this IS, after all, the most elaborate plan at One World Government ever on your planet.

Of the first kind, the most outstanding example is COMMANDANT OF AUSCHWITZ by Rudolf Hoess (London, 1960), which was originally published in the Polish language as Wspomnienia by the Communist Government. Hoess, a young man who took over at Auschwitz in 1940, was first arrested by the British and detained at Flensburg, but he was soon handed over to the Polish Communist authorities who condemned him to death in 1947 and executed him almost immediately. The so-called Hoess memoirs are undoubtedly false and were produced under Communist auspices, as you shall see, though the Communists themselves claim that Hoess was “ordered to write the story of his life” and a hand-written original supposedly exists, but no one has ever seen it. Hoess was subjected to incredible torture and brain-washing as only the Communist Psychopoliticians can inflict it during the period of his arrest, and his testimony at Nuremberg was delivered in a mindless monotone as he stared blankly into space. Even Reitlinger rejects this testimony as hopelessly untrustworthy. It is indeed remarkable how much of the “evidence” regarding the Six Million stems from Communist sources; this includes the major documents such as the Wisliceny statement and the Hoess “memoirs”, which are undoubtedly the two most quoted items in extermination literature, as well as all the information on the so-called “death camps” such as Auschwitz. This information comes from the Jewish Historical Commission of Poland; the Central Commission for the Investigation of War Crimes, Warsaw; and the Russian State War Crimes Commission, Moscow.

Reitlinger acknowledges that the Hoess testimony at Nuremberg was a catalog of wild exaggerations, such as that Auschwitz was disposing of 16,000 people a day, which would mean a total at the end of the war of over 13 million. Instead of exposing such estimates for the Soviet-inspired frauds they obviously are, Reitlinger and others prefer to think that such ridiculous exaggerations were due to “pride in doing a professional job. Ironically, this is completely irreconcilable with the supposedly authentic Hoess memoirs, which make a clever attempt at plausibility by suggesting the opposite picture of distaste for the job. Hoess is supposed to have “confessed” to a total of 3 million people exterminated at Auschwitz, though at his own trial in Warsaw the prosecution reduced the number to 1,135,000. However, we have already noted that the Soviet government announced an official figure of 4 million after their “investigation” of the camp in 1945. This kind of casual juggling with millions of people does not appear to worry the writers of the extermination literature.

A review of the Hoess “memoirs” in all their horrid detail would be tedious. We may confine ourselves to those aspects of the extermination legend which are designed with the obvious purpose of forestalling any proof of its falsity. Such, for example, is the manner in which the alleged extermination of Jews is described. This was supposed to have been carried out by a “special detachment” of Jewish prisoners. They took charge of the newly arrived contingents at the camp, led them into the enormous “gas-chambers” and disposed of the bodies afterwards. The S.S., therefore, did very little, so that most of the S.S. personnel at the camp could be left in complete ignorance of the “extermination program”. Of course, no Jew would ever be found who claimed to have been a member of this gruesome “special detachment”, so that the whole issue is left conveniently unprovable. It is worth repeating that no living, authentic eyewitness of these events has ever been produced.

Conclusive evidence that the Hoess memoirs are a forgery lies in an incredible slip by the Communist editors. Hoess is supposed to say that the Jehovah’s Witnesses at Auschwitz approved of murdering the Jews because the Jews were the enemies of Christ. It is well known that in Soviet Russia today and in all her satellite countries of eastern Europe, the Communists conduct a bitter campaign of suppression against the Jehovah’s Witnesses, whom they regard as the religious sect most dangerous to Communist beliefs. That this sect is deliberately and grossly defamed in the Hoess memoirs proves the document’s Communist origins beyond any doubt.


Certainly the most bogus “memoirs” yet published are those of Adolf Eichmann. Before his illegal kidnapping by the Israelis in May, 1960 and the attendant blaze of international publicity, few people had ever hear of him. He was indeed a relatively unimportant person, the head of Office A4b in Department IV (the Gestapo) of the Reich Security Head Office. His office supervised the transportation to detention camps of a particular section of enemy aliens, the Jews. A positive flood of unadulterated rubbish about Eichmann showered the world in 1960, of which we may cite as an example Homer Clarke’s EICHMANN THE SAVAGE TRUTH. (“The orgies often went on until six in the morning, a few hours before consigning the next batch of victims to death,” says Clarke in his chapter “Streamlined Death, Wild Sex Orgies”, p. 124.)

Strangely enough, the alleged “memoirs” of Adolf Eichmann suddenly appeared at the time of his abduction to Israel. They were uncritically published by the American “Life” magazine (Nov. 28, Dec. 5, 1960), and were supposed to have been given by Eichmann to a journalist in the Argentine shortly before his capture--an amazing coincidence. Other sources, however, gave an entirely different account of their origin, claiming that they were a record based on Eichmann’s comments to an associate in 1955, though no one even bothered to identify this person. By an equally extraordinary coincidence, war crimes investigators claimed shortly afterwards to have just “found” in the archives of the U.S. Library of Congress, more than fifteen years after the war, the “complete file” of Eichmann’s department. So far as the memoirs” themselves are concerned, they were made to be as horribly incriminating as possible without straying too far into the realms of the purest fantasy, and depict Eichmann speaking with enormous relish about “the physical annihilation of the Jews”. Their fraudulence is also attested to by various factual errors, such as that Himmler was already in command of the Reserve Army by April of 1944, instead of after the July plot against Hitler’s life, a fact which Eichmann would certainly have known. The appearance of these memoirs” at precisely the right moment leaves no doubt that their object was to present a pre-trial propaganda picture of the archetypal unregenerate Nazi and fiend in human shape”.

The circumstances of the Eichmann trial in Israel do not concern us here; the documents of Soviet Origin which were used in evidence, such as the Wisliceny statement, have been examined already, and for an account of the third-degree methods used on Eichmann during his captivity to render him “co-operative” the reader is referred to the London Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 2, 1960. More relevant to the literature of the extermination legend are the contents of a letter which Eichmann is supposed to have written voluntarily and handed over to his captors in Buenos Aries. It need hardly be added that its Israeli authorship is transparently obvious. Nothing in it stretches human credulity further than the phrase “I am submitting this declaration of my own free will,” but the most hollow and revealing statement of all is his alleged willingness to appear before a court in Israel, “so that a true picture may be transmitted to future generations.” Now you who are in knowledge of possibilities contained herein, please be patient and keep to the subject. It matters not whether this man was an “imposter”, “synthetic”, “double” or just the “same old man”--for the intent is the same and that is to further deepen the deceit by whatever means necessary to keep the world from finding out in time to stop the move for world control.


One of the latest reminiscences to appear in print are those of Franz Stangl, the former commandant of the camp of Treblinka in Poland who was sentenced to life imprisonment in Dec. 1970. These were published in an article by the London Daily Telegraph Magazine, Oct. 8, 1971, and were supposed to derive from a series of interviews with Stangl in prison. He died a few days after the interviews were concluded. These alleged reminiscences are certainly the goriest and most bizarre yet published, though one is grateful for a few admissions by the writer of the article, such as that “the evidence presented in the course of his trial did not prove Stangl himself to have committed specific acts of murder” and that the account of Stangl’s beginnings in Poland was in part fabrication.

A typical example of this fabrication was the description of Stangl’s first visit to Treblinka. As he drew into the railway station there, he is supposed to have seen “thousands of bodies” just strewn around next to the tracks, “hundreds, no, thousands of bodies everywhere, putrefying, decomposing”. And “in the station was a train full of Jews, some dead, some still alive.. .it looked as if it had been there for days.” The account reaches the heights of absurdity when Stangl is alleged to have got out of his car and “stepped kneedeep into money; I Didn’t know which way to turn, which way to go. I waded in papernotes, currency, precious stones, jewelry and clothes. They were everywhere, strewn all over the square.” The scene is completed by “whores from Warsaw weaving drunk, dancing, singing, playing music”, who were on the other side of the barbed wire fences. To literally believe this account of sinking “kneedeep” in Jewish banknotes and precious stones amid thousands of putrefying corpses and lurching, singing prostitutes would require the most phenomenal degree of gullibility, and in any circumstances other than the Six Million legend it would be dismissed as the most outrageous nonsense.

The statement which certainly robs the Stangl memoirs of any vestige of authenticity is his alleged reply when asked why he thought the Jews were being exterminated: “They wanted the Jews money, is the answer. “That racial business was just secondary.” The series of interviews are supposed to have ended on a highly dubious note indeed. When asked whether he thought there had been “any conceivable sense in this horror”, the former Nazi commandant supposedly replied with enthusiasm: “Yes, I am sure there was. Perhaps the Jews were meant to have this enormous jolt to pull them together; to create a people; to identify themselves with each other”. One could scarcely imagine a more perfect answer had it been invented!

Let us have a break at this point prior to taking up the so-called Diary of Anne Frank.

Thank you,




FRI., NOV. 15, 1991 8:14 A.M. YEARS, DAY 091



The most important thing of this day is probably missed by 99 & 9/10ths per cent of you-the-public.

Representative Gonzales of Texas made a speech before the House (totally empty) regarding “Special Orders”; this subject being in objection to the NEW WORLD ORDER EUROPEAN CURRENCY UNION. This is THE MOST IMPORTANT economic issue in your world and to the U.S. is without doubt the worst nightmare to ever strike if (WHEN) it comes into being. This is more important a “group” than the Committee of 7 and/or “10” and your nation cannot stand alone when this issue is brought into law. It deals with the one world currency which, in effect, will cause you to pay off all of your existing debts (trillions of dollars) in what amounts to a foreign currency--and you cannot do it.

There was one gentleman in the “audience” for the speech and he left--having obviously been there to hear the rantings of a Representative from Louisiana denouncing David Duke.

Actually, that is worthy of note herein. What is this outrage against one, David Duke? Why don’t you look at this in its proper perspective? The people are sick and tired of the criminals who run your Governments. Further, just to say you are ...against quotas and hiring of incapable persons just because they are a specific ”color” is intelligent, not bigoted. The point is to bring all “colors” and “creeds” into balance in equality and you will never legislate that balance through “laws” that require that “man” act in harmony. The young man took some foolish actions earlier which will better serve your nation NOW--for he will dare not act in bigoted manners for he knows the glass is upon him. My feeling is that the criminals in your Government and Political Parties protesteth far too loudly. They want no one in power that can uncover the lies to you-the-public. If you ones will deliberately elect a known and self-professing criminal into office then I suggest you deserve fully that which is coming down upon your nation. You cannot legislate “MORALITY”-- that comes from experience and dedication within. Criminality suggests total evasion of the laws to suit a “persons” greedy selfish fulfillment. God does not judge, but you can expect to flow back unto you in each event--exactly in kind--that which you sow. The man with the “moral” issue at stake says he has changed and grown. The criminal laughs and says nothing about reform in any believable measure whatsoever. It is YOU who must be discerning in these instances for you know on the one hand you will simply have more and greater criminal corruption. The other man may have a few good points, after all.

Why do you object? Because you have been told by the media that he associates with Nazis, KKK, etc? In the first place you can only assume such from what he tells you for you cannot believe the media which is totally Zionist run. You cannot tell from the politicians who do not wish to lose their corrupted positions. So you must look at the facts.

Your First Amendment rights under the Constitution give you the right to express your opinion. When Duke says he is not in favor of interracial marriages and quotas but is in favor of lifting the minorities up from the poverty and into education, etc.--DOES HE NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS THAT OPINION? If you prefer “red” to “blue”, do you not have a right to that opinion? The point is, will the man stand in justice under the law? Until you ones get the important facts in view-- you will continue to be manipulated by the media adversaries to “common law” and freedom.

You must further come to know that the “activist” groups are arranged to totally destroy order. I know that ones must speak out--but these groups are to cause confusion and mass emotional reaction, not knowledgeable response. I am not here to tell you what to do or think--in freedom you have a right to do and think that which is within your rights as a citizen. My commission is to present the Truth to you, even if it brings great discomfort to my own crew to do so. I assure you that Dharma would like to resign her post. Bullets hurt, no matter who you are. Meanness brings pain to the target--I care not who you are. Disagreement is one thing but to threaten death if you continue to speak, in a so-called “free” nation, is without acceptable reason. You all must think hard on these things for you are about to come under rule by the sword. When you can no longer speak out in your opinion regarding possibility of incorrectness of given issues-- you are a lost people. I remind you that the Zionists leagues have proposed legislation before your Congress to make it “illegal” to even disagree with their presentation of what happened at the so-called Holocaust. I remind you that in France, Germany, England, Canada and the Soviet Union (and several other European nations) IT IS NOW ILLEGAL TO EVEN HAVE AND VOICE AN OPINION THAT INFERS THE HOLOCAUST DID NOT OCCUR-- EVEN “DIFFERING” IN NUMBERS OR OTHERWISE SPECULATION AS TO POSSIBILITIES OTHER THAN GIVEN YOU BY THE ZIONISTS. This is the most vile and evil form of moral blackmail and financial extortion. The bill is in present argument before the Australian Law Reform Commission--to make denial of the orthodox version of the holocaust a “hate crime”. Who is that “hate” against? You better look again--it makes YOU the victim of “hate crime” IF YOU DISAGREE! Oh, you think I am bigoted and want to deny right to change laws to protect the public? The “public” is not bringing any of these suggestions, even before the United Nations (as is also under way), it is brought forth by the Jewish Leagues and announced through “Jewish” press. In Australia, for instance, in September (27), 1991 it is announced that the Secretary of the Executive Council of Australian Jewrv and Sydney (Australia) director of Australia/Israel publications, has asked “. . . the Australian Law Reform Commission to make denial of the orthodox version of the holocaust a ”hate crime. I don’t know how you can better sum it up than in their own words.

How is it that these ones proudly announce themselves ”JEWS” and yet if another calls them “Jew” it is unacceptable? What are you doing, World?


We will continue to give you “facts”. For this deed, the people are continually under threat of death by the self-proclaimed Zionists. They identify their origin only leaving personal identification missing. The papers and books are publicly burned and a special packet of threats has gone from the ADL (Jewish Anti-Defamation League) to every known TV station and Radio station. IS THIS FREEDOM IN AMERICA? YOU ALLOW YOUR GOVERNMENT TO PAY FOR MUSEUM PRODUCTIONS OF HOMOSEXUAL SEXUAL ACTS IN PICTURES, PORNOGRAPHIC PLAYS ARE PRESENTED THROUGH GOVERNMENT FUNDING, AND OTHER PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIAL IS BLESSED--BUT WHEN SOMEONE SPEAKS OUT AND SAYS, “HEY. HERE IS EVIDENCE THAT SOMETHING MIGHT BE A BIT WRONG WITH NUMBERS AND PRESENTATION OF A THING CALLED THE HOLOCAUST”--YOU ARE THREATENED WITH DEATH! THIS THREATENING COMES FROM THE VERY GROUP WHO GAVE FORTH THE ORTHODOX VERSION !!! MIGHT IT BE A BIT WISE FOR YOU TO ALSO QUESTION INTENT?

Well, today it is still “legal” to write in differing opinion and therefore, we shall write as quickly as the little fingers can move--TO BRING YOU THE COMPILED FACTS SO THAT YOU CAN JUDGE ON FACTS AND NOT EMOTION. I ONLY ASK HEARING FOR IF YOU CANNOT COME INTO BALANCE THROUGH TRUTH THERE IS NOT MUCH GOD CAN OFFER UNTO YOU. SO BE IT.

Dharma, we have hundreds of pages to present on this matter and, therefore, we must attend it while we can do so. You of the world populace have been such “people-of-the-LIES” for so long that you have ceased to “think”. It is time to “reason” lest you never be given another chance upon this wondrous place called “Earth”.

This is the task I have been sent forth to do, and so shall it be done--what you do with the Truth is of your own choosing. Amen.


Of the other variety of memoirs, those which present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, and the truth concerning this book is only one appalling insight into the fabrication of the propaganda legend. It has already been proven over and over again as a hoax, but the media and Zionists continue to deny the facts and continue to silence the truth-bringers. I only give that which has been presented to you over and over again. Why don’t YOU know about these things? Because the contradiction is NEVER ALLOWED ON THE MEDIA OR IN THE PRESS IN ANY WAY WHICH GAINS ATTENTION. BOOKS CONTAINING THE TRUTH ARE BANISHED AND A SPECIAL FOOTBALL GAME WILL BE AIRED IN THE SLOT WHEREIN SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE GIVEN YOU SOME TRUTH.

First published in 1952, THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK became an immediate best-seller; since then it has been republished in paper-back, going through 40 impressions, and was made into a successful Hollywood film. In royalties alone, Otto Frank, the girl’s father, has made a fortune from the sale of the book, which purports to represent the real-life tragedy of his daughter. With its direct appeal to the emotions, the book and the film have influenced literally millions of people, certainly more throughout the world than any other story of its kind. And yet only seven years after its initial publication A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT CASE ESTABLISHED THAT THE BOOK WAS A HOAX.

It is the way in which the book is presented that is the problem. If it had been presented as a novel of “fiction” and drama--excellent--for it is sensitive and emotionally captivating. But this is NOT that which happened. THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl from Amsterdam, which she wrote at the age of 12 while her family and four other Jews were hiding in the back room of a house during the German occupation. Eventually, they were arrested and detained in a concentration camp, where Anne Frank supposedly died when she was 14. When Otto Frank was liberated from the camp at the end of the war, he returned to the Amsterdam house and “found” his daughter’s diary concealed in the rafters.

The truth about the Anne Frank Diary was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the “diary” and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15, 1959, as follows:

History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth.

The Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, Anne Frank’s Diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.”

[H: This is NOT the reasoning which is valid, however, for one does not “judge” on such opinion but on merit of facts presented]

A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the Anne Frank Diary.

Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just as it was and ”implanted it in the diary as being his daughter’s intellectual work.”

Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962 from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated:

I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.

I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman’s decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported in 141 New York Supplement, Second Series 170, and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk’s office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one...

Here, then, is just one more fraud in a whole series of frauds perpetrated in support of the “Holocaust” legend and the saga of the Six Million. Of course, the court case bearing directly on the authenticity of the Anne Frank Diary was “not officially reported”.

A brief reference may also be made to another “diary”, published not long after that of Anne Frank and entitled: NOTES FROM THE WARSAW GHETTO THE JOURNAL OF EMMANUEL RINGELBLUM (New York, 1958). Ringelblum had been a leader in the campaign of sabotage against the Germans in Poland, as well as the revolt of the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943, before he was eventually arrested and executed in 1944.

It is a MUST to constantly remind yourselves of the facts herein regarding the REASON the “JEWS” were in that Ghetto: The “JEWS” had also declared to be in a State of War against Germany. America had already put all American Japanese citizens and any Japanese in the States into concentration (detention) camps. This was the same event in Germany only with Jews--who had declared war against Germany and were, in fact, having constant war encounters. The gathering up of Jews Didn’t “just happen”--the Jews declared a state of war.

The Ringelblum journal, which speaks of the usual “rumors” allegedly circulating about the extermination of the Jews in Poland, appeared under exactly the same Communist auspices as the so-called Hoess memoirs. McGraw-Hill, the publishers of the American edition, admit that they were denied access to the uncensored original manuscript in Warsaw, and instead faithfully followed the expurgated volume published by the Communist Government in Warsaw in 1952. All the “proofs” of the Holocaust issuing from Communist sources of this kind are worthless as historical documents.

Since the war, there has been an abundant growth of sensational concentration camp literature, the majority of it Jewish, each book piling horror upon horror, blending fragments of truth with the most grotesque of fantasies and impostures, relentlessly creating an edifice of mythology in which any relations to historical fact has long since disappeared. We have referred to the type already--Olga Lengyel’s absurd FIVE CHIMNEYS (“24,000 corpses handled every day”). The truth is terrible enough and to lie causes all respect to leave for that horror which was actually present.

You have to realize, dear ones, that this is part and parcel of the “plan” to deceive and thereby move into one world control over you-the-masses. It is directly accomplished through the traditions, such as the “Kol Nidre” whereby annually on Day of Atonement--the vows are rendered negated until the following Day of Atonement. The Protocols “order” that the Talmudists (Zionists) lie, cheat, steal and do anything necessary to accomplish the ends of World Domination. Another couple of books which represent the same type of issue are DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ by Miklos Nyiszli, apparently a mythical and invented person, THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP by Philip Friedman, and so on ad nauseam.

Another in this same vein is FOR THOSE I LOVED by Martin Gray (Bodley Head, 1973), which purports to be an account of his experiences at Treblinka camp in Poland. Gray specialized in selling fake antiques to America before turning to concentration camp memoirs. The circumstances surrounding the publication of his book, however, have been unique, because for the first time with works of this kind, serious doubt was cast on the authenticity of its contents. Even Jews, alarmed at the damage it might cause, denounced his book as fraudulent and questioned whether he had ever been at Treblinka at all, while B.B.C. radio pressed him as to why he had waited 28 years before writing of his experiences.

You all must realize that it is only the few who know the truth of these lies. Ones who came out of the concentration camps to find family members still living never thought further than the ones who came out and found all missing. There was no way to KNOW what transpired in another place--even the next room. Circumstances were terrible at best and the stories would be accepted without question--just as YOU do that your Government is Pure and Works in your Behalf! Your senses tell you otherwise but it is easier and more comforting to believe the “orthodox” ideas. As these ones who escaped are shown pictures supposedly of Auschwitz--how can they know the pictures came from an Eisenhower prison camp of death? As you come into discernment, this is WHY you must attend facts as given and THEN, ONLY THEN, decide how it might have been other than given.

It was interesting to observe that the “Personal Opinion” column of the London Jewish Chronicle, March 29, 1973, although it roundly condemned Gray’s book, nevertheless made grandiose additions to the myth of the Six Million. It stated that: “Nearly a million people were murdered in Treblinka in the course of a year, 18,000 were fed into the gas chambers every day.” It is a pity indeed that so many people read and accept this kind of nonsense without so much as exercising their minds. If 18,000 were murdered every day, the figure of one million would be reached in a mere 56 days, not “in the course of a year”. This gigantic achievement would leave the remaining ten months of the year a total blank. 18,000 every day would in fact mean a total of 6,480,000” “in the course of a year”. Does this mean that the Six Million died in twelve months at Treblinka? What about the alleged three or four million at Auschwitz? This kind of thing simply shows that, once the preposterous compromise figure of Six Million had scored a resounding success and become internationally accepted, any number of impossible permutations can be made and no one would even think to criticize them. In its review of Gray’s book, the Jewish Chronicle column also provides a revealing insight into the fraudulent allegations concerning gas-chambers: “Gray recalls that the floors of the gas chambers sloped, whereas another survivor who helped to build them maintains that they were at a level...”

Occasionally, books by former concentration camp inmates appear which present a totally different picture of the conditions prevailing in them. Such is UNDER TWO DICTATORS (London, 1950) by Marguerite Buber. She was a German-Jewish woman who had experienced several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian prison camp before being sent to Ravensbruck, the German camp for women detainees, in August 1940. She noted that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not straight away released from the Gestapo. Her book presents a striking contrast between the camps of Soviet Russia and Germany; compared to the squalor, disorder and starvation of the Russian camp, she found Ravensbruck to be clean, civilized and well- administered. Regular baths (showers) and clean linen seemed a luxury after her earlier experiences, and her first meal of white bread, sausage, sweet porridge and dried fruit prompted her to inquire of another camp inmate whether August 3rd, 1940 was some sort of holiday or special occasion. She observed, too, that the barracks at Ravensbruck were remarkably spacious compared to the crowded mud hut of the Soviet camp. In the final months of 1945, she experienced the progressive decline of camp conditions, the causes of which we shall examine later.

Another account which is at total variance with popular propaganda is Die Gestapo Lasst Bitten (The Gestapo Invites You) by Charlotte Bormann, a Communist political prisoner who was also interned at Ravensbruck. Undoubtedly its most important revelation is the author’s statement that rumors of gas executions were deliberate and malicious inventions circulated among the prisoners by the Communists. This latter group did not accept Marguerite Buber because of her imprisonment in Soviet Russia.

A further shocking reflection on the post-war trials is the fact that Charlotte Bormann was not permitted to testify at the Rastadt trial of Ravensbruck camp personnel in the French occupation zone, the usual fate of those who denied the extermination legend.

You say, “Well, these discounters can’t be believed! Why? You believe the exaggerated and totally impossible tales of the opposition which is far more heinous to believe! I don’t ask that you believe one against another--JUST LOOK AT THE FACTS!!!

Let us take a bit of a rest-break before we take up the subject of the nature and condition of those war-time concentration camps. I would remind all of you that concentration camps are exactly what their name implies and in war, it means a very tacky situation at best. There certainly were camps in which Death should have been the first name--but precious ones, they seem to all be found inside the control of the Iron Curtain Communist Zionists. It always comes back to haunt all of you--and MUST BE FACED! And still--NONE can begin to compare with the horror of the Eisenhower Death Camps--NONE!

Hatonn to clear.

Please summon me when you are ready to proceed with the writing.

Thank you.



FRI., NOV. 15, 1991 12:15 P.M. YEAR 5, DAY 091


In his recent book ADOLF HITLER (London, 1973), Colin Cross, who brings more intelligence than is usual to many problems of this period, observes astutely that “The shuffling of millions of Jews around Europe and murdering them, in a time of desperate war emergency, was useless from any rational point of view” (p. 307). How many of you can relate to just having family and relatives, say a large family of 20, to a special Thanksgiving dinner and they are there as your guests for the week-end. Taking this tiny little “blip” of possibility a bit further; now take this little gathering for three days of meals, bathing, sleeping, etc., etc., and multiply it to 50, 100, 1000-- now try a million--3 million--6 million! Now, while you are trying to fix this celebration dinner, you also have a full-blown bombing war going on, the power goes off and you have no cooking facilities, the dog kills the cat after it ate the pet canary, the babies are teething and have chicken pox and the in-laws find dust on the furniture. Now, you have to stop what you are doing and murder all these people and dispose (totally) of the bodies for you must not have any evidence of the act remaining! You may actually, at this point, feel like doing just that--but it becomes totally impractical to consider as a feasible course of action. Does it not leave consideration of possibilities of perceptions which are simply not true? You ones must begin to put these things into reasonable perspective and THEN look at possibilities and PROBABILITIES.

At the point above it becomes necessary to question the likelihood of this irrationalism, and whether it was even possible. Is it likely that, at the height of the war when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts, they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses? To have conveyed three or four million Jews to Auschwitz alone (even supposing that such an inflated number existed in Europe, which it did not), would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities which were strained to the limit in supporting the far-flung Russian front. To have transported the mythical six million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps, and to have housed, clothed and fed them there, would simply have paralyzed their military operations. There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk.

On the other hand, the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners to Auschwitz in the course of the war (the number known to be registered there) at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied. In fact, of the 3 million Jews living in Europe, it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time, and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000-- that is a LOT of people. You shall see later, in the “Report of the Red Cross”, that whole Jewish populations such as that of Slovakia avoided detention in camps, while others were placed in community “ghettos” like Theresienstadt. Moreover, from western Europe deportations were far fewer. The estimate of Reitlinger that only about 50,000 French Jews from a total population of 320,000 were deported and interned has been already noted.

The question must also be asked as to whether it could have been physically possible to destroy the millions of Jews that are alleged. Had the Germans enough time for it? Is it likely that they would have cremated people by the million when they were so short of manpower and required all prisoners of war for purposes of war production? Would it have been possible to destroy and remove all traces of a million people in six months? Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret? This secrecy, you must remember, was kept from the very inmates in the orthodox view of this matter--there are NO witnesses to any gassing--not even inmates of the camp! These are the kind of questions that the critical, thinking person should be asking. And he will soon discover that not only the statistical and documentary evidence given here, but simple logistics combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million.

Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature and conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible. William Shirer, in a typically reckless passage, states that All of the thirty odd principal Nazi concentration camps were death camps” (ibid. p. 1150). This is totally untrue, and is not even accepted now by the principal propagators of the extermination legend. Shirer also quotes Eugen Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y. 1950, p. 227) which puts the total number of deaths at all of them at the ridiculous figure of 7,125,000, though Shirer admits in a footnote that this is “undoubtedly too high”.


It is true that in 1945 Allied propaganda did claim that all the concentration camps, particularly those in Germany itself, were “death camps”, but not for long. On this question, the eminent American historian Harry Elmer Barnes wrote: “These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen and Dora, but it was soon demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in these camps. Attention was then moved to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Beizec, Chelmno, Jonowska, Tarnow, Ravensbruck, Maughausen, Brezeznia and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed” (Rampart Journal, Summer 1967). What had happened was that certain honest observers among the British and American occupation forces in Germany, while admitting that many inmates had died of disease and starvation in the final months of the war, had found no evidence after all of “gas chambers”. As a result, eastern camps in the Russian zone of occupation such as Auschwitz and Treblinka gradually came to the fore as horrific centers of extermination (though no one was permitted to see them), and this tendency has lasted to the present day. Here in these camps it was all supposed to have happened, but with the Iron Curtain brought down firmly over them, no one has ever been able to verify such charges. The Communists claimed that four million people died at Auschwitz in gigantic gas chambers accommodating 2,000 people--and no one could argue to the contrary.

What is the truth about so-called “gas chambers”? Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement in the widely read Catholic magazine Our Sunday Visitor, June 14th, 1959:

I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. Nor were there gas chambers in any of the other concentration camps in Germany. We were told that there was a gas chamber at Auschwitz, but since that was in the Russian zone of occupation, we were not permitted to investigate since the Russians would not allow it. From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”

This tells a very different story from the customary propaganda. Pinter, of course, is very astute on the question of the crematory being represented as a gas chamber. This is a frequent ploy because no such a thing as a gas chamber has ever been shown to exist in these camps, hence the deliberately misleading term of “gas oven”, aimed at confusing a gas chamber with a crematorium. The latter, usually a single furnace and similar to the kind of thing employed today, were used quite simply for the cremation of those persons who had died from various causes within the camp, particularly infectious diseases. This fact was conclusively proved by the German archbishop, Cardinal Faulhaber of Munich. He informed the Americans that during the Allied air raids on Munich in September 1944, 30,000 people were killed. The archbishop requested the authorities at the time to cremate the bodies of the victims in the crematorium at Dachau. But he was told that, unfortunately, this plan could not be carried out; the crematorium, having only one furnace, was not able to cope with the bodies of the air raid victims. Clearly, therefore, it could not have coped with the 238,000 Jewish bodies which were allegedly cremated there. In order to do so, the crematorium would have to be kept going for 326 years without stopping and 530 tons of ashes would have been created.


The figures of Dachau casualties are typical of the kind of exaggerations that have since had to be drastically revised. In 1946, a memorial plaque was unveiled at Dachau by Philip Auerbach, the Jewish State-Secretary in the Bavarian Government who was convicted for embezzling money which he claimed as compensation for non-existent Jews. The plaque read: “This area is being retained as a shrine to the 238,000 individuals who were cremated here.” Since then, the official casualty figures have had to be steadily revised downwards, and now stand at only 20,600, the majority from typhus and starvation only at the end of the war. This deflation, to ten percent of the original figure, will doubtless continue, and one day will be applied to the legendary figure of six million as a whole.


Another example of drastic revision is the present estimate of Auschwitz casualties. The absurd allegations of three or four million deaths there are no longer plausible even to Reitlinger. He now puts the number of casualties at only 600,000; and although this figure is still exaggerated in the extreme, it is a significant reduction on four million and further progress is to be expected. Shirer himself quotes Reitlinger’s latest estimate, but he fails to reconcile this with his earlier statement that half of that figure, about 300,000 Hungarian Jews were supposedly “done to death in forty-six days”--a supreme example of the kind of irresponsible nonsense that is written on this subject.

Another thing that seems strange to me is WHY would ones who are so without mercy and so heinous bother with the middle step of providing gas chambers? You Didn’t bother to even kill the troops you buried in the Eisenhower camp holes nor in the trenches in Iraq. Why, then, would not the people be placed directly into the ovens to be both killed and cremated? There seems to be totally illogical and inefficient methodology at play in this scenario. Do you suppose it was to insure that the Polish gas salesman, who later became Pope, could continue in business? Come, come, chelas--God gave you brains with which to REASON!


That several thousand camp inmates did die in the chaotic final months of the war brings us to the question of their war-time conditions. These have been deliberately falsified in innumerable books of an extremely lurid and unpleasant kind. The Red Cross Report, examined below, demonstrates conclusively that throughout the war the camps were well administered. The working inmates received a daily ration, even throughout 1943 and 1944, of not less than 2,750 calories, which was more than double the average civilian ration in occupied Germany in the years after 1945. The internees were under regular medical care, and those who became seriously ill were transferred to hospital. All internees, unlike those in Soviet camps, could receive parcels of food, clothing and pharmaceutical supples from the Special Relief Division of the Red Cross. The Office of the Public Prosecutor conducted thorough investigations into each case of criminal arrest, and those found innocent were released; those found guilty, as well as those deportees convicted of major crimes within the camp, were sentenced by military courts and executed. In the Federal Archives of Kohlenz there is a directive of January 1943 from Himmler regarding such executions, stressing that “no brutality is to be allowed” (Manvell & Frankl, ibid. p. 312). Occasionally there was brutality but such cases were immediately scrutinized by S.S. Judge Dr. Konrad Morgen of the Reich Criminal Police Office, whose job was to investigate irregularities at the various camps. Morgen himself prosecuted commander Koch of Buchenwald in 1943 for excesses at his camp, a trial to which the German public was invited. It is significant that Oswald Pohl, the administrator of the concentration camp system who was dealt with so harshly at Nuremberg, was in favor of the death penalty for Koch. In fact, the S.S. court did sentence Koch to death, but he was given the option of serving on the Russian front. Before he could do this, however, Prince Waldeck, the leader of the S.S. in the district, carried out his execution. This case seems ample proof of the seriousness with which the S.S. regarded unnecessary brutality. Several S.S. court actions of this kind were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses, and more than 800 cases were investigated before 1945. Did some go unaccounted for? Certainly, I would imagine--do you know what goes on in your prisons? What about Rodney King of Los Angeles? All we suggest is that you open your eyes and LOOK.



Morgen testified at Nuremberg that he discussed confidentially with hundreds of inmates the prevailing conditions in the camps. He found few that were undernourished except in the hospitals, and noted that the pace and achievement in compulsory labor by inmates was far lower than among German civilian workers.

The evidence of Pinter and Cardinal Faulhaber has been shown to disprove the claims of extermination at Dachau, and we have seen how the casualty figures of that camp have been continuously revised downwards. The camp at Dachau near Munich, in fact, may be taken as fairly typical of these places of internment. Compulsory labor in the factories and plants was the order of the day, but the Communist leader Ernst Ruff testified in his Nuremberg affidavit of April 18th, 1947 that the treatment of prisoners on the work details and in the camp of Dachau remained humane. The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940 until April 19th, 1945 also testified on March 21st, 1946 that prisoners there received good treatment, and that the S.S. personnel at the camp were “well disciplined”. Berta Schirotschin, who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates, until the beginning of 1945 and despite increasing privation in Germany, received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning.

In general, hundreds of affidavits from Nuremberg testify to the humane conditions prevailing in concentration camps; but emphasis was invariably laid on those which reflected badly on the German administration and could be used for propaganda purposes. A study of the documents also reveals that Jewish witnesses who resented their deportation and internment in prison camps tended to greatly exaggerate the rigors of their condition, whereas other nationals interned for political reasons, such as those cited above, generally presented a more balanced picture. In many cases, prisoners such as Charlotte Bormann, whose experiences did not accord with the picture presented at Nuremberg, were not permitted to testify


The orderly situation prevailing in the German concentration camps slowly broke down in the last fearful months of 1945. The Red Cross Report of 1948 explains that the saturation bombing by the Allies paralyzed the transport and communications system of the Reich, no food reached the camps and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims, both in prison camps and among the civilian population of Germany. This terrible situation was compounded in the camps both by great overcrowding and the consequent outbreak of typhus epidemics. Overcrowding occurred as a result of prisoners from the eastern camps such as Auschwitz being evacuated westward before the Russian advance; columns of such exhausted people arrived at several German camps such as Belsen and Buchenwald which had themselves reached a state of great hardship. Belsen camp near Bremen was in an especially chaotic condition in these months and Himmler’s physician, Felix Kersten, an anti-Nazi, explains that its unfortunate reputation as a “death camp” was due solely to the ferocity of the typhus epidemic which broke out there in March 1945 (MEMOIRS 1940-1945. London 1956). Undoubtedly these fearful conditions cost several thousand lives, and it is these conditions that are represented in the photographs of emaciated human beings and heaps of corpses which the propagandists delight in showing, claiming they are victims of “extermination”.


A surprisingly honest appraisal of the situation at Belsen in 1945 appeared in Purnell’s HISTORY OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR (Vol. 7, No. 15) by Dr. Russell Barton, now superintendent and consultant psychiatrist at Severalls Hospital, Essex, who spent one month at the camp as a medical student after the war. His account vividly illustrates the true causes of the mortality that occurred in such camps towards the war’s end, and how such extreme conditions came to prevail there. Dr. Barton explains that Brigadier Glyn Hughes, the British Medical Officer who took command of Belsen in 1945, “did not think there had been any atrocities in the camp” despite discipline and hard work. “Most people,” writes Dr. Barton, “attributed the conditions of the inmates to deliberate intention on the part of the Germans.. Inmates were eager to cite examples of brutality and neglect, and visiting journalists from different countries interpreted the situation according to the needs of propaganda at home.”

However, Dr. Barton makes it quite clear that the conditions of starvation and disease were unavoidable in the circumstances, and that they occurred only during the months of 1945. “From discussions with prisoners it seemed that conditions in the camp were not too bad until late 1944. The huts were set among pine trees and each was provided with lavatories, wash basins, showers and stoves for heating.” The cause of food shortage is also explained. “German medical officers told me that it had been increasingly difficult to transport food to the camp for some months. Anything that moved on the autobahns was likely to be bombed...I was surprised to find records, going back for two or three years, of Large quantities of food cooked daily for distribution. At that time I became convinced, contrary to popular opinion, that there had never been a policy of deliberate starvation. This was confirmed by the large numbers of well-fed inmates. Why then were so many people suffering from malnutrition?.. .The major reasons for the state of Belsen were disease, gross overcrowding by central authority, lack of law and order within the huts, and inadequate supplies of food, water and drugs.” The lack of order, which led to riots over food distribution, was quelled by British Machine-gun fire and a display of force when British tanks and armored cars toured the camp.

Apart from the unavoidable deaths in these circumstances, Glyn Hughes estimated that about “1,000 were killed through the kindness of English soldiers giving them their own rations and chocolates.” As a man who was at Belsen, Dr. Barton is obviously very much alive to the falsehoods of concentration camp mythology, and he concludes: “In trying to assess the causes of the conditions found in Belsen one must be alerted to the tremendous visual display, ripe for purposes of propaganda, that masses of starved corpses presented”. To discuss such conditions “naively in terms of ‘goodness and badness is to ignore the constituent factor....

To be continued at the next writing. Thank you.



SUN., NOV. 17, 1991 8:53 A.M. YEARS, DAY 093



I, too, am totally “torn” about the amount of priceless information we are NOT printing due to lack of space and time. Give me this much, Dharma, I am more torn than are you--for I am not accustomed to working within time and space constraints.

It simply is that we are able to take the “whole” and see that background information in TRUTH is all that will allow you ones to begin to function with knowledge in this present experience. If you do not, for instance, know the historically political background of Croatia, then its “fall” means nothing. If you know that the United States has been involved from onset with that fall then the course can be changed. As long as another’s plight, who lives half a planet away, is actually your own, then there is a little hope for you AS A PLANET. Ah, we have so far to go and--as with the radio questions and answers of yesterday--there is hardly any “concept” of “reality”. When it is more important as to whether or not Pleiadians “take a bath” than perishment of your planet, you are in serious background ignorance. I do, however, desire to stay away from direct political involvement and/or religious separation of denominations--it is the overall thrust which is incorrect and deadly and it must be considered from that broad aspect. The way we begin is “whether or not Pleiadians bathe” and when we work our way through those introductory aspects--then, and only then, will our presence be acceptable. As long as we diligently apply ourselves, we shall be granted time to make the necessary impact--for getting the Truth of the “WORD” unto MAN is the point of this segment of God’s lessons for MAN. Every day is a priceless gift and everyone who dares to entertain us on the radio waves to an audience is blessed indeed.

I repeat and repeat--”I, or my people, are NOT anti-Jew, anti- Zionist, anti-Catholic and anti-ANYTHING, We are pro- TRUTH and you ones have been placed in ignorance by the groups who have gained ability to fool an entire population species. The problem is that, with this kind of deceit, the entire population can be destroyed except for the Elite who projected the “lie” in the first place. God is simply giving “His people” (which are ALL) ammunition with which to counter the lies.

I think a parable might be appropriate at this point. Let us say you have a magnificent Oak tree in your garden. A child asks, “What does an Oak tree do?” Now, let us suppose that you tell the child, "It bears apples.” You tell the child this over and over again, then you draw pictures with apples upon the tree. Does THIS STORY cause the acorns to be apples? Ponder it.

As with Croatia, the truth is available with names, places and events to prove the background to this moment. It sits right in your own living room--and yet we are stacked up some four papers behind with space. Worse, how can the receivers get all the documentation read and digested, especially when we have to continually go back and explain whether or not Pleiadians bathe.

As a matter of fact, I would RATHER speak of Pleiadians bathing--or anyone bathing--for it is a far better and more advantageous subject. All should frequently bathe for WATER CLEANSES. Water washes away the unbalancing energies that cling to an electrical aura about all life-forms. A good spring rain does not JUST allow moisture to cause the garden to grow-- it balances energy flow and allows the plant to heal that which may be incorrect in its development. You will note that there is not enough “water” in the world to do what one good steady rainfall can do in mere minutes.


I weary of the inquiries for I am not interested in your “politics” to any great extent. There is no “perfect” politician or he would never be a “politician”. I do believe that you had better pay attention for Mr. Duke made a very fine showing and he was up against the entire political system of Washington as well as the entire CONTROLLED MEDIA AND PRESS! Mr. Edwards DID NOT WIN THE GOVERNORSHIP--he only “got” it.

More important for your attention direction is the wondrous way in which sir Poindexter has now been “ACQUITTED” of all charges of wrong-doing. Does it not strike you as strange that the people who “survived” the Iran mess--are all free with full benefits and back in charge of the repeating of the same crimes? These ones are tools used in the “Killing of the Planet” and as long as you support it--so be it!

I want to get back to the erroneous counting of “victims” in the so-called Holocaust for I would really like to get this subject over with and out of the way and still, we have myriads of pages of information (proven on your place) to present. Let us move on and we will effort to pick up current items as we move along.


Not only were situations such as those at Belsen unscrupulously exploited for propaganda purposes, but this propaganda has also made use of entirely fake atrocity photographs and films. The extreme conditions at Belsen applied to very few camps indeed; the great majority escaped the worst difficulties and all their inmates survived in good health--of course, you are never shown those pictures of robust, happy released persons. I want you to please look at the map provided (at the end of this chapter) and see how many camps there were of size great enough for listing and you will note that there are MANY. You only hear about two or three and upon the false data given forth--you make your judgments. Friends, WAR IS HELL--CONCENTRATION CAMPS ARE HELL--PRISONS ARE HELL--AND HELL IS NOT OF GOD! BUT WE NOTE THAT ALL OF YOU CONTINUE TO BLAME GOD FOR “ALLOWING” THIS TO HAPPEN. YOU DID IT--GOD DID NOT!

As a result of there being actually so few instances of horror, outright forgeries were used to exaggerate conditions of horror. A startling case of such forgery was revealed in the British Catholic Herald of October 29th, 1948. It reported that in Casset, where every adult German was compelled to see a film representing the “horrors” of Buchenwald, a doctor from Goettingen saw himself on the screen looking after the victims. But he had never been to Buchenwald. After an interval of bewilderment he realized that what he had seen was part of a film taken after the terrible air raid on Dresden by the Allies on Feb. 13th, 1945, where the doctor had been working. The film in question was shown in Cassel on Oct. 19th, 1948. After the air raid on Dresden, which killed a record 135,000 (remember the 65% target), mostly refugee women and children, the bodies of the victims were piled and burned in heaps of 400 to 500 for several weeks. These were the scenes, purporting to be from Buchenwald, which the doctor had recognized.

The forgery of war-time atrocity photographs is not new. For further information the reader is referred to Arthur Ponsonby’s book FALSEHOOD IN WARTIME (London, 1928), which exposes the faked photographs of German atrocities in the First World War. Ponsonby cites such fabrications as “The Corpse Factory” and “The Belgian Baby without Hands”, which are strikingly reminiscent of the propaganda relating to Nazi “atrocities”. Actually, chelas, “seeing IS RARELY believing!” You will be shown exactly that which the enemy desires you to see. F.J.P. Veale explains in his book that the bogus “jar of human soap” solemnly introduced by the Soviet prosecution at Nuremberg was a deliberate jibe at the famous British “Corpse Factory” myth, in which the ghoulish Germans were supposed to have obtained various commodities from processing corpses (VealE, ibid. p. 192). This accusation was one for which the British Government apologized after 1918. It received new life after 1945 in the tale of lamp shades of human skin, which was certainly as fraudulent as the Soviet “human soap”. In fact, from Manvell and Frankl we have the grudging admission that the lamp shade evidence at Buchenwald Trial “later appeared to be dubious” (THE INESCAPABLE CRIME, P. 84). It was given by a certain Andreas Pfaffenberger in a “written affidavit” of the kind discussed earlier, but in 1948 General Lucius Clay admitted that the affidavits used in the trial appeared after more thorough investigation to have been mostly ”hearsay.

Now you who wish to think this kind of photographic license is unusual and too difficult to fake--I SUGGEST YOU TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THE RECENT PHOTOGRAPHS COMING OUT OF ASIA REGARDING POW/MIAs. The government claims they are ALL fakes--I assure you that SOME are fakes (and poor fakes, at best). YOU cannot have it both ways as suits your desires for “belief. You are going to find that a lot of the pictures you have been shown were actually REAL, it was only that they were from other times--all the way back to your own U.S. Civil War--transposed and presented as German Concentration Camp “evidence”.

Another less formidable reminder of trick photography is the National Inquirer’s picture of Oprah Winfrey’s face attached to Ann Margaret’s body--on the front page, yet! Well, most inquiring minds” don’t REALLY WANT TO KNOW!

An excellent work on the fake atrocity photographs pertaining to the myth of the Six Million is Dr. Udo Salendy’s Bild Dokumente’ fur die Geshichtschreibung? (Vlotho-Wener, 1973), and from the numerous examples cited we illustrate by telling you that photographs were arranged and became what is known as “photomontage”. Close examination of these photos reveal immediately that the pictures are superimposed or tampered with. For example, one most memorable picture was of standing “skeletons” with piles of dead skeletal bodies in front of them. Of course it becomes easier after seeing the original photograph of the standing persons WITHOUT the dead bodies in front of them, If there is a way for our printers to show the illustrations, I will make them available. (See end of chapter.)

The picture in point has, for instance, a high wooden (solid) fence behind the people standing. In the final picture, this fence is removed, and an entirely new horror “photograph” created. This blatant forgery appears on page 341 of R. Schnabel’s book

on the S.S., MACHT OHNE MORAL: EINE DOKUMENTATION UNDER DIE SS (Frankfurt, 1957), with the caption “Mauthausen”. (Walendy cites eighteen other examples of forgery in Schnabel’s book.) The same photograph appeared in the PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL, Vol. XXX, p. 421, likewise purporting to illustrate Mauthausen Camp. It is also illustrated without a caption in Eugue Aroneau’s KONZENTRATIONLAGER Document F 321 for the International Court at Nuremberg: Heinz Kuhnrich’s DER KZ-STAAT (Berlin, 1960, p. 81); Vaclav Berdych’s MAUTHAUSEN (Prague, 1959); and Robert Neumann’s HITLER-AUFSTIEF AND UNTERGANG DES DRITTEN REICHES (Munich, 1961).

Remember, dear ones, these are technicians of superb talent-- these are the same film makers who now control your media and motion picture industries--illusion is the name of their game and they are exceptionally good at that which they do.


There is a survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three- volume REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ON ITS ACTIVITIES DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR, Geneva, 1948. This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: DOCUMENTS SUR LACTIVITE DU CICR EN FAVEUR DES CIVILS DETENUS DANS LES CAMPS DE CONCENTRATION ON ALLEMAGNE 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946, and INTER ARMA CARITAS: THE WORK OF THE ICRC DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frederich Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value. ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva Military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the German authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.

The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e., as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhaftlinge”), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. III, P. 73). These persons, it continues. “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons” (p. 74).

The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “From Feb. 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. III, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief program which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.


The Report states that, “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1, 112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachenshausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Floha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83). In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organizations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644), This latter organization was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.

The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich.. .These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . .two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favorable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p. 642).

The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.


One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on Feb. 1, 1945...In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorized to stay in each camp...” (Vol. III, p. 83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross is quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (INTER ARMA CARITAS, P. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for all people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.

In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis-occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report DOES NOT even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigors and privation, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day.

So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff.). Incidentally, it is quite frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).


Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (1. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population”, and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination program”, and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on”. In Slovakia, for instance, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that, A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labor market” (Vol. I, p. 646).

Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. 1, p. 645). As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens.

The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities, “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. 1, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued. The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States. . . now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p. 649).


Without doubt the most important contribution to a truthful study of the extermination question has been the work of the French historian, Professor Paul Rassinier. The pre-eminent value of this work lies first in the fact that Rassinier actually experienced life in the German concentration camps, and also that, as a Socialist Intellectual and anti-Nazi, nobody could be less inclined to defend Hitler and National Socialism, Yet. for the sake of justice and historical truth, Rassinier spent the remainder of his post-war years until his death in 1966 pursuing research which utterly refuted the Myth of the Six Million and the legend of Nazi diabolism.


From 1933 until 1943, Rassinier was a professor of history in the College dEnseignement General at Belfort, Academy de Besancon. During the war he engaged in resistance activity until he was arrested by the Gestapo on October 30, 1943, and as a result was confined in the German concentration camps at Buchenwald and Dora until 1945. At Buchenwald, towards the end of the war, he contracted typhus, which so damaged his health that he could not resume his teaching. After the war, Professor Rassinier was awarded the Medaille de la Resistance and the Reconnaisance Francaise, and was elected to the French Chamber of Deputies, from which he was ousted by the Communists in Nov. 1946.

Rassinier then embarked on his great work, a systematic analysis of alleged German war atrocities, in particular the supposed “extermination” of the Jews. Not surprisingly, his writings are little known; they have rarely been translated from the French and none at all have appeared in English. His most important works were: LE MENSONGE DULYSSE (The Lies of Odysseus, Paris, 1949), a sequel which further refuted the impostures of propagandists concerning German concentration camps. His monumental task was completed with two final volumes, LE VERITABLE PROCES EICHMANN (1962) and LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN (1964), in which Rassinier exposes the dishonest and reckless distortions concerning the fate of the Jews by a careful statistical analysis. The last work also examines the political and financial significance of the extermination legend and its exploitation by Israel and the Communist powers.


One of the many merits of Rassinier’s work is exploding the myth of unique German “wickedness”; and he reveals with devastating force how historical truth has been obliterated in an impenetrable fog of partisan propaganda. His researches demonstrate conclusively that the fate of the Jews during World War Two, once freed from distortion and reduced to proper proportions, loses its much vaunted “enormity” and is seen to be only one act in a greater and much wider tragedy. In an extensive lecture tour in West Germany in the spring of 1960, Professor Rassinier emphasized to his German audiences that it was high time for a rebirth of the truth regarding the extermination legend, and that the Germans themselves should begin it since the allegation remained a wholly unjustifiable blot on Germany in the eyes of the world.

You will please note, however, that the law came down on the Germans making it a felony crime to even debate the orthodox Jewish expression of the holocaust. YOU ARE NEXT, AMERICA, FOR THE BILL AWAITS THE PASSAGE IN YOUR CONGRESS AND THE UNITED NATIONS.


Rassinier entitled his first book THE LIES OF ODYSSEUS in commemoration of the fact that travellers always return bearing tall stories, and until his death he investigated all the stories of extermination literature and attempted to trace their authors. He made short work of the extravagant claims about gas chambers at Buchenwald in David Rousset’s THE OTHER KINGDOM (New York, 1947): himself an inmate of Buchenwald, Rassinier proved that no such things ever existed there (LE MENSONGE DULYSSE, p. 209 ff). Rassinier also traced Abbe Jean-Paul Renard, and asked him how he could possibly have testified in his book CHAINES ET LUMIERES that gas chambers were in operation at Buchenwald. Renard replied that others had “told him of their existence”, and hence he had been willing to pose as a witness of things that he had never SEEN (ibid. p. 209 ff.). Rassinier also investigated Denise Dufournier’s RAVENSBRUCK: THE WOMEN’S CAMP OF DEATH (London, 1948) and again found that the authoress had no other evidence for gas chambers there than the vague “rumors” which Charlotte Bormann stated were deliberately spread by communist political prisoners. Similar investigations were made of such books as Philip Friedman’s THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ; THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP (N.Y., 1946) and Eugene Kogon’s THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HELL (N.Y., 1950), and he found that none of these authors could produce an authentic eyewitness of a gas chamber at Auschwitz, nor had they so much as seen one. Rassinier mentions Kogon’s claim that a deceased former inmate, Janda Weiss, had said to Kogan alone that she had witnessed gas chambers at Auschwitz, but of course, since this person was apparently dead, Rassinier was unable to investigate the claim. He was able to interview Benedikt Kautsky, author of TEUFEL UND VERDAMMTE who had alleged that millions of Jews were exterminated at Auschwitz. However, Kautsky only confirmed to Rassinier the confession in his book, namely, that never at any time had he seen a gas chamber, and that he based his information on what others had “told him”.

The palm for extermination literature is awarded by Rassinier to Miklos Nyizili’s DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ, in which the falsification of facts, the evident contradictions and shameless lies show that the author is speaking of places which it is obvious he has never seen (LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN, p. 52). According to this “doctor of Auschwitz, 25,000 victims were exterminated every day for four and a-half years, which is a grandiose advance on Olga Lengyel’s 24,000 a day for two and a-half years. It would mean a total of forty-one million victims at Auschwitz by 1945, two and a-half times the total pre-war Jewish population of the WORLD. When Rassinier attempted to discover the identity of this strange “witness”, he was told that “he had died some time before the publication of the book”. Rassinier is convinced that he was never anything but a mythical figure.

Since the war, Rassinier has, in fact, toured Europe in search of somebody who was an actual eye-witness of gas chamber exterminations in German concentration camps during World War Two, but he HAS NEVER FOUND EVEN ONE SUCH PERSON. He discovered that not one of the authors of the many books charging that the Germans had exterminated millions of Jews had even seen a gas chamber built for such purposes, much less seen one in operation, nor could any of these authors produce a living authentic witness who had done so. Invariably, former prisoners such as Renard, Kautsky and Kogan based their statements not upon what they had actually seen, but upon what they heard, always from ones already dead and thus not in a position to confirm or deny their statements.

Certainly the most important fact to emerge from Rassinier’s studies, and of which there is now no doubt at all, is the utter imposture of gas chambers. Serious investigation carried out in the sites themselves have revealed with irrefutable proof that, contrary to the declarations of the surviving witnesses” examined above, no gas chambers whatsoever existed in the German camps at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Ravensbruck, Dachau and Dora, or Manthausen in Austria. This fact, which we noted earlier was attested to by Stephen Pinter of the U.S. War Office, has not been recognized and admitted officially by the Institute of Contemporary History at Munich. However, Rassinier points out that in spite of this, “witnesses” again declared at the Eichmann trial that they had seen prisoners at Bergen-Belsen setting out for the gas chambers. So far as the eastern camps of Poland are concerned, Rassinier shows that the sole evidence attesting to the existence of gas chambers at Treblinka, Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek and Sobibor are the discredited memoranda of Kurt Gerstein referred to above. His original claim, it will be recalled, was that an absurd 40 million people had been exterminated during the war, while in his first signed memorandum he reduced the number to 25 million. Further reductions were made in his second memorandum. These documents were considered of such dubious authenticity that they were not even admitted by the Nuremberg Court (and that court entertained every bit of garbage drummed up), though they continue to circulate in three different versions, one in German (distributed in schools) and two in French, none of which agree with each other. The German version was featured as “evidence” at the Eichmann Trial in 1961.

Finally, Professor Rassinier draws attention to an important admission by Dr. Kubovy, director of the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv, made in LA TERRE RETROUVEE, Dec. 15, 1960. Dr. Kubovy recognized that not a single order for extermination exists from Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich or Goering LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN, p. 31, 39).


As for the fearful propaganda figure of the Six Million, Professor Rassinier rejects it on the basis of an extremely detailed statistical analysis. He shows that the number has been falsely established, on the one hand through inflation by the pre-war Jewish population by ignoring all emigration and evacuations, and on the other by a corresponding deflation of the number of survivors after 1945. This was the method used by the World Jewish Congress. Rassinier also rejects any written or oral testimony to the Six Million given by the kind of “witnesses” cited above, since they are full of contradictions, exaggerations and falsehoods. He gives the example of Dachau casualties, noting that in 1946, Pastor Niemoller reiterated Auerbach’s fraudulent 238,000 deaths there, while in 1962 Bishop Neuhausseler of Munich stated in a speech at Dachau that only 30,000 people died of the 200,000 persons from thirty-eight nations who were interned there” (LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN, p. 12). Today, the estimate has been reduced by several more thousands, and so it goes on. Rassinier concludes, too, that testimony in support of the Six Million given by accused men such as Hoess, Hoettl, Wisliceny and Hoellriegel, who were faced with the prospect of being condemned to death or with the hope of obtaining a reprieve, and who were frequently tortured during their detention, is completely untrustworthy.

Rassinier finds it very significant that the figure of Six Million was not mentioned in court during the Eichmann trial. “The prosecution at the Jerusalem trial was considerably weakened by its central motif, the six million European Jews alleged to have been exterminated in gas chambers. It was an argument that easily won conviction the day after the war ended, amidst the general state of spiritual and material chaos. Today, many documents have been published which were not available at the time of the Nuremberg Trials, and which tend to prove that if the Jewish nationals were wronged and persecuted by the Hitler regime, there could not possibly have been six million victims” (ibid. p. 125).

With the help of one hundred pages of cross-checked statistics, Professor Rassinier concludes in ULE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEEN that the number of Jewish casualties during the Second World War could not have exceeded 1,200,000, and he notes that this has finally been accepted as valid by the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Paris. (WHY HAVENT YOU BEEN TOLD OF THIS RECOGNITION?) However, he regards such a figure as a maximum limit, and refers to the lower accepted number of 896,892 casualties in a study of the same problem by the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg. Rassinier points out that the State of Israel nevertheless continues to claim compensation for six million dead, EACH ONE REPRESENTING AN INDEMNITY OF 5,000 MARKS. (Could we be getting to a better picture of the facts?) I believe any school child could see that it is far more desirable to receive money in the amount of 5,000 marks for each of Six Million persons than only 896,892. It seems Khazarian Communist (Soviet) run Israel always comes out ahead in the money category, at your expense, in every confrontation whether or not it even involves them.


Prof. Rassinier is emphatic in stating that the German Government never had any policy other than the emigration of Jews overseas. He shows that after the promulgation of the Nuremberg Race Laws in September 1935, the Germans negotiated with the British for the transfer of German Jews to Palestine on the basis of the Balfour Declaration. When this failed, they asked other countries to take charge of them, but these refused (ibid. p. 20). The Palestine project was revived in 1938, but broke down because Germany could not negotiate their departure on the basis of 3,000,000 marks, as demanded by Britain, without some agreement for compensation. Despite these difficulties, Germany did manage to secure the emigration of the majority of their Jews, mostly to the United States. Rassinier also refers to the French refusal of Germany’s Madagascar Plan at the end of 1940. In a report of the 21st August, 1942, the Secretary of State for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Third Reich, Luther, decided that it would be possible to negotiate with France in this direction and described conversations which had taken place between July and December 1940, and which were brought to a halt following the interview with Montoire on Dec. 13, 1940 by Pierre-Etienne Flandin, Laval’s successor. During the whole of 1941 the Germans hoped that they would be able to re-open these negotiations and bring them to a happy conclusion (ibid. p. 108).

After the outbreak of war, the Jews, who, as Rassinier reminds us, had declared economic and financial war on Germany as early as 1933, were interned in concentration camps, “which is the way countries all over the world treat enemy aliens in time of war. .. It was decided to regroup them and put them to work in one immense ghetto which, after the successful invasion of Russia, was situated towards the end of 1941 in the so-called Eastern territories near the former frontier between Russia and Poland: at Auschwitz, Chelmno, Belzec, Maidanek, Treblinka, etc.. .There they were to wait until the end of the war for the reopening of international discussions which would decide their future” (LE VERITABLE PROCES EICHMANN,p. 20). The order for this concentration in the eastern ghetto was given by Goering to Heydrich, as noted earlier, and it was regarded as a prelude to “the desired final solution”, their emigration overseas after the war had ended.


Of great concern to Professor Rassinier is the way in which the extermination legend is deliberately exploited for political and financial advantage, and in this he finds Israel and the Soviet Union to be in concert. THEY CERTAINLY ARE AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN. After 1950, an avalanche of fabricated extermination literature appeared under the stamp of two organizations, so remarkably synchronized in their activities that one might well believe them to have been contrived in partnership, which they were. One was the “Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and Criminals” established under Communist auspices at Warsaw, and the other, the “World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation” at Paris and Tel-Aviv. Their publications seem to appear at favorable moments in the political climate, and for the Soviet Union their purpose is simply to maintain the threat of Nazism as a maneuver to divert attention from their own activities.

As for Israel, the myth of the Six Million is inspired by a purely material problem. In LE DRAME DES JUIFS EUROPEEN (P. 31, 39), Rassinier writes:

...It is simply a question of justifying by a proportionate number of corpses the enormous subsidies which Germany has been paying annually since the end of the war to the State of Israel by way of reparation for injuries which moreover she cannot be held to have caused her either morally or legally, since there was no State of Israel at the time the alleged deeds took place; thus it is a purely and contemptibly material problem.” What do you good lawyers say about this carriage of “JUSTICE”? Obviously rules are made to suit the need of the ones who hold the power.

Perhaps I may be allowed to recall here that the State of Israel was only founded in May 1948, and that the Jews were nationals of all states with the exception of Israel, in order to underline the dimensions of a fraud which defies description in any language; on the one hand Germany pays to Israel sums which are calculated on six million dead, and on the other, since at least four-fifths of these six million were decidedly ALIVE at the end of the war, she is paying substantial sums by way of reparation to the victims of Hitler’s Germany to those who are still alive in countries all over the world other than Israel and to the rightful claimants of those who have since deceased, which means that for the former (i.e., the six million), or in other words, for the vast majority, she is PAYING TWICE. NOT A BAD DEAL!


Here let us briefly summarize the data on Jewish war-time casualties.

Contrary to the figure of over 9 million Jews in German-occupied territory put forward at the Nuremberg and Eichmann trials, it has been established that, after extensive emigration, approximately 3 million were living in Europe, excluding the Soviet Union. Even when the Jews of German-occupied Russia are included (the majority of Russian Jews were evacuated beyond German control), the overall number probably does not exceed four million. Himmler’s statistician, Dr. Richard Korherr and the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation put the number respectively at 5,550,000 and 5,294,000 when German-occupied territory was at its widest, but both these figures include the two million Jews of the Baltic and western Russia without paying any attention to the large number of these who were evacuated. However, it is at least an admission from the latter organization that there were not even six million Jews in Europe and western Russia combined.

Nothing better illustrates the declining plausibility of the Six Million legend than the fact that the prosecution at the Eichmann trial deliberately avoided mentioning the figure. Moreover, official Jewish estimates of the casualties are being quietly revised downwards. Analysis of the population and emigration statistics, as well as studies by the Swiss Baseler Nachrichten and Professor Rassinier, demonstrated that it would have been simply impossible for the number of Jewish casualties to have exceeded a limit of one and a half-million Jews and it doesn’t take a Space Cadet to point it out--you don’t add that differently on planet Earth. It is most significant, therefore, that the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation in Paris now states that only 1,485,292 Jews died from ALL causes during the Second World War (but the reparation figures have not reflected the fewer acknowledgement), and although this figure is certainly too high, at least it bears no resemblance at all to the legendary Six Million. As has been noted earlier, the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg estimates an even lower figure of

896,892. This is beginning to approach a realistic figure, and the process of revision is certain to continue.

Doubtless, several thousand Jewish persons did die in the course of the Second World War, but this must be seen in the context of a war that cost many millions of innocent victims on all sides. To put the matter in perspective, for example, we may point out that over 700,000 Russian civilians died during the siege of Leningrad, and a total of over 2,050,000 German civilians were known to have been killed in Allied air-raids alone, and forced repatriation after the war. In 1955, another neutral Swiss source, Die Tat of Zurich (January 19th, 1955), in a survey of all Second World War casualties based on figures of the International Red Cross, put the “Loss of victims of persecution because of politics, race or religion who died in prisons and concentration camps between 1939 and 1949” at 300,000--not all of whom were Jews--and this figure seems the most accurate assessment.


The question most pertinent to the extermination legend is, of course: how many of the 3 million European Jews, under German control, survived after 1945? The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee estimated the number of survivors in Europe to be only one and a-half million, but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is proved by the growing number of Jews claiming compensation from the West German Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965, the number of the claimants registered with the West German Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000 (AUFBAU, June 30th, 1965). Nothing could be a more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy of the Six Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be no doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi occupation of Europe are, in fact, very much alive. It is a resounding confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second World war can only be estimated at a figure in thousands. Surely this is enough grief for the Jewish people? Who has the right to compound it with vast imaginary slaughter, marking with eternal shame a great European nation, as well as wringing fraudulent monetary compensation from them?

This shame does not simply rest on the one nation--it rests upon the hearts and shoulders of ALL nations. It is these massively shameful deceits which we are sent forth to correct in consciousness. YOU ARE PEOPLE-OF-THE-LIES AND UNTIL YOU AWAKEN TO YOUR PLIGHT AND THE DECEIT--YOU SHALL BE INCREASINGLY TORMENTED IN CHAOS. THE PLAN IS TO ENSLAVE THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD INTO A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT AND THE PLAN IS RIGHT ON TRACK TO BE OPERATIONAL BY YEAR 2000. IT IS THE EVIL INTENT TO RULE THE WORLD.

Let us close this segment and this volume. We need no Epilogue for we will now begin the next Volume on the same subject. You will know what has come about in your world and you will see that your enemy is of the ones of the Khazarian lineage having taken what is now called the Soviet Union who, in turn, deliberately set up the State of Israel for its evil infiltration into the very beings of all other nations, especially the United States of America wherein its most fruitful harvest could be reaped.

Salu and may God have mercy upon you sleeping children.

Hatonn to clear.

What Are The Phoenix Journals?

Many people have asked us what the PHOENIX JOURNALS are. They contain the true history (His-story) of mankind on this planet as well as detailed information about the most asked about and wondered about subjects (i.e., Spirituality, E.T.s, our origin, our purpose here on this planet, etc.). Commander Hatonn and the other Higher Spiritual Teachers who have authored these JOURNALS, weave spiritual lessons and insights throughout the unveiling of lies which have been deceptively forced upon us, throughout ti me, by the Elite anti-Christ controllers. These JOURNALS are the "DEAD SEA SCROLLS" of our time. Their importance in the growth of mankind cannot be overstated. They are the textbooks of understanding which God promised us we would have, to guide us through the "End Times".

Here is what Commander Hatonn has said about the PHOENIX JOURNALS. Quoting from JOURNAL #40, THE TRILLION DOLLAR LIE, Vol.II, pgs. 47 & 48: "Some day in the far recesses of the future experiences of another human civilization—these JOURNALS will be found and TRUTH will again be given unto the world manifest so that another lost civilization can regain and find its way. God always gives His creations that which they need when the sequence is proper. It is what man DOES WITH THESE THINGS which marks the civilization. WHAT WILL YOUR LEGACY BE????? I focus on current activities which might turn your world about in ti me to save your ecosystems and your sovereignty as nations and peoples. You cannot wait to be filled in on the lies of the generations lest you wait until too late to take control of your circumstance presently within the lies. YOU ARE A PEOPLE OF MASSIVE DECEPTION AND WHAT YOU WILL DO WITH THIS INFORMATION IN ACTION DETERMINES YOUR PURPOSE AND GROWTH IN THIS WONDROUS MANIFESTED EXPERIENCE—WILL YOU PERISH PHYSICALLY OF THE EVIL INTENT, OR WILL YOU MOVE INTO AND WITHIN THE PLACES OF HOLY CREATOR? THE CHOICE IS YOURS."



1. SIPAPU ODYSSEY ISBN 1-56935-045-0




5. FROM HERE TO ARMAGEDDON 1-56935-043-4



9. SATAN'S DRUMMERS ISBN 1-56935-054-X

10. PRIVACY IN A FISHBOWL ISBN 1-56935-042-6

11. CRY OF THE PHOENIX ISBN 1-56935-036-1





16. YOU CAN SLAY THE DRAGON ISBN 0-922356-21-1

17. THE NAKED PHOENIX ISBN 0-922356-22-X

18. BLOOD AND ASHES ISBN 0-922356-25-4




23. BURNT OFFERINGS ISBN 0-922356-33-5






29. END OF THE MASQUERADE ISBN 0-922356-40-8

38. THE DARK CHARADE ISBN 0-922356-53-X




42. UNHOLY ALLIANCE ISBN 0-922356-61-0

43. TANGLED WEBS VOL. I ISBN 0-922356-62-9

44. TANGLED WEBS VOL. II ISBN 0-922356-63-7

45. TANGLED WEBS VOL. III ISBN 0-922356-64-5

46. TANGLED WEBS VOL. IV ISBN 0-922356-65-3

48. TANGLED WEBS VOL. V ISBN 0-922356-68-8

49. TANGLED WEBS VOL. VI ISBN 0-922356-69-6

50. DIVINE PLAN VOL. I ISBN 1-56935-29-9

51. TANGLED WEBS VOL. VII ISBN 0-922356-81-5

52. TANGLED WEBS VOL. VIII ISBN 0-922356-83-1

53. TANGLED WEBS VOL. IX ISBN 0-922356-84-X

54. THE FUNNEL'S NECK ISBN 0-922356-86-6

55. MARCHING TO ZION ISBN 0-922356-87-4

56. SEX AND THE LOTTERY ISBN 0-922356-88-2

57. GOD'S PLAN 2000! DIVINE PLAN VOL. II ISBN 1-56935-028-0



60. AS THE BLOSSOM OPENS ISBN 0-922356-92-0



63. THE BEST OF TIMES ISBN 1-56935-002-7

64. TO ALL MY CHILDREN ISBN 1-56935-003-5

65. THE LAST GREAT PLAGUE ISBN 1-56935-004-3


67. THE BEAST AT WORK ISBN 1-56935-006-X

68. ECSTASY TO AGONY ISBN 1-56935-007-8

69. TATTERED PAGES ISBN 1-56935-009-4

70. NO THORNLESS ROSES ISBN 1-56935-010-8

71. COALESCENCE ISBN 1-56935-012-4

72. CANDLELIGHT ISBN 1-56935-013-2





77. PLAYERS IN THE GAME ISBN 1-56935-022-1


79. MARCHING TO ZOG ISBN 1-56935-024-8

80. TRUTH FROM THE "ZOG BOG" ISBN 1-56935-025-6



83. POLITICAL PSYCHOS ISBN 1-56935-030-2



86. MISSING THE LIFEBOAT?? ISBN 1-56935-033-7

87. IN GOD'S NAME AWAKEN ISBN 1-56935-034-5







94. WINGING IT... ISBN 1-56935-044-2

95. HEAVE-UP (PHASE ONE) ISBN 1-56935-046-9

96. HEAVE-HO (PHASE TWO) ISBN 1-56935-048-5

97. HEAVE 'EM OUT (PHASE THREE, PART 1) ISBN 1-56935-049-3





102. SACRED WISDOM ISBN 1-56935-055-8


104. FIRST STEPS ISBN 1-56935-057-4


107. RING AROUND THE ROSIE ISBN 1-56935-060-4


222. BIRTHING THE PHOENIX Vol. 1 ISBN 1-56935-179-1

223. BIRTHING THE PHOENIX Vol. 2 ISBN 1-56935-180-5

224. BIRTHING THE PHOENIX Vol. 3 ISBN 1-56935-181-3

225. BIRTHING THE PHOENIX Vol. 4 ISBN 1-56935-182-1

227. RISE OF ANTICHRIST Vol. 1 ISBN 1-56935-184-8

228. RISE OF ANTICHRIST Vol. 2 ISBN 1-56935-185-6

229. RISE OF ANTICHRIST Vol. 3 ISBN 1-56935-186-4

230. RISE OF ANTICHRIST Vol. 4 ISBN 1-56935-187-2