This Phoenix Journal was generated by scanning a printed edition using optical character recognition (OCR). Although efforts have been made to correct errors readers should refer to the image-based or printed version if discrepancies need to be resolved.

/Ground Crew

Version 1.0
This version was converted from a MS Word document and should work fine on any newer devices (Smartphones, Tablets, etc.)


The Phoenix Journals are intended as a "real time" commentary on current events, how current events relate to past events and the relationships of both to the physical and spiritual destinies of mankind.

All of history, as we now know it, has been revised, rewritten, twisted and tweaked by selfishly motivated men to achieve and maintain control over other men. When one can understand that everything is comprised of "energy" and that even physical matter is "coalesced" energy, and that all energy emanates from God's thought, one can accept the idea that the successful focusing of millions of minds on one expected happening will cause it to happen.

If the many prophecies made over thousands of years are accepted, these are the "end times" (specifically the year 2000, the second millennium, etc.). That would put us in the "sorting" period and only a few short years from the finish line. God has said that in the end-times would come the WORD--to the four corners of the world--so that each could decide his/her own course toward, or away from, divinity--based upon TRUTH.

So, God sends His Hosts--Messengers--to present that TRUTH. This is the way in which He chooses to present it, through the Phoenix Journals. Thus, these journals are Truth, which cannot be copyrighted; they are compilations of information already available on Earth, researched and compiled by others (some, no doubt, for this purpose) which should not be copyrighted. Therefore, these journals are not copyrighted (except SIPAPU ODYSSEY which is "fiction").

The first sixty or so journals were published by America West Publishing which elected to indicate that a copyright had been applied for on the theory that the ISBN number (so necessary for booksellers) was dependent upon the copyright. Commander Hatonn, the primary author and compiler, insisted that no copyrights be applied for and, to our knowledge, none were.

If the Truth is to reach the four corners of the world, it must be freely passed on. It is hoped that each reader will feel free to do that, keeping it in context, of course.


Vol. 4

ISBN 1-56935-182-1

First Edition Printed by


P.O. Box 27353

Las Vegas, Nevada 89126

February 1998

Printed in the United States of America




SUN., JAN. 25, 1998




Chapter V











SUN., JAN. 25, 1998








SUN., JAN. 25, 1998







SUN., JAN. 25, 1998








MON., JAN. 26, 1998











MON., JAN. 26, 1998










1/11/95 #2 HATONN























Chapter 22



















1/30/91 #1 HATONN







SUN., JAN. 25, 1998 7:51 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 162

SUN., JAN. 25, 1998


Before we start on Nilus' observations about the Protocols, I would remind all of you of something important. You cannot do "it" FOR anyone save self. And sometimes when you think that somehow you can help another, it may well not be what is best or what is ultimately right for that "other". Always remember, friends, that "complaining" has become a significant, even phenomenal, part of living.

Many times a "complaint" is a way to tell somebody outside your loop about what you did to contribute but the contributor doesn't know just how to make a fact known. So, "I had to help my sister Jenny and I'm not sure I can make the car payment..." This is not just a symptom of youth; it has become a method of "declaration". Perhaps each should look carefully at cause and effect, be overgenerous with love and interchanges, and allow people choices without long faces or somehow causing another to feel less than comfortable with a decision not matching your own. What is sauce for the goose might well be sauce for the gander but remember something--the goose AND the gander would rather be left to the freedom of living instead of saucing.

I have focused on this topic because what you are seeing spread before you on the highest level is also reflecting the confusion and individual perceptions of living. You see a presidency in turmoil--but what does this do to THE WORLD in turmoil. Students, what has happened in the highest offices and to people in the highest and most visible places may well not be considered your business (you know, what you think about personal vs. public life), but remember something more important: God sees YOUR THOUGHTS regarding each incident and measures mankind by those individual thoughts about morality, responsibility and justice. It is there that nations are taken or broken for there MUST be a foundation of morality upon which a nation can rest or stand. If a man will cheat on his family and lie to hide such indiscretions while pushing to get away with just a little more and a little more--he has no moral attitudes which prevent him "screwing" YOU. And because EVERYBODY before him "did it" DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT.


And what about that wondrous and now confrontation speech of Tuesday called State of the State (or Union)? How will Clinton react in facing his compatriots and the nation? Who cares because the whole thing is a cover-up of trying to fool you people more with outright stupid "fixit" clauses.

I would quote Archibald Rutledge:

"Whenever I hear that the government is helping someone, I feel sorry for that person. . . . Even helping a person to help himself may be a disservice to him too; for you will probably--perhaps unconsciously--compel him to do it your way. Charity, if needlessly bestowed, probably will have a vicious effect. People who are promised support will hardly work. All grants, all subsidies, all rewards for services not rendered have a deleterious effect on character; and if character is not of foremost consideration, what is?"

I know that most of you feel that you wouldn't be in such a position anyway, ever, to have so much that you dump it carelessly onto another, but reconsider that stance. However, do not fail to consider what is a return for service, a "make-up" for inability to serve earlier, even with time and attention (as with children), a fringe benefit which allows no taxation of the benefit-- ah, there are myriads of causes for right, or wrong, attitudes.

Mostly you will find that all of US and most citizens are giving, loving individuals. But you must never fail to measure and discern through the actions of another in relationship to YOUR STEWARDSHIP as may be placed upon your head as WE move forward. Can the one you place in command be absolutely trusted? If you left a pile of money on a desk in the office for indefinite periods of time--will it disappear? Will a person take because it is within ability to perhaps "borrow" from our fund in secret? The intention of course, is to pay back? Are you sure? If that were the full intention--why not simply ask for an advance or an extension?

Are we all guilty of such "tiny" indiscretions which usually work out well? BUT, IS IT RIGHT? Anything you HIDE is somehow not right! And as to minding another's business a good rule of thumb is twofold. First, there is the danger that a man may leave his business unattended; and, second, there is the danger of an impertinent interference with another's affairs. The "friends of humanity" almost always run into both dangers.


Now, please, as we seemingly, again, get close to funding a project or two, we must pay attention to, first, expectations of those who actually have only waited for abundance and, second, remember that the project funds are for the individual PROJECT. Carelessness in any philanthropic altruism move is NOT what responsibility is about. Think about it.

We will turn back to the topic under scrutiny and review some concluding passages from Nilus as regards the Protocols of Zion.


[QUOTING, Part 21:]


According to the testament of Montefiore, Zion is not sparing, either of money or of any other means, to achieve its ends. In our day, all the governments of the entire world are consciously or unconsciously submissive to the commands of this great supergovernment of Zion, because all the bonds and securities are in its hands; for all countries are indebted to the Jews for sums which they will never be able to pay. All affairs--industry, commerce, and diplomacy--are in the hands of Zion.

It is by means of its capital loans that it has enslaved all nations. By keeping education on purely materialistic lines, the Jews have loaded the Gentiles with heavy chains with which they have harnessed them to their "Supergovernment". [H: Here I suggest you attach criminal subterfuge to Supergovernment by adding "Superfund"! The saddest part of this Superfund, however, is that the criminals and Elite used it when it was also offered freely and clearly to you-the-people, and, all you had to do was accept it! You didn't, you denied it and tore down the people offering it unto you. You spat in God's face for offering you "the way" and so it goes. If you fail to be responsible or even to SEE and HEAR, why think you that GOD would dump great gifts on you to simply be turned away while you clamor for more and more while never accepting the gifts. So be it for the day will come, my friends, WHEN GOD SHALL DENY YOU!]

The end of national liberty is near, therefore personal freedom is approaching its close; for true liberty cannot exist where Zion uses the lever of its gold to rule the masses and dominate the most respectable and enlightened class of society.

"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear."

It is nearly four years since the Protocols of the Elders of Zion came into my possession. Only God knows what efforts I have made to bring them to general notice--in vain--and even to warn those in power, by disclosing the causes of the storm about to break on apathetic Russia [H: And NOW, the major thrust is in the U.S.A. AND MOVING TO ASIA.] who seems, in her misfortune, to have lost all notion of what is going on around her.

And it is only now, when I fear it may be too late, that I have succeeded in publishing my work, hoping to put on their guard those who still have ears to hear and eyes to see.

One can no longer doubt it, the triumphant reign of the King of Israel rises over our degenerate world as that of Satan, with his power and his terrors; the King born of the blood of Zion--the Antichrist--is about to mount the throne of universal empire. [H: Remember: This was referring to 1905--and the Plan had been fully laid for centuries.]

Events are precipitated in the world at a terrifying speed: quarrels, wars, rumors, famines, epidemics, earthquakes--everything which even yesterday was impossible, today is an accomplished fact. One would think that the days pass so rapidly to advance the cause of the Chosen People. Space does not allow us to enter into the details of world history with regard to the disclosed "mysteries of iniquity", to prove from history the influence which the "Wise Men of Zion" have exercised through universal misfortunes by foretelling the certain and already near future of humanity, or by raising the curtain for the last act of the world's tragedy.

Only the light of CHRIST and HIS Holy Church Universal [H: The True body of Christ intent--not a church doctrine or church house.] can fathom the abyss of Satan and disclose the extent of its wickedness.

I feel in my heart that the hour has already struck when there should urgently be convoked an Eighth Ecumenical council which would unite the pastors and representatives of all Christendom. [H: Really? Oh Nilus, friend, these very ones to whom you call are the most deadly of all. More religion has come to pass and surely the lies are open for the world to see and still the people sleep on, and on...!] Secular quarrels and schisms would all be forgotten in the imminent need for preparing against the coming of the Antichrist. (This forecast of Sergius Nilus is all the more remarkable, when one considers that it appeared in the Epilogue to his edition of the Protocols of 1905.)


While you have been reading this pile of information, I know that the complaint is that there is simply "too much" and "after all, all you have to do is scan it in and pass it on". No, every letter of every word has been typed finger by finger in hopes that you-the-receiver will read it word following word. We now, however, come to a segment which has symbols which we cannot reproduce on this keyboard and we have no intention of drawing them in in this place. I suggest that if you have capability, staff, that you somehow get the copy into useable format in order that the public readers have access to the information. If this is too inconvenient, we will hold the section for later when we have time to attend the extra task of diagram work.

The work in point runs from p.229 through p.238. We could represent the parts without symbols but there is so much exceptional reference material that I don't wish to do that if we can use a scanner. [Editor's note: The material about which Commander Hatonn is referring is inserted next and was scanned in but the technology for the use of we-the-people is not sophisticated enough yet to be of any real help when it comes to a combination of text and Greek symbols. The symbols are pasted into the text so you will not miss the information.]

Part of the material relates to the League of Nations. To my people dealing with that "Superfund" resource possibility, this is extremely IMPORTANT.

See what can be done photographically, and if it is too difficult, I will take up the task. Thank you.






About the middle of the last century, Jacob Brafmann, a Jewish rabbi in Russia, became a convert to Christianity and spent the rest of his life endeavoring to throw light on the Jewish question in general, and on the situation in Russia in particular, both in the interest of gentiles and of the Jews themselves. His two works, The Book of the Kahal, [First edition (Vilna, 1869), excellent German translation by Siegfried Passarge, "Das Buch vom Kahal" (Hammer Verlag, Leipzig, 1928), 2 vol. French translation by Mgr. Jouin, "Les Sources de l'imperialisme juif": Le Qahal (Paris, 1925).] and The Jewish Brotherhoods, [Vilna, 1868] were first published at government expense some sixty years ago and are still the best source of information on many points. Brafmann's story, given in his own words in the preface to The Book of the Kahal, is reprinted here: [Our translation, somewhat abbreviated:]

"During his majesty's (Alexander II) stay at Minsk in 1858, I submitted to him a report on the social status and organization of the Jews in Russia. Some time after, by order of the Holy Synod (April 29, 1859), I was called to St. Petersburg in connection with the report, and was subsequently (May 13, 1860) appointed professor of Hebrew at the Minsk seminary. I was also charged with finding a means for overcoming the obstacles to conversion to Christianity set up by the Jews. Thoroughly familiar with the Jewish question, (as I had professed Judaism till the age of thirty-four) I knew where to draw the materials necessary for the work, and the archbishop of Minsk furnished me with the means. My task was facilitated by the cooperation of several enlightened Jews [See Vilna Gazette (1866), 169: "Views of an individual Jew".]. I thus obtained valuable material which served not only for the work in hand, but also to throw light on the Jewish question in general, as well as their social and religious organization in Russia.

This material included over a thousand acts of the Jewish Kahal (civil administration), and of the Beth-Dins (Talmudic law courts), showing the power and extent of their secret government. The Kahal goes so far as to decree what individuals may be invited to, and what dishes served at, a Jewish family feast.

On the important question, whether the law of the land is binding on the Jews, the comments in the Talmud are evasive, but the documents here listed (under Nos. 5, 16, 166) show that the Jews must abide by the instructions of the Kahal and the Beth-Din, in contra-distinction to the law of the land and their own conscience.

Similarly, on the question of the real estate and appurtenances belonging to non-Jews, the Talmud is obscure; but the thirty-seven acts cited in our fifth article prove conclusively that the Kahal may sell to Jews the right (Hasaka and Meropie) to the real estate and appurtenances of any gentile. The documents also prove that the Kahal and the Beth-Din are not bound to judge according to Jewish law, but may hand down personal decisions as they please....

Thus, by secret acts, the Jews circumvent their Christian competitors and acquire a controlling share of the capital and real estate of the country.

I submitted these documents together with my recommendations to Gov. Gen. von Kaufmann, who appointed a commission to examine them, with the result that the official Jewish Kahal was suppressed by the circular of August 34, 1867.

The authenticity of all the documents is thoroughly established: the 290 documents published herewith cover the period from 1794 to 1803. To facilitate their study, they have been arranged in seventeen categories, each preceded by a short explanation on the laws and customs referred to, and indicating their real aim and influence on the Jews and on the gentiles".

As the subject of Brafmann's other work, The Jewish Brotherhoods, has been treated rather fully in chapter II, it is hardly necessary to give an analysis of the book here.



The Cabbalistic Significance of the Mysterious inscription found on the wall of the room in which the imperial Russian Family was murdered.

The three letters of the inscription are the letter "L" repeated three times in three different languages. [The student way be confused by the fact that, in the photograph which is reproduced on the opposite page, the characters appear as though reversed, and written from right to left. But this is not the case, and is explained by the position assumed by the writer, who stood with his back to the wall, with his right arm stretched down, and formed the letters from right to left, in the Hebrew manner.] The first letter on the right is a (lamed) in the cursive handwriting of the ancient Hebrew alphabet. It is the twelfth letter of that alphabet with the numerical value of 30 (cabbalistically reduced to the fundamental number: - 3 + 0 - 3, which explain why the letter "L" is thrice repeated in the inscription). [The cabbalistic interpretation of letters and words is found in the following books: Kircher, Oedipus Aegyptiacus; Lenain, La Science Cabbalistique; Dée, Monas Hieroglyphcia; H. Krumrath, Amphithéatre de l'éternel sapience; Franck, La Cabbale.] The second letter is also the letter lamed but in the Samaritan script. [Fabre d'Olivet, La Langue hébraique restituée.]

The third letter γ is the Greek letter lambda, corresponding to the same letter lamed.

In ancient sacred Hebrew, based on the ancient sacred language of the Egyptian temples, each letter, apart from its vernacular value as sound and number, has, moreover, secret meanings known only to adepts. Fabre d'Olivet thus characterizes the accumulation of the different meanings contained in the ancient Hebrew alphabet:

"Moses, in his teaching, followed the method of the Egyptian priests who made use of three methods to express their thoughts: the first was the common use; the second was symbolical or figurative; the third was sacred or hieroglyphic. Such was the character of that language. According to their will, the same word had the ordinary, figurative or the allegorical meaning. Heraclitus has expressed this difference in three terms: namely, the spoken word, the symbol, and the hidden meaning". [Fabre d'Olivet, op. cit.]

Moreover, each letter stood for one of the names of God, and or one of the mysterious keys of the Tarot, the sacred book wherein, under different images, is concentrated all the ancient practice of magical science. [Eliphas Lévy, Dogme et Rituel de la haute magie.]

The name of God, corresponding to the letter lamed, is Shdaï, composed of three letters, represented by Δ (the Greek capital letter D) and it governs the sphere of Saturn. The number of Saturn is also 3. This explains once again why the letter lamed is thrice repeated. [Cornelius Agrippa, Philosophie Occulte.]

On the other hand, following cabbalistic teaching, the letter lamed stands for the heart, the king of the body, wherein dwells the soul--Ruach. Cabbalists affirm that man is formed of three main invisible parts: namely, Nesham, the mind, Ruach, the soul, and Nefesh, the lower soul or subconscious which governs directly the material body. Nesham has its seat in the brain; Nefesh, in the liver, and Ruach, in the centre, between liver and brain, namely, in the heart. According to the ancients, the heart is king of the body (Melek-king), and, we repeat again, was situated in the body between brain and liver, that is, in the centre. [Cf. The report made by Leinigen io the Munich Psychological Society, March 3, 1887.] This is clearly shown by the cabbalistic analysis of the word Melek-king.

Three words are fused in one: "brain", represented by the first letter of the word mem; "heart" by the first letter of the word lamed; and "liver", by the first letter of the word kaph, which is the same letter as , but in the form used at the end of a word. It is clear, therefore, that the letter (lamed), symbolizing the "heart", which is found in the centre between "liver" and "brain", is placed in the word Melek between letters representing these two organs. [The cipher the real meaning, cabbalists frequently resort to a special kind of hieroglyphics, one form of which is synthetic, whereby a word is concealed by several others. For instance, the first letters of several words are taken and assembled in one word, as in the present case in the word "Melek". See Molitor, Philosophie de la Tradition.]

Therefore, according to the ancients, the heart (lamed) is the king (Melek) of the organism and the seat of life. The destruction of the heart causes the death of the organism and the seat of life. The destruction of the heart causes the death of the organism and, in symbolical language, it also means that the destruction of the king brings about the downfall of the kingdom.

* * *

Furthermore, in studying the hidden meaning of the roots, one discovers that the root (double lamed), still found in Arabic, means the agony of a man being torn to pieces. [Fabre d'Olivet, op. cit.] The addition of a third only strengthens this meaning and indicates the agony of a desperate situation.

Interpreting the inscription on the wall with the help of the Tarot, [Eliphas Lévy, op. cit. Papus, Tarot des Bohémiens.] one finds that the letter corresponds to the twelfth card of the Great Arcana, [The Arcana (arcana--mysterious) are the cards of the Tarot: the Great Arcana, of which there are twenty-two, correspond to the letters of the sacred alphabet which was first of all Egyptian and afterwards became Jewish. Their invention is attributed to the founder of the Egyptia secret science, Hermes Tot or Trismegistos. Our playing cards today originally came from the Lesser Arcana.] and also to the letter Luzain, of the sacred language of the Egyptian Magi. This arcanum represents a man hanging by one foot from a pole whose two ends rest on two trees from each of which six branches have been cut. The man's arms are tied behind his back and folded so as to form the base of a triangle pointing downwards; the apex is formed by the head of the man. It is the sign of violent death, but it can also mean sacrifice. [P. Christian, Histoire de la Magie.]

Therefore, reading the cabbalistic meaning of the three letters, one gets:

Here the King was struck to the heart

in punishment of his crimes,

or, Here the King was sacrificed

to bring about the

Destruction of his Kingdom.

Finally, the line drawn beneath these three letters (in Magical Science the horizontal line is the symbol of the passive principle) indicates that those who killed the king did not do so of their own will, but in obedience to superior command.

Whoever wrote this inscription was a man well versed in the secrets of the ancient Jewish cabbalism, as contained in the Cabbala and the Talmud. In accomplishing the deed in obedience to superior order, this man performed a rite of Black Magic. It is for this reason that he commemorated his act by a cabbalistic inscription in cipher, which belonged to the rite.

The inscription therefore proves:

1. That the Tsar was killed.

2. That the murder of the Tsar was committed by, men under the command of occult forces; and by an organization which, in its struggle against existing power resorted to the ancient cabbalism in which it was well versed.



Extract from League of Nations--Treaty Series. vol. XLIII-1926, No. 1046, pages 41-59.

Convention respecting the Rights of the Governments of the two Countries and their respective Nationals in Palestine, signed at London, December 3, 1924.

English official text communicated by His Britannic Majesty's Foreign Office. The registration of this Convention took place January 6, 1926. This Convention was also transmitted to the Secretariat by the Department of State of the Government of the United States of America, February 17, 1926. (Preamble followed by the text of the mandate as it was approved by the Council of the League of Nations, 28 articles, signed at London, July 3, 1922.)

Whereas the mandate in the above terms came into force on September 29, 1923; and

Whereas the United States of America, by participating in the war against Germany, contributed to her defeat and the defeat of her Allies; and to the renunciation of the rights and titles of her Allies in the territory transferred by them, but has not ratified the Covenant of the League of the Nations embodied in the Treaty of Versailles; and

Whereas the Government of the United States and the Government of His Britannic Majesty desire to reach a definite agreement independently with respect to the rights of the two Governments and their respective Nationals in Palestine;

His Britannic Majesty and the President of the United States of America have decided to conclude a convention to this effect, and have named as plenipotentiaries:

His Majesty (titles):

The Right Honorable Joseph Austen Chamberlain (titles);

The President of the United States of America:

His Excellency the Honorable Frank B. Kellogg (titles);

Who. . . . . have agreed as follows:


Subject to the provisions of the present Convention the United States consents to the dominion of Palestine by His Britannic Majesty, pursuant to the mandate recited above.


The United States and its nationals shall have and enjoy all the rights and benefits secured under the terms of the mandate to Members of the League of Nations and their nationals, notwithstanding the fact that the United States is not a Member of the League of Nations.


Vested American property rights in the mandated territory shall be respected and in no way impaired.


A duplicate of the annual report to be made by the Mandatory under Art. 24 of the mandate shall be furnished to the United States.


Subject to the provisions of any local laws for the maintenance of public order and public morals, the nationals of the United States will be permitted freely to establish and maintain educational, philanthropic, and religious institutions in the mandated territory, and to receive voluntary applicants and to teach in the English language.


The extradition treaties and conventions which are or may be in force between the United States and Great Britain, and the provisions of any treaties which are or may be in force between the two countries which relate to extradition or consular rights shall apply to the mandated territory.


Nothing contained in the present Convention shall be affected by any modification which may be made in the terms of the mandate, as recited above, unless such modification shall have been assented to by the United States.


The present Convention shall be ratified in accordance with etc. Done in duplicate at London this 3rd day of December, 1924.

(L.S.) Austen Chamberlain.

(L.S.) Frank. B. Kellogg.



This part was not written by Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg, but was entirely the work of a Jewish Chicago lawyer, Solomon O. Levinsohn. He first presented it to the late M. Briand and later to Mr. Kellog, who sponsored it.

It became known as the Kellogg-Briand Pact and was signed in Paris on August 27, 1928. (Cf. The story of this Pact in the Revue Internationale des Sociétés Secreetes, Paris, 1930).


We will simply pass by that section in point and move right on to some of the material in the back of this volume which is presented in such a way as to cover references and backup materials.

For instance, the next topic will concern the Order of B`NAI B'RITH, which in turn is a branch off the Anti-Defamation League, which in its turn is a major operation of BRITISH INTELLIGENCE. Since we don't have time nor inclination to RE-PRESENT the volumes and volumes of our prior work and that of other researchers and authors, here, you must do your homework, readers--ONLY YOUR LIVES AND SOULS ARE AT STAKE HERE.



[H: First off, a comment: This is going to become so entangled with the Masonic order, the Mormon doctrine AND the Jewish Covenant as to complicate your thoughts if you don't know what "Covenant" means AS USED BY THESE GROUPS. As an example, let us consider our friend Bo Gritz' "Covenant Community" in Idaho. Bo is a Mason and no matter what "he thought" or "didn't think", COVENANT means exactly what it says here. Don't be fooled by "Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob..." and gobble-de-goop about born in Jesus, etc. JESUS IS THE APPOINTED CORNERSTONE OF THE TEMPLE AND THE CAPSTONE OF THE PYRAMID OF THE ILLUMINATI--NOT THE CHRIST!]

B'nai B'rith means "Sons of Covenant", the Covenant being that of circumcision practiced according to the Mosaic law. Hence the Independent Order of the B'nai B'rith admits only Jews as members.

This rite "was founded in New York in 1843 by a number of German Jews, headed by Henry Jones." (Jewish Encyclopaedia, Art. B'nai B'rith.)

Its constitution, District Lodges, Grand Lodges, stamp it as a Jewish Masonic Society.

Like most societies, it covers its political activities under the cloak of "benevolence and philanthropy".

From its inception until the present time, its main contact has been with Germany and its chief aim the establishment of the supremacy of the German Jews in all world affairs through the channel of "Internationalism".

In 1882, the strength of the I.O.B.B. in the United States warranted the opening of Lodges in Germany by Moritz Ettinger, and the growth of the order was so rapid there that in 1885, Julius Bien, President of the Order in New York, went over and inaugurated the first German Grand Lodge of the I.O.B.B.

The political activities of the leaders of the order in Rumania, Austria and Hungary are a matter of record, although the chief center of their power is in the United States where they have lately attained supremacy in the Jewish World by absorbing "national" Zionism and submitting it wholly to their own "international" policy when the Jewish World Agency was created in October, 1928.

It will be well for the reader to bear in mind that, however united a front the Jews may present to the Gentiles, yet among themselves they are divided, and the fight for supremacy and the attainment of world power is not less bitter between their various camps than it is among the different sects of Freemasonry.

Rabbi Dr. Leo Bach was the president of the B'Nai B'rith of Germany in 1928.

Grand Master for Russia, of the International Order of B'nai B'rith at the time of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was Sliozberg. He was one of the inspirers of Kerensky, the leader of the first revolution of 1917 (Le Cashiers de l'Ordre, November 1927). Alexander Kerensky, real name Aron Kirbiz, Kerensky having been the name of his Step-father.


Before we go on and while we are talking about groups as might be recognized as "side" groups or "LOBBY groups", let us directly look at how the Jews have handled the problem of finances, lobbying Congress, etc. There is a law of the land that covers religious and non-profit entities. There is also a law of the land that prevents any one group giving beyond a certain level of funds to LOBBY. How do you get away with giving more or unlimited funds? You incorporate as many groups as you need to EACH contribute its maximum and then when you add up the sums--you have perfectly LEGAL groups giving PERFECTLY LEGAL sums. Remember the corporate structures were MADE BY THESE PEOPLE TO COVER AND PROTECT THEIR OWN ACTIVITIES. THE LAWS OF THE LAND ARE FOR EVERYONE, SO IF YOU CHOOSE NOT TO UTILIZE THAT WHICH IS LEGAL FOR YOUR OWN GOODLY PURPOSES, LOOK NOT TO ME TO FIX IT FOR YOU. "THEY" CANNOT DESTROY THE LAWS AGAINST YOUR USE--FOR IT WOULD UNCOVER AND DESTROY THEIR PLAN OF CAPABILITY. IT IS TIME, PAST, TO USE YOUR GOD-GIVEN BRAINS.

Let us move on.





(FOUNDED 1860)

If, as it has been appropriately defined, Judaism is a sect, the creation of the Alliance Israelite Universelle which took place in 1860 can be regarded as that of its exoteric center.

It was founded in 1860 by Aristide Astruc, Isidor Cahen, Jules Carvalho, Narcisse Leven, Eugene Manuel and Charles Netter. Its first president was Konigswarter. Adolph Cremieux was president from 1863-1867 and again from 1868-1880.

In 1840, the world had been startled by the news of the fearful murder of Pere Thomas in Damascus. Serious investigations had resulted in the conviction of three Jews who had confessed to the commission of the abominable crime for Jewish ritual purposes of procuring human blood.

The indignation of the whole world rising against Jewry made its prominent members realize the danger threatening their newly acquired emancipation in most countries, and they made a concerted effort to disprove Jewish guilt in the Damascus affair. Foremost among them had been Moses Montefiore, Adolphe Cremieux and Solomon Munk. Yet, the real inspirer of the Alliance Israelite Universelle was Hirsch Kalisher, Rabbi of Thorn (Russia) and its enthusiastic exponent, Moses Hess.

The chief aim of the Alliance Israelite Universelle was political, and was clearly expressed in the report circulated after its foundation in which was stated: All important faiths are represented in the world by nations, that is to say, they are incarnated in governments especially interested in them and officially authorized to represent them and speak for them only. Our faith alone is without this important advantage; it is represented neither by a state nor by a society, nor does it occupy a clearly defined territory.

The Alliance Israelite Universelle therefore was destined to be the governmental representative of all Jews from whatever country they lived in under the authority of their secret Kahal or community rule.

The first political manifestation of the Alliance Israelite Universelle took place at the Berlin Congress in 1878 where it was represented by three of its delegates: Kann, Netter and Veneziani.

The link between the Alliance Israelite Universelle and Freemasonry was for many years Adolphe Cremieux and Masonic writers have asserted that the 18th degree, conferred by the Grand Orient, makes the initiate, if not a member, at any rate a supporter of the Alliance.

The Alliance Israelite Universelle saw its dream of international Jewish Government Shattered when Zionism emerged and came to the fore in 1897. It is noteworthy that the "Prophet" of Zionism: Ahad Ha'am (Asher Ginsberg) was a member of the Alliance Israelite Universelle and a disciple of Charles Netter. The avowed aims of the A.I.U., namely a super-government of the world and a universal religion, both to be Judaic, are being steadily pursued by the "Jewish World Agency" functioning today.


I think that since there will be an insert into this segment that it will be a good place to break into the document. Our next focus will be: THE SOVIETIZATION OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE UNITED STATES.

I don't personally think this is a good title because it would be impossible to more clearly usurp anything that had already usurped the world as has the British Empire, but this is not "my book" and we will offer exactly that which is offered to us.

Since this is Sunday and the paper is such a massive task for the staff during these heavy writing days, let us turn this portion over to the editor so he can arrange for the necessary copies of the omitted portion. We will continue directly onward.




SUN., JAN. 25, 1998 10:10 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 162

SUN., JAN. 25, 1998


As I watch the shadow of hopelessness seem to cloud your perceptions, I find it time to remind you of the last couple of years' prophecies, very, very briefly, from the Hopi Tribal seer.

To give you a bit of insight please realize that even though the Great Ancients KNOW of the errors of the calendars--they count by sequence all understand. Events measure the counting so it is as well to use whatever calendar system fits the need.

I will go back to the short offering for 1997, now past, and give you a bit of insight:



The dream will be actualized and this planet will hold its space in the great council of planets and become part of the Universal enlightened Brotherhood and Sisterhood of humanity because there is an organization that is intergalactic that is known as the Great International Brotherhood and Sisterhood of Humanity and Keepers of the Light Circles. It's happened on many planets and it's expected to happen on a lot of other planets.


There will be a moment in 1998 when the population will be the population. The Circle of Law will hold the image of fast thought necessary to allow this planet to become a starship.


The third migration will leave this planet for the other new world and this planet will now be a star-ship, a spaceship, have its design of energy movement guided by all of humanity that's living here because, see, it's been a starship all along floating around a central sun but not in harmony with sister planets.


In the year 2000 the Great Spirit will have left its seed and the egg of everything here on this planet and it will create itself 20 times over at the speed of light and thus the prophesy ends as I have been given it by the Grandmothers that I share with you now.


This Prophecy does not give specific dates but refers to certain symbolic events which will have a world-wide influence.

The final stage, called the "Great Day of Purification ", has also been described as a "mystery egg", in which the forces of the swastika and the Sun, plus a third force symbolized by the color red, culminate either in TOTAL REBIRTH or TOTAL ANNIHILATION--we don't know which yet, but the choice is ours. War and natural catastrophe may be involved. The degree of violence will be determined by the degree of inequity caused among the peoples of the world and in the balance of Nature.

That it will be very violent is now almost taken for granted among traditional Hopi, but man may still lessen the violence by correcting his treatment of Nature and his fellow man. Ancient spiritually-based communities, such as the Hopi, must especially be preserved and not forced to abandon their wise way of life and the natural resources they have vowed to protect.

The Hopi play a key role in the survival of the human race, through their vital communion with the unseen forces that hold Nature in balance, as an example of a practical alternative to the suicidal man-made system, and as a fulcrum of world events. The pattern is simple. "The whole world will shake and turn against those who are hindering the Hopi."

And it shall come to pass in these days within this generation. Therefore we can structure sovereign nations, sovereign peoples--or it can "go down the tubes"; the end is up to YOU.

Let us move on:


[QUOTING, Part 22:]



The preceding chapters have been devoted to a study of the Jewish world organization, its historical background, its branches, its aims and the methods whereby they are obtained. If the reader has followed the thread thus far patiently and objectively, his mind has doubtless grasped, not only the historical facts and specific Jewish plans for the immediate future, but also something of Jewish character and psychology in general. A full knowledge of the latter--which can be gained only through personal experience--is the greatest safeguard against Jewish snares and pitfalls of everyday life.

In the following pages will be found the names of men and women prominent in political, economic and social circles who, lured by the tempting bait, have become enmeshed in Jewish intrigue. To all the world they appear to play an independent role; but in reality they are merely puppets whose every move is worked by strings from behind the scene. ("Who will ever suspect that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?" Protocol No. 13. Also a quotation from Coningsby.)

The close observer will discover, slavishly serving the Jewish cause under the mask of benevolence, democracy or liberalism, bishops, archbishops, prime ministers and national presidents, government officials of every rank and leading representatives of all other professions (lawyers, economists, scientists and the rest). He will recognize them at once as traitors who have sold themselves and their country for their own personal advantage.

"Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare." (Protocol No. 1. It must be borne in mind that many of these men have, at one time or another in their lives, been involved in some crooked business or scandal and dread its disclosure.) But these traitors, when the great day comes, like their counterparts in the French and in the recent Russian revolutions, will pay the price of treason with their heads. (The aristocracy who served the Jewish cause in bringing about these revolutions were not even rewarded with life, but perished with the innocent under the edifice they had so efficiently undermined.)

Not less useful to the Jewish cause than those holding official positions, are the rich scions of socially prominent families; their wealth and their prestige are the "force and make-believe" of the Jewish countersign. (Protocol No. 1.) A rich young Bostonian, Garland, gave millions of dollars to the foundation which bears his name, and appointed as one of its trustees the notorious "red", William Zebulon Foster.

"Foster told them that the Garland Foundation could be depended upon whenever anyone gets into trouble because of radical political opinion. Several of the organizers of the Communist Party and of its 'legal' political branch, the Workers' Party, were promised regular monthly salaries by Foster, to be paid from the Garland Foundation." (Whitney, Reds in America. Beckwith Press, New York, 1924, pp. 80-81.) [H: I want you to note, readers, that this business methodology is sound and workable. The USE and INTENT may well be totally evil and that remains with the people who set up such a plan and those who run it.]

Another example is the Philadelphian, William Curtis Bok, who, on the death of his grandfather, Cyrus H. K. Curtis, in 1933, inherited, together with his mother and younger brother, a major interest in the huge Curtis Publishing Company, comprising The Ladies Home Journal, Good Housekeeping, The Philadelphia Public Ledger, The New York Evening Post and other journals. (Curtis's gross receipts from advertising for 1929 amounted to 73 million dollars; and for 1930, to 67 millions.) [H: Those were BIG dollars in those days, really BIG DOLLARS.] Bok, now 35, on his return from Soviet Russia, founded a new group to facilitate Bolshevik propaganda in America: "There came into being in Philadelphia last week (July 1933) a new investigating agency sponsored by the American Foundation. It was called the Committee on Russian-American Relations and its membership included such potent figures as the Morgan partner, Thomas W. Lamont, whose son Corliss is a near communist; the Harvard economist Frank W. Taussig; the lawyer Paul D. Cravath, (Notorious radical and shadow of Otto H. Kahn). In 1924 Cravath tried to secure the nomination of Otto Kahn as President of the English Speaking Union; and the manoeuvre was defeated only by the timely exposure of Kahn's Bolshevist activities. It was proved that Kahn's house was a meeting place for soviet agents, such as Nina Somorodin, Claire Sheridan, Louise Bryant and Margaret Harrison, a Russian recognitionist; James D. Mooney, President of General Motors Export Co.; Dean Roscoe Pound (Notorious radical), of Harvard Law School, a Liberal of the first water; Hugh L. Cooper, the engineer who built the Dnieprostry Dam for the U.S.S.R. Modestly buried away in the middle of the committee list was the name of its Chairman and sponsor--Curtis Bok." (See "Time" (Chicago Weekly) for July 17, 1933.) Many more examples of rich people of good families, such as Mrs. Elmhurst (nee Dorothy Whitney), Lady Astor the Dowager Countess of Warwick, come to mind, but space does not allow mention of all here, nor of a discussion of how and why each was inveigled into the Jewish net and into the base role of patron and purveyor to criminals.

Suffice it to say that, in general, these people "thirst for the emotion of success and applause, of which we (the Jews) are remarkably generous. And the reason why we give them this success is to make use of their high conceit of themselves, to which it gives birth. For that insensibly disposes them to assimilate our suggestions without being on their guard against them, in the fullness of their confidence that it is their own infallibility which is giving utterance to their own thoughts, and that it is impossible for them to borrow those of others. You cannot imagine to what extent the wisest goyim can be brought to a state of unconscious naivete in the presence of this high conceit of themselves; and at the same time how easy it is to take the heart out of them by the slightest ill-success, though it be nothing more than the stoppage of the applause they had, and to reduce them to a slavish submission for the sake of winning a renewal of success." (PROTOCOL NO. 15)

The definition and aims of Fabianism are given by the Fabians themselves as follows:


The Fabian Society Consists of Socialists.

It therefore aims at the reorganization of Society by the emancipation of Land and Industrial Capital from individual ownership and the vesting of them in the community for the general benefit. In this way only can the natural and acquired advantages of the country be equitably shared by the whole people.

The Society accordingly works for the extinction of private property in land, with equitable consideration of established expectations, and due provision as to the tenure of the home and homestead: for the transfer to the community, by constitutional methods, of all such industries as can be conducted socially; and for the establishment, as the governing consideration in the regulation of production, distribution and service, of the common good instead of private profit.

The Society is a constituent of the Labour Party and of the International Socialist congress; but it takes part freely in all constitutional movements, social, economic and political, which can be guided towards its own objects. Its direct business is: (a) the propaganda of Socialism in its application to current problems; (b) investigation and discovery in social, industrial, political and economic relations; (c) the working out of socialist principles in legislation and administrative reconstruction; (d) the publication of the results of its investigations and their practical lessons.

The Society, believing in equal citizenship of men and women in the fullest sense, is open to persons irrespective of sex, race or creed, who commit themselves to its aims and purposes as stated above and undertake to promote its work.

The Society took the name of Fabian from the policy of temporizing it adopted, claiming to imitate that of the Roman dictator, Fabius Counctator, during his fight against Hannibal, whom he eventually defeated at Tarentum, 215 B.C.

Frank Podmore, well-known spiritualist and occultist, one of the founders of the Fabian society, is quoted as saying to one of its earliest members: "For the right moment, you must wait, as Fabius did most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays, but when the time comes, you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain and fruitless."

The Fabian Society waited forty years, striking a continual series of covert blows at the political, economic, social and religious structure of England, and in 1924 it came to power with the advent of the first Labour Government, which can be called the offspring of the Fabian Society.

The period had been fruitful, if long.

There is no gainsaying that the Fabian Society has been first and foremost a gathering of intellectuals--a rebellious Intelligentsia whose accomplishments seem the realization of Weishaupt's dream of Masonic Illuminism, cleverly combines with Moses Mendelssohn's dream of Jewish Illuminism (Haskalah).

Historically, it was founded in 1883 at the time when in the realm of philosophy and metaphysics, the political economy of John Stuart Mill, in England, and the Positivism of Auguste Comte, in France, had thrown perturbation into the minds of numerous thinkers and given abundant food to the Freethinkers of the epoch. Henry George's book on Socialism Progress and Poverty was in great vogue. The direct influence leading to the formation of the Fabian Society was, according to E.R. Pease, its historian, exercised by Thomas Davidson, the founder of The Fellowship in the New Life, which society culminated in The Ethical Society of Culture in New York. Considerable impulse was also given to the budding association by its assimilation of Robert Dale Owen's socialistic principles.

Among the intellectuals who joined The Fabian society soon after its inception 1884 was the Irishman, George Bernard Shaw, who was elected a member in that year.

At that time, The Fabian Society had completely seceded from the Fellowship of the New Life and had formulated its own Socialistic programme. The following year, Sidney Webb, now Lord Passfield and ex-Minister of the Colonies, as well as Sydney Olivier, now Lord Olivier, who has held several Government appointments, were elected members of The Fabian Society. Soon afterwards, the late Mrs. Annie Besant, later head of the Theosophical Movement, also was elected a member.

Fabian Socialism, at the outset, groped its way along all the beaten paths of the Social Revolutionists who had preceded them. It also made incursions into Babouvism, Marxism, Bakounist Anarchism and the then existing various Social-Democratic groups. Being, however, mainly composed of intellectuals, bureaucrats, civil servants, journalists, etc., the Fabians, whose fundamental slogan was the righting of the wrongs of the working class, had no keen desire for riotous street manifestations and confined their earliest activities to drawing-room meetings.

It does not enter within the limits of the present sketch to retrace the history of the Fabian Society, but the point which should be regarded as of great importance is that out of the drawing-room meetings alluded to above, there emerged the truly Fabian tactics of temporizing and the decision taken and followed of penetrating into or, as Bernard Shaw himself expressed it, of permeating numerous existing societies with Fabian socialistic ideas and principles.

This method of penetrating into organizations, political and economic, and of boring from within, gave, in time, remarkable results. Fabians, mainly Civil Servants, easily found their affinities in Liberal circles and, moreover, owing to their loudly proclaimed socialistic profession of faith, obtained the confidence of the working classes. They were indeed sitting on both sides of the fence and recruiting the good-will of both Liberal and Labour organizations.

The study of Fabianism is one of almost unparalleled opportunism. Fabians seemed to have formulated no original creed of their own, but were animated by an unswerving resolve to get to the top and govern England. They accepted the creed or tenets of any camp into which they penetrated and, by degrees, converted its adherents to their own views. In this manner Fabian members secured their positions in political, industrial and educational fields. To suit even Anarchism, they formed a special Fabian branch which bore the name of The Fabian Parliamentary League.

No field of exploitation seems to have been overlooked by these socialist intellectual Illuminati:

I. POLITICS. In Politics, their range of activities has been well defined by one of its leaders, Bernard Shaw, in a paper he read at a conference in 1892, at Essex Hall. The policy of "permeation" of the Fabian Society was clearly outlined and much stress laid upon the enumeration of results already achieved. Within a year of this conference, in January 1893, The Independent Labour Party was formed by the grouping of the local Fabian societies then in existence. These groups, under the leadership of Keir Hardie, Friedrich Engels (co-worker with Karl Marx) and Marx's daughter, E. Aveling, had accepted, as their code, Marxism thus summarized: To establish a Socialist State where Land and Capital will be held by the community. On such principles was Russia transformed into Soviet Russia in 1917.

The author of The History of the Fabian Society does not fail to point it out as the Parent Society, emphasizing the fact that the Marxist Independent Labour Party was but its offspring. Thus, leading, on the one hand, Marxist Socialism, and having, on the other, so permeated the Liberal Party that they also practically ruled it, the Fabians were soon able to take part in local elections, and propose their own candidates for appointments on School Boards, Vestries, County Councils, Women's Liberal Federations, Liberal and Radical Unions, etc. They spared no pains in pushing forward the autonomy of municipalities as well as the various schemes for National Insurance, Old Age Pensions, Tariff Reform, Employers' Liability, Workmen's Compensation, etc.

Politically also, through their offspring The Independent Labour Party, they asserted their defeatist and anti-patriotic tenets during the Boer War of 1899-1902, when they expressed their wish "to see the Boers successful and the British Army driven into the sea".

By 1903, The Independent Labour Party, after 10 years of indefatigable efforts among the Trade Unionists, gave its parent, The Fabian society, the opportunity and satisfaction of presenting England with a full-fledged Labour Party. Up to that time, Fabian candidates had contested and won seats in Parliament as Liberals. The practice of the policy of interlocking directorates was never better evidenced than by the tactics of Fabianism.

The outbreak of the War in 1914 furnished the Illuminati of Socialism with the opportunity of manifesting their anti-patriotic feelings much more openly than they had done during the Boer War. It was then that their policy of interlocking directorates bore abundant fruit. What one might call the "melting" property of the Fabian Society became more evident for, as such, it did not create a record of anti-patriotism. That particular task was entrusted to its members of the labour Party and the Independent Labour Party who took a prominent part in the formation of the Union of Democratic Control, which counted the Zionist Jew Israel Zangwill amongst its leading band-masters.

The shameful defeatist, pro-German activities of the present Prime Minister of England, Ramsey Macdonald, Fabian and Labourite during the World War, and the open support given to Bolshevism by his Labour Party have forever sullied the political honour of England and are a matter of history.

Yet another aspect of Fabianism is the great part it took in the formation and, later, direction of LEAGUE OF NATIONS, which Bernard Shaw calls AN INCIPIENT INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT.



SUN., JAN. 25, 1998 12:14 P.M. YR. 11, DAY 162

SUN., JAN. 25, 1998

II. ECONOMICS. In the realm of the Economic, Industrial and Financial life of England. The Fabian Society played no less a part than in politics. With its slogan of "Progressive Policy" (Compare the subversive "Conference for Political Progressive Action in America".), it invaded Agriculture, preaching the Nationalization of land, in other words, the confiscation of landed property.

The first blow to Industry was struck in Lancashire, the stronghold of English industry, in 1890, with the help of the late Mrs. Annie Besant as chief spokesman and agitator. Later, the Cooperative movement was captured and Fabianized and subsequently delivered over to the Independent Labour Party and Labour Party. It is due to the Socialists having been so successful in conquering industry that, during the World War, sabotage assumed such appalling proportions in the munition factories in England.

As to the financial "ideals" of The Fabians, whose basic principle is the ruin of Capitalism, they became realities when taxation of the people took undue proportions in the shape of income tax, super-tax, death duties, and are to be followed by Capital Levy. The promised benefits to the working class to be derived from such schemes as the National Health Insurance and. Workmen's Compensation and Dole, Old Age and Widow's Pensions, have proved a myth. Yet they have gone a long way towards furthering the plans exposed in the Protocols, which aim at reducing to bondage the Goyim, rich and poor alike.

III. EDUCATION. In the matter of Education, the Fabian Illuminati have followed a theory which is none other than that suggested by one of the souls of Bavarian Illuminism, Nicolai, in the 18th century. Having secured posts on the School-boards of the country, it became very easy for Fabian socialists to instil their educational de-Christianized principles in the school curriculum. Their attack on religious teaching was subtle but deadly, as seen in the Education Act of 1902. They boasted openly of having in their ranks several Anglican bishops and divines, the list being headed by Bishop Headlam, one of the earliest Fabians. Eventually they won, having, as has always been their want, resorted to intensive propaganda, generously distributing their tracts and leaflets.

Under Fabian educational scheme come the formation of the Educational Groups and of "The Nursery", the latter designed as a kind of training school for very young prospective Socialists. Women's groups were also formed, the members of which participated in all movements tending to a fuller feminist emancipation. But, by far, one of the most important steps taken by the Fabians along educational lines has been their inauguration in existing Universities of "University Socialist Societies", which in 1912 were finally grouped by Clifford Allen into "the Universities Socialist Federation". Fertile seeds of Fabian Socialism are also shown at the Summer Schools organized annually by the Society, which E. R. Pease rightly terms a "propagandist society". The culminating triumph of the Fabians, in the realm of education, was the creation of the London School of Economics and Political Science at the London University, where, today, one of the chief lecturers is the Jew socialist, Harold J. Laski, Member of the Executive Committee of the Fabian Society and Chairman of its Publishing Committee.

As has been suggested already, and as can be seen from the succinct exposé here given, Fabianism left no field unexplored or unexploited. For fifty years, it has treated England to doses of both pure and diluted Marxism, mostly diluted, as the English, by the very nature of their steady and conservative characteristics, are not easily aroused to excesses like those perpetrated by the Paris "Communards" of 1871. But, on the other hand, they have been thoroughly permeated and their poisoning has been one of long process.

The results are, to the naked eye, the history of England since the War, politically and economically.

Lloyd George's Coalition Government had been kind to Socialism, but the real harvest-time came when the Labour Party won the election in 1924 and its members governed, or rather misgoverned, England. It needed nothing short of the Bolshevist alliance which MacDonald wished to force upon the country to provoke the remaining sound reaction of the English people and prompt them to overthrow the Labour Government. But this show of resistance was ephemeral.

How pitiful it is to know that the return of the Labour Party to power, in May, 1929, is entirely due to the incompetence of a conservative Government, in which the people trusted for the sane administration of the affairs of State. Yet, the Prime Minister, Leader of the Conservative Party, Mr. Baldwin, could not claim ignorance of the Judeo-Masonic plans contained in the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion. He found it easier deliberately to disregard them. Be it as it may, England is once more in the hands of the Labour Party with the inevitable and ubiquitous Ramsay MacDonald and, according to the latest report issued by the Society "eight Fabians are members of the Cabinet and fourteen others hold offices in the Government without seats in the Cabinet".

From the Jew-led Fabian Society issue the chaotic words and deeds which are steadily wrecking not only general prosperity, but also combating with international forces drawn from all quarters of the globe any attempt at national readjustment such as the present movement in Germany.

The drawing-room meeting system described by E. R. Pease and which in America is known as "parlor-bolshevism", formed to gain well-to-do adherents, still functions, as witness the following article which appeared in the London Evening Standard of May, 28 1931:


* * *


* * *

Mr. Cole Gets To Work

* * *

Open Mind On Empire Buying And Preference

* * *

From our Political Corresponent.

The Government is to be presented with a brand new policy. Certain ministers are to take part in its preparation.

It is called a "long run" policy, and is planned "for ten years ahead".

Tomorrow evening a group of Socialists and Trade Unionists will begin fashioning the new plan at a meeting to be held at Transport House [The premises of "The Labour Party".]. The prime movers are Major C. R. Attlee (Postmaster-General), and Mr. G.D.H. Cole.

Sir Stafford Cripps (the Solicitor-General), Mr. Ernest Bevin, and Mr. Noel Baker, M.P. (Mr. Arthur Henderson's Parliamentary Private Secretary) are among those expected at the invitation of Major Attlee and Mr. Cole at tomorrow's meeting.


The new policy--or the plan for a new policy--had its origin in a series of house parties held last year at Easton Lodge (the Labour Chequers), [Easton Lodge is the seat of Frances, Dowager Countess of Warwick. The Socialism of all "Parlor-Bolsheviks" reminds one of the Jew Isaac McBride's utterance: "We are going to milk the bourgeoisie and they will help us to keep (up) the struggle against themselves."] when Socialist politicians, economists and trades unionists foregathered at weekends. Out of these meetings grew the new Fabian Research Bureau (of which Major Attlee is chairman and Mr. Cole secretary), which received the official blessing of the Labour movement two months ago and is now established in premises in Abingdon Street. [No. 23 Abandon Street is the seat of the S.S.I.P. ("Society for Socialist Inquiry and Propaganda"); the new "Fabian Research Bureau": and the "Socialist League".]

It is with this new policy that we are presently concerned. Outside of England, the Fabians are affiliated with strong socialist groups professing the same ideas in Denmark, South Africa, Canada and Australia, Japan, United States, Spain and Germany. Lectures by Fabians were also given in Paris at the Comite d' Etudes Nationales, founded and directed by the Jew Albert Kahn, and also at the Club du Faubourg, organized by the Jew Leo Poldes, as well as to the French Socialist Party, headed by the Jew Leon Blum.

On November 1, 1930, the Evening Standard, already quoted, contained the following lines:


Many Labor members are talking about the dominance in the Government of that very academic body, the Fabian Society. I find that many people believed that this organization, through which many intellectuals entered the Socialist movement had ceased to exist. But it goes on with membership, small but influential, some 5,000.

Yet practically every recent appointment, either to high or low office, in the Labor Administration has been made from the membership of the society, the latest examples of which are the new Air Minister, Lord Amulree, and the new Solicitor-General, Sir Stafford Cripps. I am told that at least 90 per cent of the members of the Government are in the rolls of the society, and that contrary to regulations, so are a good many highly placed Civil Servants. The Civil Servants would probably defend themselves by saying that the society is more intellectual than political.

This ascendancy is, of course, due to the all-powerful influence of Lord Passfield and his wife, Mrs. Sidney Webb, with whom the Fabian Society has been the passion of their lives.

* * *

If on the one hand, the British Government is run by avowed Fabians, the present United States Government is in exactly the same position. The "brain trust" of Franklin D. Roosevelt is composed of several Jews, among them Bernard M. Baruch, Herbert Swope, Mordecai Ezekiel, James Warburg, Frank W. Taussig. Others like Swanson, Secretary of the Navy, (see Whitney, Reds In America, pp. 49, 58, 59), Arthur Bullitt, Louis M. Howe, Raymond Moley, Tugwell, George N. Peek, if not Jews, were closely connected with Jews and such radical organizations as the Conference for Progressive Political Action, the Rand School for Communism, the Friends of Soviet Russia, the League for Industrial Democracy.

The League for Industrial Democracy is the American counterpart of British Fabianism. (Among the members of the Board of Directors of this League in 1926 figured Justice Wise, daughter of Rabbi Stephen Wise.) It runs parallel to the Ethical Culture Society, founded by the Jew Felix Adler, the Conference of Progressive Political Action, the Intercollegiate Socialist League, the Intercollegiate Liberal League, the American Civil Liberties Union, and countless other subversive groups. Under the heading "Other Fabian Organizations", mentioned in the Fabian Society's annual report for 1932, one reads:

"Active relations are maintained between the "Fabian Society and the League for Industrial Democracy of America... with the Public Ownership League of the U.S.A.".

Is not one forcibly reminded of the following sentence? "We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression, when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces--Socialists, Anarchists, Communists--to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry. " (PROTOCOL NO. 3)

Not less than English Universities, have the American colleges been permeated with Fabian theories, and hardly any of them are without a branch of the National Student Forum (long headed by John Rothschild) or of the Intercollegiate Liberal League, founded at Harvard in 1921. Felix Frankfurter was one of its sponsors. Particular attention must be drawn to the Rand School of New York, founded in 1905 which, ten years ago, was raided by order of the United States Government on account of its Communist teaching. It is noteworthy that the Rand School received important financial support from the former Mrs. Willard Straight, nee Dorothy P. Whitney, now the wife of Leonard Elmhurst who, according to Mr. Israel Sieff's statement, is Chairman of the agricultural group of the P.E.P. One of the lecturers at the Rand School who has come into recent prominence is Raymond Moley, personal adviser to President Roosevelt, and his special delegate to the London Conference, 1933.

The penetration of Fabianism in the churches of America is fully evidenced by the subversive activities of the Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America. (See Sanctuary, Tainted Contacts, New York, 1931.)

As President Roosevelt's "brain trust" was recruited from such centers, it is clear that the composition of both the British and American Governments is similar. It is Jewish-radical or, to use plain language, Jewish-Bolshevist. Both governments are run by men who are merely puppets in the hands of Jews highly placed in the secret councils of the central Jewish Kahal, the present-day Zionist World organization, whose object is the ultimate destruction of all our religious, social and industrial institutions and the annihilation of our freedom. It is therefore interesting to note that plans, evolved in the numerous Bolshevist-Socialist centers created by Fabians, Liberals and Socialists, are being executed in both the British Empire and the United States.

It is curious to compare these wonderful socialist economic plans with those which were to have been the basis of the ideal Jewish State in Palestine, after the Balfour Declaration. They were formulated in 1919 by Bernard A. Rosenblatt, a prominent Zionist, in his book Social Zionism. From it we cull only the following lines, not devoid of a certain interest:

A. The Jew is a social force in history:

(1) The prophets of Israel as the preachers of political, social and economic democracy.

(2) The rabbis as the teachers in a democratic school of Jewish students.

(3) The Jewish figures in political history almost invariably the leaders in Liberalism, Labour and Socialism:

(a) Examples: Karl Marx, Lasalle, Hess, Lasker, Bernstein, Joseph Fels, Brandeis, Gompers. (Louis D. Brandeis, an active Zionist, formerly close personal adviser to President Wilson during the War, and who, since then, has been sitting as Justice of the Federal Supreme Court at Washington.) (The late Samuel Gompers, President of The American Federation of Labour.)

(b) Even unreasonable extremists like Trotzky show only the necessary evil involved in this Jewish tendency toward social justice. (If wholesale murder as practiced by Trotsky (Braunstein) is only "the necessary evil involved in this Jewish tendency toward social justice", one hesitates to ask what evil would be necessary in order that the Jews might confer on us some "greater" social blessing.)

The press notice of Rosenblatt's book in the American Jewish News is headed "Will the Jews again lead the world?" (The introduction to Rosenblatt's book is by Judge Julian W. Mack, U.S. Circuit judge, on "Juvenile Court", 1904-1917, member Board of Inquiry on Conscientious Objectors, 1917-1918; President "Zionist Organization of America", 1921.)

The "experiment" of this ideal socialism having signally failed in Palestine, it is to be tried now in both England and America. In England, the centralization of all plans for the "new policy" has, for quite some time, been worked under the name of "Political and Economic Planning" or P.E.P., and in America it has taken the name of N.R.A. (National Recovery Act). The plans of both are identical, only the method of execution is different. Whereas the English must be dealt with slowly, and as it were taken unawares, the American people, on account of the ignorance and the primitiveness of the masses, can be treated brutally, as is being done by Hugh Johnson and other henchmen of President Roosevelt.

"In 1927, Baruch asked Johnson to join him in his New York office, and ever since, the General has been Baruch's right-hand man... During most of these years (after the War) Johnson was in touch with a man who was in the thick of many contests of finance, battles of Wall Street, and intrigues of international banking. This was Bernard Mannes Baruch, suave and rich New York capitalist, friend and supporter of the President, who gave Johnson to Roosevelt, . . . . Another ace man on the Roosevelt staff here, George N. Peek, Administrator of the Farm Relief Act, was also a War Industries Board member, friend of Baruch, partner of Johnson in plow-making." Chicago Tribune, August 16, 1933.

In America, coercion is the order of the day; "freedom" is now a meaningless word; whereas the Englishman is asked to forego his freedom for the sake of patriotism, the American masses, aliens to the Anglo-Saxon race, are swayed only by cupidity and the promise of material prosperity. Both methods produce the same results: the concentration of all material resources in the hands of the Jews, the lowering of our standard of living, and complete physical and moral degradation.

"All people are chained down to heavy toil by poverty more firmly than ever they were chained by slavery and serfdom; from these, one way or another, they might free themselves, these could be settled with, but from want they will never get away." Protocol No. 3.

"The aristocracy which enjoyed by law the labour of the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested in just the opposite--in the diminution, the killing out of the goyim. Our power is in the chronic shortness of food and physical weakness of the worker because, by all that this implies, he is made the slave of our will and he will not find in his own authorities either strength or energy to set against our will." Supra.

"The need for daily bread forces the "goyim" to keep silence and be our humble servants." Protocol No. 13.


I know that we have often run the speech of Louis T. McFadden's Radio Address of 1934. However, you need be reminded of a couple of Excerpts of same:



From Congressman Louis T. McFadden's Radio Address of Wednesday Evening, May 2, 1934, as such appear in the Congressional Record of May 3, 1934, dealing with the P.E.P. Plan analyzed in The Organization of British Slavery of Jew-Fabian Bolshevism.

"The country has recently been treated to the spectacle of the present administration's attempt to ridicule the idea that there is a definite new plan of government in process. Without attempting to comment in any manner whatever on the attempt to disarm the public, I desire now to refer briefly to a plan that was advocated as far back as 1918 when A.A. Berle had some very definite ideas regarding the establishing of a new State. Indeed, he wrote a little book on The Significance of a Jewish State dedicated to his friend, Louis D. Brandeis. In it he regarded the Jew as 'the barometer of civilization at all times'. He recognized the inability of Christianity to avert war or 'to do a single thing towards mitigating its worst effects', and seemed to think the Jews were the only power that could do anything about it....

"An attempt to establish a political economic plan is now in operation under the leadership of a group, formerly connected with the Fabian Society in England. This, until the present, secret political economic plan was drawn up by Israel Moses Sieff, an Israelite, the director of a chain store enterprise in England, called 'Marks & Spencer', which house handles almost exclusively imports from Soviet Russia, which enables them to undersell its competitors... [H: Hmmmmnnn, there's that name "Spencer" again.]

"This political economic plan organization, now secretly operating in England, is designated 'freedom and planning' , and is divided into many well-organized and well-financed departments, such as town and country planning, industry, international relations, transportation, banking, social service, civil division. It is already in operation in the British Government by means of the tariff advisory board. It has gathered all data statistics obtainable by governmental and private organizations in administrative, industrial, trade, social, educational, agricultural, and other circles.... Iron and steel and cotton industrial have been ordered by the tariff advisory board to prepare and submit plans for the reorganization of their industries, and have been warned that should they fail to do so a plan for complete reconstruction will be imposed upon them. This board has been granted default powers, and can, therefore, enforce its plan....

"That this political economic group practically control the British Government is indicated by the fact that Prime Minister MacDonald and his son and J.H. Thomas and other influential Britishers are officers of the group.

"An interesting sidelight is that some six months ago when the father of this plan, Israel Moses Sieff, was urged to show more activity by the members of his committee, his answer was 'Let it go slowly for a while and wait until we see how our plan carries out in America.' That statement indicates that a plan similar to theirs is being tried in America."





On March 29th, 1933, at a dinner given to the members of the P.E.P. (Political Economic Plan), the Chairman of this group, the Jew Israel Moses Sieff, made a speech on "Planning". The speech in itself already contained some leading lines as to the aims of the P.E.P. that can be summed up as the planned destruction of the existing order of our social, political and economic life and the erection of a structure based on centralization, standardization, expropriation and compulsion, leading to inevitable enslavement.

But in spite of having been somewhat rashly outspoken in his speech, Mr. Sieff did in reality show a certain amount of caution, for his verbal utterances were very mild compared to his written exposé on the same subject. Entitled Freedom and Planning it was privately circulated some months ago.

The perusal of this document leaves the reader no room for doubting the sinister outcome of the present world economic and financial crisis as viewed by united Jews and Fabians.

The Jewish plans for the attainment of world domination have been clearly stated in the documents known as The Protocols of the Wise Men or Elders of Zion published in 1905 and subsequently in 1920. As to the Fabian subversive ideas, they have been and are still being expressed in the Fabian Societies' periodicals, pamphlets and meetings. The P.E.P. seems to be the central office wherein the propaganda for the schemes of the advent of the Jewish power is being prepared and sent forth by a group of Fabians headed by the Jew chairman Israel Moses Sieff, director of the chain stores of Marks and Spencer.

It is no wonder that as Fabianism is the power ruling England today, the members of the P.E.P. should be in close and constant contact with Mr. Ramsey MacDonald and his son. In fact it is rumored that the whole of the actual British government plans in the realm of economics issues from the offices of the P.E.P.

The document above referred to Freedom and Planning starts by giving a dark picture of: "Collapsing Civilization". It fails however to point out that this fearful description is about the most sweeping indictment of what has been the Jewish capitalistic and democratic experiment of world government. For it would be a monstrous mistake for any intelligent citizen of whatever nation to close his or her eyes to the evident fact that for nigh sixty years, the Jews have surely and rapidly though almost invisibly climbed to the heights of government wherefrom the masses are ruled. Politically, financially and economically they have seized the reins of the governments of all nations and their invasion in the realms of social, educational and religious fields is not less important.

We are able to realize into what unfathomable abyss all organization of our Christian civilizations have been hurled to the great prejudice of all the populations of this Earth and that is why the picture painted by the Chairman of the P.E.P. is in itself the condemnation of the Jewish method of government.

It is of course necessary for the reader to bear in mind the fact that in describing the woeful state of the world the Jew spokesman fails to ascribe it to the rule of the invisible Jewish government which as Disraeli, a highly talkative if intelligent Jew, had so clearly shown had, already in his time, penetrated all courts and parliaments. (Refer to Coningsby, published in London in 1844.)


Let us take a break as we have been at this without a break for the last six hours. We will then offer excerpts from Freedom and Planning. That material can be separated from this writing or directly attached as space allows.



SUN., JAN. 25, 1998 2:17 P.M. YR. 11, DAY 162

SUN., JAN. 25, 1998

Let us now quote excerpts from Mr. Sieff's FREEDOM AND PLANNING.



This generation is faced with the threat of a World collapse of modern civilization and the advent of a period comparable with the dark ages which followed on the collapse of the Roman Empire in the fifth century A.D.

We are apt to regard such statements as pleasantly sacrifying, pardonable exaggerations in the mouths of those who are trying to spur us to action against the very real ills of the time, but not meant quite seriously.

The threat is serious.

Chaos will overtake us if we cannot show intelligence enough to extricate ourselves.

For more than a year now nothing has enabled civilization to keep some sort of course and to ride out the storm except the immense momentum of ordinary economic processes and the inertia of habit and custom. It is the resisting power of those forces and not intelligence which has thus far staved off the collapse.

They can not bring us back prosperity, but they may suffice to carry the world through the immediate crisis. If so, we shall for a time be able to live on our capital, the capital stored up from past generations, the intellectual and moral capital of men and women trained for civilization and citizenship. By what chance will the next generation have, if half of them find no employment for their youthful energies, and all of them are living under the oppression of hopelessness and decay?

What forms collapse will assume no one can foresee. It may not come suddenly. More probably there will be a gradual decline with fleeting periods of revival.


Cracks are appearing everywhere. In China and in India economic distress is both aggravated and concealed by the social and political unrest of which it is the main root.

In South America revolution has become epidemic and all but one or two countries of the most solid are financially in default.

In Central and South Eastern Europe financial default is imminent, but that by itself is of little moment in comparison with the consequent social and political upheaval which will follow. It is open to question whether the populations of Germany and Central Europe can be fed and kept alive next winter and how long any organized government can control the situation of these countries.

In the U.S.A. loss of confidence is absolute. The strain of material suffering in a population, none too homogeneous, accustomed for generations to rapidly increasing prosperity may lead to a breakdown of existing institutions and forms of government. The outcome is unpredictable but the consequences throughout the globe may be catastrophic.

World disorganization, famine, pestilence, and the submergence of our civilization are visible on the horizon...


Britain cannot however prosper in a distressed world. Entirely dependent on external trade for her food and raw material Britain cannot escape world catastrophe by isolating herself.

Moreover, that world wide loss of control of the machinery of civilization is all too visible in Britain in British institutions.

If Britain is to save herself and give the world that leadership which is urgently demanded, the first need is for complete reconstruction of our national life on lines fitted for the new needs of the twentieth century.

Here a fundamental difficulty must be faced. Economic nationalism is no solution. On the contrary it is among the main causes of the world's troubles. Recovery depends on building up afresh and extending even more widely than before the worldwide exchanges of goods and services which everywhere cross national and political boundaries.

The United Kingdom is far too small an area to form today an economic unit commensurate with the vast scale of modern commercial and industrial operations.

The aim must always be the widest possible international cooperation.

...We have allowed the members of our feeble minded to double themselves in the last twenty years.

"We have watched the purchasing power of our currency fluctuate wildly and play havoc with our economic life, and have been powerless to help ourselves... Notorious unsuitable candidates 'get themselves elected' (this is our habitual way of speaking of what happens) to Parliament and the Local Councils.

Prime Ministers get nervously worn out in the mere effort to grapple with the everyday business which faces them...


Our political and economic machinery is breaking down. The great fund of individual and corporate goodwill, greater probably than at any previous period in our history, goes to waste and all our wills are frustrated for want of large-scale plans on national re-organization.

Neither in politics nor in economics have we grasped that the first and urgent necessity is planning ahead.

Particular projects often of great political value are put forward in Parliament or elsewhere without any effort being made to relate them to each other or to a national plan, and they either break down or function imperfectly through needless friction engendered by absence of ordered planning.

Frequently where public opinion has become exasperated at its failure to get something done to remedy a defect which everyone recognizes as intolerable, our distracted legislators with unanimity unite to pass into law a compromise which is wanted by no one and merely aggravates the evil.

It is a common occurrence for a government to be pursuing two or more mutually inconsistent policies at one and the same time.

Then follows the trend of the subtle insinuating ideas meant to induce and reconcile the British people to the voluntary abandonment of their freedom if thereby their country can be benefited. Thus are they meant to become the very victims of their genuine patriotism. The example they gave of sacrifice and self-discipline has been but one more tool in the hands of their double-faced leaders. They already sacrificed their gold to comply with the plea that in so doing they would save their country. This is referred to in the document in the following lines:


Great Britain and some parts of the British Empire have in some degree improved their own position since last autumn. Absolutely the improvement in Great Britain has been small, though relatively in other countries it is striking.

This achievement is of real value to the world, even though some part of it has been made at the expense of added difficulties for others.

It has been attained thanks to a remarkable demonstration of the self-discipline and well disposed spirit of public services and the sober imperturbability and reasonableness of the British citizen in face of a crisis.

It is in this evidence of British character that the best hope for the future rests.

It is this high feeling that must be exploited and the next step is to show the people that their country's needs require of them the sacrifice of their individual freedom.

"Can we save our freedom?" asks Mr. Sieff, and he advances the following line of arguments:


Mr. Bernard Shaw's mordant words pose directly the poignant question. Is the national reconstruction possible without sacrifice of the essentials of personal and political freedom?

For all their differences Bolshevism and Fascism have two outstanding features in common. Both stress the primary need for conscious forward planning on a national scale. Both repudiate the claims of personal and individual freedom.

In this country we hold fast to the concept of freedom as one of absolute validity.

We know in our hearts that we are in imminent danger of losing both our freedom and our material well-being if we go on drifting.

But if indeed national re-organization has to be bought at the price of losing our freedom, many of us feel that it would be better for humanity to descend once again into the abyss of barbarism and struggle painfully back at some later epoch to a civilization capable of satisfying both its material and its spiritual aspirations.

Is the dilemma absolute? Can conscious forward planning of our economic life be reconciled with the essential and over-riding claim of freedom?

Is it true, that what we need is more government and a great encroachment on liberty?

Observe that it is in the sphere of our economic life, in the sphere of material things only, that conscious forward planning is demanded.

May it not be that an unprejudiced re-examination of what we call freedom may reveal unexpected possibilities?

* * * * *

In the realm of industry, the subversive opinion of the P.E.P. is that to the doctrine of "laissez-faire" or competitive initiative should be substituted standardization, monopolies and trusts, all under the rule of what Mr. Sieff calls the Planning Authority. Whoever is acquainted with the Protocols of the Elder of Zion, knows that this "planning authority" can have its directing center only in the councils of the supreme Jewish kahal where all "planning" and "conscious forward planning" have been done FOR CENTURIES.


I would think that you nice people might want to look on to that ball game today for there is much taking place and it could get interesting if plans come off as hoped. No, it wouldn't be too good but what else is new? Adonai.



MON., JAN. 26, 1998 5:35 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 163

MON., JAN. 26, 1998


Continuing quoting, Part 23, from Mr. Sieff's FREEDOM AND PLANNING:


Conscious planning leaves the consumer free but involves the substitution of some organized control over over-production and distribution on behalf of the community to take the place of that free play of supposedly automatic economic forces on which laissez-faire relied.

Control implies a controlling machinery. To the average man and woman among us there jumps to the mind at once the picture of a large number of new government departments and hordes of new officials attempting to take the place and do the work of the business man, the manufacturer, the farmer, the banker, the shopkeeper, or at least to tie them all up hand and foot and dictate to them in the management of their daily affairs. And we see further a glimpse of Parliament and Local bodies finally overwhelmed by the task of fulfilling their new duties and functions...

Is there not a middle way, or better still a new way of meeting the need for organizations and coordination of those economic tasks which the breakdown of laissez-faire is leaving unaccomplished?

* * *

The "new way" found by the subtle P.E.P. is the organization of "Public Utility Bodies" fashioned somewhat on the pattern of the B.B.C., Central Electric Board, etc., and we are told that: "It is possible to envisage a considerable extension of this form of organization of the nation's business. A new picture begins to emerge in outline of industry, agriculture, transport, etc., enjoying, if not Dominion States, at any rate wide powers of local self government, with the Cabinet, Parliament, and the Local Authorities liberated from duties to which they are not ideally suited and free to perform their essential functions on behalf of the community."


The analogy of the Grid System of the Central Electricity Board, not itself undertaking the production of power nor the final distribution of electricity services to the consumer, but providing a co-ordinated system of carrying the electricity produced from the big generating stations to local distributing centers all over the country, can be suggestively applied to other services.

Imagine the dairy farmers of the country or of various regional divisions of the country as the milk generating stations, and the retailer of milk as the local distributing centers, with a Central Milk Board conducting the business of bulk marketing of milk as the milk Grid of Britain. Already under Agricultural Marketing Act there are signs of the coming of such a Milk Grid as a natural development to meet the needs of the day. An extension of the system with suitable adaptation to other agricultural products easily suggests itself, and even more directly as a method of dealing with the needs of modern transport by rail, road, water and air.

* * *

In the above quotation we see the P.E.P. sketching a program of distribution. From the organized control of distribution to that of production, under any despotic rule, there is but one step and Mr. Sieff has inevitably taken it. Moreover, being one of many Jews who have of late years concentrated on the multiple shop and chain stores systems and the organizations of various cartels and trusts, Mr. Sieff could not refrain from dealing a blow at the independent retail stores which for centuries have been the mainstay of British trade. To paralyze and thus eliminate the individual retail shopkeeper from trade has been one of the chief aims of Jewish "planning".

Let us now quote what is written on this subject:


When we come to the organization of producers, agricultural, industrial and [_(blank)_], the Central Electricity model becomes more difficult to follow....

Methods of retailing can not indeed be left entirely unchanged in the face of twentieth century needs. The multiple shop and the chain store are already bringing about notable modifications. The waste involved in the 500,000 or more retail shops, one shop for every twenty households, cannot be allowed to continue to block the flow of goods from producer to consumer. And re-organization of retail methods is necessary to achieve the adequate organization of production....

The development of an organized Grid system for the distribution of milk must, it is certain, lead to a profound modification of the traditional individualism outlook of the Dairy-Farmer. And so it will be in other producing industries. Cooperative organization of the business of distribution cannot fail to bring about conditions in which both the need and the will to organize themselves on a co-operative basis arise among the producers whether they be agriculturists, or producers of coal, or of iron from the mines, or manufacturers of steel, or of cotton, or of wool.

Whether we like it or not--and many will dislike it intensely--the individualist manufacturer and farmer will be forced by events to submit to far-reaching changes in outlook and methods. The danger is that in resisting them because he regards them as encroachments on what he calls his freedom, he will make things much worse for himself and for the community. Resistance is likely to play into the hands of those who say that thinking is useless and that full blooded Socialism or Communism are the only cure. Or he may be tempted to flirt with Fascist ideas. In either case he loses his cherished freedom, and it is only too probable that Fascism and Communism alike would be but short stages on the road to barbarism.

* * *

It would be difficult to imply threats in a more outspoken manner and Mr. Sieff goes on to state that:

....It is idle to deny that some at least of the changes required when conscious forward planning extends into the field of production are of a revolutionary character.

It is all important that we should appraise them soberly and without prejudice and distinguish clearly between unavoidable alterations of methods of economic organizations and fundamental attacks on our personal and political freedom....

Without entering more deeply into details than space here allows, the position of the farmer and manufacturer under a system of planned production can only be sketched in broad outlines.

He may be conceived of as remaining in full control of all the operations on his farm or factory, but receiving from the duly constituted authorities instructions as to the quantity and quality of his production, and as to the markets in which he will sell. He will himself have had a voice in setting his constituted authority and will have regular means of communicating with it and of influencing its policy. He will be less exposed than at present to interference from above, that is from Government Departments and local bodies and their inspectors. He will be less free to make arbitrary decisions as to his own business outside the region of day to day operation of plant or farm.

It must be presumed that the constituted authority will be armed by enabling legislation Act of Parliament and by majority decisions of its own members, presumably elected by votes of those minorities in clearly specified cases.

All this is not very different from what already occurs in particular organized industries, but must be conceived of as applying generally to most, if not all, of the major fields of production, and as part of a conscious and systematically planned agricultural and industrial organization.

* * *

Having thus given out the basic principles upon which the Judeo-Fabian new structure of British economic life is to be erected, an outline of the organization which will direct the functioning of the plan is given:


An outline of the organization contemplated would be somewhat as follows:

A National Planning Commission, with advisory not executive functions, subordinate to the Cabinet and the Parliament, but with clearly defined powers of initiative and clearly defined responsibilities, its personal representative of the nation's economic life.

A National Council for Agriculture, a National Council for Industry, a Steel Industry Corporation, a Milk Producers Corporation, organized on the lines of Public Utility Concern, serving at least to federate, and in suitable cases to own the plants, factories, etc., engaged in production.

A series of Public Utility Corporations dealing with distributive services, e.g., the Central Electricity Board, the National Transport Boards (or a number of Regional Transport Boards); the National Milk Marketing Board.

In the constitution of these bodies provision would naturally be made for suitable representation of interests, including organized Labor, and for their due coordination by means for example of the election by various corporations of some of their members to serve on the National Councils. To all of them Parliament would delegate considerable power to regulate the affairs of their particular industries.

* * *

So far so good. Any ideologist or cracked-brain human being can devise some kind of utopia, in fact most of the inmates of lunatic asylums have been interned for that very reason. However, they are usually pronounced dangerous for society from the moment that they attempt to work out their fancy into reality.

Plans for the realization of Mr. Sieff's weird ideas have already been made. They are summed up in two words: COMPULSION and EXPORTATION. [H: These ideas are so long established today that nobody reading them can even find fault with them for they are in use EVERY DAY OF YOUR LIVES.]

Reading the following quotations, one is forcibly reminded of the tenets preached in New York at the Rand School and meetings of the "Friends of Soviet Russia".

From the standpoint of encroachments upon freedom apart from the denial of the tenets of individualism, the most obvious target for attack are perhaps the proposed grant of powers to compel minorities and (point not yet mentioned) the probable necessity for drastic changes in the ownership of land.

Powers of compulsion of minorities are not unknown under present conditions and will probably not arouse very violent antagonism on the ground of high principle.

The question of private ownership of land is one which never fails to encounter deep-rooted passions. It is also one which arises immediately in almost every aspect of consciously planned reconstruction.

The conclusion seems to be unescapable that whether in the field of Town and Country Planning or in that of Agricultural (or Rural) Planning or in the organization of Industry, it is not possible to make reasonable progress without drastic powers to buy out individual owners of land.

This is not to say that land nationalization in the ordinary sense of the term is either necessary or desirable, far from it. Nothing would be gained by substituting the State as landlord. What is required, if only with a view to equitable treatment of individuals, is transfer of ownership of large blocks of land, not necessarily of all the land in the country, but certainly of a large portion of it into the hands of the proposed Statutory Corporations and Public Utility bodies and of Land Trusts. [H: Hummnn, Statutory Corporations?]

In many cases, all that would be needed would be the conversion of rights of ownership of land into rights of participation as shareholders in the new corporations or in Land Trusts. It would be possible further in a large number of cases to leave management undisturbed, together with the enjoyment of the amenities which at present go with ownership, subject to the transfer of title to the Corporations or Trusts. [H: Sounds pretty good to we little Indians? There are two ways to run everything: properly or improperly, goodly or evilly, right or wrong!]

Here again, limits of space preclude fuller treatment of the subject. All that is here relevant is the inevitable conclusion that the planned economy which the nation needs to meet the demands of the twentieth century must clearly involve drastic inroads upon the rights of individual ownership of land as at present understood. [H: And all you need to UNDO this idea is to teach people what the controllers know and have set forth for themselves. You don't even try to "undo" the methods; you just teach the people to UTILIZE what is available for protection.]

* * *

As to Finance and the right of citizens to deal freely with their money, Mr. Sieff's kind solicitude for the property of others has prompted him to formulate the following point of view so worthy of paternal Bolshevism:

...Stable money cannot be secured without the considerable extension of control on behalf of the community over free flow of investment and the uses to which the individuals makes of his capital.

While as consumer he can retain full freedom of choice as to competing wants he will satisfy, there are real difficulties in leaving him entirely free to invest his savings in any way he chooses.

It is probable that many of these difficulties can be solved on the one hand by extension of the system of insurance, on lines to which recent developments of the motoring law again supply suggestive analogies and, on the other hand, by means which while leaving the small capitalist untrammeled will so canalize the flow of both long term and short term investment of the large sums which are at the disposal of banks and financial institutions as well as funds in the hands of large insurance companies as to ensure that adequate capital is available for the big industrial, agricultural and distributive corporations already envisaged.

Then comes the discussion of the problem of Labor which points out the future uselessness of the present Trade Unions who still labour under the delusion that they have achieved the nec [sic] plus ultra of good conditions for workmen!... The P.E.P. will reorganize them.

Social Services, P.E.P. organization will, among other things, "call for a big change in the organization of the Medical Profession which has, at present, too often a vested interest in disease."

Needless to add that "Imperial Planning" and "International Planning" have also been the object to Mr. Sieff's careful attention. Suffice it to quote the conclusive words of his scheme: "The only rival world political and economic system which put forward a comparable claim is that of the Union of Soviet Republics."

* * * * * * * *

The conclusion is almost naive but far from surprising when we know that the "plans" for the disruption of Russia and enslavement of the Russian people were made in the councils of the Jewish Kahal of which Mr. Sieff is a prominent member.

Let us now see what is to be the fate of this British Constitution of which every Briton is so justly proud:

Nevertheless our first plan is replan Britain... Effective planning on the economic side and even the introduction of desirable reforms in detail has become impossible without a drastic overhauling both of Parliament and the Central Government and the machinery of Local Government. Political and economic planning are complementary and supplementary to each other and must be carefully inter-related. We need new economic and political institutions to match the new social adjustments which applied science has created and a new technique both in politics and industry to enable us to find intelligent methods of surmounting new difficulties and complexities....

It has been suggested more than once in the course of this essay that devolution of powers to statutory bodies will be an important feature of the new order and that in the result Parliament and the Cabinet will be relieved of some part of their present duties and set free to the great advantage of themselves and of the nation for their proper tasks of directing and guiding public policy.

Big consequent changes will follow in the machinery of government.

* * *

And to anyone inclined to criticize Mr. Shieff s marvelous scheme of destruction of all existing social, political and economic order, the following answer is given:

One possible answer is of course to refer our critic to what was said at the outset as to the imminence of catastrophe if we continue to drift... Reluctance to embark on a doubtful adventure deserves a less negative treatment.

The dangers which our critics fear are real dangers... Our Statutory Corporations and Public Utility Boards may easily become unadventurous obstacles to progress, determined enemies to all new ideas. It may be indeed that one of the lessons we have to learn from our present distress is that scientific invention itself requires some planning in its application to the economic structure of the nation.

The problem of progress is no longer the problem of getting enough chance to prevent routine from deadening effort, but the problem of preventing change from destroying both routine and all social stability.

This however is no justification of institutions which deaden effort.

Our proposals must rather be defended by the claim that they will liberate the spirit of initiative and not deaden it, in that they will provide means by which the energetic man of business may escape from the disheartening frustrations and failures which are caused by the complexity of the machine, and will give him scope for serving his generation in a larger kingdom than the narrow field of competition with rivals in particular industrial or commercial pursuits.

Though organized on public utility lines with MONOPOLISTIC privileges, the GREAT INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONS will find ample room for energy and initiative in performing their primary task of combining maximum with minimum costs of production. The executive heads of particular factories will not lack the spur of competition.

Lastly we need to be told that:

...Experience alone can prove the justice of our claim that economic freedom will not be fatally shackled by the effort of conscious forward planning. Experience too will be needed to make clear the boundaries of the province within which individualistic effort can best be relied upon to secure the highest national dividend.

* * *

How forcibly one is here reminded of the words of the apostles and disciples of Lenin and Trotsky-Bronstein who so loudly proclaimed that the imposition of Bolshevism in Russia was but a great experiment! Is a five-year plan of enforced labor to be imposed also upon the British people?

Silence surrounds the results of the same experiments in Mexico, Spain and the South American States because it is the policy of the destructors of our Christian civilization to muzzle the press that they own, but England, though ruled by the chosen of the Kahal, namely the revolutionary Fabian Group, is given a warning in time and can therefore frame a line of defense.

The justification of the "Conscious forward planning" scheme is given as the final part of Mr. Sieff's masterpiece.

The irony of calling destruction a "CONSERVATIVE EVOLUTION" will not escape the reader. [H: Sorry, but when worded competently, EVERYTHING escapes the readers.]


Indeed the Socialist or Communist will condemn our planning as mere tinkering with the outworn machine of capitalism. To him it will appear a hopelessly conservative and anemic attempt to stave off the red blooded revolution which alone would satisfy him.

Our plan is, we claim, conservative in the truest and best sense. It is constructive, not destructive, and builds solidly upon the present and the past. It faces the issue boldly and it is not afraid to challenge vested interests and deeply cherished habits of thought and action.

It does not however propose to expropriate anyone and in requiring the application of compulsion in a limited sphere it is not doing more than extend and make explicit and give systematic application to tendencies and practices already at work.... Such sketch, in the broadest outline of the lines which reconstruction might take as has been given here, must inevitably raise more questions in the mind of the attentive reader than it answers.

* * *

It does!

Mr. Sieff's document is as clear an exposé of a policy calculated to kill human initiative and the spirit of competition which means progress as is given in the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion.

Will the British people allow themselves to be further bamboozled by those who have already got the best of their fine spirit of patriotism and intend to exploit it still more? [H: Of course, they not only allowed, they joined forces to enforce that these things would come about. This is why the term "British Israel" and "British Israeli Zionists" or "Zionism".]

Yes the political, economic and spiritual needs of England require as much scope of freedom today and in the future as they ever did in the past.

The foregoing quotations have given but a very succinct exposé of "conscious forward planning" as given out by Israel Moses Sieff.

The analogies between his utterances and the contents of the document known under the title of the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion first published in 1905 are very striking indeed. We quote but a few taken from the edition of the Protocols published by Small & Maynard of Boston, Mass., U.S.A. in 1920:


P. 26. 5th Pr.: "There is nothing more dangerous than individual initiative: if it had a touch of genius it can accomplish more than a million people among whom we have sown dissensions. We must direct the education of the Goy societies so that arms will drop hopelessly when they face every task where initiative is required. The intensity of action resulting from the individual freedom of action dissipates its force when it encounters another person's freedom. This results in heavy blows at morals, disappointments and failures."

P. 27. 6th Pr.: "We will soon begin to establish huge monopolies--reservoirs of huge wealth, upon which even the large fortunes of the Goys will depend to such an extent that they will be drowned, together with the governmental credits, on the day following the political catastrophe."

P. 27. 6th Pr.: "The aristocracy of the Goys, as a political force is dead. We do not need to take it into consideration: But as landowners they are harmful to us because they can be independent in their sources of life. For this reason we must deprive them of their land at any cost."

P. 34. 10th Pr.: "For this reason our plans must be strongly and clearly conceived. These plans will not immediately upset contemporary institutions. They will only alter their organization, and consequently the entire combination of their development, which will thus be directed according to the plans laid down by us."

P. 44. 13th Pr.: "To divert the over-restless people from discussing political problems, we now make it appear that we provide them with new problems named, those pertaining to industry. Let them become excited over this subject as much as they like."

[H: Before we move to the appropriate comparisons and backup references in the "Appendix", let us see the author's "Conclusion". When we are finished I would like to remind you that all the protocol items are accomplished. However, there are such SERIOUS follow-on ideas that boggle the minds of "thinking" souled human beings. We will need to speak of that and take an example from our own township and doorstep. We will render unto Jason Brent, ex-municipal judge, political lawyer from the massive firm of Shea & Gould, shoe-licker to the Governor of California, rifle marksman with an automatic AK-47, who claims to "Violently dislike the Ekkers" and states this under oath numerous times in just one sitting. He saw to it that property was stripped away and the people in point lost everything. He works with the most criminal elements around, and now blames CONTACT and Ekkers for "defaming" him and causing him to lose everything. We will look, at the end of this, at what made him lose his clients and positions of honor [see pg. 83]. He still circulates with his poison but people now, I suppose, have gotten to know who he is and what he is about--THROUGH HIS OWN BOASTING. This man even put up a billboard which reads: "A Shark? Yes, and Proud of it." This man claims to have such an IQ as to be right at the top of Mensa (the brain group of total idiots). He wrote and published (and is proud of it) a depopulation plan for the globe. He and his buddies take the Kol Nidre EVERY MORNING before they go forth to screw every hapless victim they encounter. People, you have gone as far as you can go. You begin to change things or you are down for the count.]


On re-reading the foregoing pages before sending them to press, the writer is painfully aware of their inadequacy. The subject is too vast and too unfamiliar to the general public to permit successful treatment in a small volume. It has been necessary to compress, at the risk of fatiguing and even antagonizing the reader by excessive brevity and abrupt transitions.

At the same time the author has had to take counsel of prudence in the selection of material, for the Jews have always counted on the fact that, if the whole truth were told in one comprehensive utterance, no one would believe it. Thus, bigots and minds bursting with the discoveries they have made, have never been feared by the Jews. People are incapable of believing or receiving certain knowledge which runs counter to their habitual manner of thinking; facts are not accepted on proof, but on understanding.

Yet the problem is of such pressing interest and the lurking evil so destructive, that silence is complicity. In daily life, the serpent of Judah lies in wait in every by-path for its Gentile victims, and few are those cunning enough to escape its fangs. In social and political circles, in business and art, wherever one probes, Zionism raises its ugly head--surgit atrox et spinosa-- and suddenly reveals itself ubiquitous and all-powerful. But its power is magnified because concealed, just as a venomous snake is more dangerous hidden in the grass, than exposed on a broad, level road.

It is therefore very encouraging to note, each year and in nearly every country, the issue of new publications devoted to the defense of local and national interests against "bad cosmopolitanism and bad finance". These books and periodicals reach the public as a result of exceptional perseverance and sacrifice on the part of the authors and publishers. In addition to the difficulty and expense of publication, authors and editors are constantly faced with the alternative of paying heavy fines or serving a term in gaol. Nor are the vigorous campaigns of the older patriot groups in England, Canada, and the United States, to mention only three English-speaking countries, a matter of less satisfaction.

These signs indicate the growth, during the past ten years, of a small but intelligent minority, determined to fight to the last ditch, and learning to wield its single weapon, publicity, with increased skill and effectiveness.

For the cardinal fact is this: once the screen of secrecy has been removed, once Zionism has been dragged into the open, the peoples of the Earth will know how to deal it the deathblow. In Palestine there have been Zionist movements since the days of Nehemiah; they have always ended in failure, because their success depended on secrecy, and it was impossible to keep the secret from their own race for long. This world-Zionism has gone incomparably farther, because for generations the Jews have maintained secrecy among themselves as against the goyim.

No organization with a predetermined aim, such as Zionism, can achieve success without secrecy; its programme, elaborated in the course of centuries, is necessarily rigid in its main features; it will not bend or ply to suit circumstances, but everything must be ground to fit the mould. This is possible if people are led, little by little, to adopt each feature of this programme, to regard it as their own choice, and thus put the heavy yoke on their own necks. But if the people should realize that this yoke of iron which the Kahal has been so long in forging, is now being imposed on them, they would have none of it. Such is the problem in its broader aspect.

From the outlook of the individual, on the other hand, it is clear that a serious study of the whole question is richly rewarded. Beneath the changing surface of things, the new names and the specious promises, it is easy to recognize the old issue, the real movers behind the scenes, and their definite aims. After a year's study, the observer should be able to follow all the big moves in the Jewish game and predict, with amazing accuracy, the course which Zionism will take under given circumstances and the one thing Zionists cannot do is change their secret programme; it binds them, as they would bind the world. It is therefore essential to master all the points of this programme, in order to recognize each under its manifold disguises. The man who has done this holds in his hand a lever with which to pry Zionism out of its concealment. If he is discreet and courageous, he need fear nothing. In his ears will sound the words:

"Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy; and nothing shall by any means hurt you."

Zionism risks more by attacking such a man than he by attacking Zionism, against which new enemies spring up every day from the least-expected quarters of the globe.

Our concern is therefore not so much for the ultimate survival of free Gentile nations, as for the national freedom and culture of our own and the next succeeding generations. Now is the time to resist in ourselves, and to stir others to resist that subtle, hypnotic current drawing towards the East to slavery and sensuality, to Babylonian pomp and spiritual desolation. The beauty of Greece, the freedom and courage of the North, the Christianity of Western Europe, these are our heritage; their spirit lives in us, and it is our duty and privilege to defend it.

June, 1934


I note that at this writing Dharma was but a wee toddler. Most of you who will have to make the changes, if there be changes, were not yet born.

Why has it taken so long to see and know this PLAN was afoot? Because it has taken just as long as was required and "everything will [yet] be as it will be!" Thanks, "Crow", for such insight.

Let us give this portion over to be checked for spelling, etc. Remember, readers, WE WORK UNDER THE VERY WORST OF CIRCUMSTANCES AS YOU WILL NOTE JUST BY READING THE INFORMATION ON JASON BRENT [see pg. xx]. There have been threats, even from the "Christian" community, to bomb cars, to be detonated by a turn of the key in the ignition. Dharma has been called a "slimy little puke" by someone you consider a real whiz in UFO pale-horse riders--Bill Cooper. She has been called EVIL and even TBN's leader suggests she come back to Jesus. At that time she didn't know Jesus wasn't Christ of the Bible. Jason Brent even ran ads in the local paper asking for a gathering of Jews to form new and bigger groups to get better control of the citizens. He and Steven Horn, attorney at Kol Nidre, ran devastating accusations in the papers claiming "that bunch" to be Anti-Semitic nuts.

In Nevada at court where gold was a gift to the Institute, Green stole $400 thousand worth of same and buried it in his newly moved-to property--in Nevada.

His attorneys met with the Associated Press and claimed internationally that Dharma claimed to be JESUS CHRIST. Now, any reasonable party would know THAT would not be so. However, a JUDGE ruled that there would be no further discounting of Jesus and dismissed the case--but ordered the gold back to the owner (which is, of course, the Institute) but some five years and thousands of $$ in litigation--to attorneys--it goes on and on and on even in the face of TWO rulings by the Supreme Court of Nevada to return it as ordered. The case now spans from Nevada to Texas and is farther behind than at onset.

How can YOU win? YOU CANNOT WIN UNTIL YOU KNOW WHAT IS WRONG AND ALL YOU HAVE TO DO TO "FIX" IT IS KNOW THE GAME PLAN AND MEET EVERY INDISCRETION WITH GLOBAL PUBLICITY. YOU HAVE SOMETHING NOW THAT UNTIL NOW WAS NOT AVAILABLE--SPLIT-SECOND CIRCULATION AROUND THE GLOBE. But, rules are already being made to demand full identification for all computer users--in order to shut down this outlet. You have a tiny, tiny window of information access. Take it or leave it, but the alternative of the New World Zionist Satanic Order is the consequence.

Can it be done? Of course! We have worked night and day to get this information into the brain, onto the keyboard, and in less than two weeks, HERE IT IS, WORLD. The Journals will be bound and hopefully available in short order. Meanwhile--the information is being run in full in CONTACT.

Brave? No, just mad as hell, perhaps, and choosing to not take it any more.


We will be back for the "APPENDIX" to these writings regarding, directly, the PROTOCOLS OF ZION.

Yes, you observant people, I left my fingerprints all over this book in point. All you really had to do was look at the prepositions in the comments. God, too, always leaves a sign for the weary travelers.

Adonai (please look up this label).



MON., JAN. 26, 1998 9:27 A.M. YR. 11, DAY 163

MON., JAN. 26, 1998


Continuing directly from the book, THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION, With Preface and Explanatory Notes. We offer the APPENDIX.

[QUOTING, Part 24:]



We take this Protocol from the Morning Post of September 6th, 1920:

"A correspondent writing in reference to the hidden peril draws attention to a Manifesto issued in 1860 to the 'Jews of the Universe', by Adolphe Cremieux, the founder of the Alliance Israelite Universelle, and the well-known member of the Provisional Government of 1871. Adolphe Cremieux, while Grand Master of the French Masonic Lodges, offered 1,000,000 francs for the head of William I. of Germany. On his tomb he requested the following sole inscription to be inscribed:

"'Here lies Adolphe Cremieux, the founder of the Alliance Israelite Universelle.'" [H: Beware you who are led by good speeches and idea-ideals, "Crem" is simply an extraction of Cremieux and that "movement" in particular is setting up for the already returned Maitreia. Either name can be spelled or pronounced any way you choose.]


Emblem: On top, the tablets of Moses, a little lower--two extended hands clasping each other, and as basis of the whole--the globe of the Earth.

Motto: "All Jews for one, and one for all."

The union which we desire to found will not be a French, England, Irish, or German union, but a Jewish one, a Universal one.

Other peoples and races are divided into nationalities; we alone have not co-citizens, but exclusively co-religionaries.

A Jew will under no circumstances become the friend of a Christian or a Moslem before the MOMENT ARRIVES WHEN THE LIGHT OF THE JEWISH FAITH, THE ONLY RELIGION OF REASON, WILL SHINE ALL OVER THE WORLD. [H: So, where would you just guess YOU ARE now at this time in 1998?]

Scattered amongst other nations, who from time immemorial were hostile to our rights and interests, we desire primarily to be and to remain immutably Jews.

Our nationality is the religion of our fathers, and we recognize no other nationality. [H: Please refer back to what the Master Teacher told you: "Ye are of your fathers and they have been evil and spoken lies from the beginning." The "Fathers" are the Antichrist himself.]

We are living in foreign lands, and cannot trouble about the mutable ambitions of countries entirely alien to us, while our own moral and material problems are endangered.

The Jewish teaching must cover the whole Earth. Israelites! No matter where fate should lead--though scattered all over the Earth, you must always consider yourselves of a Chosen Race.

If you realize that the Faith of your forefathers is your only patriotism... ...if you recognize that, notwithstanding the nationalities you have embraced, you always remain and everywhere form one and only nation... ...if you believe the Jewry only is the one and only religious and political truth... ...if you are convinced of this, you, Israelites of the Universe... ...then come and give ear to our appeal and prove to us your consent!

Our cause is great and holy, and its success is guaranteed. Catholicism, our immemorial ENEMY, is lying in the dust, mortally wounded in the head.

The net which Israel is throwing over the globe of the Earth is widening and spreading daily, and the momentous prophecies of our holy books are at last to be realized.

The time is near when Jerusalem will become the house of prayer for all nations and peoples, and the banner of Jewish mono-deity will be unfurled and hoisted on the most distant shores.

Let us avail ourselves of all circumstances.

Our might is immense--learn to adopt this might for our cause.

What have you to be afraid of?

The day is not distant when all the riches and treasure OF THE EARTH WILL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL.



In its issue of October 21, 1920, (No. 195), La Vieille France published an extremely important Russian document in which the following passage occurs:

"There is a striking analogy between the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the discourse of the Rabbi Reichhorn, pronounced in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of the Grand Rabbi Simeon-ben-Ihuda, and published by Readcliffe, who paid with his life for the divulgation; Sonol, who had taken Readcliffe to hear Reichhorn, was killed in a duel some time afterwards. The general ideas formulated by the Rabbi are found fully developed in the Protocols."

In the issue of March 10, 1921, (No. 214) La Vieille France gives the version of this funeral oration which was published in La Russie Juive. It is perfectly clear that the funeral oration and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion come from one and the same mint. Both are prophetic; and the power which made the prophecies has been able to bring about their fulfillment. This oration is so important that we append to it an account of the fulfillment, of each of the sections. There can no longer be any doubt as to whose is the power which is disturbing the world, creating World unrest, and at the same time reaping all the profits. Jewry is enslaving all Christian peoples of the Earth. There IS a Jew world Plot and it now stands finally and completely unmasked.

1. Every hundred years, We, the Sages of Israel, have been accustomed to meet in Sahnedrin in order to examine our progress towards the domination of the world which Jehovah (Lucifer) has promised us, and our conquests over the enemy--Christianity.

2. This year, united over the tomb of our reverend Simeon-ben-Ihuda, we can state with pride that the past century has brought us very near to our goal, and that this goal will be very soon attained.

3. Gold always has been and always will be the irresistible power. Handled by expert hands it will always be the most useful lever for those who possess it, and the object of envy for those who do not.

With gold we can buy the most rebellious consciences, can fix the rate of all values, the current price of all products, can subsidize all State loans, and thereafter hold the states at our mercy.

4. Already the principal banks, the exchanges of the entire world, the credits of all the Governments, are in our hands.

5. The other great power is THE PRESS. By repeating without cessation certain ideas, the Press succeeds in the end in having them accepted as actualities. The theater renders us analogous services. Everywhere the Press and the Theater obey our orders.

6. By the ceaseless praise of DEMOCRATIC RULE we shall divide the Christians into political parties, we shall destroy the unity of their nations, we shall sow discord everywhere. Reduced to impotence, they will bow before the LAW OF OUR BANK always united, and always devoted to OUR CAUSE.

7. We shall force the Christians into wars by exploiting their pride and their stupidity. They will massacre each other, and clear the ground for us to put our own people into.

8. The possession of the land has always brought influence and power. In the name of social Justice and Equality we shall parcel out the great estates; we shall give the fragments to the peasants who covet them with all their powers, and who will soon be in debt to us by the expense of cultivating them. Our capital will make us their masters. We in our turn shall become the great proprietors, and the possession of the land will assure the power to us.

9. Let us try to replace the circulation of gold with paper money; our chests will absorb the gold, and we shall regulate the value of the paper which will make us masters of all the positions.

10. We count among us plenty of orators capable of feigning enthusiasm and of persuading mobs. We shall spread them among the people to announce changes which should secure the happiness of the human race. By gold and by flattery we shall gain the proletariat which will charge itself with annihilating Christian capitalism. We shall promise workmen salaries of which they have never dared to dream, but we shall also raise the price of necessities so that our profits will be greater still.

11. In this manner we shall prepare Revolutions which the Christians will make themselves and of which we shall reap the fruit.

12. By our mockeries and our attacks upon them we shall make their priests ridiculous, then odious, and their religion as ridiculous and as odious as their clergy. Then we shall be masters of their SOULS. For our pious attachment to our own religion and the superiority of our souls.

13. We have already established our own men in all important positions. We must endeavor to provide the Goyim with lawyers and doctors; the lawyers are au courant with all interests; doctors, once in the house, become confessors and directors of consciences.

14. But above all let us monopolize Education. By this means we spread ideas that are useful to us, and shape the children's brains as suits us.

15. If one of our people should unhappily fall into the hands of justice amongst the Christians, we must rush to help him; find as many witnesses as he needs to save him from his judges, until we become judges ourselves.

16. The monarchs of the Christian world, swollen with ambition and vanity, surround themselves with luxury and with numerous armies. We shall furnish them with all the money their folly demands, and so shall keep them in leash.

17. Let us take care not to hinder the marriage of our men with Christian girls, for through them we shall get our foot into the most closely locked circles. If our daughters marry Goyim they will be no less useful, for the children of a Jewish mother are ours. Let us foster the idea of free love, that we may destroy among Christian women attachment to the principles and practices of their religion.

18. For ages past the sons of Israel, despised and persecuted, have been working to open up a path to power. They are hitting the mark. They control the economic life of the accursed Christians; their influence preponderates over politics and over manners.

19. At the wished for hour, fixed in advance, we shall let loose the Revolution, which by ruining all classes of Christianity will definitely enslave the Christians to US. Thus will be accomplished the promise of God made to his people.


A Russian newspaper, Prizyv, of 5th of February 1920, published in Berlin, contained an interesting document in Hebrew, dated December, 1919, which was found in the pocket of the dead Jew Zunder, the Bolshevic Commander of the 11th Sharpshooter Battalion, throwing light on the secret organizations of Jewry in Russia. In extenso it ran as follows:

SECRET. To the representatives of all the branches of the Israelite International League.

Sons of Israel! The hour of our ultimate victory is near. We stand on the threshold to the command of the world. That which we could only dream of before us is about to be realized. Only quite recently feeble and powerless, we can now, thanks to the world's catastrophe, raise our heads with pride.

We must, however, be careful. It can surely be prophesied that, after we have marched over ruined and broken altars and thrones, we shall advance further on the same indicated path.

The authority of the, to us, alien religious and doctrines of faith we have, through very successful propaganda, subjected to a merciless criticism and mockery. [H: Still wonder what is alien and what is not, and WHO THEY MIGHT REALLY BE?] We have brought the culture, civilization, traditions and thrones of the Christian nations to stagger. We have done everything to bring the Russian people under the yoke of the Jewish power, and ultimately compelled them to fall on their knees before us. [H: Please don't overlook the fact that just as "Goy", "goyim", Gentile, etc. mean ALL OTHERS THAN JEW, so too does the term Christian refer to every other person who is not Jew. I did not say Judean--I said Jew, those ones from the Serpent race/people who decided to take up Judaism and call themselves Jews to fool the most people most of the time. THEY ARE THE ANTICHRIST IN FULL BLOSSOM! THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH JUDEANS OR HEBREWS OR ANY OTHER PEOPLE OF ANY LOCATION.]

We have nearly completed all this but we must all the same be very cautious, because the oppressed Russia is our arch-enemy. The victory over Russia, gained through our intellectual superiority, may in future, in a new generation turn against us.

Russia is conquered and brought to the ground. Russia is in the agony of death under our heel, but do not forget--not even for a moment--that we must be careful! The holy care for our safety does not allow us to show either pity or mercy. [H: "Holy"?] At last we have been allowed to behold the bitter need of the Russian people, and to see it in tears! By taking from them their property, their gold, we have reduced this people to helpless slaves.

Be cautious and silent! We ought to have no mercy for our enemy. We must make an end of the best and leading elements of the Russian people, so that the vanquished Russia may not find any leader! Our victory is near, because our political and economic power and influence upon the masses are in rapid progress. We buy up government loans and gold, and thereby we have controlling power over the world's exchanges. The power is in our hands, but be careful--place no faith in traitorous shady powers!

Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), Rosenfeld (Kameneff), Steinberg--all of them are like unto thousands of other true sons of Israel. Our power in Russia is unlimited. In the towns, the Commissariats and commissions of food, House Commissions, etc., are dominated by our people. But do not let victory intoxicate you. Be careful, cautious, because no one except yourselves will protect us!

Remember we cannot rely on the Red Army, which one day may turn its warfare on ourselves.

Sons of Israel the hour for our long-cherished victory over Russia is near; close up solid your ranks! Make known our people's national policy! Fight for eternal ideals! Keep holy the old laws, which history has bequeathed to us! May our intellect, our genius, protect and lead us!

Signed, The Central Committee of the Petersburg Branch of the Israelite International League.


I think this is enough for one sitting, especially when you append the information on our local clown for your attention.

I will leave today with Little Crow:

"If you really have a question about it, just be patient and the Mother-Father Creator is going to answer your inquiry. It doesn't take the question to get the response. It takes your patience, faith and your discipline to wait until you get the sign. You have to be observant along the way and that would mean you have to pay attention to what's going on around you.

"I was taught to pray for all people, all of my relations. That doesn't mean I support what they think or how they act."

[H: Wow, hold your breath for the next one:]

"There was no Jesus Christ, son of God, in my Oral Tradition. There was no "pale prophet" that came amongst us speaking of that, to tell us that in any way. What there was was a Creator. A Creator of both masculine and feminine energy that said, "When you pray, you pray for all of your relations and for all of Creation." Not just Americans, Jews or Palestinians--pray for all your relations--and that includes those that you are currently engaged in conflict with... Let your prayers be for everything but yourself. Pray for everyone but yourself."

OK, Son, it is time, and realizing that it is time, you shall have that which you need to lead our people. You shall be given STRENGTH against the days of endless load--but it will go quickly in LIGHT and shall transcend all time and space, that which we now do. And in those distant days to come and those long past, we shall bow before God and HE SHALL SAY "WELL DONE" and it will be so!

And Little Crow said: ...

"So what's the greatest thing you ever did that you think is a self accomplishment?" I said, "Get out of my own way". ... I died, I got out of my way so I could get on and do what I had to do.

He should have said, in the last sentence: WHAT I HAVE TO DO! Aho. Adonai.



Editor's note: The following information, some of which is reprinted from early 1995 issues of CONTACT, puts a spotlight on just one of the Khazarian-Zionist tribe members who has crossed our local paths on too many occasions. Commander Hatonn refers to this material in the 3rd column of page 55 and 2nd column of page 56.

The following article is reprinted from the Front Page of the January 17, 1995 issue of CONTACT.

High-IQ Group's Star Spokesman?

Ex-judge Jason Brent's

Shocking "Concern" For Humanity

1/11/95 #2 HATONN


You are being set up again in a different direction and you had better look again at the articles in the paper regarding Jason Brent, Esq. and the Mensa bunch. They MEAN IT! The only thing they find wrong with Hitler, according to Brent (not his name--he was born something like Berkowitz), was that Hitler blew it for the "Master Race". This man (Brent) CLAIMS to be a Jewish leader with over 150 of his people killed in the Holocaust. Boy has he stuck his foot firmly into his mouth this time.

[QUOTING, 1/10/95 Los Angeles Times:]


* Opinion: Writers in Mensa publication

spark outrage by advocating killing the old,

infirm and homeless. Board backs the editor and

the authors' right to express their views.


Times Staff Writer

In what sort of publication would you expect to read:

"Those people who are so mentally defective that they cannot live in society should, as soon as they are identified as defective, be humanely dispatched."

Or that Adolf Hitler's greatest offense was not the killing of 6 million Jews in the Holocaust but "the fact that his actions prevent a rational discussion of the creation of the master race."

These articles recently ran in the monthly newsletter of the Los Angeles chapter of the high IQ society, Mensa. The publication circulates to a readership that claims IQ in the top 2% of the public.

In defending her decision to publish the article--which appeared to propose extermination of the homeless, the mentally retarded, the old and the infirm--newsletter editor and Mensa member Nikki Frey was unapologetic and surprised that anybody would be offended.

"I would not print anything I thought was truly harmful or offensive," she said. "I didn't think it was harmful; I don't think it's even that offensive--nobody wants to have a deformed child.

"I personally wouldn't hurt a fly. Well, maybe a fly. I am the most sensitive person."

Not everybody thinks so. The articles in the November edition of the Mensa newsletter caused considerable outrage among the chapter's 2,000 members. Some wrote irate letters, others called to complain. And several attended a board meeting to protest.

"We have these Nazi ideas being published in the publication that goes everywhere," said Mensa member Betty Schneider. "This is fascism carried to the nth degree. I don't want to be identified with an organization that condones this type of thing."

Alan Stillson, puzzle editor of the newsletter, wrote a letter threatening to quit unless an apology was printed.

"As a Mensa member who enjoys the organization and most of the members and as a stepfather of a Down's Syndrome child who loves him and is incensed at the thought of advocacy of his extermination, I insist on an immediate written apology and a retraction of the policy of printing hate articles," Stillson wrote in his letter, printed in the December newsletter.

In the previous issue, one of the writers, Jason G. Brent, a Tehachapi lawyer, wrote that "society must face the concept that we kill off the old, weak, the stupid and the inefficient." He concluded that the true travesty wrought by Hitler was that he forever spoiled the concept of a master race.

The other writer, Jon Evans, put forth equally shocking views.

"It is not clear to me just exactly why anyone would expend time and effort and money on the homeless. What good are they? The vast majority are too stupid, too lazy, too crazy, or too anti-social to earn a living," Evans wrote. "Granted, there are a few people who have fallen beneath the blows of circumstances and are unable to afford any place to live, but they are few and far between. The rest of the homeless should be humanely done away with, like abandoned kittens."

Nor did Evans show much mercy for the infirm.

"A piece of meat in the shape of a man but without a mind is not a human being, whether the body be deathly ill, damaged by accident, mentally blank because of brain deficiency, or criminally insane."

Brent said he was merely writing about a crucial reality--the urgent need for population control--that much of the world has ignored. "I'm not a fascist," he said. "I just have a problem that we better face."

Evans was unavailable for comment.

This is the second time in little more than a year that the Los Angeles chapter of Mensa, which admits only those with IQs above 132, has been caught in an embarrassing spotlight. In late 1993, Mensa board members were rattled by a string of anonymous letters, including death threats that appeared linked to a personal feud.

Newsletter editor Frey, who works as a legal secretary, and some Mensa board members are quick to point out that the monthly newsletter, called LAMENT, endorses no official point of view. A disclaimer beneath the masthead reads: "Opinions expressed in Lament are those of the individual contributors."

"Besides," said Frey, "Nobody actually reads the newsletter." (Well, they do in St. Louis; the newsletter's circulation was wide enough to attract the attention of a newspaper columnist in that city, who recently wrote an enraged piece.)

Frey also felt the criticism was overblown because it was merely about words. "I don't know what people are so excited about; it's not like Evens or Brent have any influence over any law," she said.

Nor was it as if Frey had great respect for the opinions of the writers. Evans had published dozens of similar articles in the newsletter before she took over almost two years ago, she said.

"Evans used to have these articles month after month, 'Kill this group, kill that group,'" Frey said.

Bruce Kent, publications officer and board member with the national parent organization, American Mensa Ltd., said the group has guidelines for the newsletters that are issued by almost 150 chapters. Those guidelines call for material to be in "good taste" and suggest that editors "avoid publishing material that reflects negatively on Mensa."

"We officially deplore hate material," Kent said.

Did Evans' and Brent's pieces violate the guidelines? Apparently not.

"I hadn't seen them as hate articles," said the chairman of the Greater Los Angeles Area Mensa chapter, a woman who goes only by the name of Gowen. While one board member dissented, seven agreed with Gowen during their Dec. 3 meeting. Members rallied around Frey, giving her a unanimous vote of confidence and telling others that the flap over the articles was a waste of the best and brightest's brain energy.

Gowen said the newsletter and its articles were appropriate for its high-IQ readership.

"It depends on whom the publication is for," she said. "If you are writing for just anyone, you write it one way. But if you write it to get people to think, you write it a different way."

Author Brent, who wrote about population control, said, "I don't want to be portrayed as some weirdo person, though nobody else agrees with me.

"We cannot continue to have population explosion. Growth has to stop. We better face that we have to kill people. There are not unlimited amount of resources."

The way to trim the population, according to Brent, is to force people to purchase the right to reproduce. In his world view, children would not be allowed to inherit wealth, so everyone would start on a level playing field when it came to buying their reproductive rights.

Many Mensa members say they don't begrudge anyone the right to express an opinion. But they said the official newsletter was not the correct spot to air views advocating exterminations.

"While I agree with free press, I also believe there's a certain responsibility," said member Martin Elkort. "This indicates to me that having a high IQ does not necessarily translate to common sense or wisdom."

[And then, from the 1/11/95 issue of The Bakersfield Californian:]

by Tamara Koehler

It is the last thing you'd expect to hear from a Jewish man who says he lost 190 relatives in the Holocaust.

"Hitler's greatest crime was not that he killed millions of Jews, but that his actions prevent discussion about population control and a master race," says Tehachapi attorney and former East Kern Municipal Court Judge Jason G. Brent.

Well, OK, it's a free country where people can say what they think. But when Brent put his thoughts to paper in the November newsletter of Mensa, the high-IQ society, it touched off a furor of criticism that he knows he hasn't heard the last of.

Hate material, dangerous talk, get rid of the bum. That was the reaction of many members of the elite group that boasts IQs in the top 2 percent nationwide. Others wrote letters threatening to quit the organization unless Brent wrote an apology.

"As a stepfather of a Down syndrome child who loves him and is incensed at the thought of advocacy of his extermination, I insist on an immediate written apology and retraction of the policy of printing hate articles," wrote Alan Stillson of Lancaster.

But reactions among Brent's fellow Mensa members in Bakersfield are more tolerant, in part because they know him as a lawyer who takes in poor clients and has served on the county's Human Relations Commission.

They say Brent's article was at worst "politically incorrect" and at best an honest expression of well-thought-out ideas.

"First of all, this is an in-house publication; it's not pitched and promoted on the newsstands," said Peggy Noland, an attorney in Kern and proctor of the local Mensa chapter. "I encourage the forum and the opportunity where people can express a position that may be a little unpopular in the mainstream."

Don Silvius, a retired Bakersfield City School District supervisor and Mensa member, said the newsletter often is filled with non-mainstream types of opinion pieces.

"Political correctness is not one of the strong suits of this group of minds," Silvius said. "One of the things that makes Mensa interesting is that any topic is up for discussion."

The article in question is called "Like It Or Not," a one-page discussion on the need for enforced birth control and euthanasia to bring the world's population under control. It appeared in Lament, the monthly newsletter of the Southern California chapters of Mensa, which includes about 2,000 members in Kern and points south.

At the center of the article is a picture of Pope John Paul II, a man Brent says is "one of the two greatest criminals who ever lived." (The other, Brent says, is Hitler.)

The greatest crime anyone can commit in this age of exploding population growth is to have more than two children, Brent argues.

Grim facts are woven through Brent's arguments. Every 30 years, the world's population doubles. At present, there are more than 5.6 billion people on the globe, with roughly two-thirds living in Asia.

Brent argues that society eventually will play God and decide who is to live and who should die. On the debit side are "the old, the weak, the stupid and those unable to survive in a highly technological society."

Brent admits his words inspire strong reactions. But that's what he wants.

Despite his strong rhetoric, Brent is a man of contrasts--a Democrat turned Republican, a man who says the poor are bound to be on society's to-do-in list yet takes on many of his clients for little or no payment.

Brent was appointed to the East Kern Municipal Court judgeship by Gov. George Deukmejian in 1988 and served in the Mojave, Tehachapi and Boron branches until 1990.

Information is available by calling Noland at (805) 589-4691.


This is the same man who ruled against Ekkers while working with the S&L and Governor of California. He and Steven Horn, his friendly cohort (still), both were given information from George Green AND THE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY to prevent getting the "property" case settled. I warned you local friends, in the beginning, that it was going all the way to the White House--and so it has gone even further. Brent is a part of the Zionist One Worlders who fully plan to HAVE EVERYTHING OF PROPERTY--AND KILL OFF THE ELDERLY, INFIRM AND COMPROMISED--THAT MEANS EVEN THE HOMELESS!! AND, WORSE, IT HAS HIT THE PAPERS!! Well, perhaps it is "better". It is hard to continue to blame E.J. and Doris for ALL HIS PROBLEMS today, is it not?

I do suggest that this information from Mensa with cover-letter be gotten to all the legal counsel in EVERY case--it will reflect right back into Green's lap. Remember that everything is hooked to everything else--that is, the attorney, Jason Brent, that George sent Leon and Eleanor to, to "getcha". With morals such as described in the paper and a history of removal of documents and tapes from case files and personal threats with many witnesses, while representing a case HE STARTED with the lot owner and then the subsequent arrest fiasco--is good background to consider for ammunition now. The fact they are making amends FOR HIM by saying that he handles some cases free--is pure B.S. Jason Brent committed a crime by trying to force Ekkers to pay his legal fees in a case he brought through the county in which the taxpayers paid for his client's legal encounter. This is where it is, readers, you have to hit it at home or you can't change a nation when these are the types of men you have on the benches of your courts across this nation. I am tired of the criminals winning! I also hope you ones who now KNOW THE ASSOCIATED PRESS PERSONNEL WILL ACT WISELY AND SWIFTLY. [See Rick Martin's letter to the Associated Press in the following article.] Thank you.

The following article is reprinted from page 43 of the January 24, 1995 issue of CONTACT.


Editor's note: In our spare time (ha!) here at CONTACT, we've perfected a Time Machine that has allowed us to go forward and bring back for your "enjoyment" the Letters To The Editor which are printed in this Wednesday's (1/25/95) edition of THE TEHACHAPI NEWS. After Brent took center stage as last week's Front Page story, Commander Hatonn has continued to refer to the absurdity of this man and his viewpoint throughout writings in this week's CONTACT. Thus we thought you might care to read some of the heated, indignant local reactions to the ideas of this "rebel without a cause". If you didn't already have it figured out before now, you ought to now have a pretty good idea of the typical "brilliance" of the shining stars of most so-called high-IQ societies. I have reluctantly had to be around such proclaimed "brilliance" for all of my professional life and, believe me, it takes some getting used to--if that's ever really possible while holding onto one's common sense! --E.Y.


I am shocked and alarmed that Mojave's former judge, a licensed attorney-at-law, would make such Nazi statements as Jason Brent has in his recent article appearing in the newsletter of an alleged high-IQ organization called Mensa.

Mr. Brent, a practicing attorney in Tehachapi, wrote some of the following remarks in his article--which, by the way, has been picked up by the major press across the country. His remarks include:

"...society must face the concept that we kill off the old, weak, the stupid and the inefficient," concluding that the true travesty wrought by Hitler was that he forever spoiled the concept of a master race, and "I'm not a fascist, I just have a problem that we better face," (I'll say he has a problem--big time) and "I don't want to be portrayed as some weirdo person, though nobody else agrees with me--we cannot continue to have population explosion. Growth has to stop. We better face that we have to kill people. There are not unlimited amounts of resources."

From a man who is practicing law in our humble community, and touted as a leader of the community, formerly evidenced by a bill-board upon entering town and one in Mojave--is this the kind of stupid and prejudicial commentary that we want to reflect on our community? In Brent's pious condescending tone, he goes on to add, "The way to trim the population, is to force people to purchase the right to reproduce."

With such inappropriate commentary, Brent should be called to answer for his actions before the State Bar Association.

Even in a free society this kind of outrageous arrogance is rare--particularly when stemming from an alleged group of "smart folk".

Amazing disgrace.

Rick Martin


In reference to that article on Jason Brent's idea of eliminating the elderly, weak, stupid and inefficient [it] is better known as Genocide. Does Mr. Brent want to walk these people into ovens as did Hitler!

I would like Mr. Brent to know that the people of this nation will not put up with this kind of thinking.

And if any organization that Mr. Brent belongs to would advocate this kind of thinking, [they] should be watched and monitored closely.

I suggest that Mr. Brent get some psychological help.

I would also like to add that I will defend Mr. Brent's right to his opinion.

The world should be protected from people like Mr. Brent and his way of thinking.

I hope that my God is more forgiving of the elderly, weak, stupid and inefficient people of this world than is Jason Brent.

Sandra L. Wills


In reference to Mr. Brent's statement to Mensa. I would be appalled to have a member of my organization write or say anything like this.

I, being one of the old, weak, stupid and inefficient (veterans) that fought for this country so that Mr. Brent can have his opinion. I must say Hitler would have been proud.

Why have a debate? What political office is Mr. Brent trying to run for. I think Mr. Brent should read the plaque on the Statue of Liberty.

David F. Terry
Old, weak, stupid taxpayer


I'm writing regarding the comments that Jason Brent (ex-municipal court judge of Mojave who has a law office in Golden Hills) made to his Mensa group.

How can anyone in this community support a person who advocates the killing of our old, maimed, ignorant and sick.

Some of you who are his clients I'm sure fit one of the categories now. How does that make you feel??? Does he have his or your best interest at heart or does he even have a heart???

Talk about Nazi Germany!! This man(??), whose recent desire was to get voted onto the Superior Court bench in Bakersfield, is right here among us and advocating that many in this community should be murdered.

He proudly claims to be a Jew, and they criticized Hitler for the Holocaust. His ideas seem to be aligning with the Hitler philosophy of creating a master race. "If you talk like a duck and act like a duck..."

Dr. Al Overholt


Tehachapi attorney, Jason G. Brent, was quoted on January 10, 1995 in the Los Angeles Times from an article he wrote for Mensa. Mensa is a group of people who think they have high IQs--over 132.

Mr. Brent, referring to the overpopulation in the world says in the article, "society must face the concept that we kill off the old, weak, the stupid and the inefficient. We cannot continue to have population explosion. Growth has to stop. We better face that we have to kill people. There are not unlimited resources." Further, Mr. Brent says the true travesty wrought by Hitler was that he forever spoiled the concept of a master races.

Rush Limbaugh was so incensed by Mr. Brent's article that he quoted from it on his national radio and television shows, pointing out the absurdity of it and arrogance of Mr. Brent or anyone touting such a barbaric view.

In the May 31, 1990 edition of the Tehachapi Ad-vantage, Kern County Judge John Quinlen publicly listed $50,000 worth of political contributions made by Jason Brent's L.A. law firm in 1987 and 1988. Mr. Brent was appointed shortly afterward to his Kern County Judgeship. What a coincidence. In 1989, Judge Brent was officially criticized in the Kern County Auditor's report for a poor record in disposing of cases. After seeing the facts in print, the voters turned Brent's bid for election down in 1990.

There is a problem with overpopulation in this world but I think that Jason Brent's solution is a disgrace to humanity. You certainly have a right to your opinion but you also represent the public as an attorney and people have the right to know what kind of a person you are. The ironic thing is that Mr. Brent has stated publicly many times that he is Jewish. In my opinion, he is living proof that a supposed high IQ doesn't translate to any degree of moral integrity or wisdom.

Brent Moorhead

The following article is reprinted from the page 13

of the February 7, 1995 issue of CONTACT.

Keep Writing Those Letters!


Editor's note: We have to share with you some of the latest feedback from the news media about "brilliant" ex-Judge Jason Brent--you know, the Mensa high-IQ group's star(?) spokesman who wants to "humanely dispatch" any of us old, poor or stupid taxpayers--and who has had a personal vendetta against the Ekkers for many years now. See the Front Page story of the 1/17/95 issue of CONTACT for the basics on this matter, and also see p.43 of the 1/24/95 issue of CONTACT for follow-up reactions. Last week's CONTACT, pgs. 55-56, provided some of the early background on how this paragon of "justice" has railroaded and otherwise persecuted the Ekkers.

And don't forget to register YOUR indignations about the shenanigans of this "judge"--and keep those letters pouring onto the desks of the others, listed below, who either need constant reminding of your watchful concern or who just need your words of support.


THE DENVER POST (1/22/95):

Evolution has graced homo sapiens with the capacity for high intelligence, and the capacity for compassion and moral reasoning. Based on the disgraceful pronouncements from the Los Angeles chapter of Mensa, I would much rather cast my lot with Mensa's designated misfits than with a group whose putative high intelligence is distressingly devoid of any trace of essential humanity.

Joseph D. McInerney

Colorado Springs, CO


This letter is written in response to the article by Jason Brent, which dealt with his views on population control and euthanasia. My first comment is in regard to the reaction of people who became outraged at the thought of those two subjects. But isn't this how our ideas and our ideals begin to change. We start with a radical concept introduced by someone, then it is fostered along by others.

New words or phrases are used by these people to tone down or soothe us until we are desensitized to what is actually going on. At this point, we may begin to believe what is being said just might be right. This, in turn, erodes the moral fiber of ourselves and our society.

This has already happened in our society. Forty years ago, the concept of abortion would have brought about the same reactions that are happening today regarding the statements by Brent. Now we have phrases such as, "It's a woman's choice," "Medical procedure," or using the word "fetus" when referring to the baby.

All of these have contributed to the devaluing of our morals, and many of us are not even aware of it. Take some time and ask yourself what is actually going on. Are we believing that something is right based upon the criteria that I have mentioned? If so, let's work to change what has been done.

Ronnie McLean

Bakersfield, CA


The gift of a superior IQ carries with it the duty to use that ability to assist those with limitations imposed by physical or mental incapacity and the inevitable effects of growing old.

A good example of this is Dr. Steven Hawking, the world renowned astrophysicist whose intellect searches for answers that may benefit all life forms without arbitrary standards or distinctions, while at the same time his remaining bodily functions are held hostage by a most debilitating illness.

Brent's concern about the effects of the geometric increase in population growth is nothing more than a restatement of the earlier discarded views of the economist Robert Malthus.

Instead of looking at the glass as half empty, I challenge Brent, together with all thinking people regardless of their age or infirmities, to view the glass as half full and provide the leadership that is needed to ensure that the family of man will act responsibly and to guarantee that the atrocities committed by any self-appointed superior being will never happen again.

Philip Rudnick, Attorney

Bakersfield, CA


I am not a member of Mensa, but I am sometimes interested in the discussion of radical ideas. With this in mind, I present the following:

Is it better for society to put a disabled man out on the streets without food or clothing, expose him to abuse by those who would take advantage of his vulnerability, ignore his medical needs and allow him to suffer untold misery for years until he dies of starvation, exposure and disease, or would it be better to extinguish the man's life quickly in a humane manner?

Most readers would probably respond that neither of these options is acceptable in a civilized society. Many were shocked recently when Jason Brent suggested that societies might benefit if they considered the second solution for citizens suffering from serious, persistent mental illness.

For me, the first idea is just as immoral, and yet we have allowed it to become a reality. One-third of our homeless population sufferes from serious mental illness, which is, in most cases, treatable. However, our legislators have passed laws that prevent the medical intervention these people must have to improve their quality of life.

Unless the laws are changed, our citizens who have been struck down by incurable, no-fault diseases at the beginning of their adult lives are doomed to suffer rejection and abuse until they die.

Elizabeth Davis

Tehachapi, CA